Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 16 Jul 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Williams

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Williams

  • Postcode verified

    LU3 3AL

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+85Very positivemore positive than 88% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentvery welloutstandingeffectivemake good progressstrengthskeenenjoy
Criticismmissednot strongbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings750w+82
  • Leadership204w+69
  • What needs to improve122w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,060
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 70%Leadership 19%What needs to improve 11%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr J Burridge Headteacher Lealands High School Sundon Park Road Luton LU3 3AL

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 20 and 21 June 2012 to look at work in ICT.

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and students; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of students’ work; and observation of nine lessons.

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

The overall effectiveness of ICT is good.

p.1

Achievement in ICT

 Students begin in Year 7 with standards that are mostly at or below national expectations. They make good progress so that by the end of Year 9 they are achieving above the national average although fewer are achieving the higher levels. Examination results are good with all students gaining the equivalent of one GCSE in ICT and many going further to achieve two or three equivalent GCSEs in a vocational qualification. A significant number of students go on to study ICT-related courses at local post-16 providers. Across Key Stages 3 and 4 students have strengths in the business applications aspects of the subject but are less strong in the media studies and computer science aspects of ICT, including programming.  Disabled students and those who have special educational needs make excellent progress due to effective targeted support. Teachers know the needs of these students very well and the ethos for learning in the

p.1

Achievement in ICT

classroom is excellent.  Students’ behaviour is excellent; they respond very well to adults and to each other, working together and supporting each other to achieve. They are keen to contribute to lessons and clearly enjoy what they are doing.

p.2

Quality of teaching in ICT

 ICT-specialist teachers have good knowledge of the examination specification, which means they can accurately show students what they need to do to achieve a higher grade; teachers answer students’ questions precisely. Lessons are planned in detail to include individual, paired and group activities, and the focus on peer assessment means that students both give and take constructive criticism very well. Students are very aware of their targets and levels. Teachers prepare good resources that meet the needs of the individual student. Sometimes teachers try to fit too much into the one-hour lessons. This results in missed opportunities to reinforce key ICT concepts and a tendency for lessons to be too teacher- led at the expense of an investigate approach.  Good and sometimes outstanding use is made of ICT in other subjects. ICT is used appropriately as a tool for teaching and learning. Teachers often use ICT imaginatively, for example in a history lesson the teacher

p.2

Quality of teaching in ICT

used a video clip that was enhanced with a moving subtitle. This challenged the students to ask questions about what they were seeing in the video. The outstanding ICT facilities being developed through the new building programme are being used well by teachers to model good practice in ICT, although sometimes opportunities are missed to pick up and develop students’ ICT capability or to assess their ICT capability as the lesson progresses.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in ICT

The quality of the curriculum in ICT is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in ICT

 The taught ICT programme in Years 7 and 8 provides progression through a range of topics, although media and computer science are not represented in any great depth. The Year 9 curriculum prepares students effectively for the vocational course beginning in Year 10. Some good liaison is in place with other departments so that, for example, some collaborative planning is undertaken to deliver spreadsheet work between the mathematics and ICT departments.  The Key Stage 4 curriculum has been modified to allow some students to follow ICT GCSE in Year 10. Some tracking occurs of students’ ICT exposure in other subjects, but this is not in sufficient detail yet, and students’ achievements using ICT in other subjects are not assessed with a view to informing the overall assessment of ICT capability.  The curriculum is enhanced by a virtual leaning environment which technically works well and has become much more effective in the last 12

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in ICT

months. Students are keen to use the system to access their work and are beginning to expect this to be the preferred medium for communication about items such as homework.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in ICT

The effectiveness of leadership and management in ICT is good.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in ICT

 Outcomes for students in terms of examination results are good and progress is also good. The response students make to teaching is excellent and, overall, teaching is good. Students know their targets and what they have to do to improve and many achieve above their targets.  The infrastructure, hardware and applications have become much more reliable as the new building works settle down so that teachers and students have access to ICT that works well as and when they need it. All teaching areas have interactive whiteboards and portable technology enhances many lessons.  Some turbulence in staffing within the department has been dealt with well so that there has been no negative impact on students’ progress. A clear vision for ICT is acknowledged by all although this is not represented well in documentation. For example, the ICT department’s self-review is not sharp enough to address key issues to improve the subject.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in ICT

Consequently the department’s development plan does not identify subject needs but instead relates mainly to whole-school issues.  Senior managers are accurate in their assessment of standards, teaching and learning. The school shows good capacity to improve further in ICT.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 providing lessons that use a more investigative approach and focus on identifying and teaching key ICT concepts rather than just the course specification  improving the ICT subject self-evaluation and planning documents so that continuing professional development needs are met  improving progression through the curriculum by coordinating the cross- curricular use of ICT and using assessment of ICT in other subjects to inform curriculum planning.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop ICT in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion