Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Stanchester Academy

Inspected 4 Jul 2012 · published 5 Sept 2012 · URN 137080

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Michael Smith (lead), David Howley, Sulina Piesse, Sylvie Trevena

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    4 Jul 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    David Howley, Michael Smith, Sulina Piesse, Sylvie Trevena

  • Name on report verified

    Stanchester Community School

  • URN verified

    137080

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+13Mostly positivemore positive than 9% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingimprovedimprovingmake good progresshighly effectiveexceptionallyfeel saferigorous
Criticisminadequatenot consistentlynot alwaysweaknessespoorweakslowfailed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1790w−11
  • Leadership562w+47
  • What needs to improve218w+68

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,561
about usual (typical 3042)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 49%Leadership 15%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Age group 11−16 Inspection date(s) 3−4 July 2012 Inspection number 397467 Stanchester Community School Inspection report

p.1

Unique reference number 137080 Local authority N/A Inspection number 397467 Inspection dates 3−4 July 2012 Lead inspector Michael Smith HMI

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Academy converter School category Non-maintained Age range of pupils 11−16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 798 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Susan Collard Headteacher Judy McBlain Date of previous school inspection 19 March 2009 School address East Stoke Stoke-sub-Hamdon Somerset TA14 6UG Telephone number 01935 823200 Fax number 01935 826635 Email address office@stanchester-academy.co.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.2

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. Inspectors observed all teachers who were teaching during the inspection, visiting 39 lessons. Many of these visits were accompanied by a member of the senior leadership team. Inspectors held meetings with staff, students, and the members of the governing body. They took account of the responses to the on-line Parent View questionnaire in planning the inspection, observed the school’s work, and looked at assessment records, minutes of the meetings of the governing body, safeguarding documentation and the school’s monitoring records and action plans. Questionnaire responses from 131 parents and carers, 52 staff and 144 students were analysed and considered.

p.3

Information about the school

Stanchester Community School is an average-sized comprehensive school which converted to an academy in August 2011. The proportion of students known to be eligible for free school meals is well below average. The proportion of disabled students and those who have special educational needs who are supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is below average. The great majority of students are from a White British background. Since the previous inspection the school has had significant changes at both senior and middle management. The headteacher was appointed in September 2009. The school has recently received a number of awards including Young People Friendly Health Clinic and Healthy Schools Plus.

p.3

Information about the school

The school meets the current government floor standard which sets the minimum expectations for students’ attainment and progress. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Key findings

 Stanchester provides a satisfactory standard of education. The school is not good because teaching is not consistently good enough for students to make better than satisfactory progress and there are some weaknesses in leadership and management. Schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.  Students start school with average attainment and make satisfactory progress. Achievement in English, mathematics and science has improved recently and is average. However, students do not get sufficient opportunities to practise their literacy and numeracy skills across subjects. Lessons do not always challenge students, particularly the most able.  Students say they feel safe. Behaviour is good around school and poor behaviour is rare. However, lessons are occasionally disrupted by weak behaviour. At times students are passive and do not actively engage in lessons,

p.4

Key findings

especially when they have to listen for extended periods. The good pastoral support has ensured attendance has risen significantly and is above average.  Teaching is satisfactory with some good and outstanding practice. When teaching is good, teachers use a variety of different activities which engage and enthuse students so that they take responsibility for their own learning. In weaker lessons, students do not start learning quickly enough and lessons are teacher dominated. Students do not have opportunities to work independently. Marking does not consistently inform them of how to improve and they are not always give time to respond to comments.  Senior leaders have a clear ambition for the school, but this is not understood and shared by all staff. Many middle leaders are relatively new in post and, consequently, actions to improve the quality of teaching have not been fully implemented and then evaluated. Performance management is rigorous and

p.4

Key findings

has been effective in improving the overall quality of teaching. School improvement plans are focused upon the correct areas, but success criteria are not always sufficiently challenging or measurable. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Continue to raise achievement by ensuring that:  work consistently challenges and engages all students, particularly the most able, so that they make good progress in lessons and over time  students have a variety of planned opportunities to practise their literacy and numeracy skills across subjects.  Improve further the quality of teaching and learning by ensuring that:  students have more opportunities to work independently and take responsibility for their own learning  students start their learning quickly in lessons without listening to overlong introductions and that a brisk pace of learning is maintained throughout the whole lesson  marking is used consistently to show students how well they are achieving and what they can do to improve, and that students are given time to respond to teachers’ comments.  Improve the effectiveness of leaders at all levels by ensuring that:  the strategic direction of the school is shared, understood and agreed by

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

all staff so that there is a collective ambition to improve further  middle leaders take more responsibility for improving the quality of teaching and raising achievement in their subject areas through a process of monitoring, improvement and evaluation  all success criteria within improvement plans are challenging and based upon the measurable impact of actions to drive through whole-school improvements.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Achievement is satisfactory. Attainment at the end of Key Stage 4 has been improving over the last few years, particularly in mathematics, and students now make satisfactory progress while at school. During the inspection, the inspectors observed students making mainly satisfactory, and occasionally good or outstanding, progress in lessons. For example, students were observed progressing well in mathematics when the work set was challenging and was such that students were able to identify key concepts for themselves. However, there were also a number of lessons where progress was slow because the work did not engage and challenge students. Responses from the parents and carers show that the very large majority say that their children make good progress at the school, but this is not supported by inspection evidence. Learning was best when the lesson engaged and enthused students. For example, in drama, students were highly motivated as the teacher

p.5

Achievement of pupils

facilitated good learning with students showing respect for each other’s work. However, at other times work failed to motivate and progress was no better than satisfactory because students were more focused upon task completion than learning. The school’s emphasis on improving speaking and listening means students Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Achievement of pupils

often discuss their work as a precursor to giving answers. Students are encouraged to read and the library has a good selection of both fiction and non-fiction books. However similar opportunities for students to develop literacy and numeracy skills across different subjects are not consistently planned.

p.6

Achievement of pupils

The school’s accurate assessments, together with inspection evidence, show that attainment is likely to be broadly average this year. Achievement in English, which has been falling over the last few years, has improved and is satisfactory.

p.6

Achievement of pupils

In 2011, achievement for disabled students and those with special educational needs was variable. However, improved systems to identify where support is needed and to monitor the progress of these students have resulted in a much improved picture; as a result, the achievement of these students is now in line with that of their peers.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Inspectors found that teaching has improved since the last inspection and is satisfactory, with a significant proportion of good or outstanding teaching. Where teaching is no better than satisfactory activities often fail to engage students. For example, such lessons start with an over-long teacher exposition and students do not get down to learning quickly enough. The range of teaching strategies is narrow. For example, most are teacher initiated or controlled with limited opportunities for students to work independently or in groups. Hence, pace is slow and students do not have control of their own learning. Use of assessment data does not consistently inform the level of challenge for students; consequently, in lessons the work was too easy for some and too hard for others. Marking is more frequent than at the time of the previous inspection. At its best it identifies how well students are achieving and

p.6

Quality of teaching

gives clear advice on how to improve. However, marking is not consistently of this high standard and time is not always given to students to respond to teachers’ comments.

p.6

Quality of teaching

When teaching is good, relationships are good and teachers are confident to use a variety of teaching strategies. Work builds systematically on prior learning, for example in a French lesson where students extended their vocabulary work with ever more complex sentences, including using different tenses. Lessons are well planned and get off to a purposeful start. Students quickly become engaged in their work. Students work well in groups or independently. Behaviour is good because students are interested and are enthused. Teaching assistants often give good individual support for disabled students and those who have special educational needs; however, on rare occasions students are not encouraged to be independent and work is done for them. A large majority of parents and carers say teaching is good, although many commented that progress was interrupted for their children because of a high staff turnover. Inspectors judge the quality of teaching as satisfactory.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Teaching allows students to be reflective on spiritual matters, for example in art through the theme of peace. Students gain an insight into different cultures, for example within music. They consider moral aspects, for example by debating the Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Quality of teaching

alleged links between MMR vaccinations and autism.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Behaviour observed around school during the inspection was good, with students being polite and courteous. Students said that there are occasional times when silly behaviour stops them working as well as they would like. They explain that this is when lessons are less interesting and they are expected to listen for a long time to teachers talking before getting down to work. They also say that things have got better recently and these incidents are not as common as they used to be. However, at times the narrow corridors mean that some students are jostled by older students. Responses from parents and carers say behaviour in lessons is variable and is not consistently good. This is confirmed by behaviour records over time, exclusions and observations during the inspection.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

The very large majority of students say they feel safe and this is confirmed by responses from parents and carers. Students have a good understanding of the dangers of substance abuse and the different types of bullying, including cyber- bullying. They are confident that they can receive support from the ‘Hub’ if they should need it. Students say that staff give good-quality support to the bullied student and deal with the bully effectively, including support to prevent further incidents. A number of parents and carers commented about bullying, some saying the incident had been quickly and effectively dealt with while others felt that more could be done.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Attendance is above average and has improved since the last inspection, with a significant reduction in the proportion of persistent absentees. Attendance of different groups is closely analysed and reported to the governing body.

p.7

Leadership and management

Leaders have worked successfully to increase the proportion of good and outstanding teaching, improve attendance rates and ensure students now make satisfactory progress. There have been a significant number of changes to procedures within the school over the last few years. The majority of staff have responded positively and share the ambition of senior leaders. However, a small minority of responses from staff who completed questionnaires indicate that some staff do not feel part of the strategic direction the school is taking. The school development plan has appropriate areas for improvement, but the success criteria are not always sufficiently challenging or related to the impact of actions on improving the quality of teaching or raising standards. Nevertheless, improvements since the last inspection show that the school demonstrates a satisfactory capacity to improve.

p.7

Leadership and management

The quality of teaching has improved because performance management is rigorous and linked to professional development opportunities, both at an individual and whole school level. Middle leaders are taking increasing responsibility for improving the quality of teaching and learning and raising achievement within their subject Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Leadership and management

areas. However, some are relatively new in post and as such there has not been a system of monitoring, support and evaluation to ensure improvements are embedded.

p.8

Leadership and management

Analysis of data has improved and the school is able to identify any groups who are underachieving. Support is then given to ensure students remain on track to achieve their target grades. The school’s strong pastoral support has been successful in supporting students whose circumstances may make them more vulnerable, with good working relationships with outside agencies. The school works closely with other local secondary schools and provides good support for pupils in partner primaries.

p.8

Leadership and management

The curriculum is based upon a mixture of academic and vocational courses. The school recognised that groups of students who had been identified to complete GCSE courses early were not achieving as well as expected and have changed the curriculum accordingly. Additional activity and themed days are enjoyed by students. The curriculum supports students to develop their spiritual, moral, social and cultural understanding in individual subjects, although this is not coordinated.

p.8

Leadership and management

Members of the governing body support the school well. They are aware of the issues which have meant the school has not progressed as quickly as they would have liked. They have a well informed overview of the school’s strengths and areas for further development. The committee structure is effective in ensuring careful monitoring of the school’s work, including close analysis of a variety of different data sets to ensure equality of opportunity. The governing body, along with all staff, ensures all aspects of safeguarding meet current requirements.

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 54 42 2 2 Primary schools 14 49 32 6 Secondary schools 20 39 34 7 Special schools 33 45 20 3 Pupil referral units 9 55 28 8 All schools 16 47 31 6

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September to 31 December 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Floor standards the national minimum expectation of attainment and progression measures.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.

p.10

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.11

TA14 6UG

When I visited your school recently with my colleagues, we met some of you at lunchtime and talked to others during lessons and at break. Thank you very much for your help and cooperation. We were impressed with your courtesy and manners, and how well you get on with each other. We judged your school as satisfactory and this may mean you have a visit from inspectors before your next full inspection.

p.11

TA14 6UG

Our observations showed that achievement is rising in English, mathematics and science and is satisfactory. However, there is more that your school can do, including making sure all of you are fully challenged with your work in lessons, especially those of you who are capable of gaining the highest grades. You need more opportunities to practise your literacy and numeracy skills across all subjects.

p.11

TA14 6UG

We observed 39 lessons and saw that you enjoy some interesting lessons. We judged that teaching is satisfactory. We have asked the school to improve the quality of lessons further so that teachers make sure you get down to work quickly and that marking tells you how to improve, including giving you time to respond to teachers’ comments. You can help by always responding to the advice you have been given. We judged behaviour as satisfactory and we are pleased that attendance is above average.

p.11

TA14 6UG

Staff care for you and you say you feel safe. The headteacher and other senior leaders have identified what needs to be done and they are very determined to carry on improving the school. However, we have asked them to make sure all staff understand how the school is developing and that middle leaders help make teaching and learning even better. We have also asked that improvement planning is improved by making sure that targets are always sufficiently challenging and focus on all achievement measures.

p.11

TA14 6UG

We wish you well at your school and hope you carry on helping it to get better.

p.11

TA14 6UG

Michael Smith Her Majesty's Inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion