Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Manorfield Primary and Nursery School

Inspected — · published 23 Feb 2012 · URN 134732

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Julie Sackett (lead), George Long

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectors verified

    George Long, Julie Sackett

  • Postcode verified

    RH6 8AL

  • Name on report verified

    Manorfield Primary and Nursery School

  • URN verified

    134732

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 41% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingimprovedstronggood progresssuccessfulsuccessfullymake good progresseffective
Criticisminadequatenot yetnot alwaysinconsistenciesbelowmissedpoortoo few

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1960w+31
  • Leadership545w+31
  • What needs to improve192w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,684
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 52%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 29%

Full report text

Age group Inspection date(s) January 2012 Inspection number 381723 Manorfield Primary and Nursery School Inspection report

p.1

Unique reference number 134732 Local authority Surrey Inspection number 381723 Inspection dates January 2012 Lead inspector Julie Sackett

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 250 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Rob Turner Headteacher Nicola Jones Date of previous school inspection 18 May 2009 School address Sangers Drive Horley RH6 8AL Telephone number 01293 782839 Fax number 01293 822511 Email address info@manorfield.surrey.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.2

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. The team observed 15 lessons taught by 13 teachers. Discussions were held with senior staff, teachers, members of the governing body and pupils. Inspectors took account of the responses to the on- line questionnaire (Parent View) in planning the inspection, observed the school’s work, and looked at documentation including the school’s improvement plan, policies and records of pupils’ progress and attainment. The inspection team considered 78 questionnaires from parents and carers, as well as questionnaires from staff and pupils.

p.3

Information about the school

Manorfield Primary and Nursery School is an average sized one-form entry primary school. The percentage of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs is higher than the national average. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is above the national average. The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic groups is above average. A higher than average proportion of pupils speaks English as an additional language. The proportion of pupils who join or leave the school other than at the expected times is above the national average. An acting headteacher was in post during the year 2010/11. The substantive headteacher resumed her position in September 2011 and a new deputy headteacher was appointed. The school has Nursery provision and a breakfast club, both of which are managed by the governing body and were inspected as part of this inspection. The school has a range of awards; including Healthy School status and is an Eco-school.

p.3

Information about the school

The school does not meet the current floor standards for pupils’ achievement. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Key findings

 Manorfield is a satisfactory school. The school has improved since the last inspection, with a trend of sustained improvement in the quality of teaching, pupils’ achievement, behaviour and safety. However, progress is not as rapid as it could be due to some variation in the quality of teaching, and the newness of some initiatives.  Pupils’ achievement is satisfactory and improving. Children make good progress in the Early Years Foundation Stage and in Key Stage 1, from starting points which are generally well below expectation, reaching attainment at the end of Year 2 that is average.  Achievement in Key Stage 2 has steadily improved over the last three years, especially in mathematics. However, improvements further down the school have not had time to impact fully on attainment at the end of Year 6, so that attainment is low. In 2011, too few pupils achieved the nationally expected levels, especially in English.

p.4

Key findings

 Improvements in teaching mean that much of the teaching is good. However, this is not yet sufficiently consistent to ensure that pupils make good or better progress. Assessment is not always used well enough during lessons to evaluate pupils’ understanding.  Pupils are generally polite, welcoming and cooperate well with each other in lessons. In a few lessons, however, pupils become unsettled, particularly where the pace of learning slows and where pupils are not as actively involved in their learning as they might be. ‘The Nest’ is especially successful in supporting those pupils who find it difficult to behave well.  School leaders are addressing the legacy of underperformance and are securing improvements in achievement, behaviour and attendance.  The school has been successful in developing the role of senior leaders in the use of assessment information to drive further improvements in pupils’

p.4

Key findings

achievement. However, this has not yet impacted fully on the quality of teaching and learning during lessons.

p.4

Key findings

Schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 By the end of the summer term 2012, accelerate the progress made by pupils, especially in English, through ensuring that teaching is consistently good or better by:  providing regular opportunities in lessons for pupils to be actively involved in their learning and to contribute their ideas and demonstrate their understanding  ensuring that teachers use pupils’ contributions during lessons to evaluate pupils’ understanding and modify the lesson to meet emerging needs more promptly and accurately  regularly providing pupils with good quality written feedback, linked to learning targets, about how they can improve their work and the next steps in their learning  setting aside time in lessons for pupils routinely to read and respond to the comments teachers make when they mark their work  reducing time during lessons when pupils are passive and not actively involved in learning  increasing opportunities for pupils to work independently of adult support.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Increase the impact of leadership and management by:  increasing the rigour with which senior leaders monitor teaching and learning by regularly reviewing teachers’ use of marking in pupils’ books and the impact of this on subsequent learning.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

From starting points which are typically well below those expected for their age, most children make good progress in the Early Years Foundation Stage. They make particularly strong progress in their social skills, in their understanding of how letters are linked to sounds (phonics) and in the development of writing skills. This reflects the school’s successful focus on the development of verbal and literacy skills, which starts in the Early Years Foundation Stage and continues throughout the school. Children typically demonstrate an enjoyment of stories, an eagerness to participate in activities and a growing confidence and willingness to write, which is successfully encouraged by a broad range of lively and interesting activities. This leads to good progress in the Early Years Foundation Stage and Key Stage 1. There is a similar pattern of progress in mathematics, so that attainment at the end of Year 2 is

p.5

Achievement of pupils

broadly average in reading, writing and mathematics. This reflects a steady rise in attainment at the end of Key Stage 1 since the last inspection.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

These improvements have not had time to impact fully, however, on attainment at the end of Year 6, which is low overall. In 2011, a minority of pupils at the end of Key Stage 2 attained nationally expected levels in reading, writing and mathematics. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Achievement of pupils

That said, there has been a steady improvement in mathematics attainment since the last inspection. In English, while there is evidence of improved attainment, particularly in reading, there has been some fluctuation over three years. The proportion of pupils who arrive at and leave the school part way through their schooling is higher than in most schools and this has had a significant effect on average attainment, as many of these pupils have well below average attainment, particularly in English.

p.6

Achievement of pupils

In Key Stage 2, pupils including those with special educational needs and those with disabilities make satisfactory progress overall in both English and mathematics. Those pupils who have been in the school for an extended period of time make better progress than those who arrived in the school partway through their education. The school’s commitment to those pupils whose circumstances have made them vulnerable means that they make at least satisfactory, and sometimes better, progress, which is reflected in their improved behaviour and attention skills. This means that they are receptive to learning and are able to make the most of their lessons. Almost all parents and carers who returned a questionnaire feel that their children’s needs are met by the school and consider their children to be making good progress. During the inspection this was the case in the majority of lessons seen, especially where pupils were offered opportunities to be actively involved and to

p.6

Achievement of pupils

engage with tasks at an early stage. For example, in Reception, children thoroughly enjoyed relating words to their everyday knowledge of phrases during a phonics session. While in Year 3, pupils worked together successfully to develop adjectives and adverbs for use in a mythical story, and in Year 6, role play was used well to help pupils to develop the quality of their written work. In these lessons, all groups of pupils, including more able pupils, made good progress because the learning provided appropriate challenge to meet their needs. However, in other lessons, teachers missed opportunities to evaluate and respond to pupils’ needs as the lesson developed, so that pupils were not effectively engaged and progress slowed.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Teaching is satisfactory rather than good because there are variations in the quality of teaching across the school and over time. For example, where teaching is satisfactory, teachers do not always pay sufficient attention to pupils’ emerging needs during the course of a lesson. This is especially the case in Key Stage 2, where progress has generally been slower than in the Early Years Foundation Stage and Key Stage 1. In the most effective lessons, teachers demonstrate confident subject knowledge and use resources well to challenge and extend pupils’ understanding, as seen, for example, in a lesson when pupils were successfully helped to understand the relationship between 12 x 4 and 4 x 12. In some lessons, however, teachers spend too much time explaining and modelling activities, so that pupils are too passive and progress slows. Marking varies in quality. Although some marking gives pupils guidance on what they need to do to improve their work, this is not consistent

p.6

Quality of teaching

across the school. Teachers plan lessons which are interesting and relevant to the pupils, such as the study of Stormbreaker by Anthony Horowitz in a Year 6 English lesson, which effectively engages them. However, opportunities to allow pupils to Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Quality of teaching

work independently and to write at length are sometimes missed. Almost all parents and carers who returned a questionnaire expressed positive views about the quality of teaching. The part played by teaching assistants has developed considerably since the last inspection, so that they play an effective role in supporting pupils’ learning, particularly those with special educational needs and those with disabilities. Relationships are strong and one of the school’s particular successes lies in the effective way that staff have developed pupils’ trust and confidence in the school, so that pupils typically enjoy their time in school and want to learn and do well.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Behaviour throughout the school is satisfactory. Children behave well in the Early Years Foundation Stage, because they enjoy school and relationships are strong. Typically, pupils across the school are polite to adults, respectful of each other and demonstrate positive attitudes to learning. Most pupils, parents and carers consider behaviour in the school to be good although a few felt that lessons were sometimes disrupted by poor behaviour. Behaviour in lessons seen during the inspection was mostly good and never less than satisfactory. However, some pupils find it hard to behave well and this can result in occasional low-level disruption where teaching is less effective. A few pupils told inspectors that bullying happened in school sometimes but almost all pupils expressed confidence in adults to address any concerns. For example, one pupil said: ‘You can really trust teachers when you tell them personal things.’ Pupils particularly appreciate the role played by ‘The Nest’ in

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

helping them to manage difficult situations, with one pupil commenting: ‘Sometimes I get really angry and do the wrong thing, so I go to ‘The Nest’ and calm down.’ The school’s own records indicate that behaviour over time has improved significantly and that incidents of any type of bullying are rare.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

The breakfast club provides a secure, calm and healthy start to the day with activities which ensure that pupils who attend are in the right frame of mind for learning. The school has developed a consistent and rigorous approach to attendance. As a result, attendance has improved substantially over the past three years, although it continues to be below national averages.

p.7

Leadership and management

The headteacher, very ably supported by the deputy headteacher, has a clear vision and a quietly determined approach to driving school improvement which is shared by her team of staff. In this inclusive school, every pupil is expected to do his or her best, regardless of ability or background and discrimination is not tolerated. Refusal to accept individual or family circumstances as an excuse has been central in the school’s successful drive to secure improvements in important areas such as behaviour, attendance and achievement. For example, the school’s actions are beginning to address the legacy of underperformance as seen through sustained improvements in attainment at the end of Key Stage 1, particularly in reading, and in year-on-year improvements in mathematics attainment at the end of Key Stage 2. Self-evaluation by senior leaders correctly identifies priorities for improvement Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

p.7

Leadership and management

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.8

Leadership and management

supported by clear action plans. The sharing of good practice and professional development is focused well on improving the quality of teaching. Systems for monitoring teaching are in place and their impact on improving pupils’ progress is beginning to be seen. However, leaders do not monitor the work in pupils’ books and teachers’ marking systematically or rigorously enough to identify and address any inconsistencies promptly. Tracking systems are being used by senior leaders with increasing effect to identify underachievement and to hold teachers to account for the progress of their pupils. Capacity to improve is satisfactory because, although the quality of teaching is regularly monitored, the impact of this on learning and progress is not yet fully evident and inconsistencies remain.

p.8

Leadership and management

The governing body is supportive but also challenges leaders, for example about pupils’ behaviour and attendance rates. They visit regularly and so have first-hand knowledge of what happens in school. The school works well with parents and carers so that almost all feel well informed about their children’s learning. Safeguarding procedures meet current government requirements.

p.8

Leadership and management

The curriculum is broad and well balanced and is appropriate to pupils’ needs. Initiatives such as the ‘well-being workshops’ are a particular strength of the curriculum, successfully encouraging pupils to reflect and express their thoughts, feelings and ideas, including those who find this particularly challenging. Events such as these make a good contribution to the development of pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. One parent commented: ‘Manorfield instils good values, promoting independence and well-being.’ Pupils learn about their own cultural heritage as well as those in other parts of the United Kingdom and the world through well-planned events and through links with schools in Tanzania and Nigeria.

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 46 46 8 0 Primary schools 8 47 40 5 Secondary schools 14 38 40 8 Special schools 28 48 20 4 Pupil referral units 15 50 29 5 All schools 11 46 38 6

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance: the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour: how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety: how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.

p.10

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.11

Inspection of Manorfield Primary and Nursery School, Horley, RH6 8AL

Thank you for making us so welcome when we visited your school. We particularly enjoyed talking to you about your school and your work. You behave well in school and told us that you feel safe because you know that adults will look after you if you have a concern. Manorfield provides you with a satisfactory education. We have asked your teachers to help you to reach higher attainment at the end of Year 6, especially in English. You can help by always trying your best and by making sure that you go to school every day.

p.11

Inspection of Manorfield Primary and Nursery School, Horley, RH6 8AL

Teachers try to make lessons fun and interesting so that most of you enjoy school and want to do your best. However, sometimes you are not given enough opportunities to be more involved in the lesson. We have asked teachers to take care not to spend too much time explaining what you need to do during the lesson, so that you can get started more quickly. We have also asked them to provide opportunities for you to work without the help of an adult, so that you can show teachers what you can do when you are given longer to work on a task. We have asked teachers to listen carefully to what you have to say during lessons so that they can help you to understand the lesson and make sure that your work is not too hard and not too easy.

p.11

Inspection of Manorfield Primary and Nursery School, Horley, RH6 8AL

Your teachers mark the work in your books regularly. We have asked teachers to use their marking to give you more ideas about what you have done well and how you can improve your work. We have also asked teachers to give you time to read and respond to their comments. You can play your part by making sure that you read what your teacher has written and do your best to follow any advice and to try out any suggestions.

p.11

Inspection of Manorfield Primary and Nursery School, Horley, RH6 8AL

Thank you for welcoming us to your school. We wish you every success in the future.

p.11

Inspection of Manorfield Primary and Nursery School, Horley, RH6 8AL

Julie Sackett Lead inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion