Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 17 May 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Joan Davis (lead), Patrick Geraghty

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Joan Davis, Patrick Geraghty

  • Postcode verified

    CH43 5JY

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+5Mixedmore positive than 27% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisegood progressoutstandingimprovingrapid progresshigh expectationsimprovedstrongeffective
Criticismweaknot alwayslacklow expectationspoorlacksinsufficientbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings910w−29
  • Leadership291w+79
  • What needs to improve236w+42

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,435
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 34, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Leadership 20%What needs to improve 16%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Mr Eric Jackson Principal University Academy Birkenhead Park Road South Birkenhead Wirral CH43 5JY

p.1

Introduction

Following my visit with Joan Davis, Her Majesty’s Inspector, to your academy on 24 and 25 April 2012, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

Introduction

The inspection was a first monitoring inspection in connection with the academies initiative.

p.1

Evidence

Inspectors observed the academy’s work, scrutinised documents and met with the Principal, other nominated staff, groups of students and the Chair and other members of the Governing Body.

p.1

Context

The academy was formed from two predecessor schools in January 2011 and has approximately 900 students. Students’ attainment at entry is significantly below average. The proportion of students known to be eligible for free school meals is significantly above the national average. The proportion recorded as having special educational needs is significantly above national averages. The academy has five sponsors. The lead sponsor is the University of Chester in partnership with the CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566 852 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: chuxley@cfbt.com University of Liverpool, Birkenhead Sixth Form College, Wirral Metropolitan College and Wirral Borough Council. The academy has been through turbulent times between 2011 and 2012 with the resignation of the academy’s first Principal and

p.1

Context

deputy principal. Issues coalesced around leadership and management and the difficulty in establishing a climate and momentum through which rapid improvements across the provision could be achieved. Staff morale deteriorated. An interim Principal and vice-principal have brought stability and direction. A new permanent Principal has been appointed and is expected to take-up post shortly. The academy is currently conducting redundancy procedures with a view to reducing staff numbers by about twenty-five.

p.2

Achievement of pupils at the academy

The proportion of students gaining five A* to C grades at GCSE, including English and mathematics, has risen set against the results of the two predecessor secondary schools. In the case of one of the predecessor schools this amounts to a 12 percentage point increase in one year. However, attainment remains below the national average and the academy recognises the need for further rapid and sustained improvement. The scrutiny of current tracking information and evaluation of the most recent results in mathematics indicates that the improving trend will be maintained in 2012. Gaps in performance between groups of students, such as those known to be eligible for free school meals, are narrowing as a result of focused, additional support. The proportion of students attaining five or more GCSE A* to C grades is above the national average and reflects students’ good progress in modern foreign languages, science and humanities.

p.2

Achievement of pupils at the academy

A significant proportion of students enter the academy in Year 7 with weak literacy and numeracy skills. The academy has not yet developed well-focused strategies to ensure that these students make more rapid progress in closing the gap in attainment in English and mathematics. The scrutiny of work and lesson observations in Years 10 and 11 indicates that too many students continue to make grammatical and technical errors, and that their reading skills do not always allow for a secure understanding of texts. The academy acknowledges the need to further embed students’ use of literacy and numeracy skills across the curriculum and particularly in Years 7 and 8.

p.2

The quality of teaching

The best lessons are characterised by sharp planning with the effective use of data to plan activities so that they reflect the needs and abilities of all students. They offer an imaginative range of activities with a sharp focus on students’ learning. Students are engaged and respond with enthusiasm to the variety of activities and opportunities to develop their understanding and skills. Well-focused questioning enables students to develop their thinking skills. Teachers use praise and encouragement to promote high expectations. Outstanding practice was observed in modern foreign languages, science and physical education.

p.2

The quality of teaching

There remains too much satisfactory teaching which lacks challenge and pace. In these lessons there is too much teacher-talk and limited opportunities for students to develop independent learning skills and collaborative work. The planning of paired and group work is weak. Lesson planning is weak and often superficial. Data is not always used effectively to plan lessons and to inform on the variety of activities that will meet the needs of all students and enable them to make better progress. In these lessons there were low expectations and a lack of ambition and students made no better than satisfactory progress.

p.3

The quality of teaching

There is insufficient sharing of good practice across subjects for the most skilled teachers to share their approaches, ideas and strategies and enable the level of teaching across the academy to be raised. The use of assessment to support learning is satisfactory. In some subjects there is infrequent guidance given to students as to what they need to do next to improve. There is also too much variability in the quality of teachers’ marking of student work. Very good marking practice was seen in modern foreign languages.

p.3

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Students behave well in lessons and around the academy showing a spirit of cooperation and consideration for one another. Students sometimes demonstrate passivity in lessons which are dominated by too much teacher-talk and lack variety. Students are friendly, courteous and helpful. They say that they feel safe and that bullying issues, including racist and homophobic bullying, are rare and if they occur are dealt with effectively by staff. Attendance is low but initiatives to tackle this are beginning to have some impact.

p.3

The quality of leadership in and management of the academy

The current interim Principal and vice principal have brought renewed direction and focus to the academy’s work. Staff morale is now improving. The academy’s development plan correctly identifies the most important areas for improvement. It clearly recognises the need to improve the effectiveness of quality assurance systems and to ensure they are consistently applied at senior, middle and classroom management levels. In particular, the role of middle leaders requires development so as to enhance their responsibility in the processes through which improvements can be achieved more rapidly. Improved data systems to track and monitor students’ progress have been introduced and are being embedded. The management of data, evaluation of performance and tracking of progress is improving.

p.3

The quality of leadership in and management of the academy

The management of teaching and learning has a clear focus on the most important areas for improvement and the time scale they need to be delivered within. More- focused professional development programmes for staff are beginning to be developed to enable teachers to improve and develop new skills. All these positive developments need to be embedded within a more defined aspirational culture.

p.3

The quality of leadership in and management of the academy

Governors provide extensive professional experience and skills and strong links to the local community and wider education communities. They are acutely aware of the challenges facing the academy and its community and are highly supportive of the quest for rapid improvement across provision.

p.4

External support

Representatives from the sponsors are regular visitors, involved in governance and play a pivotal role in the academy’s progress and development. Professional development programmes for staff have been established with the University of Chester. The academy has also drawn on the support of the Specialist Schools and Academies Trust. Good links exist with the local further education and sixth form colleges.

p.4

Main Judgements

The academy has made satisfactory progress towards raising standards.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

■ Raise attainment and achievement rapidly so that students gain five GCSE grades A* to C including English and mathematics by:  raising and sustaining attainment in English and mathematics so that students make at least good progress in these areas  embedding literacy across all provision so that students’ writing and comprehension skills are improved  establishing more-ambitious target setting for individual students.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

■ Develop focused provision at Key Stage 3 that tackles students’ low attainment on entry and their poor skills in literacy, numeracy and oracy.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

■ Improve the consistency of teaching and learning by:  improving lesson planning to ensure that the needs of individual students are met by appropriate, challenging, student-centred activities  improving targeted support for all teachers to help them improve their practice in the classroom: developing mechanisms to judge and evaluate the impact of these actions regularly, and use this to inform future teaching and learning improvements  sharing outstanding and good practice so that all lessons offer challenge and enable students to make at least good progress. ■ Ensure the embedding and consistent application of quality assurance and improvement systems for all senior and middle managers, and in all classroom practice.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State for Education, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Academies Advisers Unit at the Department for Education. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion