Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Birmingham City Council

Inspected — · published 9 Jul 2012 · URN 50213

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    B3 3HQ

  • Name on report verified

    Birmingham City Council

  • URN verified

    50213

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+16Mostly positivemore positive than 33% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedeffectiverigorousimprovinggood progressstrongeffectivelysuccessful
Criticismpoornot alwaysweaknessesnot sufficientlyinsufficientdeclinedstrugglelimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings569w−10
  • What needs to improve789w+47

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,341
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 31, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 37%What needs to improve 52%About the inspection 11%

Full report text

Published date 09 July 2012 Inspection Number 387976 Unique reference number: 50213

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Maxine Mayer HMI

p.1

Address:

Birmingham Adult Education Service 2 nd Floor, Central Library Chamberlain Square Birmingham B3 3HQ Telephone number: 0121 3034734

p.1

Partial reinspection report

Partial reinspection report: Birmingham City Council, 31 May 2012 1 of 4

p.2

Introduction

1. In March 2011, Ofsted judged the overall effectiveness of the provision to be satisfactory. However, provision in literacy and English for speakers of other languages (ESOL) in learning for qualifications programmes was judged to be inadequate. This reinspection focuses on the adult learner responsive funding stream of literacy and ESOL.

p.2

Introduction

The outcome of the reinspection is as follows:

p.2

Context

2. At the time of the reinspection of adult learner reponsive funded programmes, 3023 learners were enrolled on literacy and ESOL courses, comprising 1,630 literacy and 1,397 ESOL learners. Courses are part-time and offered in a range of venues across the city. Approximately 60% of the provision is accredited at entry, foundation and intermediate levels. The vast majority of learners are female and/or from a minority ethnic heritage, and around 10% have a disablilty.

p.2

Key findings

 In-year success rates on accredited courses are improving and, in 2011/12, were in line with or above the national average. Only ESOL Speaking & Listening success rates at intermediate and foundation levels have dropped to below the national average, but they are relatively small cohorts representing less than five percent of the provision.  Retention in non-accredited literacy and ESOL provision in 2011/12, which comprises 40% of the provision, has improved very significantly since the last inspection. Good progress has been made in raising achievement rates from being very poor to satisfactory levels, although these remain slightly lower than the high national average.  Target setting for learners is good. Targets in all classes are personalised, differentiated and based on initial assessment. This is a significant improvement and a consequence of effective targeted staff development. In most classes,

p.2

Key findings

targets are owned well by learners and learners’ progress is monitored regularly. However, a few tutors are not providing feedback that is sufficiently developmental.  Teaching and learning are satisfactory. Session planning is very detailed for all classes and frequently includes differentiated activities and objectives related to citizenship or employability. Learners have good opportunities to engage in a high level of discussion and learner-led activities. They benefit from collaborative learning with their peers, particularly on the assessment of written work. Partial reinspection report: Birmingham City Council, 31 May 2012 2 of 4

p.2

Key findings

 Tutors’ practice of enabling learners to develop their skills within sessions is not always successful. In some sessions, learners struggle to complete tasks within the timescales allocated. In a few classes, the range of stimulating learning resources used is too limited.  The use of learning technology is not sufficiently developed. Learners have far too little opportunity to interact with the learning intranet, although it is increasingly used by tutors to share resources and to access web-links in the classrooms. Learners have insufficient access to hands-on technology in class in order to ensure that they develop effective skills for improved employability and social inclusion.  Observation and class visits are used effectively to drive up standards of teaching and learning. Observers have benefited from extensive training leading to university diploma accreditation. Documentation has been simplified to

p.3

Key findings

include a greater emphasis on learning, rather than teaching techniques. However, observers do not always identify sufficiently well enough how to improve teaching and to make innovative use of resources.  Curriculum management is satisfactory. Immediately after the last inspection, managers took firm and effective action to drive improvement. The management of in-year data is improving rapidly and is resulting in successful measures to tackle poor retention, and to speed up the implementation of planned improvement actions. Systems for monitoring progress towards targets are in place but they are not implemented consistently.  Staff development is good. It has had a strong impact on targeted areas for improvement identified at the last inspection and through self-assessment. Tutors report that training has been very practical and has given them the confidence to implement changes.  Self-assessment is good. Tutors and learners have contributed extensively to

p.3

Key findings

the self-assessment report and tutors now have a better understanding of their contribution to the whole service report. Most strengths and areas for improvement have been identified accurately and the current report matches the findings of the reinspection.

p.3

What does Birmingham City Council need to do to improve further?

 Continue to monitor data and make timely interventions to further improve retention and success in non-accredited provision.  Increase the proportion of teaching and learning that is good or better by continuing to develop tutors and by increasing the time spent on the controlled practice of skills for learners in class.  Develop learner use of information technology, including the use of the learning intranet, to improve their learning, employability, social inclusion and access to further education.  Ensure all learners are provided with well-focused feedback to promote extended and independent learning. Partial reinspection report: Birmingham City Council, 31 May 2012 3 of 4

p.3

Additional Themes

Inspectors explored the following themes as part of this reinspection.

p.4

progress

The service continues to implement well-established self assessment and improvement planning processes as identified at the last inspection. Good investments in information technology and human resources have led to considerable improvements in data collection and analysis to inform curriculum planning and action planning. Since the inspection, a senior manager has been allocated responsibility for ensuring all recommended improvement actions in literacy and ESOL are addressed, resulting in significant progress in addressing improvements in these areas. Reasonable progress has been made in the majority of other subject areas and in responding to recommendations made at the last inspection. However, the service recognises the disappointing downward trends in retention and success rates in language, literature and culture programmes.

p.4

progress

Senior managers have devised a high profile and clear retention strategy which is well published, understood and acted upon by staff. In-year data demonstrates that retention rates for the whole service have improved significantly this year to 85% and are now satisfactory overall. Rates are particularly high in health, social care and public service and information and communication technology programmes. However, retention rates in language, literature and culture programmes have declined over a four year period. In 2010/11, Black and Pakistani learners undertaking ESOL courses did not succeed as well as other learners. Analysis of current retention data indicates that there is no marked difference between the retention rates of different groups of learners. Partial reinspection report: Birmingham City Council, 31 May 2012 4 of 4

p.4

progress

The service has made significant investment in the provision of training and development for all staff. Imaginative policies and procedures are encouraging even staff who work the fewest hours to participate in learning. Improved tutor participation in learning activities is a key target for the service and this is closely monitored by managers. Much work has been undertaken to develop a modularised programme of tutor development and the programme is now extensive. The up-take of these modules has significantly improved this year and is having a very beneficial effect on improving teaching and learning. A revised and accredited mentoring programme is being used to very good effect in order to develop and support tutors.

p.5

progress

The accuracy and monitoring of teaching and learning have much improved since the last inspection. A rigorous schedule of observations has been undertaken in the weakest subject area identified at the last inspection. All tutors have been observed, any unsatisfactory teaching quickly identified and actions are swiftly put in place to address weaknesses. Observers are much more rigorous in making their judgments. They have participated in well focused professional development in order to improve and develop their observation practice and are now able to gain accreditation for their observation activities through arrangements with a local university. Managers are monitoring carefully the outcomes of observations and have taken swift and effective action to reduce any identified unsatisfactory teaching. Actions for improvement are identified on tutor development plans and most are monitored well. Tutors’ training and professional development needs are well targeted.

p.5

progress

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231 or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way.

p.6

progress

To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.6

progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion