Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Barnwell SchoolOfsted inspection, 31 May 2012

Inspected 31 May 2012 · published 20 Jun 2012 · URN 117518

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Ofsted inspected Barnwell School on 31 May 2012, led by Deborah James. The overall judgement was Satisfactory. Ofsted published the report on 20 Jun 2012. Source: Ofsted (Open Government Licence v3).

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    31 May 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Caroline Pardy, Cheryl Jackson, Deborah James, Isobel Randall, Sean Wyartt

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Behaviour and safety verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Quality of teaching verified

    Satisfactory

  • Name on report verified

    Barnwell School

  • URN verified

    117518

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Behaviour and safetySatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Quality of teachingSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+14Mostly positivemore positive than 12% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingmake good progresspositiveeffectivelyeffectiveimprovinghighly effectiveexceptionally
Criticisminadequateweaknessespoorconcernsnot alwaysunacceptablenot yetnot sufficiently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1916w−1
  • Leadership479w+33
  • What needs to improve154w+64

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,541
about usual (typical 2796)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
4
typical 3
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 52%Leadership 13%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Age group 11–18 Inspection date(s) 30–31 May 2012 Inspection number 379435 Barnwell School Inspection report

p.1

Unique reference number 117518 Local authority Hertfordshire Inspection number 379435 Inspection dates 30–31 May 2012 Lead inspector Deborah James

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Secondary School category Community Age range of pupils 11–18 Gender of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 1437 Of which, number on roll in the sixth form 207 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Julie Ashley-Wren Headteacher Anthony Fitzpatrick Date of previous school inspection 25 February 2009 School address Barnwell Stevenage SG2 9SW Telephone number 01438 222500 Fax number 01438 222501 Email address admin@barnwell.herts.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and

p.1

other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.2

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. Inspectors observed 50 lessons, including 14 observed jointly with members of the senior leadership team, taught by 50 teachers. In addition, inspectors made a number of short visits to lessons to look at learning approaches in the sixth form, marking, literacy development and behaviour. Meetings were held with students, senior leaders and other staff and local authority representatives. A telephone conversation was held with the Chair of the Governing Body. Inspectors took account of the responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) in planning the inspection, observed the school’s work, and looked at the tracking of students’ progress, school improvement plans, school self-evaluation documentation and records of attendance and behaviour. They reviewed responses to questionnaires from 255 parents and carers, 150 students and 118 staff.

p.3

Information about the school

This is a larger than average-sized secondary school. The school is split across two sites about a mile apart, one serving Key Stage 3 students and the other providing for students in Key Stages 4 and 5. The majority of students are White British. The proportion of disabled students and those who have special educational needs is slightly above average. The proportion of students supported by school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs and/or disabilities is 11.1%. The proportion of students known to be eligible for free school meals is broadly average.The school meets the current government floor standard, which sets the minimum expectation for attainment and progress. The school holds a number of awards including Artsmark Gold, the Quality in Study Support and the Centre for Education and Industry award for excellence in enterprise education.

p.3

Information about the school

The school has undergone considerable leadership turbulence over the last year and is currently led by an acting headteacher, supported by the local authority and an executive headteacher from another Hertfordshire school for two days a week. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Key findings

 This is a satisfactory school that provides a supportive and welcoming environment for its students. Students enjoy coming to school and benefit from positive relationships with staff. The school is not yet good because teaching does not ensure that all students make good progress and school leaders have not been sufficiently focused on improving the quality of teaching. Schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.

p.4

Key findings

 Students’ achievement is satisfactory. Progress in lessons and over time for the majority of students is satisfactory. Attainment has been improving strongly, particularly in the English and mathematics, and is now average. Students do not get enough opportunities to develop their literacy and numeracy skills in a co-ordinated way across all subjects.

p.4

Key findings

 Teaching is satisfactory and improving. Much good teaching was seen during the inspection, with teachers challenging and motivating students to make good progress. However, where teaching was less effective, activities were not sufficiently matched to students’ individual needs. Marking is inconsistent across the school, with too little guidance for students on how to improve their work.

p.4

Key findings

 Although students display positive attitudes to learning, work well with each other, and the behaviour seen in lessons and around the school during the inspection was good, many parents and carers raised concerns about low level disruption in lessons. Inspectors agree that, over time, behaviour is satisfactory.

p.4

Key findings

 School leaders have a broadly accurate view of strengths and weaknesses, effectively manage the performance of teachers and are committed to raising the achievement of all students. However, a new leadership structure and changes to school review processes have not yet sharply identified the actions required to tackle the uneven progress made by students. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Key findings

 The sixth form is satisfactory. Standards in the sixth form fluctuate and remain below the national averages. However, given their starting points, students make satisfactory progress overall.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Ensure students make good progress from their starting points and that by June 2013, at least 70% of teaching is good or better, through:  ensuring lessons are planned to provide challenging activities matched to students’ different needs  making sure that all students receive regular feedback on their work through good quality marking that gives purposeful advice on how to improve and then allows students time to respond to this advice  providing co-ordinated opportunities for students to develop their literacy and numeracy skills in all subjects.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Strengthen the leadership skills of leaders at all levels so that they can take greater responsibility for driving improvement by:  developing the school’s existing self-review model to focus on the quality of teaching and learning and its impact on students’ progress  sharing the good practice of the most effective middle leaders so that all department leadership is of a consistently high standard.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Students enter the school with attainment that is broadly average. Overall attainment at the end of Key Stage 4 remains broadly average but the proportion of students gaining five or more A* to C grades at GCSE including English and mathematics has risen significantly in the last two years. Evidence in lessons, books and from assessment data indicates that students are making progress in line with expectations. Vocational courses have been very successful in raising the proportion of students leaving with five or more qualifications. In general, students in the sixth form reach AS and A level grades below national levels but progress from their starting points is in line with national expectations.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

In lessons, students are keen to learn and, when offered suitably challenging activities, they engage enthusiastically, supporting one another and working well independently. Students enjoy opportunities for discussion and practical activities. In a Year 10 science ‘super learner day’, active teaching methods were used to fully engage students. They said that they valued the day because it gave them the opportunity to share knowledge with their peers, ask questions and ensure they were revising important topics. The development of students’ literacy and numeracy skills is supported in some lessons. For example, in a science lesson key terminology and definitions were introduced as a fun bingo-style starter. However, there are no Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Achievement of pupils

school-wide priorities to guide further development in this area.

p.6

Achievement of pupils

Some groups of students, in particular, boys, disabled students and those who have special educational needs, made less progress than other groups in 2011. The school has introduced a number of strategies to improve the achievement of these groups. These include changes to the curriculum and more rigorous monitoring of students’ performance against their targets, with appropriate interventions for those falling behind. These actions have been effective in reducing the gap between these students and other groups in the current Year 11 and so that they are now making satisfactory progress. The great majority of parents and carers believe that their children make good progress. However, inspection findings do not fully support this view.

p.6

Quality of teaching

The great majority of parents believe that teaching is good. Inspectors found that teaching is satisfactory overall with some that is good and instances of outstanding teaching. When teaching is at its best, lessons proceed at a good pace and are planned to meet the needs of all students. In a Year 7 drama lesson, questions matched to students’ different needs were pinned to the wall around the classroom so that students could select their level and the degree of challenge; they did so with enthusiasm and ambition. Teachers’ questioning is used to explore and develop students’ understanding and, in the best examples, students are encouraged to respond to and challenge the opinions of their peers. The most rapid and secure learning occurs when students engage in challenging, motivating tasks that enable them to think independently. This feature was particularly noticeable in sixth form lessons, for example in a Year 13 performing arts lesson in which students were

p.6

Quality of teaching

required to take ownership of their own learning in accurately assessing the work of their peers. In all lessons observed by inspectors, there were good relationships between teachers and students. Lessons contributed well to the development of students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development with students demonstrating good co-operative skills, respect for each other and reflective responses. For example, in a Year 8 English lesson, students were encouraged to show empathy in their writing by considering life from the point of view of a homeless person.

p.6

Quality of teaching

In satisfactory lessons, teachers often dominate learning time, limiting opportunities for students to practise and develop new skills. Work does not challenge all students and is not well matched to individual needs across the ability range within a class. As a result, students who find the work difficult struggle to get started, and to sustain the pace of learning. Teachers’ questions seek responses that are brief or superficial and, as a result, miss opportunities to reshape the learning in lessons to address weaknesses in understanding. These features combine to limit the progress made in lessons and over time.

p.6

Quality of teaching

The quality of marking and feedback varies considerably across the school with a significant amount of marking that is brief and infrequent. The most effective Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Quality of teaching

marking gives students clear written information about what they have achieved and how they can improve.

p.7

Quality of teaching

The teaching of disabled students and those who have special educational needs is satisfactory. Teachers use their understanding of students’ needs to plan effectively and individual support provided by teaching assistants ensures they are able to engage in lessons. However, at times, this support encourages dependency rather than giving students the tools and confidence to complete tasks for themselves.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

During the inspection, the vast majority of students behaved well in lessons and around the school. They displayed positive attitudes and were polite and courteous to each other and to adults. However, the school is right in judging that behaviour is satisfactory. Responses to the parental questionnaire and discussions with students indicated that, on occasions, the poor behaviour of a few students disrupts learning, especially when teaching does not engage or motivate them. The school has strong evidence that behaviour is improving, including a considerable year-on-year fall in the number of fixed-term exclusions required to address unacceptable behaviour. Bullying logs and behaviour records suggest the number of incidences of bullying have halved between 2010-11 and 2011-12. The school has logged a number of instances of racial bullying, but inspectors are confident that the school acted appropriately to deal with these incidents and has put in place actions to increase

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

students’ understanding of all types of bullying. Students expressed a high degree of confidence in how the school deals with bullying. As a result, they feel safe in school and a large majority of parents and carers agree with that. However, parents and carers raised a number of concerns about poor communication from the school on the resolution of bullying issues and inspectors agree that although the school takes bullying seriously, it does not always inform parents and carers of the outcomes of its actions.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Attendance has improved during this academic year for all groups of students, as a result of a number of positive interventions, and it is now broadly average. Recent developments have included a more systematic approach to improving attendance, parental notification by text and focused, multi-agency work. These improvements have led to a decline in the number of students who are persistently absent from school.

p.7

Leadership and management

The school is led effectively and senior leaders have the confidence of staff and are driving forward improvements after a period of turbulence in the leadership of the school. The local authority currently manages some areas of governance but it is working closely with the governing body to re-establish full accountability once a permanent headteacher has been appointed. A system of departmental reviews, including lesson observations, work scrutiny and feedback from students, has been in place for a year and has been effective in identifying areas of underperformance. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Leadership and management

These reviews lie at the heart of school self-evaluation and while in some cases they provide senior leaders with information that is sufficiently rigorous to highlight in detail the steps required to improve departmental performance, this is not always the case. Performance management systems are robust and require that staff at all levels are held to account for the progress of students. However, professional development opportunities are not focused sharply enough on enabling satisfactory teachers to improve. All requirements for the safeguarding of students were in place at the time of the inspection. Success in improving attendance, behaviour and achievement in core subject areas are indicative of the school’s capacity for further improvement.

p.8

Leadership and management

Leaders effectively monitor the performance of all groups of students to ensure the school meets its responsibilities in promoting equality and tackling discrimination. The school is working hard to ensure that all students have access to an appropriate curriculum and the support they need to achieve their potential. The curriculum is good because it has undergone significant change over the last few years to meet the needs of all students better, including boys and disabled students and those who have special educational needs. At Key Stage 4, the focus has been on increasing the range of academic and vocational courses to motivate and engage students. The school promotes students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development well. These aspects of learning are well-embedded in lessons and reinforced through assemblies and in the ethos of the school. The curriculum in the sixth form provides a good range of courses, partly in collaboration with other local schools.

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 54 42 2 2 Primary schools 14 49 32 6 Secondary schools 20 39 34 7 Special schools 33 45 20 3 Pupil referral units 9 55 28 8 All schools 16 47 31 6

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September to 31 December 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance: the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour: how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Floor standards: the national minimum expectation of attainment and progression measures.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety: how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.

p.10

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.11

Inspection of Barnwell School, Stevenage, SG2 9SW

Thank you for the friendly welcome you gave us when we inspected your school recently. Many of you took the time to approach us and talk to us about your school. We enjoyed being in your lessons and reading your responses to the questionnaires.

p.11

Inspection of Barnwell School, Stevenage, SG2 9SW

We found that Barnwell School is a satisfactory school. There is clear evidence of improvement in your achievement, and most of you are making satisfactory progress. You told us you enjoy coming to school, and your attendance is improving. You benefit from positive relationships with staff. Like you, we found that much teaching at Barnwell is good but overall we judged teaching to be satisfactory. This is because the quality of teaching varies considerably and it is not yet supporting you to make consistently good progress.

p.11

Inspection of Barnwell School, Stevenage, SG2 9SW

We found that your school is a safe and orderly place where most students conduct themselves well and are courteous and polite. However, we agree with you that, on occasions, low-level disruption interrupts learning so behaviour was judged to be satisfactory.

p.11

Inspection of Barnwell School, Stevenage, SG2 9SW

We have asked your teachers to help you to make consistently good progress by making some changes to the way they teach including:

p.11

Inspection of Barnwell School, Stevenage, SG2 9SW

 providing you with learning activities that are closely matched to your ability  marking your work in greater detail and giving you clear suggestions about how to improve  supporting your literacy and numeracy development in all lessons.

p.11

Inspection of Barnwell School, Stevenage, SG2 9SW

We have also asked the leaders to check the school’s work more closely. You all can help by continuing to work hard, attend regularly and behave well. Thank you again for helping us with the inspection of your school. We wish you every success in the future.

p.11

Inspection of Barnwell School, Stevenage, SG2 9SW

Deborah James Lead inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion