Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Dorset Council in Dorset

Inspected 22 Mar 2012 · published 8 May 2012 · URN SC032163

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sharron Escott

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    22 Mar 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Sharron Escott

  • URN verified

    SC032163

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−56Criticalmore positive than 8% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseclear
Criticismpoor

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings57w0
  • What needs to improve265w−56

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
313
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 38, typical 50
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
5
typical 4
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 5%What needs to improve 21%About the inspection 74%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC032163 Inspection date 22/03/2012 Inspector Sharron Escott Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Date of last inspection 29/06/2011 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.3

About this inspection

The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection (March 2011).

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.

p.3

Brief description of the service

The provision is a purpose-built children's home that is run by a local authority. The home is able to accommodate up to 14 children and young people of either sex, aged between four and under 18 years of age who have a learning disability, including those who have additional more complex or challenging needs.

p.4

Brief description of the service

The children receive medium- to long-term care as well as respite care. In addition, the home provides a day care service for up to 10 children during weekends and school holiday periods.

p.4

Progress

Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making inadequate progress.

p.4

Progress

At the full inspection carried out in June 2011, the overall effectiveness of the service was judged as good. One requirement and four recommendations were raised as part of that inspection. The home has successfully met one requirement and one recommendation. At the time of this inspection there were five children present in the home.

p.4

Progress

Since the last inspection, and as a result of this inspection, the service has made inadequate progress. Three requirements and three recommendations have been raised; these relate to the quality of care and appropriately safeguarding children.

p.4

Progress

The requirement relating to monitoring matters, as detailed in Regulation 34, has been successfully met. The quality of care is regularly monitored by Regulation 33 visits and Regulation 34 checks. Copies of these reports are sent to Ofsted within the appropriate time scales. However, the detail within these reports and the lack of any formal consultation systems in place, to seek the views of the young people, the child's family, social worker and Independent Reviewing Officers on the quality of care provided, has resulted in the recommendation being reinstated.

p.4

Progress

The core staff records for recruitment and vetting are held at the home; references for new employees are on file and telephone verification now takes place. The current staffing levels reflect the supervision levels required for the young people in placement, ensuring that continuity of care is provided. However, the staffing rota does not show that there is a dedicated handover time where essential information is shared between staff, and it could not be identified what staff member is responsible for spending time with individual young people. As a result, young people are not clear which staff member is working directly with them and that they are fully aware of their changing daily living needs.

p.4

Progress

New staff and existing staff receive inadequate support. The Children's Workforce and Development Council's induction standard has not been undertaken within seven days of employment and supervisions are inconsistent and not in line with the home’s policies and procedures. Not all staff have had their performance reviewed and appraised annually. The staff training programme is currently under review. However, a significant number of staff have not been provided with mandatory training. In addition, a significant number of staff are administrating medication, using intervention techniques, and lifting and handling children without being provided with any formal training. This results in young people being cared for by staff who are not well supported, and whose limited training opportunities have restricted their ability to safeguard young people and themselves from harm and injury.

p.5

Progress

Poor and inappropriate behaviour management strategies are being used frequently that potentially restrict the liberty and rights of children and young people. These include, young people being 'removed' to their room or 'removed' to a 'chill out' room without consultation and consent for short but varying periods of times. Care plans, associated risk assessments and care practise are potentially restrictive, individualised behaviour management strategies lack imagination and creativity. In addition, recommendations made from the local authority Designated Officer have not been acted upon following a Section 47-strategy meeting. As a result, children and young people are not fully protected from harm and appropriately safeguarded.

p.5

Progress

However, the home has successfully progressed their development action plan. The home now provides additional areas to promote family contact, formal meetings and recreational play. A number of bedrooms have been redecorated and appropriately personalised to the individuals taste and interests. Funding and planning is underway for a sensory garden in the court yard to provide opportunities for children and young people to enjoy therapeutic play and leisure time.

p.5

Statutory Requirements

This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.

p.5

Reg. Requirement Due date

(2001) ensure consideration to be given to the measures which may be necessary to protect children following an allegation of abuse or neglect ( Regulation 16 (2) (e)) 18/05/2012

p.5

Reg. Requirement Due date

(2001) ensure no measure of control or discipline which is excessive or unreasonable shall be used at any time on children accommodated in the children's home (Regulation 17 (1)) 18/05/2012 (2001) ensure all persons employed receive appropriate training, supervision and appraisal. (Regulation 27 (4)(a)) 18/05/2012

p.5

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):

p.6

Recommendations

 ensure the views of the child's family, social worker and IRO are sought regularly on the child's care. (NMS 1.4)  ensure that staff rotas include scheduled time to ensure handovers are held and they include the planning of spending time with individual children, specifically 1:1 supervision (NMS 17.6)  ensure new staff undertake the Children's Workforce Development Council's induction standards, commencing within seven working days of starting their employment and being completed within six months (NMS 18.3 )  ensure the child's placement plan sets out any specific strategies that have been agreed to reduce the incidences of any negative behaviour exhibited by the child; in particular with in reference to the use of time out room. Sanctions for poor behaviour need to be clear, reasonable and not excessive. (2.88. volume 5)

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion