Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 16 May 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paul Joyce

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Joyce

  • Postcode verified

    DE24 9DE

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+71Very positivemore positive than 70% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyhighly effectiveextremelywell-designedhigh qualityimproved
Criticismnot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings405w+69
  • What needs to improve141w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
539
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 27, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 74%What needs to improve 26%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms C Harcula Derby City Council Adult and Community Learning Allen Park Centre Allen Street Allenton DE24 9DE

p.1

employment

This survey evaluates providers’ response to initiatives launched on 1 August 2011 to use Skills Funding Agency funds flexibly to support people on benefits.

p.1

employment

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and participants, during my visit on 24 and 25 April 2012 to look at your work in employability provision.

p.1

employment

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

employment

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with managers, staff, participants, employers and other partners; scrutiny of relevant documents; analysis of participants’ work; and observation of three learning sessions.

p.1

Key findings

 Derby Adult Learning Service works extremely effectively with key stakeholders, including Jobcentre Plus and the National Careers Service, to plan provision to meet identified local need. The service has recently developed bespoke courses for participants that are over 45 years of age and for those wanting to be self-employed. Courses provide participants with good opportunities to improve their employability skills in well- resourced local learning centres. However, links with employers to enable them to undertake work trials or meaningful work-experience are underdeveloped.  Participants receive good initial advice and guidance before starting courses. Initial assessments are comprehensive and used well to enable courses to be tailored to meet participants’ individual needs. However, the targets set on their individual learning plans are not always sufficiently specific or useful in aiding their development or progress.

p.1

Key findings

 In the learning sessions observed, participants received highly effective tuition and support. They developed skills and knowledge well in relevant contexts on well-designed courses that were tailored effectively to meet their individual needs. In particular, they gained considerable confidence through improved listening and speaking skills.  The employability provision is managed well and the resources used for teaching and learning are of high quality. Marketing and publicity materials promote the courses very effectively. Administrative processes are well managed and quality assurance arrangements are good. However, arrangements for tracking and monitoring participants’ post-course destinations are underdeveloped and the information is not used to inform improvements to the quality of provision.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 ensuring that the targets set on participants’ individual learning plans include more specific learning goals to support their development and progress to increase their chances of employment  developing links with employers to enable participants to complete work trials or meaningful work-experience so that they can demonstrate their skills in real work settings  enhancing arrangements to ensure that participants’ post-course destinations are tracked and monitored more effectively and using this information to evaluate and improve the quality of the provision.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop employability provision at Derby Adult Learning Service.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to the Skills Funding Agency.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion