Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
BR2 7AG
- Name on report verified
Nash College
- URN verified
131924
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 18
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- 9 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Published date 3 March 2011 Inspection Number 366296 Unique reference number: 131924
p.1
Type of provider: Independent specialist college
p.1
Address:
Telephone number: 020 8315 4802 Nash College
p.1
Focused Monitoring Visit Report
Focused monitoring visit: Nash College, 2 February 2011 1 of 2
p.2
Context and focus of visit
Nash College is an independent specialist college that currently provides further education to 62 learners aged 19 to 25, of whom just over half are residential. Of these, around a third are of minority racial and ethnic heritage. The learners are funded by the Young People’s Learning Agency (YPLA). The college, situated in Hayes on the outskirts of the London Borough of Bromley, provides for learners with severe or profound learning disabilities and complex needs. The college is registered as a care home with nursing, and is part of Livability, a large UK-based charity. The provision at Nash College centres on four programme areas: functional skills; personal and social development; vocational and community access; and, the residential programme. A new chief executive has recently been appointed and the college is planning to extend its remit by increasing the numbers of learners with autism.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
At its last inspection, the college was found to be satisfactory overall, with equality and diversity good. However, the site, which is on a sharp incline, was not satisfactory. This inspection focuses on the themes explored during the visit.
p.2
progress
At the last inspection, the outcomes for learners were satisfactory overall, but the systems for tracking and recording of learners’ achievements relative to their previous attainment were not robust. Since the last inspection, the college has made reasonable progress. In 2009/10, 18 students passed foundation learning units and, following a dip in 2008/09, the percentage of course targets achieved over the year improved to 83% in 2009/2010. The college did not identify any significant differences in achievements between different groups of learners. The college’s analysis included different types of capability. The college shows an improving trend in relation to economic well-being, with more students following some form of employment-related pathway. The majority of current learners now have employability targets. The therapy staff are able to show the progress of learners over time, and have developed a very useful spider graph to demonstrate progress
p.2
progress
graphically. The college has made a start to developing performance indicators to capture the progress of students across all aspects of the programme, but has yet to complete a full cycle using its newly-developed management information system. Focused monitoring visit: Nash College, 2 February 2011 2 of 2
p.2
progress
At the last inspection, the arrangements for quality assurance were satisfactory. Teaching and learning were satisfactory, but inspectors identified specific areas for development in the use of intensive interaction when working with students with profound needs, and in the planning of activities to match the individual needs of learners. Lapses were found in health and safety. The college has made reasonable progress in using self-assessment and the quality improvement plan to improve teaching and learning since then. Staff have had further training in relation to all of the aspects identified as requiring improvement. Managers record the schemes of work and lesson plans electronically, and have intervened where they have identified the need for improvements. The use of lesson observations, including the use of external observers, has increased. Managers have collated the results of lesson observations and used them for further planning. A system of mentoring by senior
p.3
progress
staff has been introduced and senior staff now spend time working alongside teachers. The scheme observers know what to look for and understand what constitutes best practice. The formal observations show improvement, but more needs to be done to ensure that all staff implement the training in intensive interaction and health and safety effectively, and that all teachers make best use of support staff to ensure learners are fully engaged and challenged.
p.3
progress
At the last inspection, safeguarding was satisfactory overall, but policies were not clearly written and not always fully understood by the staff. The college site was not satisfactory. Since then, safeguarding has had a much higher profile within the college, and staff and learners have a much greater understanding of the issues. Staff have had further training, including the Mental Capacity Act 2005. The policies and documentation have been revised and a senior manager has recently been accepted on the board of the local safeguarding authority. Issues of concern are raised at the college safeguarding forum. The reporting of incidents has increased as staff have a greater understanding of the issues and of the importance of reporting. The college maintains and updates the central register. Health and safety are included in lesson planning and is one of the criteria in the lesson observation scheme. The college has made significant refurbishments to its site as, despite
p.3
progress
vigorous efforts, the charity has not been able to find a site that is fit for purpose. The current site limits the freedom of learners in wheelchairs to move around the site safely and staff have to ensure that learners do not enter unsafe areas of the site. The college has taken suitable steps to minimise the impact by, for example, enabling learners to spend more time off the site as part of their teaching programme. regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It rates council children’s
p.3
progress
services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
progress
If you would like a copy of this report in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 08456 404040, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk.
p.4
progress
You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way.
p.4
progress
Royal Exchange Buildings St Ann’s Square Manchester, M2 7LA
p.4
progress
T: 08456 404040 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion