Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Kingsdown SchoolOfsted inspection, 3 Jul 2012

Inspected 3 Jul 2012 · published 3 Sept 2012 · URN 137265

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Ofsted inspected Kingsdown School on 3 Jul 2012, led by Jonathan Palk. The overall judgement was Satisfactory. Ofsted published the report on 3 Sept 2012. Source: Ofsted (Open Government Licence v3).

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    3 Jul 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Ann Short, Ian Bryant, Jonathan Palk, Judith Goodchild, Neil Gillespie

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Behaviour and safety verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Quality of teaching verified

    Satisfactory

  • Name on report verified

    Kingsdown School

  • URN verified

    137265

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Behaviour and safetyGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Quality of teachingSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+31Mostly positivemore positive than 42% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingpositiveeffectivegood progressvery wellconsistentlystronghighly effective
Criticisminadequatenot alwaysinconsistentweakervariablenot sufficientlyinsufficientgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1794w+26
  • Leadership528w+33
  • What needs to improve86w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,399
about usual (typical 2796)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
2
typical 3
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 51%Leadership 15%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Age group 11-16 Inspection date(s) 2-3 July 2012 Inspection number 397472 Kingsdown School Inspection report

p.1

Unique reference number 137265 Local authority Swindon Inspection number 397472 Inspection dates 2–3 July 2012 Lead inspector Jonathan Palk HMI

p.1

Type of school Academy converter School category Community Age range of pupils 11–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 1,245 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Reverend David Gray Headteacher Wendy Conaghan Date of previous school inspection 15 October 2008 School address Hyde Road Stratton St Margaret Swindon SN2 7SH Telephone number 01793 822284 Fax number 01793 828726 Email address head@kingsdownschool.co.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.2

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. Inspectors observed 43 lessons taught by 40 teachers. Nine of the lessons were jointly observed with members of the school’s leadership team. One inspector undertook a learning walk comprising a number of short visits to lessons to look at provision for the students with autism. Inspectors joined students at their tutor classes. Discussions were held with senior and middle leaders, staff, the Chair of the Governing Body and different groups of students. Inspectors observed the school’s work, and looked at the school’s self- evaluation and planning documents, external evaluations of the school’s work, policy documents and students’ work. Inspectors took account of the responses to the on- line Parent View survey in planning the inspection and analysed 113 questionnaires sent in by parents and carers, as well as questionnaires completed by a sample of

p.3

Introduction

students from each year group and 48 staff.

p.3

Information about the school

Kingsdown School is a comprehensive secondary school with a specialist status in technology for nine years. This school is larger than average in size. The proportion of students known to be eligible for free school meals is lower than average, as is the proportion of students from minority ethnic groups, including those who speak English as an additional language. The proportion of disabled students and those who have special educational needs, who are supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is similar to that of most schools. The school is the designated centre for secondary-aged children in Swindon with autism. The school meets the government’s floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for students’ attainment and progress. The school holds the Quality in Study Support award, has achieved National Healthy Schools status and is an accredited Investor in People. The school converted to an academy in August 2011.

p.3

Information about the school

There is a privately registered before- and after-school care provision on the school site that is subject to a separate inspection. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Key findings

 This is a satisfactory school. It is improving quickly as a result of good leadership and management at a senior level. It is not a good school because improvements have not accelerated learning to the point where students make consistently good progress and the impact of middle leaders is variable. Schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.  Students’ achievement is satisfactory because they leave school with broadly average standards having made satisfactory progress from their average starting points.  Teaching is satisfactory, with an increasing proportion that is good and, occasionally, outstanding. While lessons are well structured with good reference to expectations as to what students should learn, teachers do not always challenge the students sufficiently and the pace of learning does not always

p.4

Key findings

maintain their engagement. Marking gives students helpful feedback on how they can improve their work.  Behaviour is good in lessons and around the school. Students respond very well to teachers’ consistent expectations of behaviour. The few parents and carers who responded to the Ofsted questionnaire and the students agree that the school is a very safe place. Good behaviour and positive relationships result in an orderly and effective climate for learning.  The school is being driven forward by a strong senior leadership team. Checking on the quality of learning in lessons by subject leaders is not always rigorous enough. Important improvements have been made to systems for assessing and tracking students’ progress. This ensures leaders and teachers can regularly check on their progress towards challenging targets. Self-evaluation has accurately identified the areas for improvement in the school’s development

p.4

Key findings

plan. Performance management is robust and professional development is well matched to the school’s needs. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Increase the proportion of lessons where learning is good, in particular by:  ensuring that all learning activities are closely tailored to meet individual needs and stretch and challenge all students  using questioning and dialogue during lessons to deepen understanding, extend thinking and raise expectations  applying consistently the proven strategies for engaging all students in lessons.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Strengthen the role subject leaders play in strategic school improvement by ensuring that they are more rigorously assessing the impact of teaching on learning in lessons.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

The variations in students’ achievement in subjects are closing quickly and the majority of students now make at least satisfactory progress. Girls are still outperforming boys in a minority of subjects but inspection evidence indicates strongly that these in-school gaps are narrowing. Assessment criteria are increasingly used to support learning. The school’s stronger focus on target setting has led to students making faster progress in the current school year. Attainment is continuing to rise across the core subjects and is likely to meet the challenging targets set by the school in relation to the proportion of students gaining five GCSE A* to C passes, including English and mathematics. Most parents and carers feel their children makes good progress at the school, but the inspection findings indicate that progress is satisfactory when compared to that of students nationally.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

While attainment on entry is average overall, around a third of students join the school each year with above-average attainment. In previous years, only a few of this group have made the progress required to attain A* or A grades in English or mathematics or both. The school’s reliable assessment information and work seen in lessons show that these students now make better progress in all year groups, due to better teaching and adjustment to the curriculum that enables some of these students to start GCSE courses earlier.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Students known to be eligible for free school meals make satisfactory progress, as do students registered to the autistic resource base, together with disabled students and those with special educational needs. An increasing proportion of middle-ability students are on course to achieve expected grades in English, mathematics and science due to some effective interventions in these departments. The most recent analysis of progress between Years 8 and 9 shows greater consistency between different groups of learners, due to timely interventions and improving teaching. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Cooperation, keenness, enthusiasm and the ability to learn independently were key features of the most effective learning observed during lessons. For example, in an outstanding English lesson, open questioning helped move along group discussions on imprisonment and encouraged students thinking at a high level.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Most students, and their parents and carers, were positive about teaching in their responses to the inspection questionnaires. Although inspectors saw examples of good teaching, teaching is satisfactory overall because the attention given to how well students learn is inconsistent across subjects and the school. In a minority of lessons, students are not purposefully engaged with their learning.

p.6

Quality of teaching

The most effective teaching is the result of thorough planning in which lessons are carefully structured and learning objectives clear. Relationships between students and teachers are generally purposeful. In many good lessons, students used assessment criteria well to focus on how to achieve target grades. For example, in one good geography lesson for Year 7, students made good progress because the level of response required of different-ability students was well illustrated. Teachers make good use of their knowledge of students’ different starting points and prior learning, and build on this through smart questions. Marking is thorough in most subjects, and feedback seen in students’ work helps students understand what they need to do to improve their work. Students value the regular and detailed feedback they received on their progress and the next steps in their learning.

p.6

Quality of teaching

In satisfactory lessons, the pace was slower and the planned activities were not sufficiently challenging. Teachers’ questioning did not always extend students’ thinking as some required students only to give a short answer without explaining their reasoning. Students relied too heavily on their teacher in these situations and were not able to develop the skills they need to work independently and take responsibility for their learning. In addition, where teaching is satisfactory, teachers do not check on the learning of particular students or groups of students as the lesson proceeds to assess if they are keeping up or could be challenged to think more deeply.

p.6

Quality of teaching

The teaching of disabled students and those with special educational needs shows similar variation to that of other students. Although, in some cases, activities were matched closely to students’ needs, teachers did not do enough to tailor their questioning to engage students effectively, and some support did not follow the strategies set out in students’ individual education plans. The support in lessons for students to develop their literacy skills is inconsistent and not always effective. There is emphasis on new vocabulary but this is often delivered with insufficient exemplification. Teachers often provide time to reflect and this supports the spiritual aspect of students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Students are positive about behaviour in the school, and the majority felt that it is good in lessons. In discussions, they noted recent improvements in behaviour, and linked this to the impact of a consistent application of the new system of rewards and sanctions. A minority of those parents and carers returning the questionnaire were less positive about students’ behaviour but the school’s own recent survey and inspection evidence supports students’ views, as inspectors found students to be calm, friendly and respectful. The school’s ‘Behaviour for Learning’ facility has had a good impact on students who were previously not engaged with learning, with its focus on achievement as well as reintegration into mainstream classes when behaviour has improved. Exclusion rates are low, with no permanent exclusions this school year. The students’ attendance is consistently high and they are punctual to school.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Students recognise different forms of bullying and are well aware of the school’s strong stance on bullying. In discussions, they generally felt this is dealt with well and that only a limited amount takes place. Parents and carers had a similar view. Students are well aware of the risks associated with the internet and are aware of how to keep safe when surfing the web. They feel that any racist behaviour is dealt with swiftly by staff and that the use of inappropriate language of any sort is not tolerated. As a result, students feel safe in school; a view echoed by the large majority of parents and carers.

p.7

Leadership and management

Since the last inspection, the headteacher, senior and subject leaders, and the governing body have focused successfully on raising achievement and improving the curriculum. At all levels, they strike a good balance between accountability and supporting development. Efforts to improve teaching are now bearing fruit in terms of raising the achievement of middle and higher attainers. Examination results have improved satisfactorily over time. The weaker performance last year in foundation subjects has been tackled robustly and departmental differences are beginning to close because of effective cross-departmental monitoring of students’ progress data by senior leaders. Consequently, the school has the capacity to improve.

p.7

Leadership and management

All leaders are held accountable for students’ achievement and reviews provide a good balance of support and challenge. Ensuring equality of opportunity for all students is a high priority and school leaders do not tolerate discrimination. Systems for monitoring the performance of students and subjects have been significantly strengthened recently and assessment information is being used assiduously to identify and address quickly any underperformance. The school has embarked on a programme to address some students’ weaker literacy skills in Years 7 and 8, and subject leaders are developing subject schemes of work, to identify where literacy skills need to be developed in lessons. The effectiveness of the implementation in lessons is variable. Strategic and departmental planning is based on regular monitoring and evaluation that has led to well-targeted professional development for Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

p.7

Leadership and management

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.8

Leadership and management

staff. However, not all subject leaders are rigorous in their review and monitoring processes, particularly in checking on the quality of learning in lessons. The school has already identified the priority to strengthen this work and fully embed it into the departmental accountability cycle to ensure consistent practice across the school.

p.8

Leadership and management

The curriculum is broad, balanced and meets the needs of most students well. There are fewer differences in the progress of groups of pupils, and a gap between boys and girls is closing. Provision now meets the higher-attaining students’ needs as effectively as it is currently doing for those of other students. There are good opportunities to develop spiritual, moral, social and cultural understanding through clubs and enrichment days. Parents and carers are kept very well informed of their children’s progress through regular reports and are very supportive of the homework and intervention programmes set up by departments. They hold very positive views of the school. The governing body is well informed, challenging and ensures safeguarding requirements are fully met.

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 54 42 2 2 Primary schools 14 49 32 6 Secondary schools 20 39 34 7 Special schools 33 45 20 3 Pupil referral units 9 55 28 8 All schools 16 47 31 6

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September to 31 December 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Floor standards the national minimum expectation of attainment and progression measures.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.

p.10

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.11

Inspection of Kingsdown School, Swindon SN2 7SH

Thank you for the help that you gave to the inspection team when we visited your school recently. Particular thanks to those of you who gave up time to join discussions and share your work with the inspectors, and to those of you who completed the questionnaire. We judged your school to be satisfactory overall. A number of things have improved since inspectors last visited, particularly the processes for accurately assessing your progress. This helps improve your learning in some, but not all your lessons. Consequently, examination results are improving in most subjects. The very positive relationships you have with adults and with each other make school a supportive place where everyone strives to succeed and you feel very safe. Your good behaviour and obvious enjoyment of learning show in your continuing excellent attendance and punctuality. You generally work hard and make an important contribution to the running of the school, through, for example, the

p.11

Inspection of Kingsdown School, Swindon SN2 7SH

student council and the anti-bullying prefects.

p.11

Inspection of Kingsdown School, Swindon SN2 7SH

The good leadership means the school is well placed to improve further. It is evident from our inspection that the most important thing for the school is to continue to improve the quality of teaching and, in particular, your learning in lessons, so we have asked the school leaders to ensure that:

p.11

Inspection of Kingsdown School, Swindon SN2 7SH

 that there are more lessons in which your learning and progress are good; we have also asked that subject leaders play a greater role in ensuring that learning is the best it can be in their departments.

p.11

Inspection of Kingsdown School, Swindon SN2 7SH

We are confident that all of you will continue to work with staff to achieve these things and we wish you every success in the future.

p.11

Inspection of Kingsdown School, Swindon SN2 7SH

Jonathan Palk Her Majesty’s Inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion