Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)
Stoke St Gregory Church of England Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
13 Jul 2012
- Inspectors verified
Juliet Jaggs
- Achievement verified
Satisfactory
- Behaviour and safety verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Satisfactory
- Overall effectiveness verified
Satisfactory
- Quality of teaching verified
Satisfactory
- Name on report verified
Stoke St Gregory Church of England Primary School
- URN verified
123802
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.
- OverallSatisfactory
- AchievementSatisfactory
- Behaviour and safetyGood
- Leadership and managementSatisfactory
- Quality of teachingSatisfactory
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Satisfactory.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. p.9
- An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.9
- Most pupils report that instances of bullying are rare and that if they do occur, they are confident that staff will act swiftly and effectively. p.7
- The school’s self-evaluation is broadly accurate and effective professional development activities are having a positive impact on the quality of teaching. p.8
- Improved systems for monitoring pupils’ progress have had a positive impact on raising attainment by the end of Year 2 so that it is now significantly better than it was at the time of the previous inspection. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve the quality of leadership and management at all levels by: ensuring that evaluation procedures are used to identify specific actions for improvement that are sharply focused on improving pupils’ achievement in Key Stage 2 monitoring the performance of the school more frequently to ensure that its effectiveness is sustained. p.5
- Develop the curriculum so that by December 2012 planning documents clearly identify how standards in literacy and numeracy will be improved during topic work. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 2,634
- about usual (typical 3005)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 44
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 3
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Age group 4–11 Inspection date(s) 12–13 July 2012 Inspection number 380734 Stoke St Gregory Church of England Primary School Inspection report
p.1
Unique reference number 123802 Local authority Somerset Inspection number 380734 Inspection dates 12–13 July 2012 Lead inspector Juliet Jaggs
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 88 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Adrian Stables Headteacher Barbara Berks Date of previous school inspection 17 March 2009 School address Huntham Lane Stoke St Gregory Taunton TA3 6EG Telephone number 01823 490437 Fax number 01823 409145 Email address office@stoke-st-gregory.somerset.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked
p.1
after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.2
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.
p.2
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
Introduction
This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. The inspector observed teaching and learning in nine part lessons taught by five teachers. She held meetings with members of the governing body, staff and groups of pupils. The inspector took account of the responses to the on-line Parent View survey in planning the inspection and observed the school’s work as well as looking at self-evaluation documentation, development planning, assessment information and safeguarding procedures. The inspector analysed 55 questionnaires received from parents and carers.
p.3
Information about the school
Stoke St Gregory Church of England Primary School is smaller than most other primary schools and a relatively high number of its pupils leave and join the school during the academic year. At the time of the previous inspection, it was part of a federation but this arrangement came to an end in March 2012. Since June 2012, the headteacher has been employed on a part-time basis for three days per week. On the remaining days the school is led by the senior teacher. The largest groups of pupils are of White British heritage, with the proportion of pupils who are from other minority ethnic backgrounds well below average. There are currently no pupils who speak English as an additional language. The number of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is broadly average. The percentage of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is average, with most of these pupils’ needs
p.3
Information about the school
associated with speech, language and communication. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress. The school has been awarded the Arts Mark silver standard accreditation and healthy schools status. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.3
Key findings
This is a satisfactory school. It is not yet good because the management of its performance has not been concerted enough to ensure that pupils make good progress throughout the school. Schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.
p.4
Key findings
Improved systems for monitoring pupils’ progress have had a positive impact on raising attainment by the end of Year 2 so that it is now significantly better than it was at the time of the previous inspection. Their impact on accelerating progress in Key Stage 2 has not been as marked. By the end of Year 6, pupils’ attainment in English and mathematics is average although they reach higher standards in reading.
p.4
Key findings
The leadership of teaching has been effective in improving teaching, especially in Key Stage 1. Generally, teachers use a variety of strategies to help pupils reflect on their learning and make good progress in Key Stage 1. While teaching is satisfactory in Key Stage 2, there are too few opportunities for pupils to form their own ideas and think about their own learning to support better progress. Similarly, in the Early Years Foundation Stage children do not have sufficient opportunities to explore their own ideas.
p.4
Key findings
Pupils’ behaviour and safety are good; they have positive attitudes to learning and encourage one another in following instructions conscientiously. Pupils feel safe and make a special effort to help one another feel safe.
p.4
Key findings
The school makes a strong contribution to pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. The welcoming school community gives pupils a sense of self-worth so they demonstrate conviction in their beliefs. Pupils enjoy a variety of educational visits that enhance their learning and the standard of music in the school is high. The curriculum does not include a sharp focus on improving pupils’ progress in writing and mathematics in their topic work. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.4
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching, especially in the Early Years Foundation Stage and Key Stage 2, so that by July 2013 much of it is good through: ensuring that teachers make pupils aware of what they will be learning during activities so that they take more responsibility for their progress as they are learning providing children in the Early Years Foundation Stage with more opportunities to learn by investigating in different ways ensuring that teachers prepare a greater variety of materials and activities with increasing levels of challenge to meet the needs of different groups of learners in their class giving pupils opportunities to think and talk about their learning in different ways by asking more open questions.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of leadership and management at all levels by: ensuring that evaluation procedures are used to identify specific actions for improvement that are sharply focused on improving pupils’ achievement in Key Stage 2 monitoring the performance of the school more frequently to ensure that its effectiveness is sustained.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Develop the curriculum so that by December 2012 planning documents clearly identify how standards in literacy and numeracy will be improved during topic work.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Children join the Early Years Foundation Stage with the range of skills that are generally as expected for their age. A few of them have difficulty with communication and language but the school works effectively to help children develop these aspects, although they do not have enough opportunities to explore ideas for themselves. By the time they move into Key Stage 1, children’s attainment is broadly average. Since the last inspection, there has been a significant improvement in pupils’ achievement in Key Stage 1, with the result that standards are above average and progress is good in reading, writing and mathematics.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Following a sustained trend of good achievement in Key Stage 2, there was a significant drop in standards achieved by pupils who left the school in 2011. Pupils in the current Year 6 are attaining at higher levels, especially the proportion working at the higher Level 5. Progress for this group has been satisfactory from their starting points. Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs make satisfactory progress because of the range of support they receive. Most parents and Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.5
Achievement of pupils
carers agree that their children make progress at the school, with only a few commenting that their children were not sufficiently challenged. Inspection findings confirm that in lessons, especially in Key Stage 2, not all pupils are challenged sufficiently.
p.6
Achievement of pupils
In lessons, pupils show good levels of sustained concentration and collaborate successfully, especially in discussing the tasks set and in answering key questions set by teachers. For example, pupils in one Key Stage 1 lesson talked together effectively and made progress calculating sums by recognising when ‘like numbers’ could be multiplied rather than added. Pupils learn well by transferring curriculum enrichment experiences to the classroom which also makes a significant contribution to their personal development. For example, pupils in Key Stage 2 were so outraged at the proposed closure of a local conservation area that they were able to write about it convincingly.
p.6
Achievement of pupils
Pupils make good progress in reading. By the end of Key Stage 1, many decode relatively complex words independently so that their attainment is above average. Pupils take increasing responsibility for selecting their own reading material in order to enhance their progress and their attainment is above average by the end of Key Stage 2. Pupils joining the school part way through a key stage adjust quickly to the school’s reading routines and they make similarly good progress.
p.6
Quality of teaching
Teachers make a strong contribution to pupils’ spiritual development by planning creative tasks that encourage pupils to be inventive. For example, pupils enjoyed thinking of ideas for a poem about imaginary sports equipment and a few were able to evoke emotional images. In better lessons, teachers consider how themes develop and they plan activities that encourage pupils to link new learning logically. This was seen in one class where pupils were quickly reminded of various number bonds in a lively introduction so they were able to propose correct answers in the subsequent activity about corresponding fractions. However, in Key Stage 2, there are occasions when teachers describe the nature of a task without making pupils fully aware of what they should be learning and, as a result, progress is satisfactory rather than good.
p.6
Quality of teaching
Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage often have opportunities to practise using the sounds made by letters to write independently. Teachers prepare a range of purposeful activities but tasks do not always encourage children to learn by investigating. In Key Stages 1 and 2, teachers monitor pupils’ book choices carefully so that pupils sustain their progress in reading by making appropriate choices.
p.6
Quality of teaching
Teachers’ planning, especially in Key Stage 2, does not always meet fully the differing learning needs of pupils and this contributes to satisfactory rather than good progress. Not all pupils are challenged to use and apply their previous learning in their work. Some teachers have established effective systems that enable pupils to assess their own learning. Pupils in Key Stage 1 confidently assess their own Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.6
Quality of teaching
progress by using target sheets and they apply simple proof-reading techniques to check the accuracy of their writing. Some teachers modify their plans in response to the progress made by individual pupils during lessons and pupils’ work is marked frequently and usually shows how it could have been improved. Other assessment procedures are less effective. On occasions, teachers ask closed questions that prompt an accurate response but do not enable pupils to think about their learning more deeply or to consolidate it by expressing ideas in their own words.
p.7
Quality of teaching
Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs are usually well supported. In one better lesson, the teaching assistant explained spelling rules clearly so that pupils applied them successfully on their own. Occasionally, adults complete pupils’ responses too quickly so pupils do not have the opportunity to resolve questions for themselves. Most parents and carers believe that their children are well taught at the school, with a few of them appreciating the opportunity to collaborate with their child during homework tasks. Inspection evidence found that teaching is satisfactory overall.
p.7
Behaviour and safety of pupils
Pupils demonstrate high levels of empathy so they are able to consider one another’s perspective and interact sensitively. This means they work together effectively in teams because they negotiate roles and agree plans calmly. For example, pupils responded well when they were given the responsibility for organising their leavers’ performance. It was the children in the Early Years Foundation Stage who identified the emotional significance of this event so demonstrating the positive impact on their spiritual development. Most pupils demonstrate a commitment to learning so they settle quickly to tasks. They are keen to share ideas and readily commend one another’s efforts. Disruptive incidents are infrequent and the standard of behaviour is consistently good over time. This is a view shared by pupils and their parents and carers. Pupils’ attendance is above average.
p.7
Behaviour and safety of pupils
Pupils have a good understanding of the various types of bullying and they are keen to make one another feel valued within the community in order to reduce the likelihood of one another being bullied. Members of the school council take an active lead to complement this approach by representing their peers at local events that heighten awareness of cyber-bullying and then sharing their experiences on their return to school. Most pupils report that instances of bullying are rare and that if they do occur, they are confident that staff will act swiftly and effectively. There was overwhelming agreement among pupils, staff, and parents and carers that pupils are safe in school but a very few representatives from each of these groups shared concerns about bullying in their questionnaire returns.
p.7
Leadership and management
The headteacher has established a strong sense of collective responsibility for pupils’ welfare. All staff are determined to ensure there is no discrimination and that all pupils have an equal opportunity to learn well. Teachers communicate frequently to Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.7
Leadership and management
prioritise the achievement of individual pupils and these informal discussions have recently been enhanced with more systematic arrangements for monitoring pupils’ progress. This has a positive impact on the rising trend in achievement since the last inspection, particularly at Key Stage 1, for all groups of pupils, and the reversal of the recent drop in standards in Key Stage 2. This demonstrates that the school has the capacity for implementing effective improvements. The strengths in pupils’ behaviour identified in the last inspection have been sustained. Members of the governing body have been instrumental in supporting leaders as they have defined the future of the school since the conclusion of the federation arrangement.
p.8
Leadership and management
The school’s self-evaluation is broadly accurate and effective professional development activities are having a positive impact on the quality of teaching. For example, middle leaders have recently shared their new expertise in the teaching of mathematics and pupils have made accelerated progress using problem-solving techniques as a result.
p.8
Leadership and management
The curriculum has been enriched to include a variety of educational visits that enhance pupils’ learning and promote their personal development. As one pupil explained, ‘We may be a small school, but we do big things.’ Leaders in the Early Years Foundation Stage adapt their timetable creatively to ensure that children have opportunities to learn outdoors as the layout of the school does not afford them the opportunity to do so more routinely. Pupils’ commitment to sporting competitions and local music events supports their cultural development well and reflects the awards the school has received. School leaders are reviewing the curriculum in order to provide pupils with more opportunities for applying their basic skills in a variety of contexts. Plans do not place sufficient emphasis on improving pupils’ progress in writing and mathematics during topic work.
p.8
Leadership and management
Senior leaders establish important links with other local providers to prioritise pupils’ welfare. Shared-planning procedures enable children to move with confidence from the neighbouring nursery school and the school seeks regular guidance to ensure that other safeguarding procedures meet statutory requirements. Many parents and carers value the school’s distinctive caring ethos that enables their children to learn happily.
p.8
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Nursery schools 54 42 2 2 Primary schools 14 49 32 6 Secondary schools 20 39 34 7 Special schools 33 45 20 3 Pupil referral units 9 55 28 8 All schools 16 47 31 6
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September to 31 December 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.
p.9
Common terminology used by inspectors
Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attendance: the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Behaviour: how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Floor standards: the national minimum expectation of attainment and progression measures.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Safety: how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.
p.10
carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s
main findings from the inspection of their school.
p.11
Taunton, TA3 6EG
I should like to thank you for the warm welcome you gave me when I visited your school. I enjoyed talking to you about your learning and I was pleased to attend your leavers’ performance for a short time. Your views have been taken into account and I have found that yours is a satisfactory school. Here are some of the key findings from the report. Your behaviour is good and you feel safe at school. Your parents and carers are pleased that the school takes good care of you. You work hard in lessons and you make satisfactory progress. Your attainment in English and mathematics is average but the standards you reach in reading are higher. You have good opportunities to visit the local area and I was impressed that you felt so strongly about the future of the nearby nature reserve. Your teachers encourage you to be imaginative in your learning and it is good that some of you are able to use your target sheets to work out how to make
p.11
Taunton, TA3 6EG
I have asked the school leaders to continue to improve the school by: making sure that more of your lessons are good, especially in letting you know what you are going to be learning during lessons so that you can think about this as you work and aim to achieve it making sure that you know how to produce high-quality writing and mathematics while you are studying different topics changing the way they check how the school is doing so that they can decide how to help you more quickly.
p.11
Taunton, TA3 6EG
You can help by continuing to do your best and by taking opportunities to talk to your teachers about your learning.
p.11
Taunton, TA3 6EG
Juliet Jaggs Lead inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion