Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Barnardo’s in Oxfordshire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
15 Mar 2012
- Inspectors verified
Michael Williams
- URN verified
SC013143
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 57
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC013143 Inspection date 15/03/2012 Inspector Michael Williams Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 25/10/2011 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.3
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection (March 2011).
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Brief description of the service
This service is run by a national children's charity. It provides full-time and shared care for up to five children who have a severe learning disability and challenging behaviours.
p.4
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making satisfactory progress.
p.4
Progress
The previous full inspection of the service in October 2011 judged the home's overall effectiveness to be good. This inspection found that the service has maintained the quality of care and outcomes for young people that were respectively judged to be outstanding and good at the previous inspection. The previous inspection did not require or recommend the service to take any action to improve the quality and standards of care further.
p.4
Progress
The previous inspection reported that the service was in the process of amending their guidance and records relating to behaviour management. This was to ensure correlation with recent amendments made to the national minimum standards, regulations and guidance for children's homes. These matters have now been addressed and implemented. As a result, there are improvements in the quality of information recorded. This enables better monitoring and evaluation of practice in relation to any incidents of challenging behaviour.
p.4
Progress
Since the last inspection, improvements have been made to the décor, including the re-decoration of three of the five young people's bedrooms. These improvements have made the physical environment even more suitable for young people.
p.4
Progress
As outlined within the home’s operational contract monitoring report, there is an increased focus on achieving positive outcomes for young people. Staff now better evaluate and encourage opportunities to enhance young people’s potential. They identify outcomes for each young person and continually assess, monitor and celebrate their progress in achieving them. Electronic and paper recording forms enable staff to track whether or not young people are making progress towards meeting their intended outcomes on a daily and monthly basis. As a result, the home continually promotes young people's welfare and development.
p.4
Progress
Staff continue to use handover sessions very well to improve the consistency of care for young people. For example, during this inspection the scheduled staff handover comprehensively focused on promoting each young person's individual needs, in areas such as their health, family contact and positive behaviour. This is one of the ways in which the home has maintained its quality of care and outcomes for young people.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion