Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Freemantle Church of England Community Academy

Inspected 17 May 2012 · published 14 Jun 2012 · URN 136641

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    17 May 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Fran Ashworth, Joy Considine, Olson Davis

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Behaviour and safety verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Quality of teaching verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Freemantle Church of England Community Academy

  • URN verified

    136641

Page 6 of 12
Page 6 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Behaviour and safetyGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Quality of teachingGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+38Positivemore positive than 8% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingmake good progressgood progressstrengthspositiveenjoyhigh expectationshighly effective
Criticisminadequatepoornot alwaysnot yetweaknessesat risknot outstandingtoo often

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1889w+28
  • Leadership388w+52
  • What needs to improve96w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,361
about usual (typical 2920)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 47
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 55%Leadership 11%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Age group 3–8 Inspection date(s) 16−17 May 2012 Inspection number 395467 Freemantle Church of England Community Academy Inspection report

p.1

Unique reference number 136641 Local authority Southampton Inspection number 395467 Inspection dates 16−17 May 2012 Lead inspector Joy Considine

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Academy converter School category Community Age range of pupils 3−8 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 311 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Melvyn Bradshaw Headteacher Kevin Barnett Date of previous school inspection 1 July 2008 School address Mansion Road Southampton SO15 3BQ Telephone number 023 8022 7925 Fax number 023 8023 4267 Email address info@freemantle.southampton.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colle ges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.2

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. Inspectors visited 14 lessons or parts of lessons taught by eight teachers. They listened to pupils read and they scrutinised their work. Discussions were held with pupils, members of the governing body and staff. Inspectors observed the school’s work and looked at school development plans, pupils’ assessment and tracking information and other documentation relating to the inspection, including safeguarding arrangements. They analysed the responses to questionnaires received from 98 parents and carers as well as those from staff and pupils.

p.3

Information about the school

Freemantle is larger than the average-sized primary school. It converted to academy status in April 2011. About half the pupils are from White British backgrounds and the others are from a variety of ethnic minority heritages of whom over one third speak English as an additional language. The proportion of pupils who are known to be eligible for free school meals is average. The proportion of pupils who are supported by school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is broadly average. There is provision in the Nursery and Reception classes for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage. The school runs a daily before-and after-school club. In September 2011, the school expanded to admit Year 3 pupils and it will continue to grow to become a two-form entry primary school by September 2014. Since the previous inspection there have been significant changes to the teaching team and a major building project to accommodate the additional pupils has been

p.3

Information about the school

completed. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Key findings

 This is a good school. It has built on previous strengths and is well placed to improve further. The school is highly inclusive, placing pupils’ achievement and well-being at the heart of what it does. It is not yet outstanding because teachers do not provide enough challenge for more-able pupils to help them to improve their writing skills. Additionally, a small minority of pupils are absent too often.  Pupils make good progress and achieve well, particularly in reading and mathematics. Their achievement in writing is weaker although, by the end of Key Stage 1, their attainment is broadly average. Pupils are articulate and communicate clearly. Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs achieve well because they receive well-targeted support to help them to overcome their difficulties.  Teaching is good. Pupils learn well because teaching is usually lively and engaging. Teachers provide activities that motivate pupils and inspire them to

p.4

Key findings

work hard. Although teachers provide pupils with detailed comments when marking their work, they do not always provide them with enough guidance about how they can improve their writing.  Pupils have positive attitudes to learning and they behave well in school. Safeguarding is given high priority and there are good systems in place to ensure that pupils are safe. Attendance is no better than average because a small number of parents and carers do not ensure that their children attend school regularly.  School leaders provide clear educational direction and have created a real sense of purpose among the school community. They understand the school’s strengths and weaknesses and are developing the skills of less experienced teachers so that they can take a more active role in monitoring teachers’ work, particularly in scrutinising pupils’ books. The planned programme of professional development, linked closely to performance management, has led

p.4

Key findings

to improvements in the quality of teaching. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Raise pupils’ attainment in writing so that a greater proportion of pupils attain the higher levels by July 2013 through: − providing pupils with clearer information about what they need to do to improve their work − improving the skills of teachers so that they accurately assess pupils’ writing and plan appropriate activities to sharpen their skills − ensuring that middle leaders carry out a regular and thorough scrutiny of pupils’ writing and provide guidance and support for teachers.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Work more closely with parents and carers to intensify efforts to raise levels of attendance.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Children start in the Early Years Foundation Stage with skills that are well below expected levels for their age. They make good progress in all areas of learning, particularly in their social skills and language and literacy. This is due to the strong emphasis given to broadening their experiences and providing activities that challenge and engage them. They responded with a sense of wonder and delight when brushing and stroking baby animals provided by a visiting farm. In class, they work cooperatively, sharing and taking turns. They make appropriate choices and enjoy taking part in activities, for example making model animals linked to their class topic.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Pupils, including those who speak English as an additional language, achieve well in reading and mathematics. In lessons, pupils have positive attitudes to learning and they want to do well. This helps them to make good progress. Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs learn well because work is tailored to meet their needs and they receive good support to help them to meet their individual learning targets.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Pupils throughout the school enjoy reading and they have learned a wide range of strategies to tackle unfamiliar words. The systematic way in which the linking of letters and sounds (phonics) is taught helps those in Key Stage 1 to reach standards that are average by the end of Year 2. In Year 3, this good progress continues so that pupils are able to use their reading skills independently to research their class topic as well as to read for pleasure. By the end of Year 3, their attainment in reading is better than typically found for pupils of this age.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Scrutiny of pupils’ work shows that they make a good start in learning to write but Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Achievement of pupils

their progress slows in Years 2 and 3. Although the majority of pupils reach broadly average standards in writing, a few more-able pupils have not yet developed the necessary skills to enable them to write fluently and confidently. This is because they are not given enough guidance about how they can edit and improve their work.

p.6

Achievement of pupils

Pupils have made good progress in their numeracy skills. Because of timetable constraints, it was not possible to observe any discrete mathematics lessons. However, in a design and technology lesson, pupils were demonstrating accuracy in measuring to make weather vanes. In another lesson, a group of pupils made tally charts to show favourite types of weather, following a survey of class members. Scrutiny of pupils’ work showed that most were able to solve number problems involving addition and subtraction accurately.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Teachers use stimulating methods to capture pupils’ interest and inspire them to work hard. Parents and carers who responded to the survey agreed that teaching was good and that their children made good progress. Pupils say that the lessons are typically fun, with a variety of exciting activities. In one lesson, pupils explored the school grounds to find a treasure chest and used their imagination to write about what might be found inside the chest. Most teachers have high expectations and they plan lessons to meet the wide range of pupils’ learning needs. This enables most pupils, including disabled pupils and those with special educational needs, to make good progress from their various starting points. However, a few teachers are over-generous when assessing pupils’ writing and consequently work is not always challenging enough for more-able pupils.

p.6

Quality of teaching

In the Early Years Foundation Stage, teachers ensure that children get a good balance of activities between those they select for themselves and those that are led by adults. Staff make good use of space to create opportunities for children to work and play, outside as well as in classrooms. Adults carefully observe children’s learning and use the resulting information to plan new experiences which build on previous learning. This enables children to make good progress in their development.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Teachers use assessment information to plan lessons that are mostly well matched to the learning needs of pupils. Systematic procedures for recording and tracking pupils’ progress allow teachers to identify quickly those at risk of falling behind and to plan timely interventions to help them to catch up. Although teachers mark pupils’ work and provide detailed comments about what they have done well, a few do not provide pupils with enough information about what they need to do to improve their work.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Most teachers are skilled at asking pupils questions that enable them to explain their thinking and to put forward their views and opinions. In some lessons, pupils are provided with opportunities to reflect on deeper issues. For example, pupils considered the moral dilemma of whether a character from Where the Wild Things Are should return home or stay with the wild creatures. This promoted a lively Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Quality of teaching

debate in which pupils reflected on the right course of action and made a good contribution to their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils’ enjoyment of school is reflected in their typically good behaviour and their positive attitudes in lessons. Adults have consistent approaches to managing pupils’ behaviour, although most pupils behave well because they enjoy learning. They say that bullying is rare and they have a good understanding of different types of bullying, such as physical, emotional and cyber-bullying. When disagreements do occasionally occur, adults are on hand to resolve issues quickly.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

In lessons and in the playground, pupils are polite, considerate and helpful to adults and to each other. Almost all parents and carers who responded to the survey felt that behaviour and safety were good and that few lessons were disrupted by poor behaviour. Exclusions are rare and there are few recorded incidents of poor behaviour over time.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils have a good understanding of how to stay safe and feel they are well prepared to resist peer pressure associated with risks such as smoking. Older pupils mix readily with younger pupils at break times and this makes a good contribution to their social development. The activities provided for pupils at the beginning and end of the school day provide additional opportunities for pupils of all ages to play together and this makes a good contribution to their social development. Pupils enjoy the opportunities they have to work and play with those from different backgrounds. They show respect towards the cultures and beliefs of those from different parts of the world. Despite the school’s best efforts to encourage good attendance, a small minority of parents and carers do not ensure that their children attend school regularly.

p.7

Leadership and management

School leaders and governors are ambitious and have high expectations of staff and pupils. They have successfully steered the school through a period of significant change while ensuring that pupils make good progress in their learning. This is due to the procedures for monitoring teachers’ work, which are used effectively to improve the quality of teaching. Consequently, teaching is usually good and improving. Middle leaders are developing their skills in monitoring lessons but they are not all sufficiently involved in scrutinising pupils’ writing.

p.7

Leadership and management

School leaders have an accurate understanding of the school’s strengths and areas for development. They are innovative and have introduced initiatives to improve provision for pupils. For example, they have developed the school grounds to provide exciting opportunities for pupils to learn outside. Curriculum planning builds on the rich curriculum found in the Early Years Foundation Stage, so providing continuity and progression in pupils’ learning. Strengths in provision for sports, art and music make a good contribution to pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Leadership and management

The governing body is actively involved in many aspects of the school. Governors are provided with good quality information which they use effectively to monitor and challenge school leaders. The school’s procedures for safeguarding are good. All adults are carefully checked and arrangements for protecting pupils are thorough. The governing body and leadership team ensure that equality and awareness of diversity are promoted well. Consequently, the growth in the number of pupils from different ethnic backgrounds has been managed especially well, with pupils made to feel welcome and helped to achieve as well as other groups.

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 54 42 2 2 Primary schools 14 49 32 6 Secondary schools 20 39 34 7 Special schools 33 45 20 3 Pupil referral units 9 55 28 8 All schools 16 47 31 6

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September to 31 December 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance: the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour: how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Floor standards: the national minimum expectation of attainment and progression measures.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety: how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.

p.10

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.11

Southampton SO15 3 BQ

Thank you very much for making us so welcome when we visited your school. We enjoyed meeting you all and listening to what you had to say about your school. You told us that teachers make lessons fun and that they provide you with interesting activities for you to do. You also told us that you enjoy working and playing with your friends and that most people are friendly and helpful.

p.11

Southampton SO15 3 BQ

We found that your school is a good school. Most of you work hard in your lessons and you make good progress in reading and mathematics. We agree that your teachers make lessons interesting and the school’s leaders work hard to make teaching even better. Although you do a lot of writing, we found that not enough of you write as well as you should. We also found that not all of you attend school as often as you should.

p.11

Southampton SO15 3 BQ

This is what we have asked your school leaders to do to make your school even better.

p.11

Southampton SO15 3 BQ

 Ensure that teachers let you know what you need to do to improve your writing, give you the opportunity to correct your work, make sure that all school leaders regularly look at your books and make suggestions about how your writing can be improved.  Work more closely with your parents and carers to encourage you to attend school at all times unless you are unwell.

p.11

Southampton SO15 3 BQ

I know that you will all do your best to help to make your school even better. You can help by asking teachers what you need to do to improve your writing and by telling your parents and carers how much you want to go to school every day.

p.11

Southampton SO15 3 BQ

Joy Considine Lead Inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion