Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 5 Jul 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Michael Sheridan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Michael Sheridan

  • Postcode verified

    PR4 5QL

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+73Very positivemore positive than 73% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisemake good progresseffectivelyexceptionallypositivestrengthsvery wellstrongenjoy
Criticismweaknessestoo fewnot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings486w+89
  • Leadership150w+3
  • What needs to improve83w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
707
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Leadership 21%What needs to improve 12%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs S Halsall Headteacher Little Hoole Primary School Dob Lane Walmer Bridge Preston PR4 5QL

p.1

education (PE)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 11 June 2012 to look at work in PE.

p.1

education (PE)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

education (PE)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of subject documentation and observation of three lessons.

p.1

education (PE)

The overall effectiveness of PE is good.

p.1

Achievement in PE

 From average starting points, pupils reach above average standards of attainment in PE. Boys and girls perform equally well and make good progress in lessons. Almost all pupils reach the expected level in swimming.  Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs make good progress because lessons are appropriately adapted so they are able to participate fully.

p.1

Quality of teaching in PE

The quality of teaching in PE is good.  Teachers and external coaches plan a range of activities to help pupils acquire and develop skills. Pupils enjoy PE lessons a great deal and are enthusiastic about their learning and achievement. They develop a good understanding of the importance of staying healthy and develop positive attitudes to fitness and health.  Teachers use their own enthusiasm for sport to motivate and engage pupils, and bring the subject alive. Teachers demonstrate different strengths which, when used together, provide an exceptionally strong model for teaching. In two lessons observed, pupils were highly engaged in evaluating their work and that of others to improve. In a golf lesson, pupils used technology effectively to record and evaluate their stance and swing, and provide the teacher with up-to-date assessment information. In another lesson, a rapid pace and focused questioning allowed pupils to

p.1

Quality of teaching in PE

improve their athletics skills quickly. Support was used very well to enable disabled pupils and those with special educational needs to participate fully and competitively.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in PE

The quality of the curriculum in PE is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in PE

 Long-term plans show that all six areas of the National Curriculum are covered and progression is planned from year to year. Pupils are very positive about all areas of the National Curriculum; talking enthusiastically about events over several years.  Pupils who do not reach the expected level for swimming in Year 4 are provided with additional swimming lessons so almost all of them reach the expected standard by the time they leave the school.  Until recently, the school has provided a very good range of after-school sporting opportunities. There remain exciting opportunities for dance performance and competition that pupils appreciate. However, the school recognises that there are fewer after-school sports clubs now than in the past.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in PE

The effectiveness of leadership and management in PE is good.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in PE

 Leadership of the subject has been turbulent recently. The subject leader was absent during this inspection. Senior leaders have taken control effectively and have continued to build on the good provision already in place. Documents in school, including subject self-evaluation and records of partnership work, show that the subject leader is developing PE and school sport effectively.  While leaders have a clear understanding of the strengths and weaknesses within the curriculum, teachers have too few opportunities to learn from each other’s expertise. There is some monitoring of the quality of PE teaching through short drop-ins. These focus on the enjoyment and participation of pupils and less on the effective qualities of teaching.  Pupils’ views are taken into account when planning improvements. Currently leaders are focusing on innovative ways to reinvigorate the range of sports available after school.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 developing provision beyond the curriculum that captures pupils’ interest for recreational sport and activity  providing opportunities for leaders and teachers to identify and share best practice.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop PE in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion