Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Champak Chauhan
- Postcode verified
PE27 4TF
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop history in the school. p.3
- As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. p.3
- It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. p.3
- A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 729
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mrs J Branch Headteacher Holywell CofE Primary School Mill Way Needingworth St Ives Cambridgeshire PE27 4TF
p.1
Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: history
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 2 July 2012 to look at work in history.
p.1
Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: history
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.
p.1
Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: history
The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with you, staff and pupils; a scrutiny of relevant documentation; an analysis of pupils’ work; and the observation of one lesson.
p.1
Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: history
The overall effectiveness of history is good.
p.1
Achievement in history
Pupils make good progress in developing their historical knowledge and understanding and attain standards that meet the expectations for their ages due to good teaching. Those in Year 4, for example, are developing their knowledge and understanding of life in Ancient Greece well. Pupils have good chronological understanding. They are aware of changes over long periods of time and know about changes during particular periods, for instance the Victorian era. Some pupils work well with historical sources and are able to ask appropriate questions about them. They can think critically about history and can confidently communicate ideas, both orally and in writing. They are highly curious about the past. Overall, however, pupils’ historical skills are not as well developed as their knowledge and understanding. Pupils write well for different audiences and for different purposes. Most pupils can write empathetically and those in Key Stage 2 can write
p.1
Achievement in history
competent newspaper accounts of particular historical events. Pupils enjoy learning history. They talk enthusiastically about work they have covered in lessons and the historical places they have visited. Their attitudes and behaviour are excellent, and they maintain their concentration on the activities set.
p.2
Quality of teaching in history
The quality of teaching in history is good.
p.2
Quality of teaching in history
Teachers plan lessons well and promote good enquiry-based approaches to learning. They know the needs of the pupils well and encourage pupils to work in pairs and in small groups, which the pupils value. Teachers are enthusiastic about the subject and successfully encourage all pupils to be keen historical investigators. The activities set are appropriate to the needs of the different abilities. Additional adults are used efficiently to ensure that all groups of pupils make good progress. Pupils are fully engaged in their learning and they use a wide range of resources and approaches in lessons. Teachers mark work regularly and make helpful comments so that the pupils can improve their work. The comments are valued by the pupils. A relatively new system for tracking pupils’ progress is being implemented well.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum in history
The quality of the curriculum in history is good.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum in history
The curriculum is broad and meets legal requirements. The school is reviewing its curriculum and implementing a topic-based approach with a greater focus on developing independent learning. Good opportunities are provided to study different themes and issues across time and these are combined well with in-depth studies, for example about aspects of the Second World War. This fits in well with the school’s emphasis on the study of local history and its proximity to, for instance, the Imperial War Museum at Duxford. Pupils’ interest in the subject is greatly enhanced by visits to a wide range of historical places. This includes Peterborough Museum, Fitzwilliam Museum and the Scott Polar Research Institute in Cambridge, the Globe Theatre in London and Stibbington Centre where aspects of Victorian Britain can be studied in detail. A good range of visitors, including local residents, also regularly come into school to talk about aspects of history.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management in history
The effectiveness of leadership and management in history is good.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management in history
The subject coordinator for history left at Christmas 2011 and the school is reviewing the roles and responsibilities of all staff. Nevertheless, the subject has continued to benefit from clear leadership and direction. Staff value the subject and have a common sense of purpose. Strengths and weaknesses in the subject are well known through a process in which senior leaders scrutinise pupils’ work and the teachers’ planning, listen to the views of pupils and observe lessons. The quality of planning is being strengthened as a result and greater emphasis has been placed on improving the quality of pupils’ learning. Staff are enthusiastic historians but they have not had recent and relevant professional development in the subject.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
strengthening the teaching and learning of a wider range of historical skills ensuring that staff keep abreast of developments in the subject through more regular professional development.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop history in the school.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion