Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

JCoSS

Inspected 16 May 2012 · published 1 Jun 2012 · URN 135747

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    16 May 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Jennifer Barker, John Meinke, Peter Dannheisser

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Jewish Community Secondary School

  • URN verified

    135747

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+65Positivemore positive than 68% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingexcellentexceptionalstrongexceptionallyvery highenthusiasmwell-planned
Criticisminadequatenot outstandingnot alwayspoordisruptionconcernsnot well plannednot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1863w+64
  • Leadership488w+61
  • What needs to improve57w+58

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,402
about usual (typical 2920)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 47
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 52%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Age group 11–18 Inspection date(s) 15–16 May 2012 Inspection number 381919 Jewish Community Secondary School Inspection report

p.1

Unique reference number 135747 Local authority Barnet Inspection number 381919 Inspection dates 15–16 May 2012 Lead inspector John Meinke

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Secondary School category Voluntary Aided Age range of pupils 11–18 Gender of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 342 Of which, number in the sixth form N/A Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Mike Grabiner Headteacher Jeremy Stowe-Lindner Date of previous school inspection N/A School address Castlewood Road New Barnet London EN4 9GE Telephone number 020 8344 2220 Fax number 0871 918 2214 Email address admin@jcoss.barnet.barnet.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and

p.1

other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.2

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. Inspectors observed 20 teachers teach 21 lessons, of which 5 were joint observations with members of the school’s senior leadership team. In addition, the inspection team made short visits to a number of other lessons. The inspectors held meetings with two groups of students, members of the governing body and school staff, including senior and middle leaders. They took account of the responses to the on-line Parent View survey in planning the inspection, observed the school’s work, and looked at a range of documents, including the school improvement plan, minutes of the governing body and school policies. They also analysed responses to the inspection questionnaires completed by 115 parents and carers and others completed by students and staff.

p.3

Information about the school

The Jewish Community Secondary School opened in new, purpose-built accommodation in September 2010 and currently has 342 students on roll in Years 7 and 8. Its projected roll by 2016 is 1,310, making it an above average-sized school when it reaches capacity. The school will open a sixth form in September 2012. The proportion of students known to be eligible for free school meals is below the national average. Most students are of White British heritage. The proportion of students supported by school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is above the national average. There is special provision for up to 49 students on the autistic spectrum, so far supporting 14 students. The school is currently oversubscribed.

p.3

Information about the school

The school has science college status. It has gained various awards including Investors in People. Given that the school does not yet have GCSE results, its performance has not been measured against the government floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for students’ attainment and progress. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Key findings

 This is a good school. Senior leaders have quickly established a culture of high aspiration and enthusiasm for learning, summed up by this comment from a parent. ‘JCoSS has made an excellent start. Our son thoroughly enjoys going to school and is challenged to perform at a very high level.’ Overall effectiveness is not outstanding because although the quality of teaching is consistently good and sometimes outstanding, it does not yet lead to outstanding progress in all lessons.  The school sets ambitious targets for all students and their progress is rigorously monitored at school, group and individual level. Achievement is good and in some cases outstanding because of consistently good and sometimes outstanding teaching, along with high expectations.  The quality of teaching is good and, in some cases, outstanding. Lessons typically feature well-planned activities which engage students’ interests and

p.4

Key findings

enable them to lead their learning. Learning is exceptional when tasks are suitably adapted to meet the needs of learners and present a high level of challenge. It is less successful when tasks are less well matched to students’ needs, or when resources, including additional adults, are not effectively deployed to support learning.  Behaviour is good and often excellent. The highly inclusive nature of the school, along with a clear ambition for all students to be successful, promotes a great enthusiasm for learning. Students are rightly proud of their new school and its growing reputation. The school provides outstanding opportunities for students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development.  The early success of the school has been achieved through an unrelenting drive for high quality teaching and exceptional progress. Staff performance is managed very effectively. The ambition to become outstanding is

p.4

Key findings

communicated clearly by senior leaders and the governing body. Leaders have a good understanding of the strengths and areas for development in teaching and there is a determined effort to raise its quality further. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Increase the proportion of outstanding teaching by:  planning tasks that are accurately matched to the needs of learners, including making astute and well-timed decisions about when to reshape activities during lessons  ensuring that resources, including additional adults, are as well deployed to support learning as is seen in the best practice across the school.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Students demonstrate great enthusiasm for learning and tackle challenging tasks with confidence and resilience. This is supported by the school’s ‘Building Learning Power’ strategy which supports students’ development of skills. In an art lesson students worked determinedly when asked to use their imagination to create artwork using a very limited range of materials. Students work together well and demonstrate responsibility when they are given the opportunity to lead their own learning. In a history lesson students managed a collaborative task well, including negotiating with the teacher on how long the task should take.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Students enter the school with prior attainment above the national average. Clear, challenging targets are set for students and their progress is carefully monitored. Decisive action is taken to ensure that students make good or better progress. Achievement in English is good and students acquire literacy skills well across the curriculum, including demonstrating high level communication skills through confident and articulate discussions. Good provision is in place for students who enter the school with low prior attainment in English and mathematics to ensure that they make accelerated progress. The most able are well catered for, for example through a gifted and talented book club which includes opportunities for national and international links and encourages students’ reading for pleasure. Students make exceptionally good progress in mathematics because of good teaching and well- planned lessons which provide a high level of challenge. Almost all parents or carers

p.5

Achievement of pupils

who responded to the inspection questionnaire felt that their child was making good progress at the school and the inspectors agree.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Disabled students and those with special educational needs make good progress due to the good provision and support which has been put in place for them. The special provision for students on the autistic spectrum is led and managed extremely well. It provides a safe, structured environment for students where they are supported through a carefully managed range of strategies, including planned opportunities for integration into the main school. Students’ progress is carefully monitored and their achievement is good. In an English lesson, structured activities including good use of visual resources and writing frames enabled students to develop their writing skills, including independent, extended writing where appropriate. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Quality of teaching

Lesson observations, discussions with students and the quality of students’ work indicate that the quality of teaching is good with examples of outstanding practice. The vast majority of parents and carers felt that their child was well taught and the inspectors agree. Positive relationships between students and adults promote a calm, purposeful atmosphere for learning. Teachers use their good subject knowledge to plan interesting, engaging and memorable activities, which are often related to real life scenarios through a themed curriculum. Clear learning objectives and success criteria are explained well by teachers and targeted questioning is used to challenge students and check their understanding. Tasks are skilfully adapted to meet the needs of individuals and the deployment of additional adults during lessons is, in the main, carefully planned. This ensures that they support learning and that disabled

p.6

Quality of teaching

students and those with special educational needs make good progress during lessons. The planned curriculum provides excellent opportunities for students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development through the exploration of ethical and moral issues and consideration of other cultures. Consistent application of the school’s assessment and marking policies results in students receiving regular feedback on how to take the next steps in their learning.

p.6

Quality of teaching

In an outstanding mathematics lesson a well-planned sequence of activities led to a good pace of learning with a high level of challenge. Regular checking of understanding led to a palpable sense of achievement. In an outstanding music lesson an imaginative starter, based on the biography of a musician, captured students’ attention and ensured a very high level of engagement in learning throughout the lesson. In a science lesson information and communication technology was used well to support learning and there was a clear focus on the development of students’ high level evaluative skills.

p.6

Quality of teaching

In the small minority of lessons, where teaching was no better than satisfactory, planned activities were not always well matched to the different ability levels of students. Teachers sometimes missed opportunities to reshape tasks during the lesson to either consolidate learning or accelerate progress. While there is good practice in the school in the deployment of additional adults to support learning, particularly for disabled students and those with special educational needs, this was not so well planned in some lessons and their impact was less effective.

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

The strength of this school is its strong ethos. The good values and sense of responsibility and respect for others permeate throughout. Comments, such as, ‘My daughter has really developed a sense of responsibility to the community in and out of school,’ reflect the overwhelmingly positive responses made by parents and carers in the inspection questionnaires. The very large majority of parents and carers indicated that their child felt safe in the school and students and the inspectors agree; the school provides a very safe and secure environment for learning. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Behaviour is good, and often outstanding, around the site and in lessons. A small minority of parents raised anxieties about the impact of poor behaviour on learning. Discussions with students and the observations of the inspection team indicated that the school’s behaviour management policy may not always be consistently applied to tackle low-level disruption during lessons. However, the large majority of lessons proceed without interruption and students demonstrate excellent, enthusiastic attitudes to learning, and the good and often outstanding behaviour seen during the inspection is typical of that over time.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Discussions with students and the school’s behaviour records indicate that bullying is extremely rare and is dealt with effectively on the rare occasions it happens. Students understand the different forms of bullying, for example cyber-bullying and prejudice-based harassment, and they are confident that they can raise concerns and be listened to. The curriculum helps students to know how to stay safe through an extensive personal, social and health education programme which includes assemblies and talks by visiting guest speakers. Students have the opportunity to contribute to the development of the school through the school parliament and are able to manage their own behaviour appropriately. Attendance is above average.

p.7

Leadership and management

The headteacher and his team, along with the governing body, have successfully established a distinct identity for the school within its community as an inclusive, cross-communal school with high aspirations for its students. There is a clear ambition for all students to achieve at the highest levels, underpinned by robust systems for tracking and target setting and ensuring accountability. The highly-skilled governing body supports and challenges the school well and plays a significant role in the development of the school, for example ensuring that future planning, including for the new sixth form, builds capacity and sustainability. Many leaders carry multiple responsibilities with a sense of dedication and a strong desire for high achievement. Arrangements for safeguarding are robust and meet statutory requirements. The capacity for continuing improvement is strong.

p.7

Leadership and management

School leaders and the governing body have an accurate understanding of the school’s strengths and areas for development. There is a rigorous and consistent approach to monitoring the quality of teaching and leaders have a good understanding of how to raise its quality to outstanding. Performance management is robust and linked to an extensive programme of professional development.

p.7

Leadership and management

The science specialism permeates the school and makes a tangible difference to achievement. The specialism underpins the development of students’ skills across the curriculum through investigations and problems solving. The outstanding broad and balanced curriculum is being carefully developed to meet the needs of learners. It makes an outstanding contribution to students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development through both the planned curriculum and a wide and varied enrichment programme. This includes: trips and visits, including international trips; partnerships with other schools, including in other countries; and local and international charities. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Leadership and management

There are many opportunities for students’ spiritual development.

p.8

Leadership and management

There is a strong commitment to equalities at the heart of the school’s work. Assessment data are meticulously analysed to ensure that individuals and groups make at least good, and improving, progress. Students are encouraged to be good, considerate individuals who recognise, value and respect individual differences. There is a high level of engagement with parents and carers, demonstrated by very high attendance at parents’ evenings and other events, and strengthened by good communications between home and school.

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 54 42 2 2 Primary schools 14 49 32 6 Secondary schools 20 39 34 7 Special schools 33 45 20 3 Pupil referral units 9 55 28 8 All schools 16 47 31 6

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September to 31 December 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Floor standards the national minimum expectation of attainment and progression measures.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.

p.10

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.11

Inspection of Jewish Community Secondary School, London EN4 9GE

Thank you for the warm welcome that you gave to us when we inspected your school recently. On behalf of the inspection team I would like to thank you for sharing your views of the school and how well it prepares you for the future. You told us that your school is a safe place where you enjoy learning and we agree. This is a good school with outstanding features.

p.11

Inspection of Jewish Community Secondary School, London EN4 9GE

You told us, and your parents and carers agree, that you feel safe at school and that behaviour is good. A few of you, along with your parents, raised some anxieties about disruptions to lessons. However, the vast majority of your lessons run smoothly and behaviour is very good. You also said that bullying is very rare and dealt with effectively when it happens.

p.11

Inspection of Jewish Community Secondary School, London EN4 9GE

Most of you feel that you learn a lot during lessons and we agree that teaching is good and sometimes outstanding. Lessons are well planned with engaging activities that build on your great enthusiasm for learning and determination to do well. You learn especially well when you are given challenging tasks and have the opportunity to work collaboratively or independently. You are set ambitious targets and your progress is carefully monitored to make sure that you will achieve them.

p.11

Inspection of Jewish Community Secondary School, London EN4 9GE

You were very positive about the school’s extensive enrichment programme which gives you many opportunities to take part in trips and visits, clubs and societies, sporting events and many other activities within the school, your community and nationally and internationally. The school encourages you to be good, considerate individuals who recognise, value and respect individual differences.

p.11

Inspection of Jewish Community Secondary School, London EN4 9GE

We have suggested some improvements which will help the school to improve further. We have asked teachers to make sure that they plan even more activities that are carefully matched to your needs and they take opportunities to reshape activities during lessons so that you always learn well. We have also asked teachers to pay greater attention to planning the involvement of additional adults to support learning.

p.11

Inspection of Jewish Community Secondary School, London EN4 9GE

We wish you all at the Jewish Community Secondary School a happy and successful future.

p.11

Inspection of Jewish Community Secondary School, London EN4 9GE

John Meinke Lead inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion