Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 6 Jun 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

David Brown

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    David Brown

  • Postcode verified

    HG3 5HL

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+63Positivemore positive than 61% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellenthigh-qualityimprovedmake good progressclearconfidenteffectivekeen
Criticismlackmissedvariablenot effectivelylow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings677w+47
  • Leadership168w+81
  • What needs to improve167w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
998
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%Leadership 17%What needs to improve 17%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr I Simpson Acting Headteacher Nidderdale High School and Community College Low Wath Road Pateley Bridge Harrogate HG3 5HL

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 14 and 15 May 2012 to look at work in ICT.

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and students; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of students’ work; and observation of 10 lessons including two observed jointly with you.

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

The overall effectiveness of ICT is satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement in ICT

 Students begin in Year 7 with levels of attainment which are at the national average. By the end of Year 9, they have made satisfactory progress and are achieving in line with expectations. In Key Stage 4 all students now follow a vocational ICT course and make satisfactory progress.  Students with special educational needs and/or disabilities are supported well in ICT lessons. High-quality support, at times in small nurture groups, and good access to ICT facilities mean that these students make good progress.  Students’ behaviour in ICT lessons is good and this makes a significant contribution to their progress. The relationships between staff and students when using ICT are excellent. Students are keen to learn, they listen to each other and when given the opportunity, work well either in groups or independently.

p.1

Quality of teaching in ICT

The quality of teaching in ICT is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of teaching in ICT

 Teachers of ICT and those who use ICT in their teaching have good subject knowledge and are confident users of ICT. In better lessons, teachers plan work which engages, challenges and motivates students but in some lessons all the students were asked to do the same tasks. This lack of differentiation and pace limits the progress of students. Although some ICT teaching supports students in developing their independent learning skills, opportunities are missed for group or paired work and, in these lessons, learning can become too teacher-focused.  The assessment of work in ICT lessons is good. Students are aware of their end-of-year targets and their teachers ensure that they know how to achieve them. At times, however, this information is not used by teachers to plan lessons which challenge all abilities.  The use of ICT to support learning across the school is more variable. Students have good access to ICT in other subjects and it is used

p.2

Quality of teaching in ICT

appropriately in many lessons to develop their learning, but its use is not coordinated with the ICT curriculum and student progress in ICT is not monitored.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in ICT

The quality of the curriculum in ICT is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in ICT

 All students at Key Stage 3 receive their entitlement to the statutory ICT National Curriculum during ICT lessons. This curriculum has been recently updated to increase the interest to students.  The vocational curriculum provided at Key Stage 4 for all students to study ICT is appropriate and the school is flexible in choosing contexts and pathways which will be relevant. The school has plans to improve the Key Stage 4 curriculum to further increase choice and better meet the needs of more able students.  Students have access to some high-quality opportunities to use ICT in other subjects. In one Year 10 German lesson excellent resources were used to support students in preparing for their controlled assessment. However, this work is not effectively monitored or assessed, and this means that some students are receiving better experiences in ICT than others.  Students are supported to learn how to become responsible users of new

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in ICT

technologies through ICT and personal, social and health lessons (PSHE) and through assemblies. Discussions with students confirm that they have a clear understanding of how to keep themselves safe. The school informs and updates staff and parents of e-safety issues.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in ICT

The effectiveness of leadership and management in ICT is satisfactory.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in ICT

 The leadership of the school is currently experiencing significant turbulence at both senior management and departmental levels. The school has sought and received excellent support from a partner secondary school and the strategic leadership of ICT across the school is now much improved. Senior managers demonstrate a clear desire to improve standards and the quality of teaching and learning. The work of the ICT department is now monitored regularly and this is leading to rapid improvement.  Recent investments in ICT infrastructure, supported by staff, have improved access to facilities for staff and students. This is enhancing students’ achievement across the curriculum and has contributed to their improved progress.  A clear and understood vision exists for ICT both as a subject and across the school. Senior leaders are well informed of current developments in the subject and effective self-evaluation has informed a well-considered

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in ICT

ICT development plan. Overall the school shows good capacity to improve ICT further.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 improving the quality of students’ learning and their progress in ICT by:  sharing best practice to increase further the proportion of good teaching, in particular in using assessment information to provide all students with activities and tasks which are suitably matched to their abilities and interests  developing the ICT curriculum to better challenge and enthuse students, ensuring that the use of ICT in other subjects is monitored and linked to the work of the ICT department  ensuring that the school’s plans for ICT are implemented, in particular to improve access to ICT resources further, so that ICT makes a significant impact on students’ achievement in all curriculum areas

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop ICT in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion