Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)
King David Primary School
Summary
Mark Mumby (lead), Dennis Brittain
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
24 May 2012
- Inspectors verified
Dennis Brittain, Mark Mumby
- Achievement verified
Outstanding
- Behaviour and safety verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Quality of teaching verified
Good
- Name on report verified
King David Junior and Infant School
- URN verified
103444
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2007.
- OverallGood
- AchievementOutstanding
- Behaviour and safetyGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Quality of teachingGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. p.9
- An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.9
- Pupils’ achievement is outstanding as a result of good teaching, and positive attitudes to learning with strong support from parents and carers. p.4
- In other year groups, teaching is consistently at least good, with elements of outstanding practice. p.4
- This has been very well received by the pupils and is already having a positive impact on increasing progress, especially for pupils in Key Stage 2. p.7
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school is not outstanding because the quality of teaching is not consistently high enough throughout the school. p.4
- It responds rigorously to unacceptable levels of absence and has maintained attendance levels in line with the national average for the current year. p.7
- Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. p.9
- An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. p.9
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve the quality of teaching further so that the majority is outstanding by: Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms p.4
- Ensure attendance levels remain at least in line with the national average by: working with parents and carers to ensure that their children attend school every day helping pupils to understand the importance of good attendance. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 2,232
- shorter than usual (typical 2920)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Age group 3–11 Inspection date(s) 23–24 May 2012 Inspection number 376906 King David Junior and Infant School Inspection report
p.1
Unique reference number 103444 Local authority Birmingham Inspection number 376906 Inspection dates 23–24 May 2012 Lead inspector Mark Mumby HMI
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 246 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Barry Henley Headteacher Stephen Langford Date of previous school inspection 21 March 2007 School address Alcester Road Birmingham B13 8EY Telephone number 0121 4493364 Fax number 0121 4493364 Email address enquiry@kingdavid.bham.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education a nd training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked
p.1
after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.2
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.
p.2
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
Introduction
This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. Inspectors observed 10 different teachers during 15 observations of parts of lessons. Meetings were held with the senior leadership team, members of staff and representatives of the governing body. They held informal discussions with pupils in lessons and at break times. Inspectors took account of the responses to the on-line Parent View survey in planning the inspection, observed the school’s work, and looked at a range of the school’s documentation including that relating to pupils’ learning, school improvement, safeguarding and governance. They took account of the responses to questionnaires returned by pupils, staff and 96 parents and carers. Inspectors also held discussions with a few parents and carers.
p.3
Information about the school
King David Junior and Infant School is a Jewish school which serves a culturally diverse community. It is of average size for a primary school. The large majority of pupils are from minority ethnic backgrounds; the largest group being of Pakistani origin which represents just over 40% of the school’s population. Nearly half of the pupils speak English as an additional language. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is similar to the national average. The proportion of pupils supported by school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is much smaller than the national average. The school meets the government’s floor standard which is the minimum standard expected by the government.
p.3
Information about the school
The school has achieved Healthy School Status. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.3
Key findings
This is a good school. Pupils’ achievement is outstanding as a result of good teaching, and positive attitudes to learning with strong support from parents and carers. The school is not outstanding because the quality of teaching is not consistently high enough throughout the school.
p.4
Key findings
Many pupils reach levels of attainment in reading and mathematics well above those expected for their age by the time they leave. Attainment in writing is above the national average.
p.4
Key findings
Teaching is particularly strong in the Early Years Foundation Stage. In other year groups, teaching is consistently at least good, with elements of outstanding practice. Teachers do not always use assessment well enough when pupils are working independently to check on understanding and then to provide additional challenge or support as necessary. Classroom routines are firmly established in Key Stage 1, but are less secure in Key Stage 2.
p.4
Key findings
Pupils behave well and adopt safe practices. Attendance has fluctuated over recent years, dipping below the national average on occasions. It is currently in line with the national average.
p.4
Key findings
The school’s leaders, including the governing body, have a clear understanding about the school’s strengths and areas for development. Priorities for development have been identified accurately and work to strengthen the quality of teaching is being successful. For example, the effective introduction of a thematic curriculum has contributed to pupils’ high levels of achievement, especially in Key Stage 2.
p.4
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching further so that the majority is outstanding by: Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.4
What does the school need to do to improve further?
making more effective use of assessment during independent tasks to challenge and extend pupils’ learning ensuring that the well-established classroom routines already in place in some classes become firmly embedded throughout the school developing the thematic curriculum to enable younger pupils to use and apply their basic skills across the curriculum more effectively.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Ensure attendance levels remain at least in line with the national average by: working with parents and carers to ensure that their children attend school every day helping pupils to understand the importance of good attendance.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Children begin in the Nursery class with levels of knowledge and understanding similar to those expected for their age. This has risen in recent years; the attainment of older pupils when they began school was lower. In the Early Years Foundation Stage children show confidence in their speaking and listening skills. They apply skills they have developed through guided work well when working independently. Consequently, children learn quickly through their independent tasks when they are working alone or with other children. They achieve levels above the national average by the end of Reception.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Pupils in Key Stage 1 respond well to clearly established classroom routines ensuring that lessons flow smoothly. Pupils offer ideas readily and respond well to challenges. In Key Stage 2, pupils use their well-developed skills such as a good range of calculation strategies to solve mathematical problems. They have a secure understanding of appropriate scientific vocabulary. By the end of Key Stage 2, pupils have made outstanding progress to reach above-average levels of attainment. Approximately 40% of pupils in the current Year 6 are working at Level 6 in reading and mathematics, well above the expected Level 4.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Pupils have well-developed reading skills. Younger children successfully break down unfamiliar words to enable them to read them. Older pupils read a wide range of texts written by a variety of suitable authors. Pupils throughout the school enjoy reading and speak enthusiastically about the books they have read. Attainment in reading is broadly average at the end of Key Stage 1, but is above average by the end of Year 6.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
The school has very successfully narrowed the gap in attainment so that all groups of pupils achieve equally well. It has been particularly successful in enabling the large group of Pakistani pupils to make accelerated progress. Accurate identification of Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.5
Achievement of pupils
pupils’ needs and careful targeting of support has enabled the school to help disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs to make accelerated progress. Consequently, many of these pupils are quickly removed from the special needs register. The few pupils who remain on the register to the end of Key Stage 2 make at least the progress expected of all pupils.
p.6
Quality of teaching
Teachers use assessment effectively to plan lessons which meet the pupils’ needs well. They make good use of technology to engage the pupils’ interests and stimulate their imagination. For example, a Year 5 thematic mathematics lesson began with a strong sense of anticipation as pupils watched a short video clip from the winter Olympics before starting work to calculate perimeters and areas relating to a cross- country ski-ing course. During lesson introductions, teachers use questioning well to check pupils’ understanding and ensure that pupils quickly engage in independent work. However, the use of assessment is less strong during the independent tasks. Consequently, teachers and other adults do not always take every opportunity to move pupils on in their learning as quickly as they could. Classroom routines are firmly established in the Early Years Foundation Stage and in Key Stage 1 ensuring brisk and smooth transitions between activities. However, routines are less-well
p.6
Quality of teaching
established in Key Stage 2; this slows the pace of learning slightly on occasions.
p.6
Quality of teaching
Teaching assistants are deployed well. They work effectively alongside teachers to support pupils throughout lessons. They are particularly good at supporting disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs as well as those who speak English as an additional language. This helps to remove any barriers these pupils may face and enables them to make progress as quickly as other pupils.
p.6
Quality of teaching
Lessons provide pupils with good opportunities to work together and develop secure social skills. They participate in a good range of speaking and listening, drama and collaborative activities, enabling them to develop confidence. Pupils respond well to this approach which contributes to the good development of problem-solving in mathematics, for example. Pupils have opportunities to develop their investigative skills in science, but are occasionally confused because teachers do not always provide sufficiently clear guidance to ensure that investigations are fair tests.
p.6
Behaviour and safety of pupils
Pupils behave well around the school. They say that they enjoy school and feel safe. They have good attitudes in lessons, showing respect for one another and for staff. They show a good awareness of how to keep themselves safe in classrooms and outside. For example, children in the Nursery and Reception classes use a broad range of equipment safely. This positive view of pupils’ safety is shared by parents and carers; 100% of the parents’ and carers’ responses to the inspection questionnaire agreed that their children feel safe in school. At break times, some pupils take on responsibility as play leaders; they are effective in engaging other pupils in purposeful and enjoyable play. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.6
Behaviour and safety of pupils
A few of the parents and carers responding to the inspection questionnaire felt that the school does not deal with bullying effectively. However, the school’s records and discussions with pupils indicate that pupils have a good understanding about different types of bullying and that there are currently no issues with bullying in the school.
p.7
Behaviour and safety of pupils
Attendance levels have fluctuated over recent years, dipping below the national average on several occasions. The school has implemented a robust system to monitor attendance levels for different groups of pupils. It responds rigorously to unacceptable levels of absence and has maintained attendance levels in line with the national average for the current year.
p.7
Leadership and management
The school’s leaders and managers, including the governing body are firmly focused on improving teaching to make this an outstanding school. School improvement planning is rigorous and is overseen by the senior leadership team with appropriate involvement of pupils, staff, governors, parents and carers. It is based on appropriate priorities and a thorough audit. This model has been effective in securing improvement since the previous inspection. Communications with parents and carers have been improved through a range of initiatives to improve relationships and promote pupils’ learning. For example, curriculum workshops have enabled parents and carers to provide more effective support for their children at home. The success of work to improve learning in mathematics is evident in the good range of mathematical strategies being employed by pupils. There is a strong emphasis on professional development at staff meetings and teachers feel that they are supported
p.7
Leadership and management
The school assesses and tracks the attainment and progress of pupils very well. It uses this information to hold teachers to account for their work and to ensure that every pupil has equal opportunity to succeed. As a result, the school has successfully narrowed the gaps in performance between different groups of pupils.
p.7
Leadership and management
The school is currently introducing a thematic curriculum which enables pupils to develop their basic skills across a range of subjects. This has been very well received by the pupils and is already having a positive impact on increasing progress, especially for pupils in Key Stage 2. The curriculum is enriched with a good range of visits and visitors to school. The school makes particularly effective use of the local area for art, physical education and social events. The school provides adequate opportunities for pupils’ cultural development through topics studied in the geography curriculum and an annual culture day. The pupils support others less fortunate than themselves through fund-raising activities such as sending money to help a school in Kenya to build a new roof.
p.7
Leadership and management
The governing body is very knowledgeable and receives clear and accurate information about the school’s performance. Its rigorous approach to meetings and Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.7
Leadership and management
school visits as well as its conscientious regard to issues such as safeguarding ensure that it meets its responsibilities well. The school has robust systems in place for the safeguarding of pupils.
p.8
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Nursery schools 54 42 2 2 Primary schools 14 49 32 6 Secondary schools 20 39 34 7 Special schools 33 45 20 3 Pupil referral units 9 55 28 8 All schools 16 47 31 6
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September to 31 December 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.
p.9
Common terminology used by inspectors
Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attendance: the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Behaviour: how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Floor standards: the national minimum expectation of attainment and progression measures.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Safety: how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.
p.10
carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s
main findings from the inspection of their school.
p.11
Inspection of King David Junior and Infant School, Birmingham, B13 8EY
Thank you for making my colleague and me so welcome when we visited your school last week. We enjoyed talking with you and observing your lessons.
p.11
Inspection of King David Junior and Infant School, Birmingham, B13 8EY
You go to a good school, and your achievement is outstanding. Many of you attain very high standards by the time you are in Year 6. The school is not outstanding overall because teaching is mostly good, rather than outstanding. The teaching in Nursery and Reception is particularly good. In the rest of the school you could learn more quickly if your teachers challenged you a little more during your independent tasks. In Key Stage 2, some of you don’t settle down quickly enough when you move between activities on occasions. I have asked the school to improve these aspects of your lessons.
p.11
Inspection of King David Junior and Infant School, Birmingham, B13 8EY
Your school has introduced a thematic curriculum which a lot of you told us how much you like. This is making a big difference, especially in Key Stage 2. In Years 1 and 2, your teachers don’t plan quite as many opportunities for you to practise your English and mathematics skills in other subjects so I have asked your teachers to do this.
p.11
Inspection of King David Junior and Infant School, Birmingham, B13 8EY
You told us that you enjoy school and that you all behave well. We could see that you play sensibly together and understand how to keep yourselves safe. Most of you come to school regularly, but a few of you miss too much school. Please try to attend school every day.
p.11
Inspection of King David Junior and Infant School, Birmingham, B13 8EY
Mark Mumby Her Majesty's Inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion