Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Charlestown Primary School

Inspected 12 Jul 2012 · published 10 Sept 2012 · URN 136760

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    12 Jul 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Ian Hancock, Sandra Woodman

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Charlestown Primary School

  • URN verified

    136760

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+38Positivemore positive than 8% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingexceptionallyeffectivelypositivestronggood progresshigh-qualitymake good progress
Criticisminadequatenot alwaysweakerconcernsnot yetpoorat risknot outstanding

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1803w+39
  • Leadership526w+33
  • What needs to improve108w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,430
about usual (typical 2920)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%Leadership 15%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 29%

Full report text

Age group 4–11 Inspection date(s) 11–12 July 2012 Inspection number 397481 Charlestown Primary School Inspection report

p.1

Unique reference number 136760 Local authority Cornwall Inspection number 397481 Inspection dates 11–12 July 2012 Lead inspector Ian Hancock HMI

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Foundation Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 210 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Stephanie Housman Headteacher Stephen Gibson Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected School address Crinnis Road Carlyon Bay St Austell PL25 3PB Telephone number 01726 812831 Fax number 01726 812831 Email address secretary@charlestown.cornwall.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.2

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. The inspection team sampled 16 lessons taught by eight teachers, of which two were observed jointly with the headteacher. Meetings were held with staff, members of the governing body and groups of pupils. Informal discussions were also held with several parents and carers. The inspectors observed the school’s work and looked at monitoring information, plans for improvement, analysis and tracking of pupils’ progress, and records of meetings of the governing body. They looked at pupils’ work in books, listened to a sample of pupils read and checked attendance. The inspectors took account of the responses to the on-line Parent View survey in planning the inspection and looked at the questionnaire responses submitted by 20 staff, 115 pupils and 119 parents and carers.

p.3

Information about the school

Charlestown Primary School is slightly smaller than the average-sized primary school. Most pupils are of White British heritage and there are very few pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds. The proportions of pupils that are known to be eligible for free school meals, and those that are supported by school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs, are lower than most other schools. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress. The school’s work has recently been recognised by the Healthy Schools award and the Dyslexia Friendly School Quality Mark. The school converted to academy status in June 2011. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Key findings

 This is a good school where pupils achieve well because of the good teaching that they receive. Strong links with the local community enrich pupils’ learning effectively and enable the school to live out its aim to provide ‘success for all children in a caring environment’. The school is not yet outstanding because there are some inconsistencies in teaching so that pupils’ good progress is not sustained in all lessons.  High-quality play and learning activities ensure that children get off to a good start in the Reception class. Their good progress continues across the other key stages, but is particularly strong in Years 2 and 6. Weaker readers and more capable pupils are supported and challenged particularly well. Standards in English and mathematics are high by the time pupils leave the school.  Teaching is good and at times it is outstanding. Pupils concentrate for sustained periods because lessons are purposeful and engaging. Teachers confidently

p.4

Key findings

promote technical vocabulary and demonstrate important learning strategies. Occasionally, pupils have limited opportunities to show their understanding and explain their learning strategies. This is because teaching is overly directive and pupils are not always sufficiently guided in their learning, particularly through individual target setting.  Pupils have very positive attitudes to learning. They enjoy school and take great pride in their learning. As a result, their attendance rates are higher than in most other schools. The school’s caring and positive ethos ensures that most pupils behave well and feel very safe.  Leadership and management are good. Staff work with a clear sense of purpose because roles and responsibilities are distributed well. The effective leadership of teaching and the management of performance have improved pupils’ rates of progress throughout the school. Not all of the systems that support leaders’

p.4

Key findings

monitoring of the school’s work are fully utilised. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 By July 2013, ensure that pupils make good progress in every lesson by:  embedding the features of the best teaching across the school  providing more opportunities for pupils to explain their strategies and give reasons for their opinions  making greater use of individual learning targets and success criteria to guide pupils in their learning.   Strengthen the systems that help leaders to monitor and evaluate the school’s work by: − setting end-of-year attainment targets and short-term objectives for each class − summarising pupil tracking information succinctly and sharing it frequently with members of the governing body − recording and reviewing behaviour incidents systematically.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Children currently enter school with basic skills and understanding similar to those expected for their age. They make good progress in the Reception Year because of the good balance of adult-led activities and those chosen by the children. For example, the Reception teacher demonstrated correct letter formation before children chose activities to practise their writing skills by making captions for their small world creations. Pupils achieve well in Key Stage 1 and their levels of attainment in reading and other core skills at the end of Year 2 are securely above average. Their good progress continues across Key Stage 2 and by the end of Year 6, pupils’ attainment is well above average in reading, writing and mathematics. A focus to challenge the more capable pupils enabled over half of the current Year 6 to reach the higher National Curriculum levels and around one fifth to reach an exceptionally high level in mathematics. On a few occasions, pupils make satisfactory

p.5

Achievement of pupils

progress in lessons because teaching is less effective.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

In lessons, pupils take great interest in their learning and work with sustained concentration to good effect. This was evident in a guided reading session where a group of Year 4 girls earnestly discussed the elements of a persuasive text and suitably explained what made it interesting to the reader. Most pupils have a clear understanding of what is required because they frequently use success statements to check and assess their work. For example, Year 5 pupils worked with sustained concentration on short writing tasks before evaluating their partner’s effort against different success statements. Such guidance is not used in every class so pupils are not always sufficiently clear how to improve their work.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs achieve well because they receive well-targeted support in lessons and in small group sessions. Gaps between Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Achievement of pupils

other groups of pupils and the rest are localised and are closing. For example, a comprehensive programme of support for weaker readers enabled most of them to make exceptional progress and make up lost ground.

p.6

Achievement of pupils

Parents and carers believe that their children make good progress and that their individual needs are met effectively. Most pupils say that they learn a lot in lessons and this was evident during the inspection when all groups of pupils were seen to be achieving well in most lessons.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Parents and carers, and the pupils themselves, believe that teaching is good. This was also the finding of the inspection team. Teachers’ subject knowledge is good, including in the teaching of letters and the sounds they represent, (called phonics). In Reception, adults effectively support individuals to develop their reading skills. In other classes teachers keep detailed and informative records of pupils’ reading progress. Individual reading books provide an appropriate level of challenge and pupils know that they have to demonstrate proficiency before progressing to the next reading level.

p.6

Quality of teaching

High-quality teaching, particularly at the end of each key stage, is characterised by high expectations and clear explanations that move learning on at a brisk pace. New technologies illustrate important ideas well. Teachers recognise and respond promptly when pupils have not fully understood the concepts being taught. For example, in a mathematics lesson, the class teacher skilfully questioned Year 6 pupils to assess their learning before quickly giving an impromptu review to those that were struggling. Her probing questions and clear explanations enabled the pupils to successfully solve challenging algebraic problems. In a small number of lessons, teaching is overly directive and pupils are not asked to explain their strategies or give reasons for their opinions. Consequently, pupils are unable to demonstrate their understanding of the learning. Some pupils know their individual learning targets, but

p.6

Quality of teaching

these are not used consistently in all classes.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs are taught equally well. This is because teachers, and teaching assistants, ensure that tasks are carefully matched to pupils’ different capabilities so that pupils are challenged effectively. Teaching promotes pupils’ personal and wider development well. For example, in assembly pupils thoughtfully considered the Olympic ideals of promoting peace through sport. In other lessons, pupils demonstrated exceptionally mature and reflective attitudes towards their learning.

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils have very positive attitudes towards learning. Their consideration of others is demonstrated in spontaneous acts of kindness, such as older pupils offering their chairs for younger pupils to sit on. Reception children share activities and patiently wait their turn. Older pupils collaborate frequently in pairs and small groups. For Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

example, pupils in Years 3 and 5 recently worked together to create animation films. Responsible roles, such as membership of the school forum or playground buddy, enable pupils to play an active part in managing the behaviour of others. Discussions with pupils confirm that the behaviour of most pupils is good. Pupils, including those with additional needs are aware of, and respond to, the clear systems for encouraging good behaviour. For example, the coloured cards used at lunchtimes provide thinking time for pupils to reflect on their actions.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils have a well-developed understanding of different types of bullying. They report that incidents are infrequent and taken seriously. A few parents and carers expressed concerns regarding incidents of poor behaviour including bullying. The inspectors found that the school responds to incidents vigorously, but incidents are not always recorded and reviewed systematically. Pupils are knowledgeable about how to keep themselves safe in a range of situations, such as when crossing the road or using the internet. The very large majority of pupils feel safe, and parents and carers share similar views. Pupils are confident that, if any issues or concerns did arise, they could talk to a member of staff. Pupils value the ‘worry boxes’ in each class and report that they are emptied regularly and that issues are dealt with effectively. As one pupil commented, the boxes are ‘emptied on Friday and by Monday it is dealt with’.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

The school has effective systems to promote and manage attendance. As a result, attendance rates exceed those of most other schools and continue to improve.

p.7

Leadership and management

The ambitious and principled leadership of the headteacher and other leaders has established a shared sense of purpose among all staff. Leaders have effectively supported colleagues through staff training and by working alongside them in the classroom. This said, the features of the best teaching are not yet fully embedded. Teachers are held accountable for the progress that pupils make and pupils at risk of underachieving are identified. Equality of opportunity is promoted well and the support provided for specific groups of pupils enable them to catch up. Individual pupils are tracked closely, but the information is not summarised succinctly and shared frequently with the governing body. Consequently, opportunities are missed to evaluate the difference that actions are making. The increased rates of pupils’ progress and the improved attendance seen over the current academic year demonstrate the school’s capacity for further improvement.

p.7

Leadership and management

The governing body is actively involved in the school and plays its part in shaping its future development. Members visit the school frequently and participate in short- term project groups. They know the school well and are astutely aware of its strengths and areas for development. While plans for classroom improvement are informed by regular monitoring activities, they lack a succinct set of measurable targets and interim milestones to enable easy monitoring and evaluation. The school’s arrangements for safeguarding are robust and meet current requirements. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Leadership and management

The school’s revised curriculum supports pupils’ progress in literacy and numeracy well. It provides many enriching and memorable experiences including residential visits and participation in local festivals. During the week of the inspection, the pupils received a talk from a former Olympic champion and had opportunities to hold an Olympic torch. Pupils value the range of after-school clubs and the frequent opportunities provided to participate in sports activities. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is promoted well. The high-quality artwork displayed around the school is testimony to pupils’ positive responses to the work of local and international artists. Pupils have a good understanding of cultures and faiths that are different from their own. Strong links with the local community foster their appreciation of Cornish culture.

p.8

Leadership and management

Parents and carers that made their views known to the inspection team were overwhelmingly positive about the school. Several praised the school’s contribution to the community as well as the quality of education the school provides. Speaking for many, one parent commented, ‘The children are happy, safe and confident.’

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 54 42 2 2 Primary schools 14 49 32 6 Secondary schools 20 39 34 7 Special schools 33 45 20 3 Pupil referral units 9 55 28 8 All schools 16 47 31 6

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September to 31 December 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Floor standards the national minimum expectation of attainment and progression measures.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.

p.10

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.11

Inspection of Charlestown Primary School, St Austell, PL25 3PB

Thank you for being so helpful when I visited your school recently with another inspector. We were grateful to those of you that talked with us and read books to us. I would like to tell you our findings about your school.

p.11

Inspection of Charlestown Primary School, St Austell, PL25 3PB

Your school is a good school. This is because most of you make good progress and achieve high standards by the time you leave. You are proud of your learning and work hard in lessons. Those of you that spoke with us, and returned the questionnaire, told us that you feel safe and the school helps you to do as well as you can.

p.11

Inspection of Charlestown Primary School, St Austell, PL25 3PB

We have asked those who lead the school ensure that more teaching is good or outstanding so that you all make good progress in lessons. We have suggested to your teachers that they should ask you to explain your answers and make regular use of your learning targets and success statements in lessons. We have also suggested that your headteacher and other leaders make some further changes to help them monitor and continue to improve the education provided.

p.11

Inspection of Charlestown Primary School, St Austell, PL25 3PB

You can help with these improvements by thinking carefully about your answers and making good use of your learning targets and success statements in lessons. I wish you all the very best in your education.

p.11

Inspection of Charlestown Primary School, St Austell, PL25 3PB

Ian Hancock Her Majesty's Inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion