Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 3 Sept 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sue Sharkey

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Sue Sharkey

  • Postcode verified

    WN2 1RU

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+75Very positivemore positive than 76% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisemake good progresshigh expectationsexcellentenjoyeffectivelysuccessfullyenthusiasticeffective
Criticismnot sufficientlynot yetnot consistentlybelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings622w+66
  • Leadership130w+78
  • What needs to improve116w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
853
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 38, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Leadership 13%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 11%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr J Rushton Headteacher Our Lady’s RC Primary School Holly Road Aspull Wigan WN2 1RU

p.1

Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 5 July 2012 to look at work in mathematics.

p.1

Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of two lessons and parts of five lessons during a learning walk.

p.1

Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The overall effectiveness of mathematics is good.

p.1

Achievement in mathematics

 Children’s mathematical skills on entry to Reception varies from year to year but are often below those expected for their age, particularly in calculation and shape, space and measures. Children make good progress so that when they enter Year 1 their attainment is broadly average.  When the whole school was last inspected in November 2010, mathematics was identified as an improving area. This had been reflected in the above average attainment in mathematics at the end of Key Stage 2 in the previous academic year. Pupils make good progress throughout Key Stages 1 and 2. The recent test results for Year 6 pupils indicate that attainment remains above average. The school provides good quality individual and group support for disabled pupils and those with special educational needs, enabling them to make good progress.  Pupils’ behaviour is excellent in lessons and pupils have very good attitudes to learning. They listen attentively and take great care and pride

p.1

Achievement in mathematics

in the presentation of their work. Pupils work well in pairs as well as collaborating in groups, particularly when challenging each other to think.  Pupils’ conceptual understanding is secure. Pupils apply their skills well to solve mathematical problems. They say they enjoy these activities but would like more opportunities to solve real-life problems.

p.2

Quality of teaching in mathematics

The quality of teaching in mathematics is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching in mathematics

 Teaching of mathematics in the Early Years Foundation Stage is good. Planning ensures that a good range of activities and resources is provided for children to enjoy while they explore and learn mathematics. These opportunities enable children to develop their mathematical ideas and, through discussion, they are beginning to use appropriate vocabulary for adding, subtracting and sharing.  Good teaching continues through the school. Teachers and teaching assistants are enthusiastic; they have good relationships with pupils which help to engage pupils in their learning. Teachers have high expectations throughout lessons. They use their subject knowledge well to plan interesting and lively lessons. Assessment is used effectively to plan work to match pupils’ differing needs but activities do not yet consistently provide sufficient challenge for more-able pupils in Key Stages 1 and 2.  Teachers ask good questions to challenge pupils’ thinking which helps to

p.2

Quality of teaching in mathematics

deepen their conceptual understanding and consolidate their mathematical skills. Frequent monitoring throughout whole-class and group activities ensures that pupils’ understanding is checked and any misconceptions are addressed quickly. Teachers’ marking of pupils’ work is effective giving praise as well as helping pupils to know how to improve their work and what they have to learn next.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in mathematics

The quality of the curriculum in mathematics is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in mathematics

 Teachers use the Primary National Strategy materials to inform lesson planning, providing pupils with a well-balanced mathematical curriculum. Mathematics is taught as a discrete subject coupled with occasions when pupils use their skills and knowledge in other subjects. However, this is not sufficiently widespread to help pupils understand the importance of mathematics across the curriculum.  The curriculum is designed successfully to meet the needs of different groups of pupils. Well-trained teaching assistants provide a range of support programmes as required throughout the school.  The school makes very good use of homework to help consolidate skills learnt in lessons. Pupils from all classes can access their homework through the internet whereby teachers can ensure the work is generally challenging and appropriate. During lessons teachers make good use of interactive whiteboards. However, pupils have few opportunities to use a

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in mathematics

range of information and communication technology (ICT) tools to use and apply their mathematical skills and develop independent learning.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in mathematics

The effectiveness of leadership and management in mathematics is good.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in mathematics

 Over the last three years, the leadership team has been rightly focused in the drive to improve mathematics, particularly calculation. All staff have worked together successfully to review policies, particularly the calculations policy, ensuring a consistent approach to the teaching of mathematics. Leaders and managers communicate high expectations, enthuse staff, and have a clear vision for the continual improvement of mathematics.  Self-evaluation is accurate and is used effectively to set clear and realistic improvement priorities. A coherent programme of monitoring includes lesson observations, scrutiny of pupils’ work and talking with pupils. Evaluation links securely to planning and staff training. Rigorous monitoring of pupils’ progress and regular pupil-progress meetings quickly alert teachers to those pupils in need of support.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 ensuring that pupils reinforce their mathematical skills through increasing the opportunities they have to solve real-life problems within mathematics and across the curriculum  increasing the challenge for more-able pupils further by ensuring activities consistently take account of their starting points  providing pupils with more occasions to use a wide range of ICT resources to support their independent learning.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion