Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 11 Jun 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Barbara Wintersgill

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Barbara Wintersgill

  • Postcode verified

    TQ5 9NH

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−46Criticalmore positive than 8% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingeffectivelystrongenthusiasmeffectiverigoroussensitiveconsistent
Criticisminadequateinsufficientweaknot securelimitedtoo manymissedlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings501w−52
  • Leadership123w−26
  • What needs to improve112w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
723
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 37, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Leadership 17%What needs to improve 15%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr K Kies Headteacher Eden Park Primary School Academy Eden Park Brixham Devon TQ5 9NH

p.1

education (RE)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 2 May 2012 to look at work in RE.

p.1

education (RE)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

education (RE)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of two lessons.

p.1

education (RE)

The overall effectiveness of RE is inadequate.

p.1

Achievement in RE

 Achievement is inadequate at both key stages because provision is insufficient to enable pupils to gain more than superficial knowledge and understanding of religion and belief or make satisfactory progress in the subject.  Year 2 pupils know some basic facts about Christianity but their knowledge of other religions is very weak. Pupils in Key Stage 2 do not extend their knowledge of religion sufficiently and rarely have the opportunity to apply higher level skills to the subject.  When the opportunity arises, pupils show considerable interest in and enthusiasm for RE. While pupils benefit from opportunities to reflect on issues of meaning and purpose, these reflections rarely take place in relation to the context of their learning in RE.

p.1

Quality of teaching in RE

The quality of teaching in RE is inadequate

p.2

Quality of teaching in RE

 In the two lessons seen during the visit, pupils made at least satisfactory progress and in one lesson, progress was outstanding. In this lesson, resources were used effectively to enable pupils to work independently and in groups. The sensitive exploration of beliefs about death enabled pupils to make strong links between their study of religions and their thinking about issues that concerned them.  However, teaching is inadequate overall because its impact over time does not secure the necessary gains in pupils’ knowledge, skills and understanding. Teachers do not plan and deliver RE to enable pupils to identify any connections between their study of religion and belief and their exploration of more personal reflections on issues of meaning and purpose.  Across the school, teachers’ subject expertise is limited. As a result, pupils do not have the opportunities or resources to promote effective learning.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in RE

The quality of the curriculum in RE is inadequate.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in RE

 RE has a very low profile in the curriculum and pupils rarely study RE. The learning opportunities provided are uncoordinated and insufficient for securing any measure of continuity or progression.  No overarching scheme of work or model is in place nor any coherent planning for the subject’s contribution to the wider curriculum.  When RE is taught it makes a good contribution to pupils’ spiritual, moral and cultural development, but too many opportunities are missed in the curriculum for this contribution to be consistent.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in RE

The effectiveness of leadership and management in RE is inadequate with satisfactory features.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in RE

 RE is not taught frequently enough to ensure pupils’ receive their full entitlement in the subject. No designated teacher has responsibility for the subject. As a result, there is no one to take the lead in developing the subject, ensuring the curriculum secures pupils’ entitlement and in training staff.  School leadership is not well informed about subject content or how RE might be taught within the existing curriculum structure.  Evaluations of RE and of pupils’ learning are rigorous and honest and recognise the shortfalls in subject provision. Development planning for RE reflects accurately the priorities that need to be implemented to reverse the current state of affairs.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 raising achievement in RE by ensuring that:  pupils receive their full entitlement to RE  the subject is effectively incorporated into the curriculum so that pupils have a continuous experience of the subject and that they make progress throughout the school  ensuring that subject leadership has a good understanding of RE that can be shared with all teachers in the school through staff training in the subject.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop RE in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion