Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Denver Voluntary Controlled Primary School

Inspected 28 Sept 2012 · published 19 Oct 2012 · URN 121069

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    28 Sept 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Robert Greatrex

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    PE38 0DP

  • Name on report verified

    Denver Voluntary Controlled Primary School

  • URN verified

    121069

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+62Positivemore positive than 31% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexcellentoutstandingstrongvery wellhighly effectivevery effectivecleareffective
Criticisminadequatetoo fewrequires improvementseriousweaknessesnot outstandingfall behindfalling behind

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings257w+52
  • What needs to improve2011w+63

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,189
shorter than usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 2
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 9%What needs to improve 70%About the inspection 22%

Full report text

Denver Voluntary Controlled Primary School 19 Ryston Road, Denver, Downham Market, PE38 0DP

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Good 2 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  Pupils’ progress is consistently at least good.  Reading skills are particularly strong and pupils have excellent knowledge of letters and sounds.  Teaching is usually good, and in Years 5 and 6 it is outstanding so pupils make very rapid progress and leave the school with standards in English and mathematics well above the national average.  Homework reinforces and extends work done in lessons.  Pupils’ attitudes to learning are good; attendance is above average.  Leaders meticulously analyse every part of the school’s performance so the right changes are made, and precise support given to continually improve teaching and learning to ensure pupils achieve well.  Each pupil’s progress is tracked very closely. If any individual starts to fall behind, extra help is given.  Pupils who need extra help thrive and do as well as others due to the quality of the support they receive.  Staff are a very effective, well-trained team.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Governors offer very strong support to every part of school life.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 Teaching from when pupils join the school until the end of Year 4 is generally good, but not outstanding.  Children in the youngest class have too few opportunities to choose what learning they will do for themselves.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 The inspector observed teaching in all classes. Accompanied by the headteacher, he visited 12 lessons.  Pupils, teachers, the headteacher, a representative of the governing body, parents and a local authority officer had discussions with the inspector.  The inspector scrutinised a range of documents including the school’s self-evaluation. He also examined work in pupils’ books.  The views of 31 parents were analysed through the Parent View survey. Other parents’ views were sought during the inspection.

p.2

Inspection team

Robert Greatrex, Lead inspector Additional inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 The school is much smaller than the average-size primary school. Because of its size, pupils learn in four classes with two age groups in each.  All of the pupils speak English as their first language.  The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for the pupil premium is low.  There are fewer pupils from ethnic minority groups than in most schools.  The proportion of pupils supported through school action is above average.  The proportion of pupils supported at school action plus is low, while the proportion of pupils with a statement of special educational needs is high.  The school meets the government’s current floor standard, which sets the minimum expectations for pupils’ progress and attainment.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 By July 2013, ensure that more teaching from Reception to Year 4 is outstanding by:  ensuring that teachers encourage pupils to be more active participants when the whole class is led directly by the teacher  creating a climate for learning where pupils are encouraged to discuss their mistakes more fully and the misconceptions that led to them are resolved  ensuring that all teachers understand the value and importance of following up pupils’ answers when appropriate with supplementary questions to clarify or extend pupils’ thinking.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the Early Years Foundation Stage provision by:  arranging the indoor and outdoor provision so these children can more independently access a wider range of resources  creating more opportunities for children to learn on their own or in a small, self-chosen group, so that they begin to develop self-confidence and self-awareness as learners  checking that children more frequently initiate their own play activities.

p.3

Inspection judgements

 Standards on entry to the school have dipped recently and are below those usually seen nationally. Children in the Reception Year make good progress. Progress is best in adult-led activities because these are well planned and children are attentive. They already understand what is expected of them, want to please and, consequently, try hard. They enter Year 1 with average standards in most areas of learning.

p.4

Inspection judgements

 In Reception, there are too few opportunities for the children to ‘have a go’, build on what they know and choose what they do and how they do it. While meaning to be helpful, teachers and teaching assistants sometimes take over and direct activities. As a result, children’s personal, social and emotional development lags behind other skills.

p.4

Inspection judgements

 Good progress continues in Key Stages 1 and 2 largely unhampered by classes of mixed ages. Consequently, by the end of Year 2, standards are broadly average. Standards in English and mathematics at the end of Year 6 are high because pupils make accelerated progress during their last two years in school. Their excellent basic skills prepare them very well for the next stage in their education.

p.4

Inspection judgements

 Elsewhere in the school, progress is generally good as learning is better matched to pupils’ levels than at the last inspection. Higher attainers make the progress they should, though a small minority still say they find the work too easy or too repetitive.

p.4

Inspection judgements

 Acquisition of reading skills is particularly strong because expertise among teachers is very high and the school makes sure that all pupils read at the right level of difficulty. A mantra of the school is, ‘We don’t listen to children read – we teach them to read.’

p.4

Inspection judgements

 Pupils learn and regularly practise important skills necessary for their future lives, both in their next school and beyond. For example, they work as teams, learning to listen, share ideas, take turns and come to a consensus.

p.4

Inspection judgements

 Disabled pupils, those with special educational needs and those for whom the pupil premium provides support, thrive. All receive very helpful, well-directed, individual support and instruction. Consequently, they make good progress from their various starting points.

p.4

Inspection judgements

 Teaching ensures that pupils’ learning and progress are at least good. It is best for the oldest pupils for whom instruction is broken into smaller ‘chunks’, often interspersed with activity, so pupils are always interested and alert. Elsewhere in the school, instruction is often in longer, teacher-led sessions and pupils are, consequently, more passive and, occasionally they lose concentration.

p.4

Inspection judgements

 The oldest pupils make excellent gains in learning because explanations are very clear and easily understood. Pupils say, ‘Our teacher puts things in a way that you can understand.’ ‘She relates things that are new to things we already know, which makes it easier.’

p.4

Inspection judgements

 Pupils say they learn well because lessons are ‘fun and interesting’. They gave an example of an imaginative task where one partner was blindfolded and the other gave instructions to get through a course. This taught them the importance of giving clear instructions in the right order.

p.4

Inspection judgements

 Teachers and teaching assistants use open-ended questions effectively to enable them to check how well pupils understand and think through their work. However, some do not respond to their pupils’ answers and miss the opportunity to extend their thinking.

p.5

Inspection judgements

 Planning of learning is thorough and each lesson has a clear purpose. In mixed-age classes, both age groups are catered for well. In older classes, this is then broken down and matched closely to pupils’ various ability levels so that they are all learning at a good rate. In younger classes, this good practice is less secure.

p.5

Inspection judgements

 Because pupils’ progress is tracked so accurately, staff quickly recognise when pupils are falling behind. Disabled pupils, and those with special educational needs, benefit particularly. Effective support and interventions are put in place, enabling the vast majority of pupils to catch up. Teaching assistants are well trained and very helpful to the pupils. Pupil premium funds are carefully targeted to specific improvements so these pupils do well and catch up steadily.

p.5

Inspection judgements

 Pupils say the targets they are given in English and mathematics are very helpful because they understand clearly what they have already achieved and what they need to think about next in order to improve.

p.5

Inspection judgements

 Marking is used effectively, particularly for the oldest pupils. Work is marked in pupil-friendly language, clearly stating whether the lesson objective has been achieved or more needs to be done. If the latter, there is a clear statement of what needs to be done.

p.5

Inspection judgements

 Self-assessment is used throughout the school, but with mixed effectiveness. In some classes and groups, pupils are encouraged to see mistakes as learning opportunities and teachers’ further questioning helps them to gain better understanding. On other occasions, the adult’s tone of voice discourages anything but the right answer, and misunderstandings are not always fully pursued.

p.5

Inspection judgements

 Homework is effective. The amount of homework is similar to that provided in most schools. A variety of tasks support learning in school, for example by giving extra practice of something already learned or research to prepare for future work.

p.5

Inspection judgements

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good.

p.5

Inspection judgements

 Pupils’ attitudes to learning are good. The vast majority of pupils listen attentively to both teachers and teaching assistants, so that no time is wasted in lessons. When engaged, nearly all focus on learning and persevere, even with challenging tasks.

p.5

Inspection judgements

 Pupils are confident that staff will look after them and keep them safe. ‘It is a really happy school where everyone is cheerful,’ typifies their views. The school gives pupils a clear understanding of how to look after themselves, including when using the internet.

p.5

Inspection judgements

 The youngest children respond positively to adults and contribute well in whole-group instruction. They try hard to please in these situations. They cope very well when working in larger spaces such as the hall.

p.5

Inspection judgements

 A clear recognition that many others are less fortunate than themselves leads pupils to raise generous sums for several charities, largely to benefit children, both nationally and internationally. Pupils’ social and moral understanding is much enhanced from such responsible action.

p.5

Inspection judgements

 Pupils enjoy the opportunities they have to give their views about their school, for example through the school council. They think carefully about how they will spend the money they raise by selling their unwanted toys, after deducting half for charity.

p.6

Inspection judgements

 Attendance is above average. When it dipped, school leaders and governors moved quickly and decisively to put this right. Pupils say they enjoy coming to school and look forward to their lessons and time with friends.

p.6

Inspection judgements

 A real sense of togetherness is created because the school’s vision is shared by all staff and governors. All have the opportunity to contribute and all consequently share a strong commitment to meeting their agreed expectations, especially for teaching and learning.

p.6

Inspection judgements

 School leaders fully understand the importance of high-quality teaching and learning to progress and achievement. The headteacher is very analytical and so has a very clear and accurate understanding of the strengths and areas for development of each member of staff so she is able to assist them in enhancing their skills.

p.6

Inspection judgements

 Staff development is very closely matched to each individual’s needs so that all have high morale and a real sense that they are improving. Each individual is fully involved in shaping their training. Each has a programme strongly focused on enabling them to teach better and so teachers’ practice improves.

p.6

Inspection judgements

 Teachers, teaching assistants and administrative staff all receive effective performance management. Consequently, all understand their individual role in the school and their pathway to further improvement.

p.6

Inspection judgements

 The local authority recognises that the school is effective and provides support at the school’s request. For example, additional training and advice has been given in both mathematics and what the school offers the youngest pupils. Staff found this very useful.

p.6

Inspection judgements

 Curriculum tasks are interesting so that pupils have clear understanding and memorise important details. For example, they can describe their experiment to check what plants need to grow, and how they made sure the tests were fair.

p.6

Inspection judgements

 After-school activities and special events extend and enrich pupils’ learning. Pupils’ recollections show the depth of enjoyment and learning. Pen pals give pupils some sense of the wider world.

p.6

Inspection judgements

 Pupils and staff undertake many worthwhile activities with local schools. Staff train together and form beneficial support groups. Pupils enjoy opportunities to be part of a larger group, or to work with, or compete against, their peers.

p.6

Inspection judgements

 The school works closely with all parents, and recognises the importance of a trusting relationship. Regular surveys are used to check parents’ views. The school is pro-active in the advice and information it gives; for example, a clear and transparent policy describes how pupils’ next classes are chosen.

p.6

Inspection judgements

 Safeguarding is excellent. Pupils’ safety and wellbeing are held as paramount. All necessary checks are in place. Staff are thorough and meticulous, for example in teaching pupils how to stay safe when using the internet.

p.7

Inspection judgements

 Professional standards are adhered to fully. In all relationships, staff consistently model the same very high standards of courtesy and respect that they expect from their pupils. A strong bond exists between all staff which helps them form a highly effective team.

p.7

Inspection judgements

 The governance of the school:  has a very clear understanding of the school’s strengths and areas for improvement, and what must be done to take the school forward  is very carefully managed so that a skills audit has enabled the school to make very effective and efficient use of governors’ expertise and experience  very carefully and prudently manages the school’s finances to ensure priorities are fully funded while ensuring the long-term stability of the school. Pupil premium funding is used well for specific projects to meet these pupils’ needs, and is monitored very carefully.

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.8

School details

Unique reference number 121069 Local authority Norfolk Inspection number 403453

p.9

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Type of school Primary School category Voluntary controlled Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 112 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Nicola Marston Headteacher Linda Allison Date of previous school inspection 21 January 2008 Telephone number 01366 383272 Fax number 01366 383272 Email address office@denver.norfolk.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille,

p.10

School details

please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.10

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion