Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Queen Elizabeth's

Inspected 28 Jun 2012 · published 19 Jul 2012 · URN 136646

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    28 Jun 2012

  • Inspectors AI-checked

    David Nebesnuick, Marcia Headon, Norma Welsby, Paula Lahey, Peter Sanderson, Sally Hall, Wendy Delf

  • Name on report verified

    Queen Elizabeth's Academy Trust

  • URN verified

    136646

Page 1 of 15
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+36Positivemore positive than 19% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingeffectivepositiveexcellenteffectivelystrengthsconsistentlyrobust
Criticisminadequateconcerninconsistentweakernot sufficientlynot alwaysinsufficientconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings2327w+19
  • Leadership1111w+48
  • What needs to improve162w+79

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
15
Words of findings
3,588
about usual (typical 3042)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 48%Leadership 23%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 25%

Full report text

Age group 11–18 Inspection date(s) 26–28 June 2012 Inspection number 382231 Queen Elizabeth's Academy Trust Inspection report

p.1

Unique reference number 136646 Local authority N/A Inspection number 382231 Inspection dates 26–28 June 2012 Lead inspector Peter Sanderson HMI

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection of boarding provision was carried out under the Children Act 1989, as amended by the Care Standards Act 2000, having regard to the national minimum standards for boarding schools.

p.1

Type of school Academy converter School category Non-maintained Age range of pupils 11–18 Gender of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 1513 Of which, number on roll in the sixth form 262 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Demitri Coryton (Acting) Principal Richard Newton-Chance Date of previous school inspection 4 March 2009 School address Western Road Crediton EX17 3LU Telephone number 01363 773401 Fax number 01363 777859 Email address admin@queenelizabeths.devon.sch.uk

p.1

Boarding/Residential provision Queen Elizabeth's Boarding Social care unique reference number SC022233 Social care inspector Paula Lahey HMI achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.1

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.2

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

Norma Welsby Social Care Regulatory Inspector

p.3

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. Inspectors observed teaching and learning in 37 lessons, taught by 36 teachers. In addition, one inspector made a number of short visits to lessons with the college’s special educational needs coordinator to focus specifically on the support for disabled students and those with special educational needs. Meetings were held with students, members of the governing body and college staff, including the Principal, senior and middle leaders. Inspectors took account of the responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) in planning the inspection. They observed the college’s work, including scrutinising students’ books, and looked at a range of documents, including the college improvement plan, attendance, exclusion and assessment data. They also analysed 301 parental questionnaires as well as those returned from students and staff.

p.3

Information about the school

Queen Elizabeth’s is a larger than average secondary school. Nearly all students are White British. The proportion of students whose first language is not English is below average. The proportion of students known to be eligible for free school meals is below that found in most schools. The college has a specialist resource base which is funded for eight students with statements for dyslexia. The proportion of disabled students or those with special educational needs who are supported at school action plus or with a statement is similar to the national average. The college has specialist status in technology and humanities. It is also designated as a training school and became an academy converter in April 2011. The college is located on two main sites, one mile apart, in different areas of Crediton. Years 7 and 8 are on one site, with Years 9 to 13 and the boarding houses on the other. The college meets the

p.3

Information about the school

current government floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for students’ attainment and progress by the end of Key Stage 4. The college has a number of awards including Sportsmark, Artsmark and Investors in People. The college is the only state boarding school in Devon. Boarding is provided for boys and girls aged between 11 and 19 years. There are currently 50 boarders. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Key findings

 The overall effectiveness of the college is satisfactory. The boarding experience and outcomes are good. The college has a friendly, welcoming ethos, students behave well and their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. The college is no longer judged good because inconsistencies in teaching mean that students are making satisfactory rather than good progress in Years 7 to 11. Schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.  Attainment at the end of Year 11 is broadly average. Students’ achievement between Years 7 and 11 is satisfactory, but it is good in the sixth form. The achievement of disabled students or those with special educational needs, including those in the resource base, is satisfactory.  The quality of teaching is satisfactory but inconsistent. In the best lessons,

p.4

Key findings

teachers make good use of assessment data to plan engaging lessons that are well matched to students’ needs and questioning effectively explores students’ understanding. In less effective lessons, planning takes little account of the varying needs of learners, teachers talk for too long, do not actively involve students in learning and questioning is not used effectively to check students’ learning or understanding. The quality of written feedback to students also varies in quality across the college.  The overall effectiveness of the sixth form is good. Given their starting points students make good progress and achieve well. Teaching in the sixth form is good.  Students’ behaviour is good in lessons and around both college sites. Students feel safe with very little concern regarding bullying. Attendance is above the national average and exclusion rates are low.  Senior leaders have a sound understanding of the college’s strengths and

p.4

Key findings

weaknesses. Recent improvement strategies, including performance management procedures, have had a positive impact on improving teaching and accelerating students’ achievement, particularly in English. However, monitoring and tracking information is not being used strategically or robustly enough by both senior and middle leaders to ensure consistently good teaching, marking and achievement across the college. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Key findings

 The overall effectiveness of the boarding experience is good. The quality of care provided, robust safeguarding arrangements, and effective leadership and management of the boarding provision ensure that boarders achieve successful outcomes. All national minimum standards are met; however, boarding handbook information requires improvement.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve teaching to be consistently good or better in order to increase students’ progress in lessons and raise attainment, by ensuring that:  all teachers make effective use of data on students’ attainment and learning needs to plan and teach lessons that are sufficiently challenging for all students  all teachers plan and deliver engaging lessons that actively involve students in the learning process to further develop their independent learning and thinking skills  all teachers use effective targeted questioning to explore and develop students’ knowledge and understanding  students are given consistently good written feedback so that they are clear about what they need to do to improve.  Ensure monitoring and tracking information is used both strategically and robustly by both senior and middle leaders to secure consistently good teaching, marking and achievement across the school.  Revise the boarding handbook to ensure that the information is provided in a

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

format that can be easily understood by all students.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Students’ attainment on entry to the college is average. The attainment of students at the end of Year 11 has been broadly average for the past three years. The achievement of students between Years 7 and 11 is satisfactory, although there is some variation between subjects. For example, the progress made by Year 11 students in mathematics was satisfactory in 2011, it was weaker although satisfactory in science, but below expected levels in English. Lesson observations, scrutiny of work and assessment data analysed during this inspection indicate that attainment is rising in the college and that progress in English is accelerating and is now satisfactory.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Students have positive attitudes to learning and good relationships with teachers support their learning well. When students are given the opportunity to be actively involved in their learning they respond well and make good or even better progress. For example, in an outstanding Year 8 religious education lesson students were fully engaged and worked extremely effectively in pairs to produce presentations on possible conflicts between religious and scientific ideas. However, in some lessons teachers do not sufficiently match the level or nature of tasks to students’ capabilities Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Achievement of pupils

or specific needs and this is resulting in some variation in the achievement of different groups of students. For example, the progress made by boys between Years 7 and 11 has been below that of girls for the past three years and the progress made by Year 11 students entitled to free school meals was below the national average for similar students in 2011. The college is aware of these issues and effective action is being taken to address them. Lesson observations and analysis of college tracking data indicate that the achievement of both these groups of students is accelerating. Disabled students or those with special educational needs make similar satisfactory progress to their peers. Regular tracking of progress ensures that individual needs are quickly identified and appropriate in-class support organised. However, not all teachers are effectively planning for the specific learning needs of these students.

p.6

Achievement of pupils

Those students in the resource base with specific learning difficulties receive effective additional support .

p.6

Achievement of pupils

The school has rightly identified the need to improve the literacy skills of students, particularly boys. There is a whole-school focus on the development of students’ literacy skills, and the opportunities for them to produce pieces of extended writing. Some good examples were seen of effective approaches being used to develop students’ literacy skills, including reading, in a few subjects and this is beginning to have a positive impact on raising students’ achievement. However, this approach is not firmly embedded across all subjects.

p.6

Achievement of pupils

The attainment of students entering the sixth form is lower than that seen nationally across all sixth forms. The progress made by students in Year 12 is satisfactory and the percentage of students continuing to follow courses in Year 13 is similar to the national average. The progress made by those students continuing to follow courses in Year 13 accelerates, and A-level examination results are similar those seen nationally. Given their starting points, the achievement of students in the sixth form is good; however, as in Years 7 to 11, there is some variation in achievement between subjects. Outcomes for boarders are good, particularly regarding the development of their personal, social and emotional skills. Academically they are achieving as well as day pupils.

p.6

Quality of teaching

The very large majority of parents and carers returning questionnaires judged that their children are taught well and make good progress in their learning. However, a number of parents and carers made reference to variations in the quality of teaching in the college and the quality and frequency of homework that is set. Inspectors agree there is both good and outstanding teaching in the college but overall it is too inconsistent in quality. There is too much satisfactory teaching and a very small amount that is inadequate. As a result, students make satisfactory rather than good progress over time between Years 7 to 11. Teaching in the sixth form is good, resulting in good outcomes.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Teachers have good subject knowledge and this is generally used well to plan lessons that are clearly linked to intended learning outcomes. In the better lessons, Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Quality of teaching

activities creatively involve students in learning through interesting tasks that are well matched to their ability. In these lessons, careful, directed questioning from the teacher also explores and develops students understanding well. For example, in an engaging Year 10 science lesson students developed a good understanding of how to calculate the energy content of food by designing and carrying out their own investigations. During the practical work, the teacher checked and challenged the students’ thinking through effective questioning as he circulated around the groups. Where the quality of teaching is no better than satisfactory, the features of these best lessons are not always evident. In these lessons, teachers talk for too long and do not provide interesting activities that actively engage and motivate students and help develop their independent learning and thinking skills. Tasks tend to be set at

p.7

Quality of teaching

one level and there is insufficient support for lower attaining students or insufficient challenge for the more able. Questioning tends to only check students’ knowledge, rather than delving deeper to explore and develop their understanding.

p.7

Quality of teaching

A range of suitable teaching strategies supports disabled students and those with special educational needs. Amongst the most effective of these are in-class support by specially trained learning assistants and small-group teaching. Lesson plans identify students with special needs and in the majority of cases outline targeted approaches to support their learning. Where appropriate, the majority of teachers also provide prompt sheets to help students organise their ideas confidently.

p.7

Quality of teaching

Students are aware of their targets and how well they are doing; however, they are less clear about what they must improve. Some marking is of high quality, follows the new college guidelines and provides clear advice to students about how to move from one level or grade to another. However, this good practice is not consistent across the college and teachers’ written comments vary in the detail and advice that they provide.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

There is a calm and pleasant atmosphere around both college sites during break and lunchtimes. Generally, students behave well and are respectful of each other. They socialise well and have a good moral understanding of right and wrong. Questionnaires returned by parents, carers and students indicate that they believe behaviour is generally good in the college, although a number did raise some concerns over low-level disruption in lessons. Inspectors found that behaviour in lessons is good and on the rare occasion when low-level disruption occurs, it is in almost all cases a response to less engaging teaching. The attendance of students has improved during the past year and is now above average. Exclusions from college are below average. Behaviour for learning is generally good, particularly where teachers provide opportunities for students to think and learn for themselves and promote independent working. The very large majority of parents and carers

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

think that their children are safe and are well looked after. Students reported that they felt safe and that incidents of bullying were rare, and they were confident that the college dealt effectively with any incidents that did occur. Students showed a good understanding of different types of bullying, including cyber bullying and that Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

based on prejudice, including homophobic bullying.

p.8

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Boarding students feel safe and well cared for. They are provided with good guidance and information about how to keep themselves safe and secure in various situations. This has included training in using the internet and social media safely. Boarders report that bullying is very rare and staff follow up any incidents appropriately. There are effective safeguarding procedures which are implemented stringently by staff. The college counsellor and nurse provide students with excellent support and guidance to help them make safe and considered choices. This ensures students’ emotional and physical health needs are well met. Behaviour in boarding is good. There is a positive approach to managing behaviour and boarders like the recently implemented reward system.

p.8

Leadership and management

The high expectations of senior leaders are evident in the challenging targets set for students. The progress of students towards these targets is tracked well and information is stored centrally and available to all staff. Some middle leaders analyse this data forensically to highlight areas of weaker performance and drive improvement, but this good practice is not consistently in place across the college. Senior leaders recognise that for a period following the previous inspection the monitoring of teaching was not sufficiently frequent or robust. As a result, the overall quality of teaching declined from good to satisfactory. In the past year, more frequent and robust systems for monitoring teaching have been put in place. This, combined with effective support and professional development for members of staff, is beginning to have a positive impact. Although teaching remains satisfactory, it is improving. Line management meetings between senior and middle leaders are

p.8

Leadership and management

becoming increasingly effective at driving improvement; however, they are not ensuring sufficient consistency in teaching, marking and students’ achievement across the college. Senior and middle leaders have a sound understanding of the college’s strengths and weaknesses and a clear plan is in place to drive improvement. Recent successful action to improve teaching, achievement in English and attendance, plus maintenance of good behaviour, and the quality of the boarding experience demonstrate the college’s capacity for improvement.

p.8

Leadership and management

The curriculum is suitably broad and balanced. The college provides many good opportunities for students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development through subjects such as ‘world issues’ and through the college’s cross-curricular focus on ‘skills for success’. These opportunities, plus the broad range of extra-curricular activities available to students, ensure they leave the college as well-rounded young citizens.

p.8

Leadership and management

The governing body is experienced and knowledgeable and is aware of the college’s strengths and areas for improvement. The governors provide senior leaders with an appropriate level of challenge. The governing body works with managers to ensure that safeguarding arrangements meet all statutory requirements. The importance the college places on equality of opportunity is evident in the successful work it is Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.8

Leadership and management

undertaking to close the achievement gap between groups of students. Discrimination in any form is not tolerated. Some parents and carers expressed a concern during the inspection that the issues they raised with college leaders were not always taken sufficiently seriously or responded to promptly. This concern was shared and discussed with the senior leadership team.

p.9

Leadership and management

Leadership and management of boarding are good. All of the required boarding policies are in place and they are implemented effectively. Boarders and parents and carers are happy with boarding arrangements and their impact, particularly on their children’s personal development. Boarding managers regularly assess the quality of boarding provision. This includes termly self-evaluation against boarding standards and the regular monitoring of records. As a result, boarding managers have a good understanding of the strengths and areas for improvement and a suitably challenging development plan is in place. The provision demonstrates capacity for continuing improvement in that action has been taken to successfully address recommendations from the previous boarding inspection. This has included a new behaviour and rewards system, improvements to the accommodation, more robust medication systems and improved consultation with boarding students.

p.9

Boarding provision

The overall effectiveness of the boarding experience is good. Outcomes and the quality of provision for boarders are also good. The experience of boarding has a positive impact on developing personal, social and learning outcomes for students. Boarders develop self-confidence, learn practical and social skills, and take increasing responsibility for managing their academic and social programme. Consequently, boarders are independent and emotionally resilient. Students recognise that the experience of boarding life has prepared them well for further education and adult life.

p.10

Boarding provision

The quality of relationships and behaviour within the boarding provision are strong and positive. There is a unified approach to welcoming new students, underpinned by mutual respect and encouragement of each other. Consequently, boarders enjoy a sense of belonging and feel a genuine affinity to the boarding community. Boarders value their friendships with peers and the successful and constructive relationships they enjoy with members of staff. Boarders feel cared for and secure; they are confident that their worries or concerns are responded to positively and they are given appropriate guidance to make good choices. Boarding staff are positive role models and are skilled at balancing a nurturing approach with maintaining safe boundaries. Induction for new students is carefully managed; however, written information about the boarding provision is not available in a format that can be easily understood by all boarders.

p.10

Boarding provision

Pastoral support is purposeful and effective. Comprehensive care planning, risk assessment, and robust management of medication underpin this. Boarders are provided with excellent information, guidance, and support relating to health and emotional well-being. Boarders enjoy healthy lifestyles and are motivated to keep themselves active and fit. Boarding practices foster a sense of responsibility for learning and education. Teaching and boarding staff work together to monitor students’ achievement and provide support for homework.

p.10

Boarding provision

Consultation with boarders has improved. Regular house meetings and boarders council sessions have ensured students are empowered to influence the running of boarding. Students have recently produced a newsletter, aptly titled Boarderline, to keep boarders and their families up to date with developments and activities. There is a good range of purposeful and interesting leisure activities. Boarders make good use of the college facilities and enjoy being enabled to spend free time in the local community. Boarders spoke enthusiastically about the residential holidays and how they helped them to settle into boarding, make enduring friendships, and have the confidence to try new experiences.

p.10

Boarding provision

Since the last inspection positive changes have been made to the accommodation. This has resulted in improved bathroom facilities and more modern and homely communal areas.

p.10

National minimum standards

 The school meets all the national minimum standards for boarding schools.

p.11

National minimum standards

These are the grades for the boarding provision

p.11

National minimum standards

Overall effectiveness of the boarding experience 2

p.11

National minimum standards

Quality of boarding provision and care 2

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.12

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 46 46 8 0 Primary schools 8 47 40 5 Secondary schools 14 38 40 8 Special schools 28 48 20 4 Pupil referral units 15 50 29 5 All schools 11 46 38 6

p.12

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.12

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons, and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.

p.13

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.14

Crediton EX17 3LU

Thank you for being so welcoming when inspectors came to inspect your college recently. We very much enjoyed our discussions with you. Now that we have finished the inspection, we wanted to let you know our findings. We think the college provides you with a satisfactory education in Years 7 to 11. The overall effectiveness of the sixth form and boarding experience are good. Here is a list of the college’s main strengths.  The college has a friendly, welcoming ethos. Your behaviour in lessons and around both college sites is good.  You told us that you feel safe and that you are confident staff will deal quickly and effectively with any concerns you raise with them.  As a result of good teaching in the sixth form you are making good progress in the subjects you are following.  You enjoy college and your attendance is above average.  The college provides many good opportunities for your spiritual, moral, social

p.14

Crediton EX17 3LU

and cultural development, both in lessons and through the broad range of extra-curricular activities on offer. This is helping you develop into well-rounded young citizens.  Those of you who are boarders spoke positively about your boarding experiences.

p.14

Crediton EX17 3LU

You told us that the quality of teaching varies across the college. We agree. Although there is some good and outstanding teaching in the college, there is too much that is satisfactory to ensure that you make good progress between Years 7 and 11. To improve teaching we have asked senior leaders to ensure that all teachers provide you with engaging tasks that are well matched to your ability, questioning is used effectively to check your learning and understanding, and, that marking gives you clear advice about how to improve. We have also asked college leaders to ensure that you make similar, good progress in all your subjects. We have asked those managing the boarding provision to ensure the boarding handbook can be easily understood by all boarders.

p.14

Crediton EX17 3LU

You can help to make these improvements by continuing to attend regularly and continuing to get actively involved in activities arranged for you by staff.

p.14

Crediton EX17 3LU

Peter Sanderson Her Majesty’s Inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.14

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion