Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Melling St Wilfrid Church of England Primary School

Inspected 11 Jul 2012 · published 12 Sept 2012 · URN 119536

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    11 Jul 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Susan Walsh

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Melling St Wilfrid Church of England Primary School

  • URN verified

    119536

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+38Positivemore positive than 2% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingmake good progressextremelyvery wellpositivestronghighly effectiveexceptionally
Criticismnot alwaysinadequateinconsistentvariablenot yetlimitednot outstandinginconsistencies

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1871w+35
  • Leadership418w+41
  • What needs to improve162w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,443
about usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 8
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 54%Leadership 12%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 29%

Full report text

Melling St Wilfrid Church of England Primary School Inspection report

p.1

Age group 4–11 Inspection date(s) 10–11 July 2012 Inspection number 379830 Unique Reference Number 119536 Local authority Lancashire Inspection number 379830 Inspection dates 10–11 July 2012 Lead inspector Susan Walsh

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 25 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Jill Evans Headteacher Geraldine Andrews Date of previous school inspection 21 January 2009 School address Lodge Lane Melling Carnforth LA6 2RE Telephone number 01524 221538 Fax number Not applicable Email address head@melling.lancs.sch.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child's school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.1

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way.

p.2

To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days notice. The inspector visited eight lessons and saw four teachers teach. Meetings were held with pupils, staff, and members of the governing body. The inspector observed the work of the school. She looked at the school development plan, minutes of governing body meetings, and the school's records of pupils’ progress, as well as a wide range of the pupils’ work. Safeguarding documents and other policies were scrutinised. Questionnaires completed by 11 parents and carers were analysed, as well as questionnaires from pupils and staff.

p.3

Information about the school

This is a very small primary school, where pupils are taught in two mixed-age classes. Very few pupils are known to be eligible for free school meals. Most pupils are from White British backgrounds. The proportion of pupils supported at school action plus or who have a statement of special educational needs is above average. Most pupils come from outside Melling village. The proportion of pupils who join or leave the school other than at the usual times is higher than seen typically. The headteacher has a significant teaching commitment. The headteacher works full-time and is supported by a senior teacher and two teachers who work part-time, plus two support staff. The school meets the current floor standards, which set the government’s minimum expectations for attainment and progress. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Key Findings

 This is a good school that is heavily involved with its local community. It is not yet an outstanding school because teaching is good, rather than outstanding, and pupils’ progress in mathematics is not as good as progress in English, more-able pupils do not make enough progress in writing, and data about pupils’ progress is not used to best effect. Pupils’ outstanding attitudes to learning, including their ability to work independently and to use their initiative, make an important contribution to their progress.

p.4

Key Findings

 Pupils make good progress from their individual starting points to reach average levels of attainment. Progress is consistently good in Key Stage 1. Although pupils in Key Stage 2 make good progress in reading and writing, their progress in mathematics is only satisfactory and this is linked to inconsistencies in the curriculum for mathematics. Additionally, more-able pupils do not always reach the higher Level 5 in writing at the end of Key Stage 2.

p.4

Key Findings

 The quality of teaching is good. Activities are always exciting, interesting and delivered with great enthusiasm. The teaching of reading skills is a particular strength. However, the quality of mathematics teaching in Key Stage 2 is inconsistent. Explanations of mathematical concepts, sometimes, lack clarity and the quality of adult support is variable. Marking does not always tell pupils how to improve their writing.

p.4

Key Findings

 Behaviour is outstanding. In lessons, pupils listen carefully to their teachers always and try their very best. Pupils feel extremely safe and secure in the school and have very high levels of self-esteem.

p.4

Key Findings

 Staff and members of the governing body are highly ambitious for the pupils. Consequently, pupils are provided with a wide range of exciting opportunities that promote their spiritual, moral, social, and cultural development successfully. Teachers work well to share good practice and the management of performance is good. Although the school has extensive data relating to pupils’ individual progress, it has not yet analysed and evaluated this data in order to identify subtle variations in patterns of progress.

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Accelerate pupils’ progress in mathematics in Key Stage 2 by: - ensuring that pupils have a good understanding of shape, space, and measure, and can solve problems and manipulate data - making certain that explanations of mathematical concepts and methods are always crystal clear - checking that pupils, including disabled pupils and those with special educational needs, are making good gains in their learning when they are working with adults other than the class teacher.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Maximise the progress that more-able pupils make in writing by: - making sure that pupils have ample opportunities to practise creative story writing and use exciting vocabulary and other techniques to make their writing more interesting - improving marking and target setting, so that all pupils are provided with specific guidance about how to improve their work.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the impact of leadership and management by developing the analysis of data, so that the school has a clearer view of patterns of progress over time.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Children’s skills levels on joining the Reception class vary considerably from year to year. However, in recent years, attainment on entry has often been below average. Children make good progress in the Early Years Foundation Stage because of good teaching, where expectations are high. The good progress is sustained in Key Stage 1. For example, when children from Year 1 and 2 were taught the column method of addition, one boy exclaimed joyfully, ‘I could not do this before, but now I am a Billy Whizz’. Pupils in Key Stage 1 make good progress also in reading and writing, as well as mathematics. Most are able to read fluently with expression and a good level of understanding. Attainment at the end of Key Stage 1 is variable, reflecting pupils’ individual starting points. However, it is never lower than the national average, including in reading.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Although the progress observed in lessons is good in Key Stage 2, it is more inconsistent than in Key Stage 1. Progress in reading is particularly swift and pupils, usually, reach above average attainment at the end of Key Stage 2. The good emphasis on completing research for topic work means that pupils get ample opportunities to develop their reading skills. They learn to skim text and quickly pick out relevant information. Work on children’s novels, such as ‘Carrie’s War’, is used well to develop pupils’ comprehension skills. Although pupils, generally, make good progress in writing, relatively few reach the higher Level 5. Pupils’ handwriting is usually very neat. Their sentences are well structured and almost always grammatically correct. However, their vocabulary choices are not always imaginative and engaging techniques, such as the use of metaphors, similes, and alliteration, are used infrequently. There are extensive opportunities for factual writing and pupils

p.5

Achievement of pupils

use information and communication technology (ICT) well to improve their presentation. Opportunities to compose long stories are more limited. Progress in mathematics, although satisfactory, is slower than progress in reading and writing. Pupils’ work is usually well presented and there is a strong emphasis on number and calculation. There has been less emphasis on developing pupils’ understanding of space, shape, and measure, their ability to solve problems, and to handle data.

p.6

Achievement of pupils

Parents and carers are correct when they say that their children achieve well. Attainment measures at the end of Key Stage 2 are often based on a very small number of pupils. Attainment has been broadly average in recent years, reflecting the fact that some more-able pupils leave before they have completed Key Stage 2. The school is especially good at supporting potentially vulnerable pupils, including those that join the school later in the academic year than usual. Pupils settle in quickly and make good progress. Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs make good progress also in developing their social skills and are very well motivated. However, their progress in mathematics is slower because of variations in the quality of support they receive.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Teaching is never less than good. There are pockets of outstanding practice, for example, in music and in aspects of lessons in Key Stage 1. Consequently, most pupils achieve well over time. Teachers’ expectations are high and result in a good volume of neat and well-presented work. A good effort is made to make certain that the needs of pupils of different ages and abilities are met within the two small classes. That is particularly successful in Key Stage 1, where staff have a very good understanding of how young children learn. Staff are skilled in teaching phonics (the sounds that letters make) sessions and they articulate letter sounds well.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Parents and carers are right to be pleased with the quality of teaching. They describe staff as ‘warm and friendly’. Lessons in both classes are delivered with huge zeal, consequently, pupils are very keen to learn. The teaching of mathematics in Key Stage 2 is sometimes not as successful in comparison with the teaching of other subjects. That is because teachers’ explanations of mathematical concepts are not always crystal clear. Teachers do not always do enough to check the learning of pupils when they are working with adults other than the class teacher, particularly those who find learning more difficult. Therefore, teachers are not always quick enough to spot when progress is slowing.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Teachers teach the interesting curriculum well and pupils are actively encouraged to use their skills in a wide range of subjects. Activities are often linked to real-life situations; an Olympic theme, for instance, is currently being enjoyed by pupils throughout the school. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social, and cultural development is promoted well. For example, in a personal and social development lesson about whether it is right to copy commercial CDs, teachers ensured that there was a lively discussion about legal issues and moral dilemmas. Pupils in Key Stage 1 receive good advice about how to make their work better but the quality of academic guidance is more variable in Key Stage 2. Sometimes, the marking of pupils’ writing just congratulates more-able pupils, rather telling them clearly about how to improve their work. Additionally, pupils are unfamiliar with National Curriculum levels and do

p.6

Quality of teaching

not always know how to move their work to the next level. That is because targets are referred to infrequently in marking or in lessons.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils have highly positive attitudes to learning. Their resilience and independence is actively encouraged by staff, consequently, pupils are well prepared for secondary school. Parents and carers have only positive things to say about pupils’ attitudes and behaviour. Parents and carers of pupils who have recently joined the school are effusive in their praise for pupils’ personal development, saying that there has been a ‘transformation’ in their children’s levels of ‘confidence and enthusiasm’.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils get on extremely well together and records show that this is usual. They say that fallings out are rare and bullying unknown. They have a good understanding of the different forms of bullying. During playtimes, pupils of different ages have fun together. In lessons, pupils collaborate well. For example, when Key Stage 2 pupils were using computers to look for information to inform the magazine articles that they were writing, they worked very well together. Pupils show high levels of courtesy to each other and often have levels of maturity that exceed those expected for their ages. They say that they feel extremely safe and secure in a school. Their knowledge of how to keep safe is very wide ranging. For instance, not only do they understand fully what they must do to keep safe when using the internet, but they know also that adults should have sensible attitudes towards drinking alcohol. Attendance rates are above average and this has a very positive impact on pupils’

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

progress because they, rarely, miss lessons.

p.7

Leadership and management

The headteacher and the senior teacher have been pivotal in improving the school and consolidating a previously good performance. They balance their teaching responsibilities and leadership roles successfully. All teaching staff manage curriculum responsibilities effectively in this very small school. The school has demonstrated a good capacity to sustain improvement. Team teaching and mutual cooperation are strong features of the school’s work. As a result of good professional development, teachers are able to share good practice regularly and learn from one another. The management of performance is good. Formal observations of teaching are well structured and focus clearly on the impact of teaching on pupils’ progress.

p.7

Leadership and management

The governing body is thoroughly involved in the life of the school and has a robust programme of monitoring and evaluation. Self-evaluation is generally accurate and is used to inform development planning. The school knows individual pupils extremely well and keeps a close eye on their academic progress and personal well-being. However, the school does not always make optimum use of whole-school data to analyse subtle variations in patterns of attainment and progress.

p.7

Leadership and management

The curriculum is well organised. The extensive use of exciting and relevant topics ensures that there are good opportunities for practising reading, factual writing, and using ICT. Sport and music are particularly successful features of the good curriculum, which promotes pupils’ spiritual, moral, social, and cultural development effectively. There are well-developed partnerships with a wide range of local providers of education and these are used well to extend opportunities for pupils. While the school has very close links with the local community, links with the wider community in the United Kingdom are more limited and, as a result, the pupils’ knowledge and understanding of other cultures is restricted. That said, the school has created a very harmonious atmosphere, in which everyone is equally welcome and respected, whatever their background or abilities, and the promotion of equal opportunities is good. Safeguarding procedures meet statutory requirements.

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 54 42 2 2 Primary schools 14 49 32 6 Secondary schools 20 39 34 7 Special schools 33 45 20 3 Pupil referral units 9 55 28 8 All schools 16 47 31 6

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

The data in the table above are for the period 1 September to 31 December 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ).

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils' work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school's efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils' punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Floor standards the national minimum expectation of attainment and progression measures

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils' attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils' freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.

p.10

to share with their children. It describes Ofsted's main

findings from the inspection of their school.

p.11

Carnforth, LA6 2RE

 It was a privilege to visit your school. I enjoyed talking to you all and listened very carefully to what you had to say. I was very impressed by your commitment to learning. I enjoyed looking at your topic books particularly and was pleased to see that you make good use of information and communication technology. You told me that you enjoy your physical education lessons and have lots of opportunities to be involved in sport. I thought that the visit from the orchestra from the high school was inspiring and noticed that you all made very good progress in your keyboard lesson.

p.11

Carnforth, LA6 2RE

You go to a good school. You make good progress because teaching is good. Some of you join the school late in the year and it is good to see that you settle in so quickly. I noticed that older pupils make better progress in reading and writing than in mathematics. I have asked your teachers to boost your progress in mathematics by making sure that all areas of the curriculum for mathematics are covered in enough depth, making certain that their explanations are crystal clear and checking your progress when you are working with other adults in the classroom. I noticed also that the older pupils who find learning easy could produce more exciting writing. I have asked your teachers to help you with this by providing you with better guidance and encouraging you to develop your vocabulary and story writing techniques.

p.11

Carnforth, LA6 2RE

The leaders and managers at your school are doing a good job and are working to improve your school. You can help your school to improve further by continuing to do your best in lessons.

p.11

Carnforth, LA6 2RE

Susan Walsh Lead Inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion