Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 5 Jul 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Champak Chauhan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Champak Chauhan

  • Postcode verified

    LE9 7TE

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+79Very positivemore positive than 81% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisemake good progressexcellentenjoymentenjoyconfidentlyaccuratestrengths
Criticismweaknesseslow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings457w+85
  • Leadership103w+9
  • What needs to improve85w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
626
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 61%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 11%About the inspection 14%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr G Beetham Headteacher Thurlaston CofE Primary School Desford Road Thurlaston Leicester LE9 7TE

p.1

Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: history

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 26 June 2012 to look at work in history.

p.1

Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: history

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: history

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with you, staff and pupils, a scrutiny of relevant documentation; an analysis of pupils’ work; and the observation of two lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: history

The overall effectiveness of history is good.

p.1

Achievement in history

 From relatively low starting points, pupils make good progress in developing their historical knowledge and understanding because they experience good teaching. As a result, their attainment is above age- related expectations. Younger pupils in the Early Years Foundation Stage and Year 1, for example, have good understanding of how seaside holidays have changed over time.  Pupils develop good chronological understanding as they get older, especially through the regular use of timelines. They are aware of important changes over time, for example, in Victorian Britain.  Pupils enjoy learning the subject and value the wide range of resources and approaches used by the teachers. Many undertake in-depth research and the higher attainers write extensively and for different audiences and purposes.  Pupils are able to work with a sound range of historical sources. They can analyse photographs, for example, and can make reasonable deductions

p.1

Achievement in history

about them. Overall, however, their historical skills are slightly underdeveloped.  Pupils’ attitudes and behaviour are excellent. Their social skills are well developed and they work constructively with each other and with the adults.

p.2

Quality of teaching in history

The quality of teaching in history is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching in history

 Lessons are characterised by a good learning environment where teachers plan activities well. They use the interactive whiteboard confidently to make relevant teaching points and to engage the pupils.  Teachers use a good range of approaches to meet the needs and abilities of all pupils which enables them to make good progress. Enquiry-based learning is well promoted.  Time is used efficiently and learning is well paced. Pupils are given regular reminders of how much time they have for particular activities and learning is routinely evaluated by the teachers and support staff.  Pupils are encouraged to use a wide range of resources, including information and communication technology, textbooks, worksheets, artefacts and photographs. They value this and stated that it promoted their enjoyment of the subject.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in history

The quality of the curriculum in history is good .

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in history

 The history curriculum is broad and balanced, and it meets legal requirements. A good emphasis is placed on developing key concepts, for example, chronological understanding.  Pupils are given good opportunities to study different themes and issues about the past. These are combined well with the in-depth study of, for example, Roman Britain.  Pupils’ enjoyment of the subject is greatly enhanced by visits to a wide range of historical places. These include Tamworth Castle, Shugborough Estate and Beaumanor Hall. In addition, a well-established tradition involves inviting visitors, including the pupils’ grandparents, into school to talk about aspects of history.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in history

The effectiveness of leadership and management in history is good.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in history

 The subject coordinator provides good leadership and direction to the subject.  Self evaluation in the subject is accurate and appropriate strengths and weaknesses are identified. This is done through a process of scrutinising pupils’ work, teachers’ planning and through informal discussions with other staff. However, at present the subject coordinator does not regularly observe lessons.  Pupils’ progress is tracked well through the regular use of formal assessments of the units studied. This system is kept under review and discussed with all staff to ensure that assessments are accurate and reliable.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 strengthening the teaching and learning of a wider range of historical skills  strengthening quality assurance procedures so that the subject coordinator is enabled to observe lessons more regularly.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop history in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion