Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
St Augustine's Roman Catholic School, ScarboroughOfsted inspection, 24 Apr 2012
Ofsted inspected St Augustine's Roman Catholic School, Scarborough on 24 Apr 2012, led by Andrew Swallow. The overall judgement was Satisfactory. Ofsted published the report on 16 May 2012. Source: Ofsted (Open Government Licence v3).
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
24 Apr 2012
- Inspectors verified
Andrew Swallow, Geraldine Hutchinson, Nancy Walker
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Satisfactory
- Name on report verified
St Augustine's Roman Catholic School, Scarborough
- URN verified
121714
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2007.
- OverallSatisfactory
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Satisfactory.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. p.9
- An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs. p.9
- For example, in a Year 11 English lesson, all pupils showed an excellent insight into the effectiveness of an author’s use of symbols to evoke key messages to the reader, immersed in independent discussion with one another, and were spurred on by skilful questioning by the teacher. p.6
- Pupils are very polite and respectful around school. p.4
- Pupils say overwhelmingly that they feel safe in school and that adults are very supportive. p.7
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. p.9
- It is not yet a good school because not all pupils achieve well, especially in mathematics, as a result of inconsistencies in teaching. p.4
- However, in some lessons behaviour lapses, and is not as positive as it might be. p.7
- Outcomes of monitoring are not yet used successfully to reduce inconsistencies and promote consistently good or better practice, fast enough. p.7
- They are developing a good understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the school, but the information they receive on the school’s work does not always enable them to determine fully how well the school is performing, against a wide enough range of national benchmarks. p.8
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 2,492
- about usual (typical 2787)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 38, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 17%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
St Augustine's Roman Catholic School, Scarborough Inspection report
p.1
Age group 11–16 Inspection date(s) 23–24 April 2012 Inspection number 395296 Unique Reference Number 121714 Local authority North Yorkshire Inspection number 395296 Inspection dates 23–24 April 2012 Lead inspector Andrew Swallow
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Type of school Secondary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 11–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 509 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Christopher Scutt Headteacher Jes ú s Echevarrίa Date of previous school inspection 21 June 2007 School address Sandybed Lane Stepney Hill Scarborough YO12 5LH Telephone number 01723 363280 Fax number 01723 500490 Email address admin@st-augustines.n-yorks.sch.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child's school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.
p.1
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way.
p.2
To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'.
p.2
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
Introduction
Andrew Swallow Geraldine Hutchinson Additional Inspector Additional Inspector Nancy Walker Additional Inspector
p.3
Introduction
This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. Inspectors observed teaching and learning in 31 lessons, taught by 28 teachers, including three observed jointly with the headteacher. In addition, meetings were held with two groups of pupils, members of the governing body and school staff. Inspectors observed the school’s work and looked at a number of documents, including the school development plan, the safeguarding and equality policies, and minutes of the governing body meetings. Also, inspectors analysed 162 parental and carers’ questionnaires and others completed by pupils and staff.
p.3
Information about the school
This school is much smaller than the average sized secondary school. A lower than average proportion of pupils is known to be eligible for free school meals. Overall numbers who are disabled or are supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs, is slightly above the national average. A small, but increasing, group of pupils is from minority ethnic backgrounds, particularly Polish and Philippino, and who speak English as an additional language. The school meets the current floor standards, which are the government’s minimum standards for attainment and progress. Among the school’s awards are Healthy School status and the Inclusion Quality Mark.
p.3
Information about the school
Since the previous inspection a new headteacher and deputy headteacher have joined the school, and the entire senior leadership team has changed. In addition, a new Chair and vice-chair of the Governing Body have recently taken up post.
p.3
Information about the school
A minority ethnic achievement hub, funded by the local authority, but managed by the school, is located on the school’s site. The hub provides outreach support for pupils with English as an additional language, both to the school and other local schools. The hub was not part of the formal inspection process, but the impact of its work in the school was evaluated. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.3
Key Findings
This is a satisfactory school. Adults provide high levels of pastoral care for all pupils and create a positive climate in which all pupils support each other. Parents and carers are very supportive of the school’s work. Pupils say how much they enjoy life in school and the many extra-curricular and enrichment experiences, particularly music. These help to promote well pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. It is not yet a good school because not all pupils achieve well, especially in mathematics, as a result of inconsistencies in teaching. Schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.
p.4
Key Findings
Pupils’ achievement is satisfactory overall. From generally average starting points, most reach average standards by the end of Year 11. Achievement and standards in mathematics is improving, but lags behind other subjects, including English and science, and results in underperformance by some pupils.
p.4
Key Findings
Teaching is satisfactory. Inspectors saw examples of good and outstanding teaching, and a small proportion that was inadequate.
p.4
Key Findings
Behaviour and safety are good. Pupils are very polite and respectful around school. Parents and carers, pupils and staff believe that the strong relationships promote a culture of safety. In lessons, most pupils are eager to learn and succeed. When teaching lacks challenge some pupils are less attentive. Attendance is rising, and is average.
p.4
Key Findings
Leadership of teaching and management of performance are satisfactory. There are examples of leaders taking decisive actions to improve teaching, though inconsistencies remain. Self-evaluation systems are established but lack sufficient rigour to secure accurate judgements about the effectiveness of teaching on learning and progress.
p.4
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Increase the proportion of teaching that is good or better by summer 2013, in order to raise standards to above average, by: - checking the impact of professional development and support more rigorously to reduce inconsistencies in mathematics - reducing the amount of talking by teachers in some lessons, and generally increasing the time spent by pupils working with each other and thinking for themselves - providing activities and experiences better suited to the needs of all pupils, as a result of more astute checking of their progress during lessons - planning more clearly for the skills and understanding to be developed in lessons - improving the quality of marking to ensure that pupils are always given a clear view of their attainment and how they can improve it.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the evaluation of the school’s work by leaders and managers at all levels by: - refining present arrangements to monitor the progress of all pupils across Years 7-11, to pinpoint underachievement earlier and to ensure the highest expectations of how well all can achieve - establishing a more systematic approach to assessing the quality of the school’s work, setting aside the necessary time to appraise how effective arrangements are in all subjects to raise achievement, and using rigorous criteria against which to make judgments - focusing more on the impact of teaching on the quality of pupils’ learning experiences and how well these are supporting their achievements.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
The vast majority of pupils achieve satisfactorily to reach average standards by the end of Year 11. Achievement is improving in mathematics, but is not as strong as in English and in some other subjects. While there are not significant differences in the achievement of different groups of pupils at the school, there remains some underperformance by the more able, especially girls, in mathematics. This is because planning does not take consistently, account of pupils’ abilities to challenge them sufficiently in key mathematical skills such as oral calculation, presenting data in different formats and applying basic number operations to solve problems in ‘real-life’ contexts.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Most of the parents and carers who responded to the inspection questionnaire think that their children are making good progress. The majority of the pupils think that they learn a lot, most or all of the time. The inspectors found this to be so in the lessons where teaching was good, but not so in general. This is largely due to activities that are not matched sufficiently to pupils’ differing needs at different times, with many participating in the same experiences for much of the time. Disabled pupils and those special educational needs make satisfactory progress in line with their peers. They are adequately supported in their learning, particularly those with English as an additional language, by all adults, including those from the minority ethnic achievement hub. In lessons and across the school, most pupils show positive attitudes to learning and, when given opportunities, talk purposefully with each other, structuring what they say clearly and
p.5
Achievement of pupils
listening perceptively to each other’s viewpoints. For example, in a Year 10 physical education lesson, students readily coached their peers on the importance of pacing during endurance activities, pointing out the impact of too brisk a pace, at the beginning of a twelve minutes run, on subsequently slower laps and severe tiredness. Many write coherently, marshalling ideas and facts cogently, using key language and grammar, as well as punctuation, to good effect. When learning is less engrossing, some lack the levels of motivation and self-discipline required to sustain their efforts and achieve well. The promotion of reading skills across Years 7-9 is a strength, with many pupils reading with increasing confidence, fluency and interest, as they move through the school.
p.6
Quality of teaching
A majority of parents and carers who responded to the inspection questionnaire think that their children are taught well. The inspectors found evidence of good and outstanding practice, but not yet sufficient to make the quality of teaching good overall. The best examples were seen in English, science, food technology, music and physical education. More typically, the quality of teaching is satisfactory. It is more variable in the core subjects, especially mathematics.
p.6
Quality of teaching
The most effective lessons were characterised by careful planning, with precise references to how all pupils can deepen understanding and build on prior knowledge. Prompt and stimulating beginnings enthused all learners. Frequent opportunities for pupils to share ideas and think for themselves heightened motivation and participation rates, and developed effective listening and communication skills. In these instances, pupils collaborated readily, understood exactly what was expected of them and the standard required. For example, in a Year 11 English lesson, all pupils showed an excellent insight into the effectiveness of an author’s use of symbols to evoke key messages to the reader, immersed in independent discussion with one another, and were spurred on by skilful questioning by the teacher. Support provided by adults from the minority ethnic achievement hub is effective in helping to involve pupils with English as an additional language in their learning. Disabled pupils and
p.6
Quality of teaching
those with special educational needs are appropriately supported, for the most part, by resources and activities that match their needs.
p.6
Quality of teaching
In many lessons where teaching is no better than satisfactory, teachers take too long to explain and introduce activities. They do not always take sufficient note of pupils’ previous outcomes. Experiences are, therefore, not always as motivating and as challenging as they might be, with learners passive for too long, sometimes becoming restless. Not all teachers listen to and observe groups of pupils and individuals, with sufficient care during these lessons. There are inconsistencies in the ways they provide feedback about how well individuals are doing and how they can improve. As a consequence, opportunities are missed to re-shape learning and particularly deepen the understanding of the most-able. Teaching is particularly variable in mathematics, where teachers tend to present solutions too readily and opportunities are missed for pupils to collaborate, think and work things out for themselves. The quality of marking across all subjects, but particularly in mathematics, is
p.6
Quality of teaching
variable, with inconsistencies in how regularly pupils are provided with a clear view of their attainment, and how they can improve it.
p.6
Behaviour and safety of pupils
Pupils say overwhelmingly that they feel safe in school and that adults are very supportive. As a consequence, they have a good understanding of the risks to which they may be exposed, both within and outside of school. Parents and carers also believe that the school takes good care of their children and manages behaviour very effectively. Attendance is rising and is average, with pupils arriving punctually to school and to lessons. Behaviour in lessons and around the school is good over time. Incidences of bullying are rare and a large proportion of pupils express confidence in the school’s systems for dealing with such occurrences, if they arise. Pupils are acutely aware of different forms of bullying, particularly homophobic and cyber-bullying and, through their work on the school council, and other responsibilities around the school, actively try to prevent it from occurring. They make a good contribution to a safe, positive learning environment. For example, they are inclusive,
p.7
Behaviour and safety of pupils
in their work and play, of peers who join the school from overseas and at an early stage of speaking English. At the same time, they show positive regard to those with disabilities and special educational needs, ensuring that no-one feels left out. However, in some lessons behaviour lapses, and is not as positive as it might be. This is especially the case when teaching is uninteresting, and where pupils are not involved soon enough in their learning.
p.7
Leadership and management
Recently there have been significant changes in the senior leadership of the school, in roles and responsibilities of key leaders and managers across the school, and in governance. Not all of these changes are yet embedded, and have taken effect as well as they might. Nonetheless, staff and members of the governing body share an accurate view of the strengths and weaknesses in teaching and learning, and have used the information effectively as of late, to determine key actions for improvement, including tackling underperformance in mathematics. They recognise that much remains to be done and have identified appropriate priorities. Suitable systems are in place for ongoing self-evaluation. Overall, this demonstrates satisfactory capacity for further improvement.
p.7
Leadership and management
Nonetheless, there is scope to refine present arrangements to monitor the progress of all pupils across Years 7-11, so that achievement in relation to pupils’ starting points can be checked more rigorously, and expectations of pupils’ outcomes by all teachers raised. Procedures to assess systematically the quality of teaching do not yet involve leaders and managers at all levels. They concentrate too much on teaching, rather than its effectiveness on the quality of pupils’ learning, and achievements by different groups. Consequently, judgements about the overall quality of teaching are over-generous. Outcomes of monitoring are not yet used successfully to reduce inconsistencies and promote consistently good or better practice, fast enough. Not all leaders and managers have sufficient time to check the impact of professional development and performance management arrangements, on the quality of day-to-day teaching and learning.
p.7
Leadership and management
The curriculum is predominantly academic, although with some applied and vocational courses. This meets effectively the needs of most students. Extra-curricular events and clubs, including many sporting and performing experiences, visits abroad and to local museums, theatres and art galleries, enhance the more formal arrangements. Over one third of pupils take part in musical activities, singing in the three choirs, playing in the jazz bands and school orchestra, and participating enthusiastically in the range of concerts and musical events throughout the school year. Regular access to the prayer room and school chaplain, well-planned assemblies and good links with the local church, underpin the school’s Catholic ethos. As a result, pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good.
p.7
Leadership and management
Members of the governing body discharge their statutory responsibilities and ensure that safeguarding arrangements meet requirements. They ensure that the school adequately promotes equality of opportunity and tackles any discrimination. They are developing a good understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the school, but the information they receive on the school’s work does not always enable them to determine fully how well the school is performing, against a wide enough range of national benchmarks.
p.8
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Nursery schools 54 42 2 2 Primary schools 14 49 32 6 Secondary schools 20 39 34 7 Special schools 33 45 20 3 Pupil referral units 9 55 28 8 All schools 16 47 31 6
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
The data in the table above are for the period 1 September to 31 December 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ).
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.
p.9
Common terminology used by inspectors
Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attainment: the standard of the pupils' work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils' punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Floor standards the national minimum expectation of attainment and progression measures
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils' attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils' freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.
p.10
to share with their children. It describes Ofsted's main
findings from the inspection of their school.
p.11
Inspection of St Augustine's Roman Catholic School, Scarborough, YO12 5LH
Thank you for talking to my colleagues and me when we visited your school recently. The inspectors spoke with you in lessons, around the school and in groups, looked at your work, read the results of questionnaires filled in by you and your parents and carers, and spoke with some of your teachers. Here is a summary of the main findings, which I hope will be of interest to you.
p.11
Inspection of St Augustine's Roman Catholic School, Scarborough, YO12 5LH
The school provides you with a satisfactory standard of education. You make satisfactory progress in most lessons, reaching average standards by the end of Year 11. The progress that you make in mathematics is improving, but the standards that you attain are not as high as in other subjects. Most of you behave well and are polite to visitors and respectful of each other. The quality of teaching is satisfactory, but is not consistently good enough across all subjects to ensure that you achieve as well as you might. The school provides adequate support to those of you who need additional help. Senior leaders and governors at the school know what needs to be done to bring more rigour in evaluating how well the school is doing, and to make things even better.
p.11
Inspection of St Augustine's Roman Catholic School, Scarborough, YO12 5LH
I have asked the headteacher and the governing body to increase the proportion of teaching that is good or better, in order ensure that standards across the school are above average by the summer 2013. I have also asked that staff are more rigorous in evaluating the quality of teaching and the progress that you make. They will need your help to make the school as good as all of you want it to be, and I hope you will continue to attend regularly, participate enthusiastically in all lessons, and tell your teachers when you find your learning to be too easy or too difficult.
p.11
Inspection of St Augustine's Roman Catholic School, Scarborough, YO12 5LH
Andrew Swallow Lead Inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion