Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Derbyshire County Council in Derbyshire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
20 Sept 2012
- Inspectors verified
Catherine Honey
- URN verified
SC035976
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- ensure children’s safety and welfare is promoted in the home. p.4
- This is in relation to formalising written risk management strategies in relation to older teenagers being occasionally without adult supervision (NMS 4.2) p.4
- ensure where only one member of staff is on duty at any time, a risk assessment has been carried out in writing, identifying any likely risks to children, staff and members of the public (NMS 17.9) p.4
- ensure there is an emergency escape plan that all staff and children are familiar with and have practiced so they know what to do in an emergency. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 882
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC035976 Inspection date 20/09/2012 Inspector Catherine Honey Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 02/05/2012 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
This children's home is registered to a local authority. The home can accommodate up to four young people aged between 10 and 17 years with emotional and behavioural difficulties.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making satisfactory progress .
p.3
Progress
At the previous inspection in May 2012, the home received an overall judgement of Good. There was one requirement and one recommendation made. The home has taken action to meet both the requirement and recommendation. At this inspection, three recommendations have been made.
p.3
Progress
The Registered Manager has made substantial progress towards meeting the requirement and recommendation made at the last inspection. Record keeping in relation to sanctions and restorative actions have been reviewed and has a changed format. The new format helps staff consider in more detail the reason why they are using a sanction. It also encourages staff to evaluate more frequently the effectiveness of a sanction. Use of sanctions in the home is still low and better recording helps improve the quality of care young people receive.
p.3
Progress
At the last inspection, a recommendation was raised about internal furnishings and maintenance of the home. Since then a large part of the home has been refurbished. This has included wall decorations, new blinds and carpets as well as refurbished bathrooms. The garden area has also been improved. There remain some finishing touches to be completed in other parts of the home but overall the home now presents as much more modern, up-to-date and homely. Young people like the changes which complement the lounge area which was also refurbished recently.
p.3
Progress
Young people continue to receive a high quality of care. They are cared for by staff who know them very well and are concerned for their welfare. Staff work closely with other professionals such as those in health and education to secure the best outcomes for young people. Young people who are not in education are offered different opportunities to engage in programmes which suit their needs. Young people are regularly consulted about matters that affect them such as menus, holidays, activities and their future. Young people are encouraged to voice their opinions formally and informally. The quality of care for young people provided by the home has been maintained.
p.4
Progress
Young people who are approaching independence are encouraged to be as independent as possible. This might include managing their own money or going and getting a haircut by themselves. Occasionally, older young people are left in the home without staff supervision. Young people enjoy the freedom this opportunity gives them. Appropriate risk management strategies are put in place to ensure the safety of young people when this does occur. However, this assessment of risk has not been formalised in a written document meaning risk management strategies may not be consistent between staff. In addition, where staff work alone with young people, there is no risk assessment in place. This means that the risks to young people or staff or visitors have not been adequately assessed. These shortfalls have not affected outcomes for young people.
p.4
Progress
There have been some small changes in staff since the last inspection. New members of staff are given a good induction to the home. They are offered numerous training opportunities and feel confident in their role. New staff have received fire induction training about their responsibilities in relation to a fire prevention. However, there has been a delay in new staff and new residents being able to take part in a fire drill. Therefore they may not be familiar with what to do in the event of an emergency evacuation.
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.4
Recommendations
ensure children’s safety and welfare is promoted in the home. This is in relation to formalising written risk management strategies in relation to older teenagers being occasionally without adult supervision (NMS 4.2) ensure where only one member of staff is on duty at any time, a risk assessment has been carried out in writing, identifying any likely risks to children, staff and members of the public (NMS 17.9) ensure there is an emergency escape plan that all staff and children are familiar with and have practiced so they know what to do in an emergency. (NMS 10.9)
p.4
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.6
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection (March 2011).
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion