Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Portsmouth City Council in Portsmouth

Inspected 27 Mar 2012 · published 11 May 2012 · URN SC037588

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

David Coulter

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    27 Mar 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    David Coulter

  • URN verified

    SC037588

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 33% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings57w0
  • What needs to improve57w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
110
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 28, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 4
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 7%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 87%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC037588 Inspection date 27/03/2012 Inspector David Coulter Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Date of last inspection 08/08/2011 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.3

About this inspection

The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection (March 2011).

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.

p.3

Brief description of the service

This home is registered for a maximum of six young people between the ages of five and under 18 years. It is owned by a city council and provides short-term placements for young people with learning difficulties and physical disabilities.

p.4

Progress

Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress.

p.4

Progress

The home has responded positively to the recommendation arising from the last inspection and has been subject to a significant refurbishment programme that has seen the creation of a number of specially equipped bedrooms and a new lounge/recreation area. New double-glazed windows are being installed and existing ground-floor facilities are being redecorated. Although the work has still to be completed, it has already had a positive impact on the both the home’s environment for the young people and the morale of staff. While the building work necessitated the closure of the home for a two-week period, staff were able to support a number of young people and their families by undertaking community-based activities.

p.4

Progress

Young people are appropriately supported during their respite visits. Staff employ a range of communication techniques to involve each young person in decision making within the home and they are encouraged to exercise choice over such things as food and activities. During their visits young people are encouraged to participate in a range of social and recreational activities that are appropriate to their age and understanding. Although staff still undertake activities in the local community, the lack of a minibus is currently curtailing group outings.

p.4

Progress

During their visits the health and well-being of each young person are carefully monitored and any concerns passed on to appropriate parties. Staff have completed training on caring for young people with specific medical conditions such as epilepsy. A robust system ensures that medication is both booked in and dispensed appropriately.

p.4

Progress

The home operates with a team of enthusiastic staff who are led by an experienced manager. There is a culture of training and professional development within the home and an understanding that staff will regularly update their knowledge and skills in response to the changing needs of young people. For example, staff have responded to the increase in young people being referred to the home with autistic spectrum disorders by undertaking a specific training programme. Although each staff member should receive a regular individual professional supervision session, due to two unfilled senior staff posts, the intervals between supervision sessions have increased. The manager has attempted to address this problem by organising group sessions that focus on practice issues, however, he acknowledges a more sustainable long-term solution needs to be sought.

p.4

Progress

Staff spoke in positive terms about working in the home and are clearly appreciative of the improvements to the environment. They are keen to further develop the service they offer and feel their 'child-focused' approach places them in a unique position to contribute to each young person's core assessment. Staff have established good working relationships with parents and continue to liaise effectively with staff from other agencies such as social workers, teaching staff and health professionals.

p.5

Progress

Although evidence indicates the home is making good progress, two recommendations are being made to further improve existing provision.

p.5

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):

p.5

Recommendations

 provide suitable transport to enable young people to participate in a range of activities, including leisure activities and trips (NMS 7.2).  ensure staff have are provided with regular supervision by appropriately qualified and experienced staff. (NMS 19.4)

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion