Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Oct 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mark Williams

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mark Williams

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+91Very positivemore positive than 93% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisestrongoutstandingexemplaryimprovedhigh expectationspositivegood progresshigh quality
Criticismexclusions

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings49w0
  • What needs to improve1073w+91

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,120
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 4%What needs to improve 96%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566852 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: chuxley@cfbt.com

p.1

Mr J Eldon Principal Manchester Enterprise Academy Simonsway Wythenshawe Greater Manchester M22 9RH

p.1

Notice to improve: monitoring inspection of Manchester Enterprise Academy

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your academy on 13 September 2012, and for the information which you provided during the inspection. Please pass on my thanks to the students, leaders and member of the governing body who spoke with me.

p.1

Notice to improve: monitoring inspection of Manchester Enterprise Academy

Since the academy was inspected in January 2012 a further restructuring of leadership has taken place and student numbers have risen in Year 7.

p.1

Notice to improve: monitoring inspection of Manchester Enterprise Academy

As a result of the inspection on 12 and 13 January 2012, the academy was asked to address the most important areas for improvement which are set out in the annex to this letter.

p.1

Notice to improve: monitoring inspection of Manchester Enterprise Academy

Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the academy is making good progress in addressing the issues for improvement and in raising the students' achievement.

p.1

Notice to improve: monitoring inspection of Manchester Enterprise Academy

Unvalidated GCSE results for Year 11 students in 2012 show an improvement in nearly all the headline measures. Overall, these results point to stronger rates of progress than in previous years. Particularly welcome was the eight percentage point increase in A*to C grades in mathematics compared with 2011. These improvements are all the more pleasing given the attendance rates for that group of students had been the lowest in the academy. The progress of students in Years 7 to 10 also improved. These improvements are the consequence of higher expectations, stronger teaching, a clearer focus on actively involving students in their learning and providing more opportunities for them to develop their communication skills.

p.1

Notice to improve: monitoring inspection of Manchester Enterprise Academy

Teachers’ higher expectations of students are the result of determined governance and leadership, particularly from the Principal. The target that 80% of teaching should be good or better by January 2013 is challenging. Nevertheless, staff are rising to this challenge and the quality of teaching and learning continues to improve. Teachers are increasingly January 2012

p.1

Notice to improve: monitoring inspection of Manchester Enterprise Academy

Page2 consistent in their approach to developing students’ communication skills focusing, for example, on key words and opportunities for oracy.

p.2

Notice to improve: monitoring inspection of Manchester Enterprise Academy

A common format for planning lessons has students’ learning at its heart, although practice is still developing as some objectives resemble tasks, rather than learning outcomes. Of the six lessons observed during this monitoring inspection, all had elements which were at least good. Two were outstanding in both teaching and learning. In the outstanding lessons clear, high expectations and a strong emphasis on student engagement were the norm. Pacey and challenging questioning helped the students work confidently and with at least good levels of independence to produce high quality work in design and technology and drama. Students, even those who lacked initial confidence, were able to articulate clearly what construction methods made a money box. Likewise, Year 7 students evaluated through ‘freeze frames’ and ‘hot seating’ issues relating to bullying. Behaviour in these lessons was exemplary. Teachers are also more confident in making decisions relating to the learning of

p.2

Notice to improve: monitoring inspection of Manchester Enterprise Academy

their students. This demonstrates their increasing understanding that it is they who are accountable for how well the students in their classes are performing. An example of this was seen in a Year 11 mathematics lesson. On realising through good, ongoing assessment that students did not understand simultaneous equations or coefficients, the teacher quite correctly abandoned his prepared plan and focused instead on addressing the misconceptions. This he did successfully and, as a result, student confidence quickly grew. Further improvements to teaching and learning include the quality of marking which is increasingly focused on the learning the students have undertaken and what it is they need to do to improve further.

p.2

Notice to improve: monitoring inspection of Manchester Enterprise Academy

Other important improvements across the academy since the January 2012 inspection include attendance and behaviour. Attendance is up and improving and behaviour, as confirmed by the students themselves, is better. During this monitoring inspection good behaviour was observed. Exclusions continue to fall. Students spoken with were very positive about the direction the academy was taking under the leadership of the Principal. They were enthusiastic about the rewards available to them for good attendance and how lessons involved them in their learning. They were particularly pleased with the support they received if they had any difficulties. The students spoken with were well mannered and articulate, the latter demonstrating the increasing success of the academy’s efforts to improve students’ communication skills.

p.2

Notice to improve: monitoring inspection of Manchester Enterprise Academy

The January 2012 inspection report highlighted strong governance and the determination of the recently appointed Principal. These key features of leadership remain and are being strengthened. The governing body and the sponsors continue to be stringent in holding the academy to account for its performance. The statement of action is fit for purpose and has been improved to include measurable success criteria. The Principal is empowering his leaders and staff. The leading learning team and the ‘Going for good’ initiative have been well received and are both ensuring that resources and support are targeted where they are needed most to improve teaching quality. The academy’s view of the quality of teaching and learning is accurate as demonstrated by the common judgements reached by both the inspector and all five leaders who observed lessons with him. A further key improvement January 2012

p.2

Notice to improve: monitoring inspection of Manchester Enterprise Academy

Page3 has been in the quality and regularity of assessments of how well students are performing. Fortnightly assessments in English and mathematics, for example, are strengthening the academy’s view of which students are doing well and which require additional support. Already, leaders are wisely extending this approach to regular assessment to the foundation subjects. Students, staff and members of the governing body report with one voice much satisfaction with the improvements made. Such confidence places the academy in a strong position to do so further.

p.3

Notice to improve: monitoring inspection of Manchester Enterprise Academy

I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your academy. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.3

January 2012

To improve further the academy was asked to: ■ Increase the pace of students’ learning and progress to raise attainment by:  focusing sharply on learning in the planning and delivery of lessons  fostering positive attitudes to learning by enabling students to participate actively in lessons  implementing coherent strategies for improving students’ communication skills.

p.4

January 2012

■ At all levels, improve the leadership of teaching and learning by:  developing an academy-wide, consistently held view of what constitutes good learning  embedding a systematic approach to the monitoring and evaluation of learning  holding staff fully to account for the progress made by students.

p.4

January 2012

■ Raise rates of attendance, particularly for students in Years 10 and 11.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion