Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Coventry College

Inspected — · published 17 Jul 2012 · URN 130472

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    CV2 1ED

  • Name on report verified

    Henley College Coventry

  • URN verified

    130472

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+41Positivemore positive than 45% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedvery wellcleareffectivemake good progressgood progresswell plannedengaging
Criticismnot alwaysbelowdeclinedtoo fewconcernvariable

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings691w+47
  • What needs to improve858w+28

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,533
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 37, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 38%What needs to improve 47%About the inspection 15%

Full report text

Published date 17 July 2012 Inspection Number 367564 Unique reference number: 130472

p.1

Type of provider: General Further Education College

p.1

Address:

Henley Road Bell Green Coventry CV2 1ED Telephone number: 02476 626300

p.1

Partial reinspection report

Partial reinspection visit: Henley College Coventry, 12 June 2012 1 of 5

p.2

Introduction

1. Henley College is one of two medium-sized colleges in Coventry. The college recruits a high proportion of students from the most disadvantaged areas in Coventry. Unemployment and the proportion of the population who have no qualifications are above national averages. The number of Year 11 pupils living locally who achieve five A* to C grades at GCSE, including English and mathematics, is significally lower than average. The college offers provision in most subjects areas, with the exception of construction and social sciences.

p.2

Introduction

2. Ofsted inspectors conducted a monitoring visit in September 2011 to explore the progress being made against the recommendations identified at the last full inspection in December 2010. At that inspection, overall effectiveness, capacity to improve, outcomes for learners, quality of provision and leadership and management were all judged as satisfactory. Of the four subject areas inspected, one was good, two were satisfactory and engineering was inadequate. This report comprises both the reinspection of engineering provision and a review of progress against three monitoring visit themes.

p.2

Introduction

The outcome of the reinspection is as follows:

p.2

Context

3. The college offers courses in mechanical and manufacturing engineering from foundation to advanced level. At the time of inspection 62 learners aged 16 to 18 and 11 adult learners were on full-time courses with a further 22 learners aged 16 to 18 and 87 adult learners studying part-time. Almost all learners are male. The proportion of learners from minority ethnic backgrounds is similar to that of the local community the college serves.

p.2

Key findings

 Outcomes for learners have significantly improved since the last inspection. In 2010/11 success rates for foundation and intermediate level learners were high but too few advanced level learners achieved their qualification. In the current year retention rates are high and tracking information shows that most learners, including those on advanced level courses, have achieved. Success rates for functional skills qualifications have improved markedly and are high.  Learners make good progress and complete practical work to a high standard. They work diligently and safely in workshops and demonstrate confidence and competence in both producing machined components and in their use of hand tools. Learners’ written work is to a satisfactory standard. Partial reinspection visit: Henley College Coventry, 12 June 2012 2 of 5

p.2

Key findings

 Learners develop good vocational and employability skills. Their understanding of industry practice is significantly enhanced through a comprehensive range of visits to local manufacturers and an extensive work experience programme. Links with employers are good. All intermediate level learners attend work experience with local companies and some have been offered employment once they complete their course.  Progression rates to further study and higher education are good. A high proportion of learners progress from foundation level through to advanced level study. Many advanced level learners progress to higher level study either at the college or elsewhere, although few enter employment directly.  Teaching and learning are good. Teachers employ a wide range of strategies to engage learners. Practical lessons are interesting and enjoyable. Theory teaching is often lively, interesting and well structured. Learners are clear about

p.3

Key findings

their learning aims and participate well. Teachers use short quizzes well to check and reinforce learners’ knowledge although these sometimes take up too much time.  Teachers’ questioning of learners in lessons does not always challenge the most able or encourage them to go beyond what is necessary to pass the qualification. The targets set for learners to achieve are not always sufficiently specific or challenging, especially for more able learners.  Foundation level learners benefit from an engaging and enjoyable simulated work experience week. They willingly engage with the project and value the opportunity to use their skills and knowledge in a different environment. Learners benefit from experiencing realistic and varied job roles including those of supervisor, quality inspector, safety officer and production manager.  Assessment is frequent and fair. Assignments are appropriate for the level of

p.3

Key findings

study and deadlines are clear. Work is marked promptly and learners say that the feedback they receive is helpful. However, not all teachers correct spelling and grammar and the feedback provided by teachers does not always sufficiently encourage learners to improve their work to achieve higher grades.  The range of courses meets learners’ and employers’ needs very well. The introduction of an intermediate certificate and consolidation of advanced level courses provides learners with clear progression routes that help them to succeed. Theory and practical skills development now complement each other well and aid learners understanding.  Learners receive good care, guidance and support. Initial assessment is used appropriately to guide learners onto the correct course and to identify additional support needs. Teachers are acutely aware of the individual needs of their learners and have appropriate strategies in place to support them. Learners

p.3

Key findings

with significant barriers to success, including homelessness, receive good support to enable them to continue with their studies.  Leadership and management are good. Managers have responded well to the previous inspection and implemented a range of effective measures to improve performance. Managers have been successful in raising expectations and Partial reinspection visit: Henley College Coventry, 12 June 2012 3 of 5

p.3

Key findings

promoting ambition among staff and learners. The staff team work very well together sharing ideas and supporting learners. Staff morale is high.  Quality improvement arrangements are effective. The area has made good progress with all of the recommendations from the previous inspection and has improved the quality of provision and outcomes for learners. The self- assessment report is accurate and identifies clearly the areas for further improvement.

p.4

What does Henley College Coventry need to do to improve further?

 Encourage all learners to achieve to their full potential by setting more challenging and stretching targets. Ensure that questioning in lessons challenges the more able learners so they complete work to a higher standard and achieve higher grades.  Ensure that all assessors correct learners’ spelling and grammar and provide detailed individual feedback that enables and encourages learners to aim higher. Partial reinspection visit: Henley College Coventry, 12 June 2012 4 of 5

p.4

Additional Themes

Inspectors explored the following themes as part of this reinspection.

p.5

progress

The quantity and quality of management information has much improved since the last inspection. Information is more readily available and an extensive range of reports are now used to monitor course performance effectively. Curriculum managers are more rigorously held to account for the performance of courses for which they are responsible during frequent progress review meetings. A comprehensive range of data is used to monitor and evaluate course performance and to target intervention activity that enables more rapid improvement planning.

p.5

progress

The self-assessment report for 2010/11 provides a realistic overview of college performance and the grades awarded for both cross-college aspects and for curriculum areas are generally well supported by evidence. Further improvements in monitoring and evaluation practices in 2011/12 provide the college with a wider range of evidence for use in self-assessment and enable more timely improvement planning in curriculum areas. However, the impact of monitoring and evaluation activity on improving provision is variable, with the rate of improvement being much greater in some areas than in others. College performance monitoring shows significant improvements in sport while performance in beauty therapy remains a cause for concern.

p.5

progress

Overall success rates have risen since the last inspection and in 2010/11 were just below the corresponding national averages of similar colleges. Long course success rates improved for learners aged 16 to 18 at all levels but remained below national rates, significantly so at intermediate level. Success rates for adult learners on long courses improved at foundation and intermediate levels but declined at advanced level. Adult long course success rates are well above the national average rate at foundation level, significantly below average at intermediate level and below average at advanced level.

p.5

progress

Success rates improved in six of the eleven areas where the college offers provision and overall long course success rates were above average in five subject areas and below average in five areas. On work-based learning courses overall success rates declined slightly in 2010/11 and were just above the national rate. Success rates on short courses and on key and functional skills courses were well below corresponding Partial reinspection visit: Henley College Coventry, 12 June 2012 5 of 5

p.5

progress

national rates in 2010/11 but have improved in the current year. College data for the current academic year show an improvement in retention and attendance rates overall, although it is too early to judge what the impact might be on overall success rates.

p.6

progress

Since the last inspection the college has enhanced arrangements for monitoring the quality of teaching and learning by introducing a wider range of quality assurance practices. Themed learning walks now provide the college with a useful insight into aspects of teaching and learning and complement the formally graded observations that continue to take place. Developmental observations have also been introduced that provide staff with useful advice and guidance that enable them to improve their practice and develop their pedagogical skills. The college continues to refine monitoring and evaluation practices and is reviewing arrangements for graded observations to provide an even more accurate picture of the quality of typical teaching and learning.

p.6

progress

The college evaluates the information collected during monitoring activity well and has a clear understanding of the main strengths and areas for improvement relating to teaching and learning. Development activity is useful and well planned. College data for the 2011/12 academic year show that the quality of teaching and learning is improving while recognising that further improvements are required in the use of assessment for learning, the use of questioning techniques by teachers and in ensuring that all students are sufficiently challenged in lessons. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and

p.6

progress

other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231 or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’. Ofsted

p.7

progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion