Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Royal Deaf Education Trust

Inspected — · published 11 May 2011 · URN 113654

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    EX2 4NF

  • Name on report verified

    Exeter Academy for Deaf Education

  • URN verified

    113654

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
26
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
9 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 2%About the inspection 98%

Full report text

Published date 24 December 2010 Inspection Number 360955 Unique reference number: 113654

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Margaret Swift HMI

p.1

Last day of inspection: 23 November 2010

p.1

Address:

Telephone number: 01392 272692 Exeter Academy for Deaf Education

p.1

Focused monitoring visit report

Focused monitoring visit: Exeter Academy for Deaf, 23 November 2010 1 of 4

p.2

Context and focus of visit

The Exeter Royal Academy for Deaf Education comprises a school for pupils aged 5 to 16, a college for learners aged 16+, and an educational development department which serves the needs of the learners and the external community through extended, outreach services. The Academy offers residential and day placements. The vast majority of the learners are profoundly deaf and the Academy increasingly includes learners with additional learning difficulties and/or disabilities, and emotional and behavioural needs. There are currently 76 learners attending the college, 40 of whom attend local further education colleges to study a range of courses.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

The last full inspection took place in November 2008.

p.2

progress

The college has implemented a new self-assessment process which includes using data more effectively to help drive improvements. A detailed data collection system has recently been put in place and will be complete by February 2011. The system enables the college to collect and collate a wide range of data on their learners’ achievements, which can then be used to support judgements and effect improvement. However, as the systems are new, it is too early to judge the impact on the college’s ability to critically appraise their performance and make accurate judgements.

p.2

progress

Although the college knows the outcomes for their learners and knows the outcomes for different groups, it does not know how well they are doing overall. Historically, the college has not analysed its data or measured the progress learners make in relation to their starting points. The college has recently started to structure the data it collects for each learner and to use them to more effectively to monitor their progress. Extensive data are now collated for each learner and are being used to place learners on appropriate courses and to more closely monitor their progress. The work, though, is in the very early stages of development so it is too early to judge the impact of its effectiveness. Focused monitoring visit: Exeter Academy for Deaf, 23 November 2010 2 of 3

p.2

progress

The college is aware of the destinations of its learners but, again, there is no analysis of cohorts so the college cannot judge how successful it is at moving learners on to appropriate destinations. Learners do go into employment and higher education and into supported living if appropriate.

p.3

progress

The numbers of learners taking part in work experience has increased and feedback from learners is very positive. The college acknowledges that it still needs to do more work on analysing the work experience to ensure the learners are developing appropriate skills, which will enable them to move into productive employment.

p.3

progress

The college has recently reviewed and streamlined the learner files to better collate information about learners’ baseline assessment and track progress against learning targets. Learners’ files now have space for recording targets relating to vocational and academic qualifications, literacy, numeracy, British Sign Language, independent living, emotional and social development and work-related skills. Historically, the college has not used prior learning to set challenging targets for learners and had not used baseline assessment appropriately. This year, each teacher has identified targets for each of their learners, based on their prior achievement, and they have responsibility for tracking and electronically inputting learners’ progress against their targets. Senior managers intend to use this information to measure how well the college is doing over time. This work is in the very early stages of implementation so

p.3

progress

The college has put in place a single equalities policy and an associated action plan, but the action plan is very brief and lacks detail. The actions do not have an identified lead person, there is little evidence that the action plan is monitored in a systematic or frequent way and the impact of intended actions is not clear. Impact assessments are now in place.

p.3

progress

Lesson plans do not provide sufficient information about the impact of learners’ disabilities on their learning and the implications for the adjustments to be made by teaching staff. There is also insufficient use of assistive technology. Lesson plans do not demonstrate an understanding of how equality and diversity can be promoted through the curriculum. The college acknowledges that equality and diversity need Focused monitoring visit: Exeter Academy for Deaf, 23 November 2010 3 of 3

p.3

progress

embedding in the curriculum. The participation rates and outcomes for learners are not analysed by ethnicity, gender or disability.

p.4

progress

Since the last inspection all staff have had training on completing risk assessments but have not had training in the Mental Capacity Act (2005), which applies to those learners specifically over the age of 18 years. All activities have a designated leader and deputy leader, but in addition to this all staff are aware of their role when involved in an activity. Risk assessments are now linked to care plans and this has had a beneficial impact on activities, which are now better planned and staff are more confident in carrying out activities. Learners report that there are more activities this year and the new arrangements for the learner council have enabled them to have a stronger voice in the college and greater influence on what activities are offered.

p.4

progress

The college has made reasonable progress in ensuring compliance with current guidance and best practice in recruitment and vetting procedures. The procedures have been tightened up since the last inspection and are now centralised within the human resources department. All start dates are determined by the human resources department, thus ensuring staff cannot commence working at the college before the required checks have been completed. A person who has been trained in safeguarding sits on every interview panel. inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments.

p.4

progress

It rates council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.5

progress

If you would like a copy of this report in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 08456 404040, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk.

p.5

progress

You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way.

p.5

progress

Royal Exchange Buildings St Ann’s Square Manchester, M2 7LA

p.5

progress

T: 08456 404040 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion