Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Leicester City Council

Inspected — · published 22 Jun 2012 · URN 52994

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    LE1 6ZG

  • Name on report verified

    Leicester City Council

  • URN verified

    52994

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
12
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
12 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 1%About the inspection 99%

Full report text

Published date 22 June 2012 Inspection Number 385048 Unique reference number: 52994

p.1

Address:

Leicester Adult Skills and Learning Service A1 New Walk Centre Welford Place Leicester LE1 6ZG

p.1

Focused monitoring visit report

Focused monitoring visit: Leicester City Council, 16 May 2012 1 of 4

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Leicester City Council (‘the Council’) holds contracts with the East Midlands Skills Funding Agency and the Education Funding Agency to provide a range of apprenticeship qualifications, accredited courses and adult safeguarded learning for approximately 8,000 learners.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

The population of Leicester is approximately 304,000. Some 40% of its population are from minority ethnic groups. Leicester is ranked as the 25th most deprived local authority in the country. Some 18% of the local working population do not have any formal qualifications, compared with the national average of 11.6%. The proportion of learners achieving five or more GCSEs at grade A*-C, including English and mathematics is 52.1%, compared with the national average of 58.9% for 2011.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

This monitoring visit follows the previous inspection in January 2009 at which inspectors judged overall effectiveness, achievement and standards, quality of provision and leadership and management to be good. The promotion of equality of opportunity was outstanding. Inspectors found provision to be good in three subject areas and outstanding in one. This report focuses on the themes explored during the visit.

p.2

progress

The service’s self-assessment process continues to be critical, honest and inclusive. Staff understand the Council’s quality assurance and quality improvement procedures well. Managers use data well to monitor performance, retention and learners’ achievements. Detailed curriculum level self-assessment reports receive regular and thorough scrutiny from senior managers. Curriculum managers and coordinators take full responsibility and ownership of curriculum-level self-assessment. Judgements in the self-assessment report are realistic and well supported by a wide range of evidence. Targets and actions plans are clear and measurable. Improvement plans clearly identify actions, timescales and responsibilities. The service makes good use of learner and stakeholder views to support self-assessment judgements and to improve the provision. The service understands its key strengths and areas for improvement well. Many improvement actions have already taken place and others

p.2

progress

are well within the challenging timescales. However, it is too soon to judge the full impact of all of the actions taken. Focused monitoring visit: Leicester City Council, 16 May 2012 2 of 4

p.2

progress

The service continues to work highly effectively with a very wide range of partners throughout Leicester to improve employability and develop vocational skills for some of the most vulnerable people in the city. In 2010/11, the Council's partnership working helped to support some 1,242 people into sustainable employment. The vast majority of learners on non-accredited provision achieve their learning outcomes. Targets are realistic, measurable and individual. An appropriate moderation process is in place to ensure that standards remain high. Overall and timely success rates for the small number of learners on apprenticeship programmes are in line with national rates. Success rates on accredited courses in literacy and numeracy are generally at or just below national rates. Success rates on most programmes in English for speakers of other languages are below national rates, except for those in speaking

p.3

progress

and listening, which are generally satisfactory. Curriculum managers have identified the reasons for the poor performance of learners on these courses and there are some encouraging signs that success rates are increasing in 2011/12.

p.3

progress

At the previous inspection, inspectors found that the range of teaching methods used was too narrow. Tutors’ lesson plans and schemes of work now incorporate a wide range of strategies for teaching and learning. Lessons are well planned to meet the needs of different groups of learners. Learners greatly enjoy their learning and they appreciate the wide variety of activities and tasks in their lessons which tutors use very effectively to keep them engaged and interested.

p.3

progress

The Council’s team of observers uses the improved service-wide system of observation of teaching and learning well to identify areas of good practice, as well as areas for improvement. Observers provide highly detailed feedback to tutors which they then use to develop thorough and constructive action plans. Observers make good suggestions about how tutors can better use information learning technologies in lessons, such as the use of digital photography to help learners record their work and celebrate their success. The service provides regular and relevant training opportunities for staff and organises well-attended teaching and learning conferences to disseminate good practice in the classroom. Focused monitoring visit: Leicester City Council, 16 May 2012 3 of 4

p.3

progress

Staff are highly aware of the service’s overall targets for learner retention and attendance. Managers have introduced an additional detailed mid-term performance review to provide a more frequent and challenging process for monitoring the service’s achievements against agreed criteria. However, some strategic action plans do not include sufficiently measurable success milestones to help managers assess their impact.

p.4

progress

The systematic monitoring of target-setting for learners has improved through the extension of the observation of teaching and learning and quality assurance audit procedures. Curriculum managers have also strengthened the process for moderating and assessing the quality of targets and learning outcomes for learners on non- accredited courses. Individual learning plans contain detailed, accurate long and short-term learning and development targets. Tutors mark learners’ work fairly and provide detailed feedback to help them clearly understand the progress they have made and what they have to do to achieve their learning goals.

p.4

progress

Service managers have worked hard to develop and manage an effective ‘whole organisation approach’ to the promotion of literacy and numeracy. The service has implemented a useful strategy to raise the skills, particularly in numeracy, of all staff, including those not directly involved in training and assessment of learners’ work. A minority of tutors have achieved qualifications in the teaching of literacy and numeracy.

p.4

progress

Initial advice and guidance effectively signposts prospective learners with low literacy or numeracy skills to discrete courses. The service provides good support for learners with dyslexia or dyscalculia. Tutors clearly link schemes of work to the core curriculum. Lesson plans have been standardised to ensure that tutors provide relevant links to literacy and numeracy across all areas of the provision. The service has improved initial assessment arrangements and clarified entry criteria for the vast majority of courses to ensure that learners have an appropriate level of skills in literacy and numeracy to succeed on their chosen course. However, in a very small minority of cases, course information sheets do not make sufficiently clear references to the literacy and numeracy skills required of prospective learners. Focused monitoring visit: Leicester City Council, 16 May 2012 4 of 4

p.4

progress

The service has considerably strengthened its observation of teaching and learning process since the last inspection. The Council’s team of observers has received thorough and regular training to help them identify strengths and weaknesses in teaching and learning. Observers pay close attention to learning in the classroom, as well as to teaching strategies. A rigorous moderation process ensures that grades for teaching and learning are carefully scrutinised and realistic and supported well by judgements. Observation reports are exceptionally detailed and provide constructive and helpful advice for teachers to improve. Action planning for teachers is particularly thorough and well monitored subsequently by curriculum managers. Teachers say that the revised observation process has helped them to improve their practice. The overall quality of teaching and learning has improved considerably since the previous inspection. Grades given to learning sessions by the service’s

p.5

progress

observers match those of inspectors. Observers pay appropriate attention to how effectively tutors promote equality and diversity and health and safety during learning sessions. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231 or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you

p.5

progress

give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’. Ofsted

p.6

progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion