Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Action for Children in Northumberland
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
29 Mar 2012
- Inspectors verified
Bill Drumm
- URN verified
SC000673
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 57
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC000673 Inspection date 29/03/2012 Inspector Bill Drumm Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 31/01/2012 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.3
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection (March 2011).
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Brief description of the service
The home, in partnership with the local authority and health trust, provides short breaks residential care for children and young people, aged from 6 years old up to 17 years old, who have moderate to severe learning disabilities.
p.4
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress.
p.4
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress.
p.4
Progress
At the last inspection in January 2012, the overall effectiveness of the home was judged to be good. Three requirements and seven recommendations for improvement were made. All of these have been fully met. Young people were observed to be happy at the home and relaxed in the company of staff. They remain well cared for and safe.
p.4
Progress
A requirement was made at the last inspection to review and update the home's Statement of Purpose to include all the matters listed in Schedule 1 of the Children’s Homes Regulations 2001. The manager of the home has subsequently undertaken a comprehensive review of this document and it now includes all the information required. As a result, it better describes the services and facilities in the home and better informs parents, staff and placing authorities how the needs of young people are met.
p.4
Progress
Another requirement was to review the register of attendance maintained at the home. A full review of this document has been carried out and the legal status of each young person is now recorded.
p.4
Progress
The third requirement was to ensure the prompt referral to the local authority of any allegation or suspicion of abuse and neglect of a young person. There have been no child protection concerns at the home since the last inspection. The home's manager has, however, used team meetings and individual supervision sessions to remind staff of their individual responsibilities in this area. In addition, staff training has been reviewed and updated. Staff therefore better understand how to protect young people from abuse and exploitation.
p.4
Progress
Two recommendations were made in relation to the young people's guide to the home. The guide has been reviewed and updated and now includes photographs of the home and its interior. In addition, the guide now includes the contact arrangements for each young person's independent reviewing officer as well as those of the Children's Rights Director. This helps young people to have a better understanding of what the home is like and who they can speak to if they are unhappy about their care.
p.4
Progress
One recommendation was that the Registered Manager should ensure that the home’s missing person procedures are compatible with those of the police and local authority. The home's manager has held meetings with the responsible police authority and a joint procedure has been agreed. Staff are now also aware of their individual responsibilities in the event of young people going missing. Staff respond appropriately to young people on their return.
p.5
Progress
Separate recommendations were made for improvement to records that are kept in relation to restraints, sanctions, fire safety checks and recruitment checks. These have been met. Records of sanctions and restraints now better demonstrate that young people know why sanctions and restraints are used. Similarly the content of other records have improved. Those held in relation to fire now show the checks that are made to protect staff, visitors and young people from potential harm. Records held in relation to the recruitment of staff demonstrate that staff are assessed as being suitable to work with young people.
p.5
Progress
One final recommendation was made in relation to the monitoring of the home by the manager. The manager has systems in place to measure the quality of the service and care provided to young people. This information helps to plan further improvements and continued development. Copies of these reports are forwarded to Ofsted for their consideration.
p.5
Progress
In addition to the above, the home has made other improvements. Several meetings have been held between the home's manager and the principal of a local college. The aim is to help young people experience and access a wider range of opportunities, particularly in the evenings and during school holidays, by sharing resources and activities. Such activities may include pottery, car mechanics and farm work. The home has also started working towards achieving a recognised award for countering bullying. This will help staff better understand the issues involved and keep young people safe.
p.5
Progress
No requirements or recommendations have been made following this inspection.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion