Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Elms Farm Community Primary SchoolOfsted inspection, 26 Apr 2012

Inspected 26 Apr 2012 · published 15 May 2012 · URN 103381

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Ofsted inspected Elms Farm Community Primary School on 26 Apr 2012, led by Clive Kempton. The overall judgement was Satisfactory. Ofsted published the report on 15 May 2012. Source: Ofsted (Open Government Licence v3).

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    26 Apr 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Clive Kempton, Conny Curuana, Lynne Bradbury

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Behaviour and safety verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Quality of teaching verified

    Satisfactory

  • Name on report verified

    Elms Farm Community Primary School

  • URN verified

    103381

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Behaviour and safetySatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Quality of teachingSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−16Mixedmore positive than 4% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingeffectivehighly effectiveexceptionallyenjoyvery wellsupportiveconsistent
Criticisminadequatetoo manyvariablenot sufficientlymissedpoornot effectiveconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1928w−30
  • Leadership532w+5
  • What needs to improve129w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,579
about usual (typical 2796)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
2
typical 3
Hedged sentences
15%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 51%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Age group 3–11 Inspection date(s) 25–26 April 2012 Inspection number 395613 Elms Farm Community Primary School Inspection report

p.1

Unique reference number 103381 Local authority Birmingham Inspection number 395613 Inspection dates 25–26 April 2012 Lead inspector Clive Kempton HMI

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 292 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Sue Robinson Headteacher Elizabeth Gallagher Date of previous school inspection 2 February 2009 School address Dorncliffe Avenue Sheldon Birmingham B33 0PJ Telephone number 0121 464 4634 Fax number 0121 464 2497 Email address bgallagher@elmsfarm.org achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.2

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

Clive Kempton HMI Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.3

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days’ notice. Eleven of the 13 teachers were jointly observed by an inspector with a member of the senior management team, and 11 lessons were observed. Two members of staff were absent. Five and a half hours were spent in lessons. Meetings were held with the headteacher and senior staff, members of the governing body, parents and carers, outside professionals associated with the school, a local authority adviser (now deputy headteacher designate), and nine groups of pupils. Inspectors heard pupils from Year 2 and Year 6 read. They observed the school’s work, including the after-school club run by the governing body, and the behaviour of pupils at lunchtime both outdoors and indoors during wet days. They looked at the school development plan, the school’s self- evaluation of its own effectiveness, and other documentation provided by the school. Inspectors also analysed the 72 parent and carer questionnaires returned, as well as

p.3

Introduction

those from staff and pupils, and followed up the key concerns identified.

p.3

Information about the school

Elms Farm is a larger than average-sized primary school that serves an area that reflects considerable socio-economic deprivation. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is well above the national average, although it varies between classes. The number of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds has increased steadily over the last five years and now represents 25% of the school population. Consequently, just over one in ten pupils now has a first language which is not English. The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs is above the national average, as is the proportion of those with a statement of special educational needs. The number of pupils who join or leave the school at times other than the usual starting points is above average. The school provides breakfast and after-school clubs run by the governing body.

p.3

Information about the school

The school’s 2011 national test results did not meet the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum standards expected for attainment and progress. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Key findings

 Elms Farm is a satisfactory school. A warm welcome by the office staff greets all visitors when they arrive. Pupils are happy and relationships between adults and pupils are good. It is not yet a good school because the quality of teaching is too variable which limits pupils’ achievement. Progress in Key Stage 2 has slowed down since the last inspection. In the 2011 national tests, standards were particularly low at the end of Year 6 in reading, English and mathematics, when they fell to slightly below national averages. Schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.

p.4

Key findings

 Children’s achievement in the Early Years Foundation Stage and through Key Stage 1 is good. It is satisfactory overall in Key Stage 2 although it varies between subjects, classes, groups of pupils and from one year to the next. Throughout the school, pupils make more consistent progress in reading because of the support they are given at home and at school through various tailor-made interventions.

p.4

Key findings

 Teaching is satisfactory because, despite some good teaching, inconsistencies in practices such as the use of assessment of pupils’ work and skills to inform planning limits progress in some classes.

p.4

Key findings

 Behaviour is good in lessons when pupils are engaged and interested by effective teaching. Their attitudes to learning decline when teaching is less effective. Behaviour and safety are more variable in less formal situations, and there have been too many exclusions and reported incidents of harassment.

p.4

Key findings

 Senior staffing has been through a turbulent time since the last inspection and is in the process of transition to a new management structure. This has slowed the pace of improvement and led to a drop in standards in teaching and learning. Improvement planning has lacked clarity in providing clear, measurable targets to support governors in holding the school to account for its Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Key findings

performance. Nevertheless, there have been some recent improvements in provision, and current data indicate that the rate of pupils’ progress throughout the school is improving.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Raise standards in English and mathematics by ensuring that all pupils make expected progress in all year groups.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality and consistency of teaching so that 80% is good or better by:  ensuring that all teachers plan lessons with clear and measurable learning objectives that are shared with pupils and regularly reviewed during and at the end of lessons, so that teachers can check what pupils have learned  ensuring that all staff can accurately assess pupils’ skills and achievements and plan for their next steps in learning.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Devise a school improvement plan focused on a few key priorities to raise standards that contains regular termly milestones and measurable success criteria so that all leaders and managers can be held to account by governors.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Children make good progress from their low starting points when they enter the nursery. By the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage, their skills are broadly in line with those expected for their age, except in problem solving, reasoning and numeracy. Throughout Key Stage 1 pupils sustain this progress, largely due to the effective range of individual interventions for those who are falling behind.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

At Key Stage 2, pupils’ rate of progress has slowed down over the last few years. Ten percent of the parents and carers who returned the inspection questionnaire said that their children could make better progress. This slower progress is due in part to variability in the quality of teaching, and in part to the extent of new arrivals in the school. The 2011 Year 6 national test results were particularly low, especially in writing. These pupils were the first year group not to reach the government minimum expectations for attainment and progress since the last inspection, but no particular pattern of underachievement in subjects, classes or groups of pupils is evident over the years.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Throughout the school, pupils make more consistent progress in reading due to the support that individuals receive from home and from school. Attainment in reading is broadly average at the end of Key Stage 1 and at the end of Key Stage 2. The weakest readers in both Year 2 and Year 6 all manage to read with some fluency, although often without expression. They sound out the letters of words that are not Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Achievement of pupils

immediately recognised and try hard. Their reading ability is often better than their understanding of the text, although a recent whole-school focus on guided reading is improving this issue. Some of the older pupils who struggle with reading are not provided with enough support to choose a book that might interest or inspire them to read more. As one boy reported, he ‘just picks one off the shelf with an interesting cover’. The more-able readers clearly enjoy reading and read for pleasure at home, often selecting books by a wide range of authors.

p.6

Achievement of pupils

Observations of lessons showed that most pupils enjoy learning and make better progress when they are given the opportunity to work independently or in groups to research and find out things for themselves. In English, mathematics and science, disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs, new arrivals and those in receipt of free school meals, are well supported by the focused support of the inclusion manager, and often make better progress. Pupils from minority ethnic groups make similar progress to their peers. Observations and school data indicate that the current Year 6 pupils are on track to reach or possibly exceed the government’s floor standards, and that the pace of progress is accelerating for a greater number of pupils across the school.

p.6

Quality of teaching

The quality of teaching is satisfactory. A large proportion of the parents and carers who responded to the inspection questionnaire felt that their child was well-taught. Inspection findings indicate that there is some good practice, especially in Key Stage 2. Overall, just over half of the teaching observed was judged to be good. However, weaker teaching was observed in the Early Years Foundation Stage. Pupils’ disinterest in their lessons, often due to less effective teaching, is not sufficiently picked up or challenged by some teachers. Not all staff manage the behaviour of pupils who are not usually in their form groups sufficiently well. The use of assessment to inform the next steps in pupils’ learning is patchy. Where assessment is used well, all pupils, including disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs, make better progress. Despite training on this, not all teachers use this practice which limits learning in some classes.

p.6

Quality of teaching

In the best lessons observed, for example in one mixed Year 3/4 lesson on the Greeks, pupils were excited about their learning. They researched the topic using laptops and resource books and worked collaboratively with a real sense of purpose. This is an example of how the best teaching uses the school’s broad curriculum to underpin learning and develop pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural awareness. In the less successful lessons, the pace of learning was too slow. Opportunities to challenge and question pupils were often missed, which meant that pupils did not learn enough. At times, teachers talk too much and pupils became disinterested in the activities which are often mundane and unexciting.

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Nearly one fifth of parents and carers who responded to the inspection questionnaire Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

felt that behaviour was not consistently good. Inspection findings agree with this view and judge behaviour and safety to be satisfactory. Behaviour is usually good in lessons due to the generally consistent use of the behaviour management system. Where more effective teaching engages pupils, they are naturally well-behaved and eager to take part and succeed. They pay attention and are keen to respond to the teacher’s questions. When pupils find the work interesting and challenging, they are totally captivated by the task and are unaware of time passing. However, if the teaching is not interesting enough, or pupils are unclear about what they are learning, or the teacher talks too much, pupils lose interest and their learning slows.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Behaviour and safety out of class is more variable. There are too many reported incidents, generally involving boys during lunch breaks. Observations show that pupils can behave very well in break times, for example in classroom-based activities or at ‘film club’ on rainy days. Some older pupils take on leadership roles as play leaders, prefects, librarians and peer tutors. These opportunities significantly develop their maturity, confidence and self-esteem. Nevertheless, there have also been too many fixed-term and permanent exclusions over recent years, and too many entries in the school’s behaviour and racist logs. Twenty percent of parents and pupils feel that the school does not deal effectively with bullying. Inspectors asked a range of pupils for their views on bullying. Some agree that there has been some falling out resulting in name calling within friendship groups, especially between girls, but that

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

the school deals with this appropriately by bringing pupils’ parents and carers together to discuss and resolve issues.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

The school has worked hard to improve attendance and all poor attendance and punctuality are now rigorously challenged. This has considerably improved attendance, although it is still below average. The biggest issue remaining is condoned absence by some families.

p.7

Leadership and management

The headteacher has ambition to drive the school forward but the pace of improvement has been hampered by the lack of stability in the senior leadership team. Some leaders have relinquished their management roles to focus more on teaching, and temporary management roles have been allocated to other staff until permanent appointments are made. The governing body is very supportive and has ensured that safeguarding arrangements meet requirements. However, it has not sufficiently held the school to account for the underachievement of some year groups. School development planning does not set clear enough, quantifiable, targets or milestones to help governors challenge the school when targets are missed. Nevertheless, there has been some improvement, for example, in accelerating the progress of pupils in Key Stage 1 by implementing good intervention strategies. This indicates that the school has the capacity to improve, even under difficult

p.7

Leadership and management

The curriculum is satisfactory in the Early Years Foundation Stage and in the main Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Leadership and management

school. Pupils are sometimes grouped out of their usual classes by ability or for other reasons which does not always have a positive effect on behaviour. The inclusion manager has worked well to coach and support individual members of staff to help them improve their performance or classroom behaviour management. Information and communication technology is used effectively in some lessons but its use for teaching and learning is generally under-developed.

p.8

Leadership and management

The school’s leaders place great importance on the inclusion of all pupils and on closing the gap between their attainment and national averages. They are keen that more pupils have better life chances and are equipped with the skills they need when they transfer to secondary school. This drive to promote equality and tackle discrimination has been particularly successful for lower-attaining and disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs. However, more recently, it has been the middle and higher ability pupils who have underachieved and on whom the school is now focusing.

p.8

Leadership and management

Parents are very supportive of the school. One said, ‘the school is very approachable and makes every effort to get to know you.’ Outside professionals provide good support to pupils and their families whose circumstances make them vulnerable. The after-school club attracts only small numbers of pupils but provides a valued resource for working parents and carers. The limited number of pupils who attend are well looked after, but some of the older pupils do not have the opportunity to play with someone of their own age.

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 54 42 2 2 Primary schools 14 49 32 6 Secondary schools 20 39 34 7 Special schools 33 45 20 3 Pupil referral units 9 55 28 8 All schools 16 47 31 6

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September to 31 December 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance: the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour: how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Floor standards: the national minimum expectation of attainment and progression measures.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety: how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.

p.10

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.11

Inspection of Elms Farm Community Primary School, Birmingham, B33

Thank you for the warm welcome you gave to inspectors when we visited your school earlier this term. We enjoyed talking to you, looking at your work and watching you learn. I thought you would like me to tell you the outcome of the inspection and what you could all do to help the school become even better.

p.11

Inspection of Elms Farm Community Primary School, Birmingham, B33

At the moment, your school is satisfactory, but it could be a lot better because some aspects of your school are good but some are not. You behave well in the classroom and are enthusiastic and eager to learn. Some of you need to improve your behaviour in the playground and consider other people’s feelings. You make visitors to the school feel very welcome, and are good ambassadors for Elms Farm. Your teachers work hard for you and mostly prepare interesting lessons. Those of you who need extra help get good support from a range of adults. You are all good at reading. Don’t forget to try to read more at home and get adults to help you choose appropriate books. You have got a good headteacher, who is supported by her senior staff in trying to improve the school.

p.11

Inspection of Elms Farm Community Primary School, Birmingham, B33

There are aspects of the school that need to get better. I have asked the headteacher and senior staff to sort these things out by making sure that:

p.11

Inspection of Elms Farm Community Primary School, Birmingham, B33

 you are helped to make quicker progress in English and mathematics.  teachers explain what you are going to learn in each lesson and check how well you have done - you should all be able to explain what you have learned in each lesson  the plans the senior staff write include more challenging targets to improve your test results.

p.11

Inspection of Elms Farm Community Primary School, Birmingham, B33

I wish you all the best for the future. Don’t forget, you need to be at school on time every day to make the most of the opportunities it provides for you.

p.11

Her Majesty's Inspector

procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.12

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion