Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Warden Park Secondary Academy

Inspected 2 Feb 2012 · published 27 Feb 2012 · URN 137416

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    2 Feb 2012

  • Inspectors AI-checked

    Andrew Lyons, Christopher Wood, David Howley, Howard Jones, Lesley Leak

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Behaviour and safety verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Quality of teaching verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Warden Park Academy

  • URN verified

    137416

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Behaviour and safetyGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Quality of teachingGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+52Positivemore positive than 28% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingexceptionalexemplaryconsistentlymake good progressstronghigh expectationsimproved
Criticisminadequatenot alwaysdisruptionslowpoorconcernsnot sufficientlylack

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1918w+46
  • Leadership645w+56
  • What needs to improve126w+54

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,682
about usual (typical 2920)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 47
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 50%Leadership 17%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Age group Warden Park School Inspection date(s) 1–2February 2012 Inspection number 386089 Warden Park Academy Inspection report

p.1

Unique reference number 137416 Local authority N/A Inspection number 386089 Inspection dates 1–2 February 2012 Lead inspector Christopher Wood HMI

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Academy converter School category Community Age range of pupils 11–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 1,466 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Jonathan Ash-Edwards Headteacher Stephen Johnson Date of previous school inspection 6–7 June 2007 School address Broad Street Cuckfield West Sussex RH17 5DP Telephone number 01444 457881 Fax number 01444 417024 Email address admin@wardenpark.co.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.2

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

Christopher Wood Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.3

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. Inspectors spent the majority of their time looking at learning in lessons. They observed parts of 52 lessons taught across a range of subjects and key stages. In addition, they looked specifically at the learning of 24 middle-ability students in Years 10 and 11 across a series of 12 lessons. Several lesson observations were undertaken jointly with senior leaders.

p.3

Introduction

Meetings were held with school staff, members of the governing body and six groups of students representing the school’s diversity. Inspectors also looked at a range of school documentation including its self-evaluation, development planning and tracking of student achievement. Inspectors considered the responses made to questionnaires from 152 parents and carers, 301 students and 86 staff.

p.3

Information about the school

Warden Park Academy is larger than the average size secondary school. Students choose to come to the academy from a wide geographical area. They are mainly from White British backgrounds. The proportion of students from minority ethnic backgrounds or for whom English is an additional language is lower than seen nationally. The proportion of students entitled to free school meals is also lower than the national average. The proportion of disabled students and those who have special educational needs is broadly similar to the national average. Typically, around 56% of students are boys. This is a higher proportion than seen in other schools nationally. The academy meets the current floor standards.

p.3

Information about the school

The academy has held designated specialist status for mathematics, computing and modern foreign languages since 2004. It gained high performing specialist school status in 2009 and acquired additional specialisms in special educational needs and gifted and talented education. It also has a resourced unit for up to 18 students with specific learning difficulties and additional learning needs. The academy holds both the Investors in People and International School awards.

p.3

Information about the school

Warden Park became an academy in September 2011 and was given powers to sponsor primary schools through the academy conversion process. In January 2012, a local primary school joined the Warden Park Academy Trust. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Key findings

 Warden Park Academy is a good school that has improved since its last inspection. The ethos of ‘best from all’ permeates its work. Students achieve well academically and develop into outward-looking and resilient young people. Students with special educational needs and students with disabilities, including those who join the resourced unit, also achieve well. The spiritual, moral, social and cultural development of students is fostered strongly in lessons and by often exceptional opportunities throughout the wider curriculum.

p.4

Key findings

 Academic attainment is consistently above average and often high. Students make good progress during their time at the academy. The more-able students often make exceptional progress. Middle-ability students achieve well but, over time, their progress has not been as rapid as their high-ability peers. This is now changing as a result of ongoing improvements to the curriculum, approaches to cross-curricular literacy and a closer tracking of students’ progress.

p.4

Key findings

 Teaching is typically good and some is outstanding. The best teaching is closely tailored to the students’ needs and abilities; it is underpinned by the teachers’ expert knowledge and high expectations. In a minority of lessons, activities do not stretch students sufficiently and there is limited time for independent working, reflection or consolidation of learning.

p.4

Key findings

 Students are welcoming and courteous. Frequently, they conduct themselves in a manner which is exemplary. They feel very safe and say that bullying is rare. A small number of students, parents, carers, and staff expressed concerns about low-level disruption in a minority of lessons. Inspectors found that behaviour over time was consistently good. However, where teaching was satisfactory and the pace of learning slow, students tended to become restless or go off task.

p.4

Key findings

 The headteacher has led the academy during a period of continuing success Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Key findings

and there is capacity to improve further. Leaders work collaboratively and are often innovative. Self-evaluation accurately identifies the academy’s strengths and its priorities for improvement. However, judgements on the quality of teaching are slightly generous. At times, monitoring of lessons is not sufficiently focused on the students’ progress in learning.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Continue to raise achievement for middle-ability students so that they make progress at a similar rate to their peers by:

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 ensuring that the school’s systems for tracking students’ progress enable even more rapid intervention and support  monitoring closely the impact of changes to the curriculum on outcomes for middle-ability students  ensuring that cross-curricular approaches to literacy and other core skills are well embedded across the full range of subjects.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Increase the proportion of good and outstanding teaching by:

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 ensuring that teachers plan lessons that are sufficiently challenging, encourage independence and provide opportunities for students to consolidate and reflect on their learning  ensuring that the monitoring of teaching focuses more closely on the progress that students make in their learning.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Students enter the academy with attainment that is typically above average. By the end of Key Stage 4, they attain examination results that are significantly above the national average. Ninety-four per cent of parents who responded to the questionnaire said that their children were making good progress. Inspectors endorse this view. Students achieve well across a range of subjects including the academy’s specialisms. Achievement in English and mathematics has been strong over a long period of time. In 2011, students in Year 11 made excellent progress in science and modern foreign languages. Nevertheless, leaders are vigilant and take decisive action to remedy any dips in performance in a small minority of subjects.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

In lessons, students are keen to learn and collaborate productively with their peers. When given opportunities to develop their skills of independent working, or challenged to deepen their responses to teachers’ good questioning, they often make quick progress. They benefit from a firm foundation in the core skills of English, mathematics, and information and communication technology. This equips them well for their future education and careers. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Overall, disabled students and those who have special educational needs, including those who join the academy’s resourced provision, make good progress. Nevertheless, leaders have rightly identified that middle-ability students, particularly boys, have not always achieved at the same rapid rate as their high-ability peers. The academy has already made changes to the curriculum and this is closing the gap successfully. These improvements are underpinned by strengthening systems for monitoring students’ progress and re-energised approaches to literacy across the curriculum.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Students benefit from teaching that is typically good and sometimes outstanding. The best teaching is imaginative, purposeful and underpinned by the teachers’ secure subject knowledge and high expectations. In the best lessons, innovative activities are well planned; they are based on the teachers’ accurate knowledge of the students’ needs and abilities, alongside a confident understanding of progression in skills and/or examination requirements. Students also make good progress because the feedback they receive orally and through marking is generally detailed and identifies how they can improve their work. This works particularly well when students also have opportunities to evaluate their own work and the work of others based on clearly shared criteria.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Inspectors endorse the view expressed by parents, carers and students, that while teaching is mostly good, a minority of teaching is satisfactory. In some lessons, the rate of progress made by students in their learning is slower than elsewhere. Commonly, this is because activities are not closely tailored to the abilities of different students or lack sufficient challenge. In these lessons, students do not always have enough time to reflect on their learning between each activity. While inspectors found that teaching was consistently good for students of all abilities, instances of satisfactory teaching tended to slow the progress of middle-ability students more than their peers. These students do not have enough regular and systematically planned opportunities to check and consolidate their progress in learning.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Teaching and the planned curriculum foster students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development strongly. For example, in a memorable electronics lesson, students experienced awe and excitement when building circuits. This fostered their interest in becoming technologists of the future. In modern foreign languages, the students’ socio-political and historical understanding had been enhanced by their exposure to films about the Berlin Wall and life in the former East Germany. In a BTEC dance lesson, studying the work of Akram Kahn had raised the artistic and cultural awareness of students and improved the quality of their own performance.

p.6

Quality of teaching

A recent reorganisation of provision for disabled students and those who have special educational needs, including those who join the resourced provision, means that students are now even better supported. Teaching assistants work effectively to Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Quality of teaching

support learning in close partnership with teachers. As one parental comment stated, ‘I am regularly invited to school for updates on the progress of my child and SEN (special educational needs) issues in general…my child is engaged and looks forward to going to school where his daily support is first class.’

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

At least 94% of the students, parents and carers, and staff who responded to the questionnaires said that the academy is a safe place to learn. Inspectors endorse this view. Students enjoy positive relationships with each other and the adults with whom they work. They are able to develop their leadership skills and demonstrate a mature concern for others through their roles as mentors, prefects and sports leaders.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Behaviour is typically good and often exemplary. Over time, the proportion of students who are excluded for a fixed period is much lower than the national average. The academy’s tracking of poor behaviour shows that such incidents are infrequent and have fallen over the past few years. Nevertheless, a small number of parents, carers, students and staff reported that low-level disruption affected learning in a minority of lessons. Inspectors observed consistently good behaviour in most classes but noted that where teaching was satisfactory students often became restless or went off task. Leaders are not complacent. They have made recent changes to the school’s behaviour management systems and are ensuring that these are applied consistently and effectively.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Students, parents and carers report that bullying is rare and is commonly dealt with quickly by caring staff. Most students talked about the academy’s friendly ethos or ‘feel good factor’ and ‘never not wanting to come to school’. A small number of students were concerned about occasional unkind name calling. The academy’s records and meetings with students confirm that incidents of racist behaviour are also very rare. The impact of the academy’s successful work on promoting equalities was demonstrated in the mature and thoughtful way that one group of students discussed why homophobic bullying was not encountered or tolerated.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Attendance is broadly average for all major groups but is improving. Current attendance is slightly above the national average while persistent absence is lower than average. Nevertheless, the academy has identified a small number of students, generally with special educational needs, who find it harder to attend school regularly. Consequently, the school has strengthened its systems for working with these students and their families.

p.7

Leadership and management

The headteacher has ensured that the academy has consolidated good achievement and improved provision during a time of significant organisational change. Accurate self-evaluation means that leaders have a shared view of the school’s strengths and priorities for development. Consequently, time and effort is spent tackling the most pressing issues and there is discernible capacity to improve further. Staff are Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Leadership and management

dedicated and proud to work at Warden Park. Leaders at all levels are fully involved in monitoring teaching and use this information to plan an effective programme of professional development. Nevertheless, judgments on the quality of teaching are currently slightly generous and do not always focus closely on the rate of students’ progress in lessons. Leadership of the resourced unit is good.

p.8

Leadership and management

The curriculum is good. It is broad and well matched to the needs of students. It is constantly developing to meet the needs and aspirations of students. For example, the school has recently introduced academic courses such as Latin and classics alongside vocational subjects such as construction. The many sporting and aesthetic opportunities that students enjoy through the wider curriculum play a central role in fostering their strong spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Students told inspectors that there were ‘lots of opportunities’ at Warden Park and that the school ‘makes you an all-round student – you can try anything’.

p.8

Leadership and management

The academy has addressed the requirements noted during the previous inspection with regard to religious education at Key Stage 4. Exciting partnerships, such as those with the nearby primary academy, enable increased opportunities for students and staff in both schools. They are encouraging the sharing of effective practice across the whole curriculum. Strong transition arrangements between Warden Park and all of its feeder primary schools enable students in Year 7 to make a good start. The academy actively promotes equality of opportunity; it is a cohesive place to learn where difference is celebrated. Variations in the relative performance of students of different abilities are being successfully addressed through changes to provision.

p.8

Leadership and management

The academy has been very successful in addressing the need to improve relationships between the leadership team and governing body noted in the previous inspection. The governing body is skilled, supportive and actively involved in the day- to-day work of the school. It challenges leaders confidently in those areas where further improvement is required. There is clear communication between the headteacher and the governing body. The academy’s arrangements for safeguarding students meet statutory requirements and are monitored effectively by the governing body.

p.8

Leadership and management

Parents and carers are strongly supportive of the work of the academy. At least 92% of parents and carers who responded to the questionnaire stated that their children’s needs were well met, that they felt well informed about their children’s good progress and were helped by the academy to support their children’s learning. One parent echoed the views of others when commenting: ‘Warden Park offers a wide range of opportunities. It has very supportive teachers and I would have no hesitation in recommending it to other parents.’ These findings are consistent with the academy’s own regular surveys of the views of larger samples of parents and carers.

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 46 46 8 0 Primary schools 8 47 40 5 Secondary schools 14 38 40 8 Special schools 28 48 20 4 Pupil referral units 15 50 29 5 All schools 11 46 38 6

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all sc hools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.

p.10

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.11

Inspection of Warden Park Academy, Cuckfied RH17 5DP

You may remember that I visited your school recently with a team of inspectors. We enjoyed meeting you and were grateful for the help you gave us. We are pleased to tell you that you go to a good school that is well led and continuously improving.

p.11

Inspection of Warden Park Academy, Cuckfied RH17 5DP

You achieve well and your examination results at the end of Year 11 are well above those gained by other students nationally. While some of you make exceptional progress, others find it harder to learn at the same pace. Nevertheless, your progress is good and changes to the curriculum are helping even more of you to achieve your potential.

p.11

Inspection of Warden Park Academy, Cuckfied RH17 5DP

At least 90% of you told us that you felt safe and happy at school and learnt a lot in lessons. You told us that bullying was rare, and most of you felt that when it did happen, it was dealt with well. Inspectors judged your behaviour to be good. Sometimes, it is exemplary. The inspectors agreed with you that teaching was good. Some is excellent. In the best lessons, your knowledgeable teachers plan challenging activities that help you to work independently and learn at a good pace. Some teaching is satisfactory. In a minority of lessons, the pace of learning is slower and some of you get restless or go off task. Leaders in the school are determined to make sure that even more of your teaching is of the same quality as the best. There are already suitable plans in place for this to happen.

p.11

Inspection of Warden Park Academy, Cuckfied RH17 5DP

One of the things that impressed the team most was how you take advantage of opportunities to extend your talents in sport, drama and the arts as well as taking on responsibilities that develop your skills of leadership. These make you into very well- rounded young people.

p.11

Inspection of Warden Park Academy, Cuckfied RH17 5DP

Your headteacher and I agree that there are some things that could be even better. Staff at the school are going to make sure that:

p.11

Inspection of Warden Park Academy, Cuckfied RH17 5DP

 all of you make progress quickly so that you can achieve your ambitious personal targets  even more of the teaching you receive is good or outstanding.

p.11

Inspection of Warden Park Academy, Cuckfied RH17 5DP

All of you can play your part by attending school regularly and continuing to participate enthusiastically in lessons.

p.11

Inspection of Warden Park Academy, Cuckfied RH17 5DP

Chris Wood Her Majesty’s Inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion