Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Holy Trinity Church of England Primary School, Dartford

Inspected 20 Jun 2012 · published 11 Jul 2012 · URN 118859

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    20 Jun 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Carol Vant, Elizabeth Dickson, Gavin Jones

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Behaviour and safety verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Quality of teaching verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Holy Trinity Church of England Primary School

  • URN verified

    118859

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Behaviour and safetyGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Quality of teachingGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+49Positivemore positive than 21% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingpositiveexcellentmake good progressexemplaryimprovedhigh expectationsstrong
Criticisminadequatenot consistentlynot outstandingnot rapid progressbelowtoo slowinconsistenciesinconsistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1903w+50
  • Leadership558w+36
  • What needs to improve135w+58

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,587
about usual (typical 2920)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 47
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%Leadership 16%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 28%

Full report text

Age group 4–11 Inspection date(s) 19–20 June 2012 Inspection number 379694 Holy Trinity Church of England Primary School Inspection report

p.1

Unique reference number 118859 Local authority Kent Inspection number 379694 Inspection dates 19–20 June 2012 Lead inspector Gavin Jones

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 334 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Matthew Davis Headteacher Julia Davies Date of previous school inspection 22–23 October 2008 School address Chatsworth Road Dartford DA1 5AF Telephone number 0132 2224474 Fax number 0132 2290667 Email address schoolheadteacher@holytrinitydartford.co.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.2

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days’ notice. Inspectors observed 23 lessons of which two were observed jointly with members of the school’s leadership team. All teachers who were present at the school during the inspection were observed at least once. Meetings were held with groups of pupils, governors and staff. Inspectors observed the school’s work and looked at a range of documents including those relating to safeguarding, school development planning and the school’s monitoring and analysis of its provision. Inspectors took account of the responses to the online Parent View survey in planning the inspection. They scrutinised the responses to the inspection questionnaires from 106 parents and carers, 48 staff and 108 pupils.

p.3

Information about the school

This is a larger-than-average sized primary school, whose pupils come from a wide variety of socio-economic backgrounds. The overall proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is average, although much higher than average in Year 6. The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is almost twice the national average, as is the proportion of pupils supported by the school at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs. The Early Years Foundation Stage comprises of children of reception age in two classes. The school meets the government’s floor standards, which set minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress. The school has the Gold Sportsmark award and the Green Tree Gold award for its environmental work. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Key findings

 This is a good school. Satisfactory at its previous inspection, it has improved steadily and is well placed to improve further. The school is not outstanding because teaching does not consistently promote rapid progress or the highest levels of achievement, especially in writing. Some aspects of monitoring and evaluation are underdeveloped.

p.4

Key findings

 Children achieve well. They make good progress in Reception and satisfactory progress in Key Stage 1. Progress is good in Key Stage 2, with pupils achieving well by the end of Year 6, bearing in mind their below average starting points. Different groups, including disabled pupils and those with special educational needs, make good progress.

p.4

Key findings

 Teaching is good overall and has improved over time. It is better in mathematics than in writing. Teachers provide pupils with a range of imaginative activities. Relationships are strong. In a few lessons seen, the pace of learning was too slow and questioning did not check accurately how much pupils understood. There are some inconsistencies in the quality of marking and the setting of targets.

p.4

Key findings

 Pupils’ behaviour is good with some exemplary behaviour seen during the inspection. Pupils are courteous and thoughtful towards each other. Pupils are motivated and enthusiastic learners. They know how to keep themselves safe and have a good understanding of internet safety.

p.4

Key findings

 The senior leadership team has made improvements year on year to the quality of teaching and to pupils’ behaviour and progress. Provision for pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is outstanding. Staff performance is well managed and teachers are now more accountable for their pupils’ progress. Monitoring and evaluation in English, mathematics and science is effective, but is underdeveloped for other subjects. The governing body understands the strengths and areas for development for the school, but does not collect enough information of its own through a range of monitoring activities. This limits its ability to challenge the school. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the consistency of teaching, especially in Key Stage 1, in order to accelerate progress, particularly in writing, by:  improving the quality of marking so that pupils consistently get helpful advice on how to improve their work  ensuring that individual pupil targets relate more closely to this advice  ensuring key skills, for example the use of interesting vocabulary, sequencing sentences and the development of story ideas, are taught consistently well by sharing existing best practice with all teachers.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of the school’s monitoring and evaluation of its work by:  developing the role of subject leaders in subjects other than English, mathematics and science  ensuring that the governing body has a structured programme for monitoring the progress of the school towards the priorities in its development plan.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Children enter Reception with skills below the levels expected for their age. They make good progress in Reception, particularly in their social and language development. Data and inspection evidence indicate that pupils make satisfactory progress in Key Stage 1 as the quality of teaching is more inconsistent than elsewhere in the school.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Pupils’ attainment in reading is similar to the national average by the end of Year 2. Pupils’ progress here is helped by regular reading sessions and daily phonics lessons (the links between sounds and letters). Pupils make good progress in Key Stage 2 to reach average levels of attainment in mathematics, reading and writing by the time they leave the school, although it is weaker in writing than in reading. Overall this represents good achievement from below average starting points. A recent focus on the teaching of mathematics has helped improve progress. In their reading to inspectors, pupils at Year 6 demonstrated a range of strategies to tackle words they did not know. They often make good use of their phonic skills. Their good progress is supported by group reading, where pupils for whom English is an additional language receive good support and make good progress.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs achieve well because a range of interventions and teaching groups meets their needs well and because of the good care and consideration shown by staff. In the Early Years Foundation Stage, children receive good support from adults as they are encouraged to talk about their activities, whether those selected by themselves or within directed Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Achievement of pupils

groups. This helps improve their overall speaking and listening skills.

p.6

Achievement of pupils

In most lessons time is profitably spent consolidating previous learning, whether from previous or current weeks. Pupils have a firm foundation for success in readiness for secondary school. The links with secondary schools give good support for pupils who are more able. ‘Gifted and talented’ classes successfully promote learning for a significant minority of pupils. Some of these pupils have recently obtained the highest Level 6 in mathematics for example, two levels higher than that expected for their age, a very positive achievement. There are no significant differences in the performance of different groups of pupils.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Teaching is good but more consistent in Reception and Key Stage 2 than in Key Stage 1. The teaching of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs is good because these pupils receive interventions specific to their needs. These are put in place by a range of skilled teaching assistants. Over 90% of parents of carers rightly consider teaching to be good. Among the very positive features of teaching, especially in Key Stage 2 and Reception, are the high expectations of staff and the very good relationships between adults and children. A Year 3 literacy lesson, for example, characterised much of the good teaching observed. The encouraging atmosphere of the classroom generated by the teacher’s enthusiasm and brisk pace led to a buzz of excitement as pupils responded to questions with glee. The ‘working wall’ was referred to, regularly reminding pupils of previous learning. Here, skilled questioning was used to check pupils’ progress and understanding, but this was not

p.6

Quality of teaching

a consistent feature in all lessons. In this lesson, the marking of work also helped pupils to see how they could improve. However this approach to marking is not consistent and in some classes pupils do not receive enough guidance on how to improve, especially in their writing. Pupils are set targets, but these are not linked closely enough to the work in their books and to teachers’ comments.

p.6

Quality of teaching

In Key Stage 1 and especially in writing, some teaching does not consistently help pupils improve their writing skills. Such aspects as the regular development of interesting vocabulary, the ways in which story ideas can be developed and the sequencing of sentences to build on characters and settings are not taught consistently well.

p.6

Quality of teaching

In many lessons there is good collaboration between pupils, especially in their use of response partners. Teachers make a strong contribution to the excellent provision for spiritual, moral, social and cultural development, providing a wide range of opportunities for pupils to explore a range of issues, for example through aspects of their Green Tree work.

p.6

Quality of teaching

In Reception, routines are well established and give good support to children’s personal and social development. The inside classroom provides a wide range of well-resourced, interesting activities. However, learning does not always flow freely between indoors and outdoors either because some activities are not closely linked Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Quality of teaching

to children’s learning needs or because there are not enough signs and labels to help them choose appropriately.

p.7

Quality of teaching

Although reading was seen being taught well in focused reading sessions during the inspection and phonics being taught to a consistent pattern, over time, progress in reading is only satisfactory at Key Stage 1.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Inspectors’ observations and school records show that behaviour is typically good in classes and around the school. Parents and carers agree. Pupils enjoy school and say that bad behaviour rarely spoils lessons. Just occasionally pupils get a little carried away in their enthusiasm to contribute to lessons and talk out of turn. Pupils’ behaviour in lessons was very positive and sometimes exemplary. This has a positive effect on their progress, as noted in a Year 3 lesson in which pupils were attentive, responded with enthusiasm to questions about similes and metaphors and showed excellent behaviour for learning. In a Year 6 lesson, pupils used their response partners very sensibly to discuss issues surrounding a folklore story, helping each other to clarify vocabulary and meaning.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

In discussion, pupils were certain that: ‘We don’t have bullying here!’ They clearly understood the various forms bullying might take but were equally sure it was not part of life at their school. Few parents disagree with this. Parental support for their children is having a positive effect on attendance. As a result attendance, while average, has improved year on year.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils say how safe they feel in school and their parents and carers agree. Pupils are very aware of how to keep safe when using the internet. Pupils understand the high expectations of their teachers and, in the large majority of lessons, they respond very well and have very positive attitudes to learning. Pupils feel valued and undertake responsibilities with pride, whether as play leaders or members of the school council. In the Early Years Foundation Stage, care and welfare are good and this contributes to children’s positive attitudes to school. They share equipment well, take turns and are happy to talk about their learning.

p.7

Leadership and management

Since the previous inspection, the senior leadership team has created a supportive learning environment with high staff morale, raised standards in pupils’ basic skills, and improved both the quality of teaching and pupils’ behaviour. The team has been well-supported by the local authority, although the level of support is now lower as the school itself has the capacity to bring about further improvement. The monitoring and evaluation of the school’s work by the leadership team has been accurate and development planning is of good quality. It has led to focused staff training, joint moderation of work and the development of pupil progress meetings, creating more accountability for class teachers for the progress of their pupils. Monitoring and evaluation of the core subjects are thorough and have led to improvement in pupils’ Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

p.7

Leadership and management

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.8

Leadership and management

achievement. However, these processes are not well enough developed in the other subjects.

p.8

Leadership and management

The governing body, although aware of the school’s strengths and areas of development, does not play a sufficiently structured role in monitoring progress towards the goals set out in the development plan. Governors have ensured that safeguarding policies and procedures are fully in place. Almost all parents and carers are positive about the leadership and management of the school. Parents and carers are supported well and say they have been helped to support their own children. The well-managed Early Years Foundation Stage is valued by parents who appreciate efforts by the staff to ensure children settle quickly into school, in spite of coming from over 14 pre-school settings.

p.8

Leadership and management

The school promotes equal opportunities well through suitable policies and an ethos valuing individual pupils and their diversity of backgrounds and cultures. It carefully tracks pupils’ progress and intervenes if any slip behind. Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs are fully integrated into classes.

p.8

Leadership and management

The curriculum offers stimulating and relevant activities that capture pupils’ interests. They are often presented in well-considered topics, helping pupils link literacy and numeracy skills with their work in history and geography, for example. It also now offers a wide range of creative activities which often arise from topics. The school’s excellent promotion of spiritual, moral, social and cultural development for its pupils is seen in a wide range of settings. For example, the ‘prayer station’ in Year 1, the school’s links with schools in the Philippines and South Africa and its work on the African philosophy of Ubuntu promote respect for others and a feeling of community. Woodland work, through the Forest Schools scheme and the Green Tree scheme, inspires an appreciation of the wonder of natural things and a concern for the natural environment.

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 54 42 2 2 Primary schools 14 49 32 6 Secondary schools 20 39 34 7 Special schools 33 45 20 3 Pupil referral units 9 55 28 8 All schools 16 47 31 6

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September to 31 December 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all sc hools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance: the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour: how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Floor standards: the national minimum expectation of attainment and progression measures.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety: how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.

p.10

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.11

5AF

It was lovely to talk to so many of you when we visited your school recently. We judged your school to be good. It has improved year on year since the previous inspection. You told us that you were happy at school and felt safe. You leave Year 6 with standards that are at least in line with those of children of your age nationally in reading and mathematics. Standards are not quite as good in writing.

p.11

5AF

Your views in the questionnaire and when we talked to you show that you get on well with each other, think that your teachers help you and that behaviour is good nearly all of the time. Most of your parents and carers share these views.

p.11

5AF

The staff at the school are caring and help you to achieve well. This has all happened because of the good leadership of the school’s leadership team. We have asked them to do some extra things to help make the school even better.  Improve teaching so that it becomes outstanding and, as a result, you make even better progress and reach higher levels, especially in writing.  Help governors and subject leaders to gain further skills so that they can keep a check on how well the school is doing and support even higher standards.

p.11

5AF

All of you can help by trying to attend regularly and raise attendance to above average.

p.11

5AF

Gavin Jones Lead inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion