Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)
Bristol Metropolitan Academy
Summary
Karl Sampson (lead), Pauline Robins, Suha Ahmad
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
24 May 2012
- Inspectors verified
Karl Sampson, Pauline Robins, Suha Ahmad
- Achievement verified
Good
- Behaviour and safety verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Quality of teaching verified
Good
- Name on report verified
Bristol Metropolitan Academy
- URN verified
135959
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- AchievementGood
- Behaviour and safetyGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Quality of teachingGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- For example, in a Year 12 English for Speakers of other Languages (ESOL) lesson, the teacher’s excellent subject knowledge and understanding of each individual were used deftly to adjust and structure learning opportunities so that all students made excellent progress. p.6
- This is due to effective behaviour systems now in place that are usually consistently applied across the academy; the ‘Metropolitan Way’ sets high expectations and clear consequences so that any inappropriate behaviour is swiftly dealt with. p.7
- Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. p.9
- An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.9
- The academy has high expectations of its students and places a strong emphasis on their social, moral, spiritual and cultural development. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In weaker lessons, teachers do not sufficiently reshape the learning planned in the light of students’ responses, and progress slows because learning activities are not matched well enough to meet individual needs. p.7
- Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. p.9
- An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. p.9
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 2,953
- about usual (typical 2920)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 37, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Age group 11–18 Inspection date(s) 23–24 May 2012 Inspection number 381982 Bristol Metropolitan Academy Inspection report
p.1
Unique reference number 135959 Local authority N/A Inspection number 381982 Inspection dates 23–24 May 2012 Lead inspector Karl Sampson HMI
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Type of school Academy School category Non-maintained Age range of pupils 11–18 Gender of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 573 Of which, number on roll in the sixth form 81 Appropriate authority The Academy Council and the Cabot Learning Federation Board Chair Jon Gould and Ron Richie Principal Steve Taylor Date of previous school inspection N/A School address Snowdon Road Fishponds Bristol BS16 2HD Telephone number 0117 3772071 Fax number 0117 3772090 Email address info@bristolmet.net achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and
p.1
other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.2
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.
p.2
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk Reference source not found.Error! Reference source not found. 3 of 12
p.2
Introduction
This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. Inspectors carried out observations of two full lessons and 26 part-lessons taught by 27 teachers. Fourteen of the lessons were jointly observed with a member of the academy’s leadership team as well as the Executive Principal of the Cabot Learning Federation. One inspector undertook a learning walk which comprised a number of short visits to lessons to look at provision for lower-ability students and students with special educational needs. Inspectors also made short visits to lessons to look at the quality of marking. Discussions were held with: senior and middle leaders, staff, the Executive Principal and Chair of the Federation board, the Chair and a member of the Academy Council and different groups of students. Inspectors observed the academy’s work, and looked at the academy’s self-evaluation and planning documents, external evaluations of the academy’s work, policy documents and
p.3
Introduction
students’ work. They analysed 99 inspection questionnaires sent in by parents and carers, questionnaires completed by a sample of students from each year group and 36 completed by staff.
p.3
Information about the school
Bristol Metropolitan Academy is smaller than the average-sized secondary school. The academy opened in September 2009 and holds modern languages specialist status. The proportion of students known to be eligible for free school meals is high. The majority of students are of minority ethnic heritage, most frequently Black African, with a broad range of other ethnic and cultural backgrounds represented. The proportion of students who speak English as an additional language is much higher than that found nationally. There are relatively high numbers of in-year admissions and many of these students are new to the country. The proportion of disabled students and those with special educational needs supported by school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is below the national average. Of these, the majority have emotional, social and behavioural needs.
p.3
Information about the school
The academy meets the government’s current floor standards, which sets minimum expectations for students’ attainment and progress.
p.3
Information about the school
The Cabot Learning Federation, sponsored by Rolls Royce PLC and the University of the West of England, has been the sponsor of Bristol Metropolitan Academy since 2009 when the Academy opened. The federation consists of a group of four local primary and six secondary academies who work together to share effective practice and leadership strategies to accelerate school improvement. This work is led and coordinated by an Executive Principal. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.3
Key findings
This is a good academy. It is not yet outstanding because greater consistency in the practice of individual teachers over time and a stronger overall quality are required to move good teaching and learning towards outstanding. The sixth form is satisfactory and is improving quickly and securely. Actions arising from the Principal’s pursuit of excellence have had considerable impact on improving academic outcomes, behaviour and students’ personal development and well-being. Support for students who speak English as an additional language is outstanding. One parent summarised the views of many as follows: ‘The Principal and his staff have transformed the school and have given the community a school to be proud of.’ The academy has high expectations of its students and places a strong emphasis on their social, moral, spiritual and cultural development. Students are encouraged to work and socialise together and this fosters good behaviour,
p.4
Key findings
positive relationships and tolerance. Historically, attainment has been low, reflecting students’ very low starting points. However, there has been strong and steady improvement in students’ achievement because of targeted professional development focusing on high- quality teaching and the improvement of literacy skills across the curriculum. Consequently, students make better progress than their peers nationally, regardless of background, starting point or special educational needs. Teaching is good overall, and some is outstanding. The development of classroom practice through ‘Theory Thursdays’ and the increasing influence of an effective federation-wide ‘learning community’ are being used well to drive further improvements in teaching. Staff performance is managed effectively. The academy council and the federation board support the academy well. The academy has an inclusive approach to promoting further studies for all
p.4
Key findings
students and this has been effective in raising their aspirations to join the sixth form. However, in the past a significant minority of students underachieved because they were inappropriately matched to their courses. The academy has taken swift and concerted action to remedy this and updated procedures are now firmly in place. Although inspectors could see the positive effect of these changes, they have not yet had time to have a full impact on students’ Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.4
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Build upon the effective foundations laid to raise students’ aspirations in the sixth form and improve achievement further by: extending and developing a curriculum adapted in response to students’ learning needs that maximises and supports the progress of all students regardless of starting point.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Strengthen the overall quality of teaching and, at an individual teacher level, achieve greater consistency of good and outstanding practice by: ensuring that the quality of all teaching and learning matches the best in the academy through effective dissemination of exemplary teaching to help others to understand how to improve their own practice ensuring that teachers are equally effective in checking the progress of all learners during lessons and are, therefore, able to reshape learning activities to meet individual needs, provide high levels of challenge and secure consistently good or better progress developing students’ numeracy skills more systematically in all subjects ensuring consistency in the use of high-quality subject-specific verbal and written feedback and providing routine opportunities for students to respond to teachers’ verbal and written comments and engage in a dialogue of learning and assessment.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Attainment on entry to the academy is low, but there has been a dramatic rise in the proportion of students gaining five or more GCSE A* to C grades or equivalent and this is now significantly above the national average. The academy has also been effective in the action it has taken to raise achievement in English and mathematics, which has risen well since the academy opened. Students’ literacy is being developed effectively through a successful emphasis on the use of subject-specific terminology and common approaches to develop the quality and structure of writing. It is complemented by excellent provision for students who speak English as an additional language, of whom some are at the early stages of learning English. Many of these students make outstanding progress. The academy’s literacy strategies are becoming effectively embedded and bearing fruit as shown by the accelerated rate at which students are closing the gap towards what is attained nationally. However, leaders
p.5
Achievement of pupils
recognise that the development of mathematical skills is a weaker aspect of students’ development and while the academy knows where different subjects might contribute, practice is as yet unsystematic. Although good overall, progress in mathematics is not as strong as in English and science. Science is a particular strength, partly because the department provides a variety of courses to meet most Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.5
Achievement of pupils
needs and partly because it promotes learning successfully. The large majority of parents and carers are pleased with the progress made by their children. A wide range of inspection evidence confirms the accuracy of this view.
p.6
Achievement of pupils
Expectations of students’ capabilities have been raised through more stringent use of assessment data to set challenging targets and inform teachers’ planning. All students know their targets and the academy tracks their progress rigorously. The best learning takes place when students are challenged to think issues through for themselves and engage with a variety of interesting and stimulating activities. Students work well together in pairs and groups and learning and progress are maximised when tasks are planned to develop their communication and literacy skills, whatever the subject content. In the majority of the lessons observed, students from all groups made good progress. This is confirmed by an analysis of students’ achievement over time which shows that almost all groups of students make better progress than their peers nationally. Disabled students and those with special educational needs achieve at least as well as their peers. The progress made
p.6
Achievement of pupils
by a few students supported at school action plus is less rapid than their peers and the academy has implemented good plans to meet these students’ specific needs.
p.6
Achievement of pupils
Intra-federation support is being used well to develop the range of courses and refine entry requirements so that all sixth form students are provided with good opportunities for progression to further education and training. Systems for monitoring the performance of students and subjects have been significantly strengthened and improved teaching is accelerating the rate at which sixth form students are making progress over time.
p.6
Quality of teaching
The overall quality of teaching across the academy is good, and improving over time. Teachers have good subject knowledge and high expectations for students’ achievement. Good relationships and behaviour in classrooms add to an atmosphere conducive to learning. The most effective teachers know exactly where students are in their learning, understand when they are ready to take the next steps and convey clearly how this can best be achieved. They communicate their enthusiasm for the subject and design activities that engage, stretch and challenge all learners regardless of starting point so that their progress is consistently good or better. For example, in a Year 12 English for Speakers of other Languages (ESOL) lesson, the teacher’s excellent subject knowledge and understanding of each individual were used deftly to adjust and structure learning opportunities so that all students made excellent progress. An analysis of students’ work showed the outstanding progress
p.6
Quality of teaching
they had made since beginning the course. The students took great pride in describing the impact that the teaching was having in developing their confidence in applying their newly found skills in written and spoken English to ‘real life’ situations. Teachers and the curriculum provide good opportunities for students to celebrate their individuality as well as fostering a strong appreciation of cultural diversity.
p.6
Quality of teaching
Elsewhere, good practice prevails, although inspectors observed as much satisfactory Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.6
Quality of teaching
teaching as that which was outstanding. In weaker lessons, teachers do not sufficiently reshape the learning planned in the light of students’ responses, and progress slows because learning activities are not matched well enough to meet individual needs. Students and their parents and carers rightly express confidence in the quality of teaching overall, but recognise that there is still some variation in quality at individual teacher level. Evidence gathered from a review of some of the students’ exercise books across a range of subjects showed some variation in the quality of marking and feedback. While students receive written feedback through ‘two stars and a wish’, in some instances the comments are too general and lack clarity to identify precisely the next steps in learning, for example, in mathematics. Teachers are beginning to expect students to engage in a dialogue of learning and respond to their comments. An outstanding product design lesson demonstrated the
p.7
Quality of teaching
impact that such an approach was having over time as a result of precisely focused and individually planned learning. All students were comfortably exceeding their challenging targets and able to talk explicitly about how regular dialogue with the teacher through their ‘learning logs’ had helped to develop their skills, extend their thinking and build their confidence in relation to the forthcoming examination. However, where students are not expected to respond routinely to written feedback and/or engage in a dialogue of learning the impact on progress is diminished.
p.7
Behaviour and safety of pupils
In this extremely diverse community, students and staff treat each other with respect. Differences are accepted as a matter of course and mixed-age tutor groups support harmonious social relationships. Students new to the academy are sensitively integrated into the community, which respects and values cultural diversity both within its boundaries and further afield. Students say that they feel safe and well cared for and their parents and carers strongly agree. Lessons typically proceed well and, as students said, there are relatively few interruptions. This was a view supported by staff and most parents and carers, although a small minority indicated that there are occasions when learning in lessons can be disrupted by others. This was explored by inspectors and found to be linked to where teaching is less secure and often where there have been temporary teachers. On most occasions, where the staff are skilful and lessons are well planned and interesting, difficult behaviour is
p.7
Behaviour and safety of pupils
managed well. The academy has systematically and effectively tackled previously low attendance so that it is now average and improving; it has been particularly successful at reducing the high level of persistent absence, although this still remains a priority for a few students supported by school action plus.
p.7
Behaviour and safety of pupils
Academy records show that incidents and exclusions have reduced dramatically since the academy opened. This is due to effective behaviour systems now in place that are usually consistently applied across the academy; the ‘Metropolitan Way’ sets high expectations and clear consequences so that any inappropriate behaviour is swiftly dealt with. Effective steps are taken to ensure that students understand their role in tackling prejudice and bullying of all kinds and they speak knowledgeably about contemporary issues with respect to homophobic and cyber-bullying. Students are confident that when problems do occur they are resolved quickly if reported to staff. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.7
Behaviour and safety of pupils
The academy works hard to support those students who arrive from other schools where they may have had problems. Increasingly, students at risk of exclusion are being successfully managed and supported through strategies which focus on raising self-esteem, on anger management and in providing support through mentoring. The work of the student support base and the federation’s ‘CLF studio’ are valuable aspects of provision in which previously disaffected learners and/or those whose circumstances make them vulnerable can thrive.
p.8
Leadership and management
The dynamic leadership of the Principal has been pivotal in transforming provision and outcomes in the time leading to the academy’s first inspection. He has assembled a good team of senior leaders who know the academy’s strengths, plan appropriately for improvement and have the confidence and trust of staff, students and parents. Performance management of teachers is linked closely to their professional development and this is having a good impact on improving the quality of teaching in many subjects. Teachers appreciate time each week for collaborative planning and sharing of effective practice within and across departments. Senior leaders recognise that the impact is not consistent across all departments and are continuing the process of further strengthening middle leadership and teaching quality as the next significant step on the journey to excellence. The academy is outward looking. Links with other agencies and with other schools within the
p.8
Leadership and management
federation add value to the academy’s practices as they evolve. For example, the academy’s work is enhanced by a range of leadership development programmes and commissioned academy peer reviews which are accessed through the federation and coordinated by the Executive Principal. It clearly shows the burgeoning ‘community of practice’ that is helping to sustain the academy’s good capacity to improve through effective succession planning and shared school improvement strategies.
p.8
Leadership and management
Equality of opportunity sits at the heart of the academy’s work and manifests itself in the good achievement of students in the main school, and a sixth form that is now well placed to maintain its upward trajectory. The curriculum at both Key Stages 3 and 4 has been carefully refined to meet students’ needs, raise achievement and support progression. Along with a good range of enrichment and extra-curricular activities, it deepens and broadens students’ experience and makes a good contribution to their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. The actions of the academy council and its links with the federation board make a worthy contribution to continuing improvement. The Executive Principal acts as an effective bridge between these aspects of governance and senior academy leaders to ensure that they are challenged and supported to improve students’ achievement. Safeguarding arrangements are robust, effective and meet requirements. Feedback
p.8
Leadership and management
from parents and carers is very positive; most say they would recommend the academy and this is supported by the significant year-on-year increase in first choice applications for Year 7. A number of parental contacts to the team by telephone highlighted the significant improvement that they had seen since the academy opened.
p.8
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Nursery schools 54 42 2 2 Primary schools 14 49 32 6 Secondary schools 20 39 34 7 Special schools 33 45 20 3 Pupil referral units 9 55 28 8 All schools 16 47 31 6
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September to 31 December 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.
p.9
Common terminology used by inspectors
Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attendance: the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Behaviour: how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Floor standards: the national minimum expectation of attainment and progression measures.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Safety: how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.
p.10
carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s
main findings from the inspection of their school.
p.11
Inspection of Bristol Metropolitan Academy, Bristol, BS16 2HD
I write on behalf of the inspection team that recently visited your academy. Thank you for being so welcoming and for sharing your thoughts with us. You said you feel safe and enjoy life at the academy. We were impressed with the harmonious social relationships which exist between all members of your school community.
p.11
Inspection of Bristol Metropolitan Academy, Bristol, BS16 2HD
Mr Taylor, the academy council and staff have worked tirelessly to significantly improve the quality of your education since the academy opened. All of you achieve well and you are well equipped for the next stage in education, training or work. You appreciate the good range of enrichment and extra-curricular opportunities available to you. Parents and carers who spoke with inspectors are right to be happy with the rate of improvement and rising standard of education you are provided with. Teaching is good in the majority of lessons and allows you to make good progress in your learning. We have asked Mr Taylor and his team to continue to improve your achievement and ensure that teaching continues to improve by:
p.11
Inspection of Bristol Metropolitan Academy, Bristol, BS16 2HD
ensuring that the sixth form curriculum is further adapted in response to need to ensure the right mix of courses exist so that all students are able to maximise their progress and achieve to their potential enabling teachers to share their best ideas across all subjects and learn from each other so that all teaching is consistently good or better developing your numeracy skills more systematically in all subjects ensuring that teachers consistently give you high-quality feedback in lessons and on your work to stretch and challenge your thinking, better meet your individual learning needs and enable you to demonstrate your improvement.
p.11
Inspection of Bristol Metropolitan Academy, Bristol, BS16 2HD
All members of the academy’s community have together made a considerable journey to become a good and improving secondary school. Through good behaviour, improved attendance and trying your best, you have played your part in that process and should feel proud of your achievements. I wish you all well in your continuing journey to excellence.
p.11
Inspection of Bristol Metropolitan Academy, Bristol, BS16 2HD
Karl Sampson Her Majesty's Inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion