Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's home SC068658
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
15 Mar 2012
- Inspectors verified
Russell Shackford
- URN verified
SC068658
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 57
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC068658 Inspection date 15/03/2012 Inspector Russell Shackford Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 05/12/2011 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.3
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection (March 2011).
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Brief description of the service
This home is run by a company and is registered to accommodate up to six children and young people of either gender, who have emotional and behavioural needs or learning disabilities.
p.4
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress.
p.4
Progress
This service is currently judged as good. The home has improved quality of care and outcomes for children and has addressed the requirements and recommendations made at the previous inspection.
p.4
Progress
At the last inspection, requirements were raised around behaviour management planning and recording. Recommendations were made to improve the recordings relating to medication, behaviour management and service development planning.
p.4
Progress
Behaviour management records have been improved to ensure that they contain the required information and detail. Young people's views are sought and recorded, These contribute to the manager’s monitoring and evaluation of the home.
p.4
Progress
All medicines at the home are accurately recorded and a robust stock-checking system is in place. The manager monitors this regularly. If there are any instances where young people do not take medication, for example, due to refusal or absence from the home, these are clearly recorded. Advice is sought from a qualified person regarding the best course of action when medication is not taken. This helps to ensure that young people's welfare and safety is protected.
p.4
Progress
There have been notable improvements in the quality of care and outcomes for young people in terms of behaviour management and physical interventions. The manager has commissioned new, specifically-designed staff training from an accredited organisation. The staff highlight the benefits of increased emphasis on de- escalation of events and uncomplicated physical intervention techniques.
p.4
Progress
Young people confirm that physical intervention is rare and that in the main, staff use incentives, talking and diversionary activities to manage behaviour. This helps to ensure that when staff regard young people’s behaviour as unacceptable, they respond with constructive and appropriate measures.
p.4
Progress
There is effective monitoring of the quality of care for the young people in the home. Effective recording enables the manager to monitor, report upon and evaluate the home’s administration systems. The quality of care is fully recorded and evaluated in a periodic summary to inform the service development plan. The manager acts promptly where there is any area of identified weakness. Effective evaluation helps to ensure that standards within the home continue to improve.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion