Other · Ofsted report
Royal Alexandra and Albert School
Summary
Patricia Metham (lead), David Gutmann, Kevin Morris, Roger Garrett, Sarah Conway
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
20 Sept 2012
- Inspectors verified
David Gutmann, Kevin Morris, Patricia Metham, Roger Garrett, Sarah Conway
- Postcode verified
RH2 0TD
- Name on report verified
The Royal Alexandra and Albert School
- URN verified
125279
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.7
- The school’s excellent facilities, increasing pupil numbers and rising levels of attainment are evidence of strong and persuasive leadership by the headteacher, who is very well supported by committed and highly competent leaders and managers at all levels. p.5
- They feel safe, are extremely well behaved and are justifiably confident that all reasonable steps are taken to ensure their well-being. p.1
- Excellent pastoral care and academic guidance are provided by year and house tutors who very effectively monitor individuals’ attitudes and behaviour. p.5
- Leadership and management at all levels share an ambitious vision that effectively fosters achievement and strongly promotes pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. p.7
- Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. p.7
- The analysis and use of assessment information to track the progress of different groups of pupils is not sufficiently robust. p.1
- followed quickly by appropriate professional development to tackle any areas of relative weakness. p.5
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Establish greater consistency across Key Stages 2 and 3, particularly in the analysis and use of regularly updated information about pupils’ attainment, to monitor the progress of different groups. p.3
- Ensure that planning, marking and curriculum development, particularly in Key Stages 2 and 3, more consistently match the outstanding practice seen in many departments, by: building on pupils’ prior knowledge and skills always combining, in marking and feedback, encouragement with specific guidance on the steps pupils should take to improve. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,484
- longer than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 38, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
The Royal Alexandra and Albert School Gatton Park, Reigate, Surrey, RH2 0TD
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Outstanding 1 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Outstanding 1 Leadership and management Good 2
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a good school. Leadership and management at all levels share an ambitious vision that effectively fosters achievement and strongly promotes pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Boarding was not part of this inspection but it clearly shapes and supports the school’s inclusive values and breadth of achievement. The rigorous setting of targets for teachers is driving improvement. Achievement is steadily strengthening. Attainment is well above national floor standards. All groups make good or better progress, including those with disabilities or special educational needs, those known to be eligible for the pupil premium, those with English as an additional language and those who join the school part way through their secondary education. The sixth form is good, with outstanding elements. Growing rapidly, it offers a broad choice of courses, encourages aspiration and fosters independent learning and
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
personal responsibility. Most teaching is good or better; much is outstanding. Overall, pupils’ learning is well supported by teachers’ and learning support assistants’ knowledge and enthusiasm, attention to individual needs, constructive assessment and firm, but quietly effective, behaviour management. Pupils are proud of their school and respond wholeheartedly to its emphasis on personal responsibility, community values, mutual respect and acceptance of differences. They feel safe, are extremely well behaved and are justifiably confident that all reasonable steps are taken to ensure their well-being. The range of subjects provided is broad and balanced, fulfilling statutory requirements and they effectively support all pupils’ needs. The range and quality of-out-of class activities and visits are outstanding, combining further academic challenge with opportunities to participate in team and individual sports,
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
community service and visual and performing arts.
p.1
It is not yet an outstanding school because
The analysis and use of assessment information to track the progress of different groups of pupils is not sufficiently robust. The curriculum in Key Stage 3 and marking require further review and development.
p.1
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed 32 lessons, looked at pupils’ books, discussed samples of their work with pupils in each key stage and listened to pupils read. They discussed professional development, perfomance management and the effectiveness of teaching and learning with teachers and learning support assistants. Inspectors reviewed documents relating to governance, school improvement and the monitoring of teaching and learning. They also considered reports by the local authority’s school improvement adviser. They met with the Chairman of the Board of Trustees for the charitable foundation and the Chair of the Governing Body, the school improvement adviser and leaders and managers of core subjects and of the school’s boarding and pastoral support teams. Inspectors took into account 157 responses entered on Parent View.
p.2
Inspection team
Patricia Metham, Lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Sarah Conway Additional inspector David Gutmann Additional inspector Roger Garrett Additional inspector Kevin Morris Additional inspector
p.2
Information about this school
This is a co-educational school of average size. It educates pupils from Year 3 to Year 13. The school’s numbers have grown steadily since the last inspection, with the establishment of a rapidly expanding sixth form as a key factor. Over half of the pupils are full or weekly boarders and flexible boarding is available to all pupils. A significant number of pupils are supported by a charitable foundation set up by an Act of Parliament to provide boarding education for children who have lost one or both parents or carers or whose circumstances make boarding a recommended option. In addition, a substantial number are supported by the Ministry of Defence. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for the pupil premium is small. The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic groups is higher than average, with those of Asian heritage making up the largest group. A slightly larger than average proportion of pupils
p.3
Information about this school
have English as an additional language. A higher than average proportion has a statement of special educational needs or is supported on a school action plus programme. Predominantly these pupils have behavioural, emotional and social development issues or specific learning difficulties. Pupils’ attainment and progress at Key Stage 2 and Key Stage 4 exceed current government floor standards. The school has specialist status for sport.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Establish greater consistency across Key Stages 2 and 3, particularly in the analysis and use of regularly updated information about pupils’ attainment, to monitor the progress of different groups. Ensure that planning, marking and curriculum development, particularly in Key Stages 2 and 3, more consistently match the outstanding practice seen in many departments, by: building on pupils’ prior knowledge and skills always combining, in marking and feedback, encouragement with specific guidance on the steps pupils should take to improve.
p.3
The achievement of pupils is good
Attainment at the end of Key Stage 2 has been above average for five years. Given the range of pupils’ attainment on entry, this reflects progress that is significantly better than average. The relative weakness previously observed in reading has been successfully tackled and standards are now in line with other aspects of pupils’ learning and are well above average. In 2011, while boys achieved more highly than the national average, they were outperformed by girls. This gap has now almost closed in response to well-targeted interventions and an engaging curriculum. The progress of different groups – rather than of individual pupils – is not always clearly tracked and reflected in planning. Entry to Year 7 has more than doubled by new admissions in the past years, and further influxes of new pupils change the make-up of Year 9. The school successfully integrates these pupils and ensures that overall attainment continues to be above average and that their
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
progress is good. The performance of different groups is not, however, specifically monitored and planning does not always build on up-to-date information about pupils’ knowledge and skills. In Key Stage 4, tracking of progress and identification of individual needs underpin planning and provision. In 2011, about two thirds of pupils gained five or more A* to C GCSE grades, including English and mathematics. Attainment is well above the national average. Provisional results for 2012 indicate that this proportion has increased, and that nine in every 10 pupils gained at least seven A* to C grades at GCSE or equivalent. Particular strengths are in mathematics, separate sciences, English literature, physical education and French. Well-managed interventions support better than average progress for disabled pupils and those with special educational needs, pupils known to be eligible for the pupil premium and those
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
supported by the Foundation or the Ministry of Defence. These interventions include one-to- one tuition, small-group teaching, informal help in the evenings for boarders and very constructive support in lessons from learning support assistants. The growing number wishing to join the sixth form has enabled the school to raise its entry requirements and tailor courses more closely to pupils’ aspirations and abilities. Provisional AS- level results indicate that the proportion gaining A* to E grades rose from two in every three in 2011 to four in every five in 2012. The number entered for A level rose from seven in 2011 to nearly 70 in 2012, and provisional results show just under half of those achieving A* to C grades. Pupils respond purposefully to challenge; for example, the number choosing to submit extended projects alongside their A-level subjects has increased dramatically and these show ambition and independence in their approach.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
Of the 157 responses on Parent View, almost all express confidence in pupils’ progress and this supports inspection findings.
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
Almost all teaching is good or better; there are substantial pockets of outstanding teaching across departments. Nine in every 10 responses on Parent View support this assessment. The emphasis on challenge, teamwork and flexibility by teachers and learning support assistants is demonstrated through their positive attitude to performance management and their readiness to provide support for pupils well beyond the timetabled teaching day. Sixth formers commented that teachers and support staff ‘care what we think’. Year 11 pupils identified approachability and subject knowledge as strengths. The most effective lessons are characterised by high expectations, underpinned by planning that matches pupils’ needs. Teachers respond to unplanned opportunities to develop a line of thought or approach to problem solving. Pupils are encouraged to evaluate their own work and that of others, drawing on clear guidelines and information about expected levels of
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
attainment. Teachers deploy a range of techniques to check pupils’ understanding, including generally effective questioning skills. They also use a variety of resources, including computers, mixed media and other technology. Pupils are encouraged to investigate and evaluate. Key Stage 4 pupils, for example, are enthusiastic about experimental work in science. ‘It gets the whole class involved.’ In most lessons, teachers model good language and communication skills. Effective teaching skills were seen in a Year 6 English class, for example. The teacher built on up-to-date information about pupils’ knowledge and skills and set high expectations for pupils as they set about writing a horror story. She offered frequent challenge by asking pupils to identify strengths and areas for improvement in their own and others’ work, giving them clear criteria against which to measure success. In a Year 10 drama lesson, the teacher showed
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
sensitivity and confident skills in setting up opportunities for pupils to be collaborative and creative. Her use of open questions, followed often by ‘Why?’, prompted pupils to be reflective and to raise the level of their response to each other’s performances. In the few less effective lessons observed, able pupils were not fully challenged, there were limited opportunities for independent learning and not all pupils were prompted to make a positive contribution in group work. Whereas lesson plans indicated different expectations for the different levels of ability represented, these were not then clearly put into practice. The quality of marking is uneven. Much is detailed and constructive, combining encouragement with specific guidance about the next steps to be taken, but there are examples of uncritical praise or commentary that is too sketchy to be useful.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding
Pupils are emphatic that they feel safe and well cared for. A Year 11 pupil commented, ’We’re quite a family.’ Pupils are extremely knowledgeable about different forms of bullying, including cyber bullying and homophobic attitudes, and are clear about how to respond should difficulties arise. Well-trained peer mentors play an important part in supporting pupils who may be finding aspects of school life difficult. Pupils’ confidence is mirrored by the responses on Parent View, which are exceptionally positive about pupils’ behaviour and the school’s response to issues. Excellent pastoral care and academic guidance are provided by year and house tutors who very effectively monitor individuals’ attitudes and behaviour. Response to inappropriate behaviour is prompt, consistent and effective, as is the response to any signs of distress or loss of motivation. Pupils are proud of their school and are keen to uphold its traditions and expectations.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding
Behaviour observed in lessons and around the site was excellent, sensible, considerate and responsive. The school’s ethos of mutual respect and support is pervasive and strong. Overall attendance figures are affected by factors such as absence allowed when a parent or carer returns from a war zone for a brief period of leave. The school remaining open for boarders when adverse weather conditions keep day pupils at home also has an impact on attendance figures. The school has rigorous systems in place to respond promptly and firmly to unauthorised absence and most pupils attend regularly.
p.5
The leadership and management are good
The school’s excellent facilities, increasing pupil numbers and rising levels of attainment are evidence of strong and persuasive leadership by the headteacher, who is very well supported by committed and highly competent leaders and managers at all levels. Members of the senior leadership team have clearly defined roles, which they fulfil with energy and expertise. Almost all the Parent View responses judge the school to be well led and managed. Evaluation of strengths and areas for development is thorough and accurate, forming the basis of a realistic and regularly reviewed school improvement plan. Initiatives put in place to tackle identified priorities have had a very positive impact. Capacity for further improvement is outstanding. The local authority continues to monitor and support the school’s work effectively, mainly through the role of the school improvement adviser. Monitoring of teaching and learning is thorough and decisive, with regular lesson observations
p.5
The leadership and management are good
followed quickly by appropriate professional development to tackle any areas of relative weakness. The impact of this targeted support is carefully monitored and contributes to well- directed performance management. Teachers’ targets are linked to national teaching standards. The performance management of individual teachers and support staff is complemented by an extensive programme of in-school training sessions, external courses and visits to observe good practice in other schools. The impact of training is always carefully evaluated to set priorities for future planning. While not all teaching is consistently as good as the best, the proportion that is good or outstanding is high and increasing. New management systems are being put in place to make the tracking of different groups of pupils speedier and more precise, to strengthen further the management of performance. Sturdy foundations are laid in Key Stage 2 for pupils’ numeracy, literacy and communication
p.5
The leadership and management are good
skills, as standards reached at the end of Year 6 demonstrate; more than four in every 10 pupils gain National Curriculum Level 5 for English and for mathematics. In Key Stages 3 and 4, the English department has a strong focus on improving pupils’ speaking and writing skills and this is complemented by attention paid to literacy skills in other subjects. The Key Stage 2 curriculum is well designed to meet all needs and engage pupils. Aspects of the Key Stage 3 curriculum are currently under review to combine its secure coverage of National Curriculum requirements with wider opportunities for independent and creative learning. The Key Stage 4 provision meets all needs, offering traditionally academic and vocational options. The increase in numbers has extended options for sixth form students. Most follow academic courses and are ambitious in their higher education choices. A small number follow a more practical programme.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
Pupil premium funding has been directed towards provision of one-to-one support in core subjects and for targeted mentoring. It has also been used to provide extension materials, resources and activities to support learning. Evidence of impact is clear. The proportion of pupils eligible for the pupil premium who achieved the English Baccalaureate in 2011 was higher than for all pupils nationally. This is an aspect of the school’s effective promotion of equality of opportunity, along with its provision for vulnerable pupils and those in need of the school’s comprehensive support. The school vigorously tackles discrimination and successfully promotes tolerance and harmony. Safeguarding arrangements are thorough and consistently implemented, including: safe recruitment processes; regularly updated child protection training for all staff; and rigorous health and safety checks and risk assessment. The governance of the school:
p.6
The leadership and management are good
The Board of Trustees and school governing body work together well to cover all aspects of governance including their statutory responsibilities. The trustees maintain a firm grasp on financial matters, as well as overseeing the selection of ‘foundationers’ – pupils supported by the trust. Governors have a clearly articulated strategic vision and are keenly alert to their responsibility to hold the school to account rigorously. A breadth of relevant experience is represented, which is channelled into committees that cover all aspects of the school’s life and work. Following the publication of GCSE, AS and A level results, governors attend departmental review meetings and set challenging, systematically monitored targets when they feel that a department’s performance has flagged. In their commitment to support vulnerable children, the trustees and the governors take a close and continuing interest in pupils’ family circumstances. With the Chair of the Governing
p.6
The leadership and management are good
Body leading by example, all governors are expected to be actively engaged in the school, for example through links with academic departments and boarding houses. They make the most of opportunities to engage with parents and carers at school events and are responsive to feedback coming through parental surveys.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 125279 Local authority Surrey Inspection number 395461
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Type of school Middle deemed secondary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 7−18 Gender of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 962 Of which, number on roll in sixth form 133 Number of boarders on roll 430 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair William Gillen Headteacher Paul Spencer-Ellis Date of previous school inspection 4−5 June 2008 Telephone number 01737 649000 Fax number 01737 649002 Email address headmaster@gatton-park.org.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille,
p.9
School details
please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion