Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

HMP Peterborough - Men

Inspected — · published 28 Jul 2011 · URN 52320

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    PE3 7PD

  • Name on report verified

    HMP Peterborough: male estate

  • URN verified

    52320

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+3Mixedmore positive than 26% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyhighly effectiveeffectivepositiveindependentclearimprovedsuccessfully
Criticisminsufficientinadequatepoorslowinsufficientlyyet totoo manynot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings532w+3
  • What needs to improve1292w+3

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,693
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 31, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 25%What needs to improve 61%About the inspection 13%

Full report text

Published date 17 June 2011 Inspection number 367959 Unique reference number: 52320

p.1

Type of establishment: Male local disbursement category B

p.1

Establishment contact:

Head of Learning and Skills HMP Peterborough Saville Road Peterborough PE3 7PD Telephone number: 01733 217500 HMP Peterborough: male estate

p.1

and Skills (Ofsted)

Ofsted works in partnership with Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons and inspects the management and provision of learning and skills for offenders across the full range of custodial establishments and probation areas.

p.3

and Skills (Ofsted)

Inspectors judge the quality of the provision against the Common Inspection Framework 2009 and contribute to the inspection frameworks of Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons.

p.3

and Skills (Ofsted)

The following text is Ofsted’s summary of the learning and skills contribution to Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons’ findings. This Ofsted summary report for learning and skills provision will be published on the Ofsted website ( www.ofsted.gov.uk ).

p.3

and Skills (Ofsted)

Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons inspection reports can be found on http://www.justice.gov.uk/inspectorates/hmi-prisons/prison-and-yoi-inspections.htm

p.3

Information about the prison

HMP & YOI Peterborough is located on the outskirts of Peterborough in Cambridgeshire and is the only prison in England and Wales holding both men and women, although they do not mix. It opened on 28 March 2005 and the current Director started in October 2010. The prison is managed by Sodexho Justice Services (formerly Kalyx) and is operated on a 25 year DCMF (design, construct, manage and finance) contract. All staff are employed by Sodexho, including the acting head of learning and skills. While most education staff work across both prison estates, all other learning and skills staff work predominately in one of them. Many external partners, including St Giles Trust and Learndirect support the resettlement pre- release provision and other groups visit to provide enrichment learning activities.

p.3

Information about the prison

The male estate is a category B local disbursement prison for remand (18 years of age and above) and sentenced (over 21 years of age) prisoners. It is nearing over- crowding operational capacity of 624, with 540 men aged 21 and over and 33 young men aged 18 and over. Their age range is from 18 to 78 years. Some 33% are remand/ unsentenced prisoners, 17% are foreign nationals and 73% are White British. The average length of stay is 15 weeks, but this includes men who stay for a few days to those, such as vulnerable prisoners, who stay a number of years.

p.3

Information about the prison

The male estate’s catchment area is Cambridgeshire and Huntingdon and it accepts prisoners from other areas when space allows.

p.3

estate

Grades: 1 is outstanding; 2 is good; 3 is satisfactory; 4 is inadequate

p.4

Common Inspection Framework (CIF) aspects Grade

Overall effectiveness 3 Capacity to improve 3 Outcomes for learners 3 Quality of provision 3 Leadership and management 3

p.4

Overall effectiveness Grade 3

Learners attend well in the majority of learning and skills areas and those who complete accredited courses mostly achieve their qualifications, except in art where achievements are poor. Mainstream prisoners develop good vocational skills but in non-accredited activities new knowledge and skills are not routinely recognised and recorded. The education sessions are mostly good, although in less effective sessions, some learners do not actively and consistently participate in learning. Taster weeks’ activities effectively promote the development of social and learning skills and are supported well by unqualified peer learning assistants. Individual coaching is good in vocational training areas, but despite personal protective equipment being delivered during the inspection inadequate attention is paid to health and safety practices in some workshops. Production of a variety of woodwork and horticulture items and the repair and recycling of white goods enable prisoners

p.4

Overall effectiveness Grade 3

to make positive contributions to the local community.

p.4

Overall effectiveness Grade 3

The range of accredited provision is narrow at level 1 with too little above that level. A very good range of pre-release courses is offered in the prison’s resettlement centre where the St Giles Trust has trained 14 prisoners to achieve a national vocational qualification (NVQ) at level 3 in information, advice and guidance; they now provide effective peer support. The assessment of prisoners’ literacy, numeracy and language needs at induction is satisfactory but support to improve these is not offered in workshops; support for those with additional learning needs is underdeveloped. The library facilities, which are based in the education department, offer a range of activities, but its opening hours and support for independent learning are insufficient. The prison kitchen provides a particularly good learning environment for prisoners to gain good vocational skills relevant to national employment on release.

p.4

Overall effectiveness Grade 3

The prison’s 2009 -12 learning and skills strategic plan has clear objectives, which are routinely monitored by the quality improvement group. The introduction of electronic kiosks as resource points around the prison is highly effective and encourages prisoners to find out information for themselves, including their learning and skills schedule. Use of this resource provides useful learning and skills for resettlement. Equal opportunities are promoted satisfactorily; this includes work by the chaplaincy team who provide effective pastoral support. However, vulnerable prisoners do not get the same access to learning and skills as other prisoners. Safeguarding arrangements are satisfactory.

p.4

Capacity to improve Grade 3

The increase in activity places since the 2008 inspection provides places for 75% of the population and is still not enough to keep all prisoners fully occupied. Waiting lists are long for many programmes. The introduction of a multi-purpose workshop offers vulnerable prisoners a choice of five basic activities, but they still have less choice than other prisoners. In education subjects, their wing-based education classroom is a cramped ex-cell. The prisoners’ needs analysis survey, completed in late 2010, has yet to be analysed to inform developments. Effective team work across the prison, identified in 2008 has been maintained; education staffing is more stable and the quality of teaching is improved.

p.5

Capacity to improve Grade 3

The learning and skills strategic plan is clear, but too generic across both prison estates. It places insufficiently specific focus on all men’s needs, especially those of vulnerable prisoners who stay longest at the prison. Insufficient use of data and information, for example to resolve the low completion rates on accredited courses, remains as an area for improvement. The self-assessment report is too generic for the whole prison and is no longer informed by an inclusive self-assessment process. However, it usefully records progress against action points separately. Inspectors agreed with some judgments but found additional areas for improvement not identified in the self-assessment report and slow progress in resolving other areas which remain from the previous inspection.

p.5

Strengths

 good achievement for learners who stay to the end of their accredited courses  good development of vocational skills for sentenced prisoners  high attendance in the majority of learning and skills areas  positive contributions to the local community through projects and activities  good use of education and some vocational training taster courses to promote social and learning skills.

p.5

Areas for improvement

 too many learners do not complete accredited courses  insufficient recognition and recording of non-accredited skills to improve self- awareness of skills learnt and provide evidence to support employment on release  inadequate development of literacy, numeracy and language skills in the work places  inadequate attention to work-shop health and safety practices.

p.6

Strengths

 much good teaching and learning in education  good individual coaching in vocational training areas  good support for learning provided by prisoners working as support assistants  particularly good learning environment in the industrial kitchen  very good range of pre-release courses  particularly good use of accredited peer mentors to provide information, advice and guidance.

p.6

Areas for improvement

 insufficient provision above level 1 for learners with higher abilities and/or for progression for those staying longer periods at the prison  long waiting lists for many learning programmes  insufficient range of meaningful education, training and work for vulnerable prisoners  underdeveloped library facilities to support independent learning  underdeveloped support for learners with additional learning needs/disabilities.

p.6

Strengths

 sustained and effective team working across the prison and sharing of good practice  highly effective electronic kiosks as resource points to support communication and information exchange with prisoners  systematic monitoring of strategic objectives by the quality improvement group.

p.6

Areas for improvement

 insufficient management focus in planning the provision to ensure the full range of prisoners’ individual learning needs are met  insufficient use of data and information to inform decisions and developments  slow progress in resolving some areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection.

p.7

improve further?

 Increase the number of learners successfully completing accredited courses, by investigating reasons for non-completion and achievement and taking action to address the root causes.

p.7

improve further?

 Introduce ways to recognise and record prisoners’ knowledge and skills development, that enhances their self-awareness, enables them to value their skills and provide evidence of learning to use for employment following release.

p.7

improve further?

 Review the accredited learning and skills provision based on the analysis of prisoners’ needs. Introduce more level 2 provision that is appropriate to prisoners’ length of stay, abilities and interests and to provide appropriate progression opportunities for longer-serving prisoners.

p.7

improve further?

 Provide work-based literacy, numeracy and language support for prisoners assessed as below level 2, to help them improve their skills, gain employment following release and for communicating with their family and community.

p.7

improve further?

 Assess and implement support for prisoners with additional learning support needs to enable them to participate more fully in learning, improve their skills and reduce their potential for reoffending.

p.7

improve further?

 Review strategic plans to ensure learning and skills objectives are appropriately focused on the learning needs of all groups of men, including vulnerable prisoners, to ensure greater equality of opportunity in the provision.

p.7

improve further?

 Improve the self-assessment process to ensure it systematically includes feedback from prisoners, staff and external partners and focuses separately on male prisoners in its evaluation and subsequent action planning for improvements. Record of Main Findings (RMF) – Young adult and adult prisons

p.7

improve further?

Prison Name: HMP Peterborough – male prison Inspection No 367959

p.8

improve further?

A. Outcomes for learners 3 A1. How well do learners achieve and enjoy their learning? 3 A1.a) How well do learners attain their learning goals? A1.b) How well do learners progress? A2. How well do learners improve their economic and social well-being through learning and development? A3. How safe do learners feel? 3 A4. Are learners able to make informed choices about their own health and well being?* 3 A5. How well do learners make a positive contribution to the community?* 3 B. Quality of provision 3

p.8

improve further?

B1. How effectively do teaching, training and assessment support learning and development? 3 B2. How effectively does the provision meet the needs and interests of users? 4 B3. How well do partnerships with employers, community groups and others lead to be nefits for learners?

p.8

improve further?

B4. How effective are the care, guidance and support learners receive in helping them to achieve? 3

p.8

improve further?

C. Leadership and management 3 C1. How effectively do leaders and managers raise expectations and promote ambition throughout the organisation? C2. How effectively do governors and supervisory bodies provide leadership, direction and challenge?* C3. How effectively does the prison promote the safeguarding of learners? 3 C4. How effectively does the prison actively promote equality and diversity, tackle discrimination and narrow the achievement gap? C5. How effectively does the prison engage with users to support and promote improvement? 3

p.8

improve further?

C6. How effectively does self-assessment improve the quality of the provision and outcomes for learners? C7. How efficiently and effectively does the prison use its available resources to secure value for money? *if applicable to the type of prison Grades using the 4 point scale 1: Outstanding; 2: Good; 3: Satisfactory; 4: Inadequate Overall Approximate number of p/t & f/t learners in training and work and education with or without qualification outcomes at the time of inspection Overall effectiveness 3 Capacity to improve 3 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and

p.8

improve further?

other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231 or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’. Royal Exchange Buildings St Ann’s Square Manchester M2 7LA

p.9

improve further?

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion