Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
St Margaret's CofE Primary School
Summary
Shirley Herring (lead), Jennifer Lawrence, John Shutt
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
29 May 2012
- Inspectors verified
Jennifer Lawrence, John Shutt, Shirley Herring
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Satisfactory
- Name on report verified
St Margaret's CofE Primary School
- URN verified
105493
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.
- OverallSatisfactory
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. p.9
- An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs. p.9
- Pupils work together extremely successfully in lessons and cooperate very well in the playground. p.6
- Teachers provide excellent opportunities to promote pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. p.6
- The school’s strong commitment to pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development has resulted in extremely harmonious relationships amongst pupils from a wide range of backgrounds and cultures. p.7
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance8
“■ The headteacher and senior leaders have established a strong drive for improvement.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 2,377
- about usual (typical 2839)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
St Margaret's CofE Primary School Inspection report
p.1
Age group 3–11 Inspection date(s) 28–29 May 2012 Inspection number 377253 Unique Reference Number 105493 Local authority Manchester Inspection number 377253 Inspection dates 28–29 May 2012 Lead inspector Shirley Herring
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Type of school Primary School category Voluntary controlled Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 416 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Tim Smith Headteacher Alison White Date of previous school inspection 4 February 2009 School address Withington Road Whalley Range Manchester M16 8FQ Telephone number 0161 2262271 Fax number 0161 2263418 Email address admin@st-margarets.manchester.sch.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child's school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.
p.1
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way.
p.2
To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'.
p.2
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
Introduction
Shirley Herring Jennifer Lawrence Additional Inspector Additional Inspector John Shutt Additional Inspector
p.3
Introduction
This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. The inspectors observed 16 teachers in 26 lessons, observed support staff working with individual pupils outside the classroom, listened to pupils read and held meetings with groups of pupils, staff and a member of the governing body. They observed the school's work, and looked at pupils’ books, documentation regarding the safeguarding of pupils, assessments and the tracking of pupils’ progress, the analysis of the progress of different groups of pupils and the school development plan. They scrutinised 126 questionnaires completed by parents and carers as well as those completed by pupils and staff.
p.3
Information about the school
The school is larger than the average-sized primary school and the numbers are increasing. The majority of pupils are of minority-ethnic heritage. A high proportion of pupils speak English as an additional language, the most predominant languages being Arabic, Somali and Urdu. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is well above average, as is the proportion of pupils supported by school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs. The school gained the Eco Schools Green Flag Award in 2011.
p.3
Information about the school
There have been several changes to the leadership of the school since the last inspection. The headteacher spent two terms as acting headteacher prior to her permanent appointment in April 2011. The deputy headteacher was appointed in October 2011. There is a new Chair of the Governing Body.
p.3
Information about the school
The school met the current floor standards, which the government sets for the minimum expectations for attainment and progress. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.3
Key Findings
■ This is a satisfactory school. It has improved significantly over the past two years. The school is not yet good because there are still variations in pupils’ achievement due to some inconsistencies in the quality of teaching. The very harmonious atmosphere between pupils, from a wide range of ethnic backgrounds, stems from the school’s strong commitment to developing pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural awareness. Schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit from an Ofsted inspector before their next Section 5 inspection.
p.4
Key Findings
■ Achievement is satisfactory over time but is improving securely and rapidly. Pupils make good progress in Key Stage 2 and attainment is now broadly average. In Key Stage 1 achievement is improving but does not yet match that in Key Stage 2. Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage achieve well because of the high emphasis placed on developing language and social skills.
p.4
Key Findings
■ Teaching over time is satisfactory and inspection evidence demonstrates it is improving securely; it is often good with now only pockets of satisfactory teaching remaining. The improvements in the teaching of writing have helped to raise attainment significantly over the past two years and the more recent focus on mathematics is beginning to make an impact.
p.4
Key Findings
■ Behaviour and safety are good. Pupils work productively with each other and treat everyone with courtesy and respect. They show good attitudes to their work and this contributes well to their learning.
p.4
Key Findings
■ The headteacher and senior leaders have established a strong drive for improvement. Good performance management and actions, such as well-focused staff training, are having a positive impact. The proportion of teaching that is good has increased significantly, consequently the proportion of pupils attaining the level expected for their age in English and mathematics in Year 6 has almost doubled since 2009.
p.4
What does the school need to do to improve further?
■ Improve the quality and consistency of teaching to raise achievement, especially in Key Stage 1, by: ensuring a good pace in lessons, with clear time limits and expectations, to keep pupils involved reducing the use of worksheets so that pupils organise their own ways of working in order to promote their independence and understanding developing the role of subject leaders in monitoring and evaluating teaching and learning in their subject.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Parents and carers are happy with the progress their children make in school. Children enter the school with a range of skills that overall are well below what is usual for their age. They make good progress in the Early Years Foundation Stage, but nevertheless their attainment is below the expectations for their age by the time they enter Year 1. The school rightly places great emphasis on developing children’s personal and social skills and so they make particularly good progress in this area of learning.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Pupils make satisfactory progress in Key Stage 1. After several years where attainment at the end of Year 2 has been significantly below average, the school’s comprehensive records of pupils’ progress show that there has been considerable improvement in the rate of their progress this year. Pupils currently in Year 2 are working closer to the level expected for their age, particularly in writing. This is as a result of a wide range of strategies that have been introduced by the new senior leadership team, including a high priority placed on improving writing. Pupils make good progress in Key Stage 2, and this accelerates in Years 5 and Year 6 because of consistently good teaching in the older classes. After several years when attainment was significantly below average attainment rose in 2011. Results showed attainment as above average in English and broadly average in mathematics. Rigorous assessments of the attainment of pupils currently in Year 6, and the work in pupils’ books,
p.5
Achievement of pupils
indicate that improvements have been maintained and that attainment is broadly average overall. Attainment in reading is slightly below average in Year 2 and is broadly average in Year 6.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs progress at a similar rate to their peers because of the good level of well-targeted support they receive. Pupils who enter the school speaking little English receive good support from staff and from other pupils. They learn English quickly and so they make similar progress to others in their class.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Learning is most effective when lessons are interesting and pupils are actively engaged. This was seen in a mathematics lesson where pupils sharpened their recall of multiplication facts by reciting a ‘rap’, by challenging their partner in a tables game and then using their knowledge to solve multiplication problems. Learning is less effective when pupils have to spend too long listening to the teacher before getting actively involved with their independent work.
p.5
Quality of teaching
Pupils, parents and carers are of the view that teaching is good. Inspection evidence shows that whilst there are many examples of good teaching there are variations across the school and so the inspection judges teaching to be satisfactory. Records of pupils’ progress support the view that while the quality of teaching is improving quickly and there is much which is good, there remains some which is satisfactory.
p.6
Quality of teaching
Lessons are generally well planned and work is well matched to the needs of different groups, including those pupils supported by school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs. This was seen in a literacy lesson where pupils were set appropriately challenging texts to describe a character. Appropriate prompts were strategically placed to remind different groups about their targets, for example use of punctuation, connectives or more advanced vocabulary. In the more effective lessons teachers give pupils good opportunities to explain their thinking to help them to develop their understanding, whether explaining how to find 75% of an amount or the difference between an orphan and a refugee. Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs are supported well in lessons and their learning is similar to others in the class.
p.6
Quality of teaching
Where teaching remains satisfactory the pace of learning is sometimes too slow and pupils begin to lose concentration. On occasions teachers do not always check that those groups working independently are on target to complete their tasks. In some classes there is an over-reliance on worksheets and this can restrict opportunities for pupils to organise their own work and develop independence.
p.6
Quality of teaching
Teachers mark work carefully and give pupils clear guidance on how they can improve. This is more established in literacy books and has helped to improve the quality of writing. This is now extending to mathematics. Teachers place an increasing emphasis in the curriculum on using and developing basic skills in other subjects. Consequently, the quality of writing has improved and opportunities for applying numeracy skills are improving.
p.6
Quality of teaching
Teachers provide excellent opportunities to promote pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Pupils work together extremely successfully in lessons and cooperate very well in the playground. Learning about religions, other cultures, art and music is given much prominence and pupils have many opportunities to explore ideas and develop their understanding of spirituality.
p.6
Quality of teaching
Teachers provide a good range of purposeful, practical activities in the Nursery and Reception classes that show a good understanding of how young children learn. Letter sounds and counting skills are taught systematically and well, and so children make good progress in developing these basic skills.
p.6
Behaviour and safety of pupils
Pupils are polite, calm and thoughtful and cooperate well to create a safe and well-ordered environment. They show a good attitude to their work and collaborate sensibly with a partner in class; this contributes well to their learning. Parents and carers and pupils themselves agree that behaviour is good and state that rare instances of bullying of any type are dealt with swiftly and effectively. Pupils say they feel safe, secure in the knowledge that there is an adult they can talk to if they have a problem, for example by visiting the ‘Place to Be’ at break times. They understand how to recognise risk and how to minimise it, for example, by learning about road safety in assemblies, and they have a good awareness of e-safety. Parents and carers appreciate the workshops in school that have helped them to support their children in this aspect.
p.6
Behaviour and safety of pupils
Attendance has improved significantly year on year, reflecting the wide-ranging efforts of the school, coordinated by the attendance manager. Older pupils play a valuable role as peer mentors on the playground. They help to address potential tensions by asking pupils to consider how they and others feel, and this fosters an ethos of care and respect for each other.
p.7
Leadership and management
Parents and carers are of the view that leadership and management are good. They point to examples of improved communications over the past two years, including weekly newsletters. They also appreciate the workshops which help them to support their children’s learning.
p.7
Leadership and management
The senior leadership team, strongly led by the headteacher, demonstrate a clear vision, with well-targeted initiatives which are helping to raise attainment. Staff training, a consistent approach to marking pupils’ work, and a clear focus on developing basic skills have helped to improve teaching. This has resulted in a significant improvement in attainment at the end of Key Stage 2 over the past two years and these strategies are now having a positive impact on attainment in Key Stage 1. Rigorous systems for assessing and tracking pupils’ progress have been adopted and are being used effectively to identify and address any underachievement at an early stage. The school has a strong commitment to equal opportunities. The progress of different groups is analysed carefully and additional support is provided promptly so that gaps are narrowing and more pupils are reaching the level expected for their age by the end of Year 6. Subject leaders monitor the curriculum
p.7
Leadership and management
and the work in pupils’ books. However, their role in monitoring and evaluating teaching and learning in lessons has not yet been developed fully. Well-focused actions to reduce absences have resulted in a good improvement in attendance.
p.7
Leadership and management
The governing body know the school well and provide good support and constructive challenge for the leadership team. They are well aware of their responsibilities in safeguarding pupils and staff and the required systems and procedures are in place. Good links with partners in the Primary Inclusion Partnership and the Place2Be service support the school in providing good pastoral care for pupils to enhance their well-being.
p.7
Leadership and management
The school’s strong commitment to pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development has resulted in extremely harmonious relationships amongst pupils from a wide range of backgrounds and cultures. One pupil explained that, ‘The best thing about our school is that it’s open to everyone, despite their different cultures.’ and this is evident throughout the school.
p.7
Leadership and management
The curriculum is satisfactory and improving. Strong attention to pupils’ personal development has had a good impact on pupils’ behaviour. The decision to link subjects together provides extensive opportunities to write and this has resulted in a good improvement in the quality of writing. The focus on developing numeracy skills across the curriculum is now having an impact. Improvements over the past two years in the quality of teaching, in attainment, particularly in writing, and in attendance indicate that the school has a good capacity to improve.
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Nursery schools 54 42 2 2 Primary schools 14 49 32 6 Secondary schools 20 39 34 7 Special schools 33 45 20 3 Pupil referral units 9 55 28 8 All schools 16 47 31 6
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
The data in the table above are for the period 1 September to 31 December 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ).
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.
p.9
Common terminology used by inspectors
Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attainment: the standard of the pupils' work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attendance the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school's efforts to encourage good attendance.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils' punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Floor standards the national minimum expectation of attainment and progression measures
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils' attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils' freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.
p.10
to share with their children. It describes Ofsted's main
findings from the inspection of their school.
p.11
Inspection of St Margaret's CofE Primary School, Manchester, M16 8FQ
Thank you for making us so welcome when we visited your school. You are well behaved and treat everyone with courtesy and respect. Well done! We were pleased to see that more of you are coming to school every day and this is helping you to improve your work. We enjoyed talking to you in lessons and in small groups and we found your views very helpful. We agree with the pupil who said that one of the best things about St Margaret’s is that it’s open to everyone, despite their different cultures. Many children join your school speaking very little English and I know how much you help them to settle in and find their way around.
p.11
Inspection of St Margaret's CofE Primary School, Manchester, M16 8FQ
Lessons are generally interesting and there is always an adult around to help those who sometimes find learning difficult. Most of you reach the standard expected for your age by the time you leave Year 6. Children in the Nursery and Reception classes make a good start to school life because their teachers plan a good range of practical activities indoors and outside to help them to learn.
p.11
Inspection of St Margaret's CofE Primary School, Manchester, M16 8FQ
We think that St Margaret’s is a satisfactory school, though it is improving all the time. It is part of our job to suggest ways that a school could be even better. We have asked that all teaching is as good as the best so that your achievement continues to improve, particularly for those in Key Stage 1. The teachers are going to make sure that you can get on quickly with your work in all lessons and also give you more chances to set out your work in your books rather than on worksheets. Those teachers who have a management role are going to check that you are doing well in all subjects.
p.11
Inspection of St Margaret's CofE Primary School, Manchester, M16 8FQ
Thank you once again for being so pleasant and helpful. We hope you enjoy the next half term and continue to come to school every day.
p.11
Inspection of St Margaret's CofE Primary School, Manchester, M16 8FQ
Shirley Herring Lead inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion