Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)
Moorthorpe Primary School With Inclusion Resource
Summary
John Rutherford (lead), Rosemary Batty
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
27 Jun 2012
- Inspectors verified
John Rutherford, Rosemary Batty
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Satisfactory
- Name on report verified
Moorthorpe Primary School
- URN verified
130863
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2007.
- OverallSatisfactory
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. p.9
- An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.9
- One of the new middle leaders makes an exceptionally strong contribution to safeguarding and provision for disabled pupils and those with special educational needs. p.7
- The new headteacher and deputy headteacher have formed a very strong partnership and their effective management of teachers’ performance is a key driver in the school’s improvement. p.4
- Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs make good progress because a new middle leader has greatly improved methods for identifying their needs and planning well-matched support. p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. p.9
- An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. p.9
- Their plans for tackling weaknesses have removed the school’s causes for concern without delay, demonstrating that they are well placed to raise standards further. p.7
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- improve the work of middle leaders so that they all make an equally strong contribution to monitoring provision and pupils’ outcomes across the school and to leading improvements where required p.5
- target more support and challenge towards the small group of pupils whose frequent absences have a negative impact on their own achievement and on the school’s ability to reach its target for above-average attendance. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 2,339
- shorter than usual (typical 3005)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 44
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 3
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Age group 3 – 11 Inspection date(s) 26 – 27 June 2012 Inspection number 385698 Moorthorpe Primary School Inspection report
p.1
Unique reference number 130863 Local authority Wakefield Inspection number 385698 Inspection dates 26 – 27 June 2012 Lead inspector John Rutherford HMI
p.1
This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 which gives Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills (HMCI) the authority to cause any school to be inspected. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.
p.1
Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 3 – 11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 203 Appropriate authority The Governing Body Chair Mark Spink Headteacher Edward Cottle Date of previous school inspection 28 June 2011 School address Regent Street Moorthorpe Pontefract West Yorkshire WF9 2BL Telephone number 01977 723860 Fax number 01977 723860 Email address headteacher@moorthorpe.wakefield.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked
p.1
after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey repor ts and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.2
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.
p.2
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.2
Introduction
John Rutherford Her Majesty’s Inspector Rosemary Batty Additional inspector
p.3
Introduction
This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. Inspectors spent eight hours observing 20 lessons and support groups taught by 13 teachers and teaching assistants. Meetings were held with the headteacher, senior and middle leaders, pupils, a small number of parents, the chair of the governing body and a representative of the local authority. Inspectors took account of the responses to the on-line Parent View survey in planning the inspection. During the inspection, they observed the school’s work and looked at a range of documents including those relating to pupils’ progress, self-evaluation, improvement planning and safeguarding. No questionnaires were requested from pupils, staff or parents and carers for this inspection.
p.3
Information about the school
The school is similar in size to most primary schools. One in five pupils is known to be eligible for free school meals, which is broadly average. A small proportion of pupils are from minority ethnic backgrounds or have English as an additional language. One in eight pupils is supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs, which is above average. The school has Healthy Schools’ status and has received the Sports Activemark and Open Futures curriculum awards. It has met the government’s current floor standard, which sets out the minimum expectations for attainment and progress.
p.3
Information about the school
The school was placed in special measures following the inspection which took place in June 2011. Since then a new headteacher has been appointed on a temporary contract and there have been significant changes to staffing and the governing body.
p.3
Key findings
This is a satisfactory school. It has improved considerably in the past year. In accordance with section 13(4) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that the school no longer requires special measures. The school is not yet good because the very effective teaching found in some classes is not consistent across the school. Furthermore, not all of the middle leaders are having an equally strong impact on raising achievement and the attendance of a small but significant group of pupils is below average. Schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.
p.4
Key findings
Standards in English and mathematics are broadly average. Pupils make good progress in the Early Years Foundation Stage and satisfactory progress in Key Stages 1 and 2. Pupils’ writing is improving strongly, however, the progress of less-able readers in Key Stage 2 is limited because they are not all confident with letters and sounds.
p.4
Key findings
Teaching is satisfactory overall. In a minority of classes, very stimulating teaching makes the pupils eager to learn and tasks are carefully adapted to meet their learning needs. These strengths are not seen in all classes and, as a result, some of the more-able pupils are not being stretched enough.
p.4
Key findings
Pupils’ behaviour is good, they feel safe and they work very hard, which helps them to make better progress.
p.4
Key findings
Leadership and management are satisfactory overall. The new headteacher and deputy headteacher have formed a very strong partnership and their effective management of teachers’ performance is a key driver in the school’s improvement. An imaginative curriculum motivates pupils to learn. It also makes a strong contribution to their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development.
p.4
What does the school need to do to improve further?
To improve achievement from satisfactory to good, the school should:
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
ensure more consistently good practice in relation to the following aspects of teaching by: planning tasks that meet the needs of all groups of pupils in lessons, especially the more able keeping all pupils thoroughly engaged in learning, especially during the introductory parts of lessons increasing the skills of less-able Key Stage 2 readers in using letters and sounds to tackle new words planning lessons with a much sharper focus for learning marking work in a way that makes clear to pupils what their next steps of learning are and gives them an opportunity to respond.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
improve the work of middle leaders so that they all make an equally strong contribution to monitoring provision and pupils’ outcomes across the school and to leading improvements where required
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
target more support and challenge towards the small group of pupils whose frequent absences have a negative impact on their own achievement and on the school’s ability to reach its target for above-average attendance.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
When children start in Early Years Foundation Stage, their skills and knowledge are below those typical for their age. They make good progress, especially in developing their language, mathematical and social skills and these are broadly in line with national averages by the time they leave the Reception Year. School records, lesson observations and analysis of work show that pupils make satisfactory progress in Key Stages 1 and 2, therefore, by the end of Year 6 their standards in English and mathematics are broadly average. This represents a considerable improvement since the previous inspection. Pupils’ writing has improved significantly, which is the result of more systematic teaching of basic skills combined with very imaginative tasks linked to cross-curricular topics, such as the ‘dragons’ or ‘pirates’. Pupils have well-developed skills in communication which they put to good use in discussion and drama. This, in conjunction with their
p.5
Achievement of pupils
ability to work independently and to persevere with challenging problems, contributes to their improving progress.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Pupils’ reading, though satisfactory, is not improving as rapidly as their writing, especially for the less-able in Key Stage 2. They have adequate skills in recognising known words or working them out from their meaning, but when faced with a new word, they do not always have sufficient skills to sound it out. Staff have recently undertaken training to improve their work in teaching letters and sounds, however, new approaches are not yet thoroughly established. Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs make good progress because a new middle leader has greatly improved methods for identifying their needs and planning well-matched support. The same approaches are beginning to be applied for more-able pupils, but it is too early to see any positive impact, therefore the progress of many coasts along at no more than a satisfactory pace.
p.5
Quality of teaching
The quality of teaching is satisfactory overall. There is no longer any of the inadequate teaching that was found in the previous inspection and a small proportion of it is good or outstanding. Where teaching is most effective, pupils make good progress in developing literacy and numeracy skills because teachers link them to other subjects of the curriculum in very stimulating ways. For example, some Key Stage 2 pupils extended their writing skills considerably in a task stemming from their role play about third-class passengers on the Titanic. In the Early Years Foundation Stage, children’s interest and progress are increased in many areas of learning by linking them to the theme of ‘Africa’ and planning exciting activities, such as a visit by a group of African drummers. These experiences also make a strong contribution to pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Teachers and teaching assistants work well together,
p.6
Quality of teaching
sharing responsibility for groups of more-able pupils, disabled pupils or those with special educational needs to ensure that they receive appropriate support or challenge.
p.6
Quality of teaching
The strongest teachers use a good range of methods for ensuring pupils are always paying attention and are fully involved in the lesson, for example, breaking up explanations with mini challenges for all pupils or carefully targeting questions so that every pupil knows it could be their turn next. Teachers use these activities well to assess pupils’ understanding and change the lesson if necessary. Where teaching is less effective, pupils sit and listen inactively for too long and occasionally spend too much time on tasks that are not pitched at the right level for them. This particularly restricts the progress of more-able pupils who are not sufficiently stretched. Some lessons do not have a sufficiently sharp focus to give a clear direction for pupils’ learning or for what teachers need to assess to evaluate their progress. As a result, the marking of pupils’ work does not always make clear whether pupils have reached a specific learning objective or what they still need to
p.6
Behaviour and safety of pupils
Pupils’ behaviour during the inspection was good and they showed very positive attitudes to work. This is typical of their usual conduct because the same judgement was made in the previous inspection and in the Ofsted monitoring visits that have been carried out since. The youngest children in Early Years Foundation Stage are eager learners and they settle well to learning their letters and sounds. Many older pupils recognise that they have a responsibility to help the school remove its causes for concern and they have increased their effort accordingly. This is typical of the responsibility shown by many pupils. Another example is the work of Key Stage 1 and older Key Stage 2 pupils in producing DVDs to illustrate the negative effects of anti-social behaviour and the misuse of mobile phones. These are of very high quality and have been widely used in the community by the local police service.
p.6
Behaviour and safety of pupils
Pupils enjoy school very much. The attendance of most is above average, however, the frequent absences of a small group lowers the overall figure to average. Pupils talk very confidently and fluently about why they feel safe, having had much guidance from staff and visiting experts on how to avoid sexual abuse, cyber-bullying and inappropriate internet use. They do not feel under any significant threat of bullying and their curriculum helps them to understand the importance of respect for people from different backgrounds.
p.7
Leadership and management
Leadership and management are satisfactory. While the headteacher and deputy headteacher provide strong direction, leadership and management are not good overall because the role of middle leaders is not fully developed. As a result, improvements to teaching are not thoroughly embedded in every class. One of the new middle leaders makes an exceptionally strong contribution to safeguarding and provision for disabled pupils and those with special educational needs. However, others have not developed the same level of skill in improving practice across the school. The new leadership of safeguarding has led to the removal of concerns identified in the previous inspection and the school now meets requirements.
p.7
Leadership and management
Senior leaders improved the school very quickly after it went into special measures. Supported well by the governing body, they dealt assertively with difficult staffing issues while also raising morale. Their performance management ensures all staff have the skills necessary to tackle priorities for improvement. Through systematic monitoring of teaching and pupils’ progress, senior leaders have an accurate understanding of strengths and weaknesses. Their plans for tackling weaknesses have removed the school’s causes for concern without delay, demonstrating that they are well placed to raise standards further. The governing body monitors the school’s improvement closely and knows in detail the strengths and remaining weaknesses. On the basis of this, they make a good contribution to strategic planning.
p.7
Leadership and management
When analysing pupils’ progress, senior leaders identify those who are falling behind because of their circumstances, for example, those who speak English as an additional language, those who are looked after by the local authority or those who have social and emotional difficulties. They quickly provide carefully tailored support which accelerates their progress and gives them an equal opportunity to achieve their expected standards.
p.7
Leadership and management
The curriculum is good because it combines subjects into very interesting topics which contribute significantly to pupils’ improving literacy and numeracy skills. It is enriched by visits, for example, archaeological activities at a university and learning history first-hand in a Jacobean mansion. It also provides pupils with what they regard as the ‘experiences of a lifetime’, for example, an outstanding production of Macbeth in a nearby theatre which involved all Year 5 and 6 pupils in such activities as acting, internet research, budgeting, writing reports and preparing costumes. The curriculum makes a strong contribution to pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development through, for example, planned opportunities to learn about other countries and faiths such as Africa and Judaism, and for exploring in depth what binds people together or drives them apart.
p.7
Leadership and management
A small number of parents and carers spoke to the lead inspector saying how much the school had improved during the past year, how approachable they found senior leaders and staff and how they valued the increased encouragement to be involved in organising school activities, such as preparing the Jubilee celebrations.
p.8
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Nursery schools 54 42 2 2 Primary schools 14 49 32 6 Secondary schools 20 39 34 7 Special schools 33 45 20 3 Pupil referral units 9 55 28 8 All schools 16 47 31 6
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September to 31 December 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.
p.9
Common terminology used by inspectors
Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attendance the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Floor standards the national minimum expectation of attainment and progression measures.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.
p.10
carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s
main findings from the inspection of their school.
p.11
Inspection of Moorthorpe Primary School, Pontefract, WF9 2BL
Thank you very much indeed for your help when I came with my colleague to inspect your school. We found our discussions with you very useful in helping us to judge that your school provides you with a satisfactory quality of education. This means that your school has improved considerably since it was placed in special measures a year ago, therefore, we have decided that these special measures can be removed.
p.11
Inspection of Moorthorpe Primary School, Pontefract, WF9 2BL
You deserve much praise for the part you have played in helping your school to improve, especially by always doing your best and behaving well. As some of you told me in a meeting; ‘we have seen our teachers working so hard this year, it has made us want to work hard as well.’ You now make satisfactory progress in English and mathematics. Your writing has improved massively and I find your work on display very interesting to read. You talk very well in lessons and this helps you to learn. Your drama is outstanding and we’ll all remember your performance of ‘Macbeth the Musical’ for a long time. During the past year you have made a very important contribution to life in your community by producing DVDs which the local police service use to discourage anti-social behaviour and the misuse of mobile phones. Well done for all of these achievements.
p.11
Inspection of Moorthorpe Primary School, Pontefract, WF9 2BL
The headteacher and staff are very keen to continue improving your education and we have agreed with them that the most important areas to work on are to:
p.11
Inspection of Moorthorpe Primary School, Pontefract, WF9 2BL
help you to achieve more, especially those of you who are more-able and those in Key Stage 2 who need extra support with their reading make sure that more lessons are as good as the very best in the school give more responsibilities to your teachers ensure that none of you miss school unless you really need to.
p.11
Inspection of Moorthorpe Primary School, Pontefract, WF9 2BL
Your teachers are, therefore, going to continue to work hard and, to use your phrase, I know you, ‘will meet them half-way.’ My very best wishes for the future.
p.11
Inspection of Moorthorpe Primary School, Pontefract, WF9 2BL
John Rutherford, Her Majesty's Inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion