Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Gosforth CofE Primary School and Nursery

Inspected 13 Sept 2012 · published 4 Oct 2012 · URN 112294

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Sept 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Alastair Younger

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    CA20 1AZ

  • Name on report verified

    Gosforth CE School

  • URN verified

    112294

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+28Mostly positivemore positive than 6% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingstrengthshighly effectiveexceptionallyhigh expectationsenjoysecureeffective
Criticismweaknessesinadequaterequires improvementnot yetseriouslowerinconsistencieslack

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1190w+57
  • Leadership548w+3
  • What needs to improve202w−5

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,869
shorter than usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 46%Leadership 21%What needs to improve 8%About the inspection 25%

Full report text

School report Gosforth CE School Wasdale Road, Gosforth, Seascale, CA20 1AZ

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Good 2 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  Pupils make good progress, especially in Key Stage 2; many exceed expectations, especially in mathematics and reading.  By the time they leave most pupils have attained standards well in excess of the national average.  Pupils with disabilities or special educational needs are given good support to help them meet ambitious expectations.  Pupils respond to the high expectations of teachers by behaving well and working hard. Pupils are happy and enjoy school and, as a result, absence is much lower than average.  Teaching and learning are good and some, especially in Key Stage 2, is outstanding. Teachers help pupils to enjoy learning by making lessons interesting.  Leadership and management are good. The headteacher has a good understanding of the relative strengths and development needs of teachers and works systematically to improve teaching.  Governance is good, ensuring that the headteacher and staff are held to account

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

and that the school is on a secure financial footing.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 More needs to be done to bring progress in writing up to the high standards found in mathematics and reading.  Children in the Reception class are not given enough opportunities to learn through playing and exploring, especially outdoors.  There are inconsistencies in the way that pupils’ progress is assessed.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 The inspector observed large parts of five lessons and lesser parts of three others.  Meetings were held with the Chair of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority and discussions took place with pupils and staff.The inspector took into account the views of the four responses to the online questionnaire (Parent View) and also responses to a similar questionnaire circulated by the governing body  The inspector looked at pupils’ work and the school’s own data about current pupils’ progress.  Documents relating to behaviour, safeguarding, attendance and school improvement were looked at.

p.2

Inspection team

Alastair Younger, Lead inspector Additional inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 This is smaller than the average-sized primary school. The proportions of pupils supported at school action, and at school action plus or with a statement of special educational need, are below average. The proportion known to be eligible for the pupil premium is also lower than average. There are currently no looked after children at the school and nearly all pupils are White British.  The school exceeds the current government floor standards, which set the minimum expectation for attainment and progress.  A breakfast, after-school and holiday club, hosted by the adjacent nursery, is open to pupils from the school. It is not managed by the school’s governing body and will be inspected separately.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve pupils’ writing so that progress and attainment match the high standards found in mathematics and reading by: - carrying out a thorough analysis of the relative strengths and weaknesses within the subject - ensuring that the marking of pupils’ work encourages style, organisation and composition rather than making simple comments about effort and presentation - encouraging writing at greater length across the curriculum and reducing the use of worksheets - generating a greater sense of celebration by displaying pupils’ best writing - ensuring that pupils understand the quality of writing that is needed to attain successively higher levels. -  Ensure that children in the Reception class are given more opportunity to learn through play and exploration by: - making better use of the well appointed outdoor learning area - reducing the proportion of adult-directed activities.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the rigour and consistency of assessment procedures by: - checking and moderating the accuracy of baseline assessments of children when they join the Reception class and transfer to Year 1 - ensuring that the marking and annotation of pupils’ work is always accurate and useful in helping pupils to understand what they are getting right and how they can improve their work.

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 On entry to the Reception class, children are at a broadly average level of learning and development. By the end of Year 6, standards of attainment are well above average in all subjects and especially so in mathematics and reading. This has been the case for most of the past five years. In two of the past four years, results were significantly above national averages for all subjects.  The assessment of children’s skills and knowledge when they first start school, and the subsequent tracking of their progress as they move into Year 1, while improving, is not yet sharp enough to capture an accurate view of children’s skills and early progress. Nevertheless, despite the underdeveloped assessment routines, children get off to a good start, learn quickly and make fast progress.  While children do well in the Reception class, a secure balance has yet to be achieved between what children learn for themselves through playing, exploring, creating and

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

thinking critically, and through what they are taught and directed to do by adults.  Attainment at Key Stage 1 is above average but has dipped from being significantly so over the past two years, mainly because of a slight decline in reading. The most recent data from Key Stage 1 teacher assessments show that, although the proportion of pupils meeting national expectations for reading was slightly lower than the national average, the proportion of pupils exceeding expectations was almost double the national average.  The very few pupils with disabilities or with special educational needs achieve well, often performing in line with or above national averages for all pupils. This is because potential difficulties are identified quickly and effective support put in place. There is very little difference between the achievement of the few pupils known to be eligible for pupil premium and any other pupils.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Girls tend to outperform boys, especially at Key Stage 1. The school is fully aware of this and has taken steps to address it. For instance, staff ensure that books and resources reflect their different interests and that tasks offer equal interest to boys and girls.  There are examples of outstanding progress, especially in mathematics at Key Stage 2, where over a half of all pupils exceeded age-related expectations at the end of Year 6. While attainment in English overall is above average, pupils’ attainment in writing is lower than the high standards achieved in reading.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Teaching is normally good and occasionally outstanding. The strongest teaching observed during the inspection was in the Year 5/6 classroom. This tallies with monitoring observations carried out by the headteacher and the local authority.  There is no record of any inadequate teaching. During the inspection teachers showed considerable perception about the strengths and weaknesses of the lessons that were observed and demonstrated that they learned quickly about how teaching could be improved.  Typically, lessons are well planned to meet individual needs. Teachers start each lesson with a clear idea of what they expect each pupil to learn during the session. They make their expectations clear to the class and they endeavour to vary work to meet the needs of pupils of differing abilities. Occasionally, the variation in task is misjudged, with a few pupils finding the work too easy and a few finding it too hard.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 The best teaching is characterised by lessons conducted at a good pace, and with suitable challenge. This is facilitated by constant checking that pupils are keeping up and none are being left behind. Astute questioning allows pupils of all abilities to contribute equally to the lesson. Adult support for pupils in classrooms is generally good.  Teachers take great care to present pupils with stimulating learning environments. Classrooms are bright and displays contain a considerable amount of information to support learning. As the inspection took place in the first week of the new school year the lack of pupils’ own work on display was understandable but, even allowing for this, there was very little evidence of pupils’ best writing being prominently displayed and celebrated.  In some classes there is an over-dependency on the use of worksheets. This is counterproductive when they are used to help pupils avoid responsibility for writing to

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

greater length or to avoid presenting their work more independently.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Good behaviour is the norm. In lessons, behaviour is often very good, with pupils concentrating hard, helping each other and being polite to staff.  Pupils say they feel safe and know what to do if they are troubled by anything. Inspection evidence supports this view. A few parents disagree or say they wish to be better informed. Nevertheless, every parent who took the opportunity to express a view said that they would recommend this school to another parent.  Good relationships between staff and pupils are a central tenet of the school. Pupils are extremely courteous to visitors and charm through their inquisitiveness.  There is no evidence of bullying, harassment or discrimination on record in the past year, although staff and pupils report that disagreements and rough play do occur on the playground from time to time. There have been no exclusions.  Attendance is above average. All absence is recorded correctly and there is no persistent

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

absenteeism.  Great care is taken by the school to support the safeguarding and care of pupils. Thorough checks are made on all staff to ensure their suitability for working with children. Good attention is paid to ensuring that the school premises are safe and secure and that health and safety regulations are met.

p.5

The leadership and management are good

 For many years the school has been led well by a dedicated headteacher who maintains high standards, ensures the school meets the needs of all pupils, whatever their circumstance and has sought continuous improvement.  Teaching is good because the headteacher’s monitoring of it, both formally and informally, is perceptive and accurate. Where weaknesses are identified, support is quickly put in place and its impact analysed. Where strengths are identified staff are given the praise they deserve. As a result morale is high.  There has been a well-planned programme of staff training in recent years. Some of this is driven by the findings from thorough and consistent performance management; some of it by wider educational initiatives. Recently, staff have received training in the moderation and assessment of pupils’ work, an area identified by this inspection as needing improvement.  Recognising the need to improve pupils’ writing to the point where it matches the

p.5

The leadership and management are good

excellence of their reading and number work, leaders and managers are making a concerted drive to raise standards. The impact is clearly evident in improvements in pupils’ reading but has been slower to impact on their writing. This is because the marking and annotation policy for writing is not followed consistently.  The curriculum is good. It promotes numeracy and literacy well. Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs are given good support to access every opportunity offered. Weaknesses in the Early Years Foundation Stage curriculum have been aired earlier in this report, they refer mainly to the need for more continuous provision and better provision for outside learning.  The school manages its finances well and is forward looking and innovative. For example, by securing a large grant to install solar panels, it is currently energy self-sufficient.  The governance of the school is good. The governing body plays a full and important part

p.5

The leadership and management are good

in supporting and challenging the school leaders. Members of the governing body demonstrate a very good understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the school and are fully involved in setting the agenda for improvement and monitoring it.

p.5

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 112294 Local authority Cumbria Inspection number 403176

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. Type of school Primary School category Voluntary controlled Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 93 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Andrew Pratt Headteacher John Corran Date of previous school inspection 22 February 2008 Telephone number 01946 725244 Fax number 01946 725244 Email address head@gosforth.cumbria.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk.

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille,

p.9

School details

please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion