Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Cottenham Primary School

Inspected 1 Jun 2012 · published 25 Jun 2012 · URN 110604

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    1 Jun 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Gillian Scobie, John Worgan, Nicholas Rudman

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Behaviour and safety verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Quality of teaching verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Cottenham Primary School

  • URN verified

    110604

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Behaviour and safetyGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Quality of teachingGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+57Positivemore positive than 42% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingmake good progressexcellentstrongexceptionallygood progressclearhighly effective
Criticisminadequatenot outstandingnot yetpoorinconsistentweakerbelowlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1724w+55
  • Leadership570w+55
  • What needs to improve66w+56

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,347
about usual (typical 2920)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 47
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
4
typical 2
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 51%Leadership 17%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Age group 4–11 Inspection date(s) 31 May - 1 June 2012 Inspection number 395402 Cottenham Primary School Inspection report

p.1

Unique reference number 110604 Local authority Cambridgeshire Inspection number 395402 Inspection dates 31 May – 1 June 2012 Lead inspector John Worgan

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 571 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Siobhan Lihoreau Headteacher James Kilsby Date of previous school inspection 9 September 2008 School address Lambs Lane Cottenham Cambridge CB24 8TA Telephone number 01954 250227 Fax number 01954 273321 Email address office@cottenham.cambs.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.2

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. Inspectors observed teaching and learning in 24 lessons or parts of lessons, taught by 19 teachers. They also observed a range of intervention and phonics (the sounds that letters make) sessions, listened to pupils reading and looked at their work. Discussions were held with groups of pupils, staff and governors. Inspectors took account of the responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) in planning the inspection, observed the school’s work, and looked at a range of documentation including the school’s self- evaluation documents and action plan, pupils’ progress records and safeguarding procedures. Questionnaires returned by 225 parents and carers were received and were analysed, along with those from pupils and staff.

p.3

Information about the school

This is a growing school and much larger than the average-sized primary, serving the village of Cottenham and surrounding areas. The proportion of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs, including those supported by school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs, is below average. Fewer pupils than in most schools are known to be entitled to free school meals. The percentages of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds and those who speak English as an additional language are lower than the national average, although rising. There is a significant and growing Gypsy Roma Traveller population.

p.3

Information about the school

The school has the Health Promoting Schools Award, The School Achievement Award, the Inclusion Equality Award and the Arts Council Artsmark. The school meets current government floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress. Following the retirement of the previous headteacher, a new headteacher was appointed in September 2011. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Key findings

 Cottenham is a good school where pupils achieve well. The school’s motto ‘Where everyone can make their mark’ reflects its inclusive philosophy. Pupils feel happy, are safe and love learning. It is not yet an outstanding school because, while pupils are making good and improving progress, achievement is not yet consistently outstanding.

p.4

Key findings

 Pupils make good progress from starting points in line with those typically expected. In the Early Years Foundation Stage, children make good progress, consolidating their personal development and reaching the progress targets set by the school. Progress in Key Stage 1 is good. The school’s tracking data indicate that pupils’ progress in Year 6 is considerably better than in the previous year, when performance dipped. This is supported by inspectors’ examination of their work.

p.4

Key findings

 Teaching is good. It was good or better in most lessons seen, with few lessons that were satisfactory. Strategies introduced by the school to improve teaching have had a significant impact on progress. The quality of marking is sometimes inconsistent.

p.4

Key findings

 Behaviour is good. Pupils are polite and considerate. There are few instances of bullying of any kind. Behaviour seen was of a high standard and school logs show that this is typical. Pupils feel safe and speak highly of the support which they receive.

p.4

Key findings

 Leadership and management are good. The headteacher’s vision of achievement for all is shared throughout the school. The curriculum provides a wide range of enrichment activities. Leaders and managers are clear about what needs to improve and teachers’ performance is monitored thoroughly. Professional development focuses on improving teaching. However, the school does not monitor sufficiently closely the performance of different groups of pupils to measure the impact of interventions. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve achievement and make more teaching outstanding by:  ensuring that marking gives pupils clear guidance on the steps which they need to take to reach the next level of attainment  using data strategically to assist staff in monitoring the performance of different groups of pupils, including disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs and those whose circumstances may make them vulnerable.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Parents and carers commented on how pleased they were with their children’s good progress and their children’s desire to learn. Children enter the school with the knowledge and skills expected for their ages. They then make good progress, especially in number and literacy skills in the Reception year. Social and emotional development is effectively promoted. Adults support the children’s learning well, engaging children in thoughtful talk about their activities and extending thinking through good questioning. Children co-operate well and behaviour is good.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

At Key Stage 1, progress is good. There has been a clear improvement in mathematics. Inspectors saw evidence of good progress in pupils’ work, especially in Year 2, where teaching is adapted skilfully to cater for the needs of pupils with a range of abilities, enabling all to reach challenging but realistic targets. In the national tests in 2011 for Year 6, attainment dipped below the high standard of previous years. The school’s data for the current Year 6 indicate that there has been significant improvement in both English and mathematics. This judgement was confirmed by lesson observations, work scrutiny and discussion with pupils. Girls, whose performance fell below that of boys last year, are now performing well, especially in English and at higher levels of attainment.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Attainment in reading is high by the end of Year 2 and when pupils leave the school in Year 6. Pupils read confidently and fluently to inspectors and effective, targeted support enables weaker readers to improve rapidly. Due to well-planned support, disabled pupils and those with special educational needs are making comparable progress to other pupils in the school. This is because well-targeted interventions and in-class support, which encourages independent learning, enable them to make good progress. Data on the relative performance of these groups is not yet analysed at a strategic level to gauge the effectiveness of support strategies, however.

p.5

Quality of teaching

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Quality of teaching

Parents and carers say they feel their children are well taught at the school. As one parent said, ‘The teaching has built up my son’s confidence tremendously and the work he is given is stimulating and absorbing’. In the good and outstanding lessons seen, pupils were challenged and inspired by tasks which were adapted to their needs and abilities. In a lower ability Year 5/6 mathematics lesson on decimals, pupils were organised into groups with a range of tasks and targeted support which enabled then to make good progress and to develop the confidence to tackle problems independently. This ‘targeted group work’ was a feature of many lessons seen and was appreciated by pupils; as one from this group said, ‘I have got much more confident. If we are not getting on you get help but they let you try it on your own first’. In the more successful lessons, pupils are actively involved and work together successfully in pairs and groups. Consequently they make good progress. In

p.6

Quality of teaching

these lessons, teachers’ good questioning skills promote learning well. In a year 5/6 mathematics lesson, pupils were challenged to speculate on probabilities in realistic contexts and more-able pupils were able to develop sophisticated hypotheses.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Independent learning is encouraged from an early age. In a Reception class, children were given a range of materials with which to make crowns for the Jubilee party the following day and were encouraged to choose materials and to develop a design for themselves. In the very few less successful lessons, opportunities for active and co- operative learning were limited. More-able pupils had fewer opportunities to develop their skills; consequently there was some restless behaviour.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Reading is well taught. In an outstanding guided reading session, pupils worked in pairs, checking each others’ reading with support from teaching assistants. Gypsy Roma Traveller children in the group received targeted support and were making excellent progress. Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs are well taught and are consequently making good progress. The system of setting across year groups and the guided group work within classes enables their needs to be catered for well. Pupils expressed confidence in the support which they receive and the intervention sessions observed were of high quality.

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Cottenham Primary School is an extremely well-ordered community where good behaviour and careful attention to safety, and excellent pastoral care and support, help pupils develop good personal skills fostering their positive attitudes to learning. Parents and carers who responded to the questionnaires agree that the school keeps their children safe and that behaviour is good. As one parent said, ‘The school does a fabulous job of caring for the pupils, really stretching, growing and building their learning and caring very much for their broader development.’

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Inspectors saw good behaviour in the majority of lessons with occasional exceptions only when teaching was less engaging. In their questionnaires few pupils said that there are instances when lessons are interrupted by poor behaviour. Discussions with pupils and the school’s own behaviour records show that this is typical. The community of Gypsy Roma Travellers within the school is exceptionally well Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

supported with dedicated staff catering for their needs and supplying and following up work when they are travelling. Their culture is celebrated and they are fully integrated and welcomed by the school community. Pupils, in their questionnaires and in discussion, said they feel safe in school and are confident that teachers deal with any incidents of inappropriate behaviour promptly and well. They said that there were clear rules which were applied fairly and that staff are sympathetic and supportive when they have problems. Bullying is very rare and pupils report that when minor instances occur they are dealt with quickly and effectively. Pupils are aware of different types of bullying including cyber bullying.

p.7

Leadership and management

Good leadership is the keystone of the success of the school. The drive, ambition and clear direction of the headteacher, with good support from senior staff and members of the governing body, is recognised by the whole community. As one parent stated, ‘It is a fabulous school run by a management team with integrity and maturity. There is no complacency’. The headteacher’s purposeful approach encourages the highest aspirations in pupils and staff. Leaders and managers have a clear focus on raising the achievement of all pupils which is shared by all staff. Professional development in group work and the teaching of reading is having a clear impact on the quality of teaching and on pupil progress, as is robust performance management. The school has a strong capacity to improve and this is clearly evidenced by the way in which the recent dip in performance was analysed rigorously, causes identified and actions

p.7

Leadership and management

focused on addressing them. The headteacher has a clear long-term vision for the development of the school which places the individual pupil at the centre, despite the large size of the school and plans for further expansion.

p.7

Leadership and management

The curriculum is broad and balanced and is enhanced by a wide range of extra- curricular activities and themed weeks. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, cultural and social development is promoted well. This was illustrated during the inspection by two impressive events. Younger children participated in Jubilee celebrations which included playground games from the 1950s and a tea party. Older pupils completed a unit of work on the Second World War with a commemoration of V E Day when veterans and parents were invited to view a range of work including archive material gathered by pupils and a musical celebration. Through these events and other activities throughout the year, pupils develop strong awareness of their own and other cultures and demonstrate strong social skills and spiritual awareness.

p.7

Leadership and management

The school is committed to promoting equality and tackling discrimination and pupils have a sense of belonging, fostered by the inclusive ethos. This is particularly evident in the ways in which Gypsy Roma Travellers are supported and integrated and their culture celebrated. There is good pastoral support, particularly for disabled pupils and those with special educational needs and those whose circumstances may make them vulnerable. However, the impact of interventions to support these pupils’ progress is not measured sufficiently well. Arrangements for safeguarding pupils are robust. Policies and procedures are effective and the governing body plays an active role in promoting and monitoring pupils’ safety. Governance overall is strong with a Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Leadership and management

skilled and supportive governing body which challenges and monitors school effectiveness well and is fully involved in school self-evaluation and strategic planning.

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 54 42 2 2 Primary schools 14 49 32 6 Secondary schools 20 39 34 7 Special schools 33 45 20 3 Pupil referral units 9 55 28 8 All schools 16 47 31 6

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September to 31 December 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance: the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour: how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Floor standards: the national minimum expectation of attainment and progression measures.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety: how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.

p.10

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.11

Inspection of Cottenham Primary School, Cambridge, CB24 8TA

Thank you very much for the welcome you gave us when we visited your school. You are polite and friendly and we appreciated the way you helped us find out about your school through questionnaires and discussions. Cottenham is a good school, which means that most things are good and a few things need to be better.

p.11

Inspection of Cottenham Primary School, Cambridge, CB24 8TA

These are some of the things that stood out about your school:

p.11

Inspection of Cottenham Primary School, Cambridge, CB24 8TA

 You and your teachers have worked hard to improve your progress and results are improving.  Your school is a safe place and staff care for you well and help you when you have problems or difficulties.  You obviously enjoy learning and are given lots of exciting things to do. We were particularly impressed by the way in which you celebrated the Queen’s Jubilee and V E day by showing the excellent work which you have done.

p.11

Inspection of Cottenham Primary School, Cambridge, CB24 8TA

We have asked your school to do a few things to improve. These are to:

p.11

Inspection of Cottenham Primary School, Cambridge, CB24 8TA

 improve marking by giving you clear guidance on the steps which you need to take to reach the next level  use information about how you are doing to help you to improve your work, especially those of you who have difficulties with your learning.

p.11

Inspection of Cottenham Primary School, Cambridge, CB24 8TA

You can help the school improve by always working hard and doing your best.

p.11

Inspection of Cottenham Primary School, Cambridge, CB24 8TA

John Worgan Lead Inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion