Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

The Crompton House Church of England Academy

Inspected 21 Jun 2012 · published 12 Jul 2012 · URN 137294

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    21 Jun 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Chris Griffin, Jacqueline Rothery, Jonathan Woodyatt, Patrick Feerick, Tim Oakes

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Crompton House CofE School

  • URN verified

    137294

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+57Positivemore positive than 8% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingconsistentlypositiveexemplaryexcellentexceptionallystrongmake good progress
Criticisminconsistenciesinadequateweaknessesnot outstandingnot effectivelynot alwaysinsufficientlynot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1819w+60
  • Leadership478w+40
  • What needs to improve95w+66

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,383
about usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 47
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
1
typical 8
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 54%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 29%

Full report text

Crompton House CofE School Inspection report

p.1

Age group 11–18 Inspection date(s) 20–21 June 2012 Inspection number 385675 Unique Reference Number 137294 Local authority Oldham Inspection number 385675 Inspection dates 20–21 June 2012 Lead inspector Jacqueline Rothery

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Secondary School category Voluntary Aided Age range of pupils 11–18 Gender of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 1,317 Of which number on roll in the sixth form 300 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Leon Ashton Headteacher Sarah Calvert Date of previous school inspection 1 November 2006 School address Rochdale Road Shaw Oldham OL2 7HJ Telephone number 01706 847451 Fax number 01706 291454 Email address admin@crompton-house.oldham.sch.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child's school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.1

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects ser vices for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way.

p.2

To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

Jacqueline Rothery Tim Oakes Additional Inspector Additional Inspector Patrick Feerick Additional Inspector Chris Griffin Additional Inspector Jonathan Woodyatt Additional Inspector

p.3

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. Inspectors observed teaching and learning in 41 lessons taught by 39 teachers. Three of these lessons were observed jointly with senior members of staff. Inspectors held meetings with senior staff, middle leaders, a member of the governing body and groups of students. They also analysed the questionnaires returned by 152 parents and carers, 229 pupils and 101 staff. Inspectors observed the school’s work and considered a range of documentation, including self-evaluation and improvement plans, performance data, minutes of the governing body meetings, and safeguarding records. In addition, they scrutinised a sample of students’ books.

p.3

Information about the school

Crompton House Church of England School is a large school with a sixth form. The school has a higher than average number of girls. The proportion of students known to be eligible for free school meals is well below average. Most students are of White British heritage and there are no students who speak English as an additional language. The proportion of students supported at school action plus and those with a statement of special educational needs is below average. The school draws from a wide area. It includes, among its awards, Artsmark, Sportsmark and Fairtrade School. The school has achieved Healthy Schools status. The school meets the government’s current floor standard, which sets the minimum expectations for students’ attainment and progress.

p.3

Information about the school

There have been significant changes to both senior and middle leadership since the previous inspection, including the appointment of the current headteacher in January 2012. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Key Findings

 This is a good school with a strong sense of purpose and tradition. Students, parents, carers and staff rightly show great pride in the school. It is not yet outstanding because achievement and the quality of teaching are still good overall and there are some inconsistencies in the way in which the school’s policies, procedures and systems are applied across the school.

p.4

Key Findings

 Students’ achievement is good across all key stages. They make good progress set against high levels of attainment on entry. The sixth form is good; retention and completion rates are high. Communication skills are developed well throughout the school.

p.4

Key Findings

 Most teaching is good or better. Some satisfactory teaching remains, however. Assessment data are not always used effectively to inform planning so that work is not closely tailored to students’ individual needs. At times, marking is unfocused and does not offer sufficient guidance for improvement.

p.4

Key Findings

 Behaviour and safety are outstanding. Students feel very safe within the school and they ensure through their behaviour that the school community is harmonious, aspirational and inclusive. They are confident in their ability to provide a respectful, orderly environment. Attendance is high and attitudes to learning are positive and enthusiastic.

p.4

Key Findings

 Leadership and management are good overall. Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is strongly promoted. The headteacher ensures great clarity of direction and purpose, recognised and appreciated by students, parents and carers, staff and members of the governing body, as providing the school with pace, drive and determination in its continued journey towards excellence. Priorities are shared and understood. Subject leaders are supportive of these, although there are some inconsistencies in the application of policies, systems and procedures. The good leadership of teaching is having a positive impact on learning and performance management systems are robust.

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of teaching to be consistently good or better and raise achievement further by:  ensuring that teachers use systems for assessment and target-setting effectively, so that all lessons meet the needs of all pupils  ensuring that progress reviews lead to appropriate interventions for pupils working below or above target  ensuring that marking consistently records what a pupil has done well and gives clear steps for improvement.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the overall effectiveness of subject leaders throughout the school by:  ensuring the consistent application of school policies, systems and procedures.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

In most lessons, progress is good. Inspectors saw little variation between subjects or across different key stages. Disabled students and those with special educational needs make good progress. Students consistently display enthusiasm for learning. They relish being challenged and working effectively in groups, teams and independently. Their secure literacy skills are frequently evident in their books and in their fluent spoken contributions in lessons. They are also resilient when presented with challenging materials, as Year 10 students showed when creating their responses to the Rossetti poem ‘Sister Maude’. Students have gained overall above average standards by the time they enter Year 7. Standards and results at GCSE have been consistently significantly above average for the last three years.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

In the sixth form, attainment is typically significantly above average. There was a dip in 2011, but current data indicate that this has been tackled and higher outcomes for Year 13 are secure. Progress is good from students’ above average starting points.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

In lessons, students typically want to do well. They are eager to answer questions and equally eager to ask questions in order to extend their knowledge and understanding. Work in books and folders is consistently well-presented, indicating good care and pride in standards. Students are fluent readers, expressing interest and engagement in their chosen texts. The school encourages this by providing dedicated reading time.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Sixth-form students tackle new and challenging learning with enthusiasm. In a psychology lesson, Year 12 students robustly gathered information on data analysis, helping each other’s learning through supportive collaboration. Almost all parents and carers who responded to the Ofsted questionnaires felt strongly that their children are making good progress and are supported in developing their skills in communication, reading, writing and mathematics. Most said that the school meets their children’s particular needs. Inspectors’ findings support these views.

p.5

Quality of teaching

Questionnaire responses from parents and carers indicate that an overwhelming majority feel that their children are well-taught. Students agree. Inspectors found the quality of teaching to be good across all key stages. Most of the teaching observed was good or better. However, there remains some satisfactory teaching and some inconsistencies.

p.6

Quality of teaching

In the most effective lessons, teachers have high expectations of students. Lessons include a good variety of interesting activities which capture the students’ imaginations and arouse their curiosity. Good use is made of assessment techniques to promote accelerated learning, for example through the widespread and effective use of ‘mini’ whiteboards and of peer- and self-assessment. In such lessons, students collaborate well together; they explore and investigate ideas. Their learning is moved forward quickly through very thorough planning, good use of questioning and effective use of resources. Support staff are deployed effectively and make a strong contribution to students’ learning. Students are frequently given time for reflection; this in turn promotes deeper thinking as they are encouraged to explore ideas fully and take risks in their answers. For example, in a Year 7 lesson exploring the misuse

p.6

Quality of teaching

of drugs, students were encouraged to reflect on how families could be affected and what kind of personal influences in relationships might lead to misuse.

p.6

Quality of teaching

In the most successful lessons, work is well-matched to students’ needs and disabled students and those with special educational needs are supported well and challenged in their learning. For example, in the lesson looking at the Rossetti poem, the particular Year 10 group included students with special educational needs who were encouraged to question and explore issues around jealousy, within a calm, safe, secure environment. As a result, students achieved the independence to relate to a difficult text from another age and recognise timeless issues. Marking is detailed and thorough, commending students on their achievements and offering clear advice for further progress. At its very best, marking offers students the opportunity to add their comments and engage in dialogue with their teachers. Students are highly appreciative of this.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Where teaching is less effective, assessment information and data are not used effectively to plan lessons which fully meet students’ needs. Reviews of progress often do not lead to timely and appropriate interventions to tackle variation in students’ performance. Targets are unclear or inappropriate and students are unsure of how to improve. Marking is insufficiently detailed in feedback and does not direct students to the next steps in their learning. At times, too many activities are planned in a lesson, so that students do not have time to consolidate their learning. Students are very articulate about their learning. Year 9 students interviewed were clear that where teaching is good, the teachers ‘get you involved’, there is a ‘range of activities’, ‘you do interesting things’ and ‘fun subjects, like Shakespeare’. Where teaching is less good, ‘you are not allowed to discuss’, and students add, ‘Discussion

p.6

Quality of teaching

is important if it’s relevant to the subject’.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

The vast majority of parents, carers, students and staff are highly positive about behaviour and safety. Students’ behaviour and attitudes in lessons and around school are mostly exemplary. Instances of bullying, of any nature, are exceptionally low. Students say that when bullying does occur, it is dealt with swiftly and resolved. Moreover, they are confident in their own ability to challenge behaviour that they perceive to be inappropriate, insensitive or unfair. When questioned as to how they might do this, a group of Year 9 students responded that they would not let racist or sexist comments go unnoticed; they would say something – but in a pleasant manner.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Students say that they feel safe and secure. They feel that they are treated fairly and respectfully. This is then reflected in their own desire to treat others with respect and consideration; they are aware of different needs and highly supportive of those students whose circumstances may make them vulnerable. Inspectors saw evidence of this in the highly-collaborative, inclusive nature of students’ behaviour in lessons and in their outstanding contribution to creating a positive, harmonious, learning environment. They make an exceptional contribution to their own learning. Relationships throughout the school are excellent. As one Year 11 boy wrote in a letter to the inspection team, `there is a really good community feel which is helped by the mingling of years’. The newly-introduced vertical tutoring system is seen by students as a positive step in improving this even further. The ‘giant Year 13s’ are

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

seen as good role models, helping others throughout the school.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Students are punctual and attendance rates are consistently above average. Exclusion rates are consistently low. Scrutiny of behaviour records indicates that behaviour over time is excellent.

p.7

Leadership and management

Leadership and management are good. The recently-appointed headteacher has made it her priority to provide the whole school community with a clear sense of purpose, vision and direction. In their responses to questionnaires, parents and carers describe her as being ‘on the ball’, very capable of ‘taking the school forward’ and all staff indicate that they are aware of what they are trying to achieve as a school.

p.7

Leadership and management

This clarity of direction and confidence in leadership permeates the school and ensures an aspirational culture, with a strong belief that improved outcomes can be secured for all students. Improving further the quality of teaching is central to this. Leaders and managers have developed highly-effective systems of monitoring teaching and providing support and professional development opportunities to enhance it further through improving performance. The impact of this can be seen in the improved rates of progress across all key stages. Senior leaders and members of the governing body have an accurate view of the school’s strengths and weaknesses, and capacity for sustained improvement is good. There remain some inconsistencies, however, in subject leaders’ application of some school policies, systems and procedures. For example, core subjects adopt slightly different approaches to marking and the use of assessment data.

p.7

Leadership and management

The school provides a broad and balanced curriculum, well-matched to the needs of all students. The curriculum is constructed following analysis of student need and adjusted accordingly. Equality of opportunity is promoted well through the range and breadth of courses, programmes and activities on offer. For example, academic GCSEs are offered alongside applied GCSEs, BTECs and off-site learning at Oldham College. The sixth form offers a wide range of courses leading to high levels of admission into higher education. Analysis of the performance of different groups of students ensures that there are no gaps in attainment between them. All students take up further education, employment or training. Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is promoted well and a large number of extra-curricular activities are available, with a high level of take-up by students.

p.8

Leadership and management

Procedures for safeguarding meet all statutory requirements; child protection arrangements are exemplary. In their responses to questionnaires, parents and carers indicate overwhelmingly that they would recommend the school; as one parent comments, ‘It is what truly comprehensive education is all about, challenge, experience and community.’

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 54 42 2 2 Primary schools 14 49 32 6 Secondary schools 20 39 34 7 Special schools 33 45 20 3 Pupil referral units 9 55 28 8 All schools 16 47 31 6

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

The data in the table above are for the period 1 September to 31 December 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ).

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add up exactly to 100.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils' work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school's efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils' punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Floor standards the national minimum expectation of attainment and progression measures

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils' attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils' freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.

p.10

to share with their children. It describes Ofsted's main

findings from the inspection of their school.

p.11

Inspection of Crompton House Church of England School, Oldham, OL2 7HJ

On behalf of the inspection team, thank you for making us feel so welcome when we visited your school recently. We would particularly like to thank those students who spoke with us in meetings and around the school.

p.11

Inspection of Crompton House Church of England School, Oldham, OL2 7HJ

Our inspection found that your school is providing you with a good education and helping you to make good progress. We were extremely impressed by your excellent conduct, the respect and consideration you show towards one another and the enthusiasm with which you approach your learning. Your achievement is good and your willingness to learn makes an exceptional contribution to that success.

p.11

Inspection of Crompton House Church of England School, Oldham, OL2 7HJ

The headteacher and other leaders in the school, including the governing body, lead the school well. They are ambitious and determined to ensure that you achieve the best you possibly can and they are well-supported in this by your teachers. We have asked them to make sure that all policies, systems and procedures are applied consistently across the school and also to make sure that your teachers give you clear feedback on what you can do, with appropriate targets for each one of you to improve your performance.

p.11

Inspection of Crompton House Church of England School, Oldham, OL2 7HJ

We hope that you will play your part in these improvements by continuing to support your school’s ambitions for you through working as hard and as enthusiastically as you do now.

p.11

Inspection of Crompton House Church of England School, Oldham, OL2 7HJ

We wish you every success for the future.

p.11

Inspection of Crompton House Church of England School, Oldham, OL2 7HJ

Jacqueline Rothery Lead Inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion