Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Kimberley Primary SchoolOfsted inspection, 2 Dec 2011

Inspected 2 Dec 2011 · published 5 Jan 2012 · URN 122706

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Ofsted inspected Kimberley Primary School on 2 Dec 2011. The overall judgement was Good. Ofsted published the report on 5 Jan 2012. Source: Ofsted (Open Government Licence v3).

Summary

Good

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    2 Dec 2011

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Kimberley Primary School

  • URN verified

    122706

Page 1 of 14
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+67Positivemore positive than 74% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongoutstandingpositivemake good progressimprovedsuccessfullyenjoysafe
Criticisminadequateunacceptableweaknessesweakerinsufficientbelowconcernslow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings2377w+63
  • Leadership248w+58
  • What needs to improve326w+80

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
14
Words of findings
2,938
about usual (typical 2680)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 2
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%Leadership 6%What needs to improve 8%About the inspection 23%

Full report text

Age group 3–11 Inspection date(s) 1–2 December 2011 Inspection number 380515 Kimberley Primary School Inspection report

p.1

Unique Reference Number 122706 Local Authority Nottinghamshire Inspection number 380515 Inspection dates 1–2 December 2011 Reporting inspector Ruth McFarlane

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 149 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Lee Jones Headteacher Jennifer Porter Date of previous school inspection 3 December 2008 School address Swingate Kimberley NG16 2PG Telephone number 0115 9385050 Fax number 0115 9385075 Email address office@kimberley-pri.notts.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out by two additional inspectors. Fifteen lessons were observed and seven teachers were seen teaching. Meetings were held with staff, representatives of the governing body and groups of pupils. The inspectors observed the school's work, and looked at information about pupils' progress, evidence of monitoring, the school development plan, a variety of policies and safeguarding documentation. In addition, the lead inspector analysed the questionnaires returned by 70 parents and carers, 58 Key Stage 2 pupils, and 20 staff.

p.3

Introduction

The inspectors reviewed many aspects of the school's work. They looked in detail at a number of key areas.  How successfully are the more-able pupils provided for?  Is pupils’ progress consistent through the school?  What is the impact of mixed-age classes, on pupils learning and well-being?

p.3

Information about the school

This school is smaller than the average primary. Most of the pupils come from the local community. Almost all are of White British heritage. No pupil is at an early stage of speaking English as an additional language. The proportions of pupils identified with special educational needs and/or disabilities and those with statements of special educational needs are below average. The proportion known to be eligible for free school meals is average. The Early Years Foundation Stage comprises a Nursery for children to attend part-time (mornings or afternoons) and a Reception class.

p.3

Information about the school

There is separate, weekly part-time provision that takes place in the school for children up to age five. It is run by other providers and was not a part of this inspection.

p.3

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Main findings

This is a good school that has improved its effectiveness since the last inspection. Pupils achieve well, they develop good personal skills and they enjoy school. There are a number of reasons for the improvements.

p.4

Main findings

 Good levels of care, guidance and support create a fully inclusive, nurturing ethos. In consequence, pupils demonstrate strong self-esteem and considerate, respectful behaviour. They are caring individuals who are able to give of their best within a safe and encouraging learning environment.  The curriculum is good. Themed learning has led to pupils’ strong contribution to the school and local community. For instance, pupils met with local councillors to design improvements to a local park. Projects such as ‘Whoosh!’ about space travel, and ‘Ship Ahoy’ about pirates and discovery, have had a positive impact on boys’ progress, which had been lagging behind that of girls. Pupils’ cultural development has improved through successful links with contrasting communities, igniting pupils’ curiosity and sense of responsibility.  Pupils develop good interpersonal skills through spending the day alongside a

p.4

Main findings

range of ages in the mixed-age classes. Good relationships and effective behaviour management ensures that pupils learn in a lively and purposeful atmosphere. Consequently, children enjoy a good start to their learning in the Early Years Foundation Stage and good progress now continues through the school.  Good teaching has been the trigger to accelerate pupils’ progress and has ensured that the school is meeting pupils’ differing needs well in the mixed- age classes. Pupils say lessons are fun. In many, they are fully involved in a variety of challenging activities, well-matched to their different abilities.  All groups do well because systems to track pupils’ progress and respond to this information have improved. As a result, the more-able pupils, and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities, achieve their potential. A quarter of the latter group have made exceptional progress this year.

p.4

Main findings

 The school is well led and managed. The headteacher provides clear vision, well shared with staff. From the knowledgeable governing body to the support and maintenance staff, all contribute well to pupils’ good learning and well- being.

p.4

Main findings

There are minor inconsistencies in the quality of teaching, and therefore, in pupils’ progress. In weaker lessons, pupils spend too long passively listening and not enough time actively involved. Occasionally, insufficient challenge for some pupils

p.4

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

slows the speed of learning. Teachers use assessment well to inform planning, and guide pupils, but formal target setting, which is just beginning to give older pupils clear pointers of how to move to the next level in their writing, is not established for reading or mathematics. Leaders and managers are already making checks on their practice in this area through good systems of self-evaluation. Improvements are systematically planned for and progress checked, by governors, the headteacher and staff. The impact of this is evident in improved pupils' progress, teaching and the curriculum since the previous inspection, and clearly demonstrates good capacity for further improvement.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Increase the impact of teaching by: − providing pupils with individual, medium-term subject-specific targets for learning in reading, writing and mathematics, shared with parents and carers, and regularly reviewed − allocating a higher proportion of time for active learning in each lesson, on tasks that challenge the different abilities within the class.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

The pupils enjoy school and show interest and enthusiasm for all it offers. They settle down quickly to learning at the start of the school day because, as they told inspectors, ‘Lessons are fun’. A typical example observed involved Key Stage 2 pupils in information and communication technology (ICT) work on ‘Ship Ahoy!’ They were fully engaged in their creation of spreadsheets to calculate the cost of items and supplies needed on their ships, working very cooperatively together. The same warm enthusiasm for learning was evident in other lessons seen. Because of this, and supported by good teaching and a lively curriculum, pupils’ progress and achievement are consistently good from starting points that are mostly below those expected for their age. Consequently, attainment at the end of Year 6 is average. In 2011, it rose to above average.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities achieve well because provision for them is well-managed. Features such as one-to-one tuition and high quality individual education plans have resulted in good and sometimes outstanding outcomes. The plans are well thought through and contain clear targets which are specific to their differing personal and learning needs. Pupils who are known to be eligible for free school meals also do well.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

Pupils’ knowledge of how to keep safe in different situations, such as on the roads, near water and when using the internet, is good. They have a good understanding of what is needed, in terms of diet and exercise, to be healthy. Their contribution to their community is strong and they are keen to help in school. For example, the school council took the initiative in helping to improve resources in the playground. Good assemblies help to ensure that pupils are tolerant young people with a good

p.5

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

sense of right and wrong. They learn about a wide range of people's beliefs and life in other countries, which gives them a good understanding of other cultures. Average attendance and average attainment in the basic skills (literacy, numeracy and ICT) prepares pupils adequately for their future lives.

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for pupils’ outcomes

p.6

Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning

Taking into account: Pupils’ attainment 1 The quality of pupils’ learning and their progress The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress

p.6

contribute to their future economic well-being

Taking into account: Pupils’ attendance 1

p.6

How effective is the provision?

The curriculum underpins pupils’ good progress. It is well organised with good interplay between subjects to hold the interest of all learners, whatever their ability or needs. ICT is used well to support learning. Visits out, visitors to school and popular clubs, such as cooking and street dance, are much enjoyed. Partnerships are strong, and enhance pupils’ experiences locally, such as in sports and music.

p.6

How effective is the provision?

Pupils value the fact that they are known as individuals. Adults keep a vigilant eye on their daily needs, offering good support and guidance. The school works well with outside agencies to enable all pupils, whatever their particular needs, to make good progress in their learning. Recent activity is having a positive effect on pupils’ attendance. Links with other providers are strong, including a group of schools, and the on-site provision for children less than five years of age. Transition to secondary school is well managed. Pupils settle in well and receiving staff are well informed about any pupil’s individual needs.

p.6

How effective is the provision?

In lessons, there is a good focus on writing and numeracy through the cross- curricular work. Pupils are given plenty of opportunity to write, often in paired work

p.6

How effective is the provision?

1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4 is low

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

or small groups. They are frequently asked to use their problem-solving and calculation skills, for instance, in geographical or scientific investigations that require measurements to be taken. Teachers successfully rise to the task of meeting the needs of mixed-age classes by ensuring that the work they set is well matched to the range of ability and ages in each class. The key to this is that, in most lessons, they organise the class into smaller groups, containing pupils of broadly similar ability rather than age. The needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities are met well in this way, supplementing their specialist support well. However, this is not so successful in a few lessons because the time allocated to individual work is too little. Pupils self-evaluate their learning, often by responding to ‘thumbs up’ if they have understood. Teachers’ written marking is positive and

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

helpful in pointing to improvements, especially in literacy. Individual target setting, to help pupils understand what they need to do to reach the next level in their learning, is not fully developed. In consequence, while pupils usually have a clear idea of what they are aiming for in each individual lesson, they are less sure of how to reach the next level in their learning.

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for the quality of provision

p.7

The quality of teaching

Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

Strong and sustained leadership from the headteacher and the supportive management provided by subject leaders have had a significant impact on improving provision and outcomes for pupils, because all staff share the driving ambition to raise the school’s effectiveness. Regular monitoring of lessons with pointers to improve has led to better teaching. Adults promote equality of opportunity well, checking to see that pupils make good progress, no matter what their background or needs. Discrimination in any form is not tolerated. Good partnerships with parents and carers, local primary and secondary schools, and with agencies to support pupils with additional needs, are widening pupils' learning experiences and enabling them to develop their social skills and overcome any barriers to learning.

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

The governing body provides good challenge and support to the school and has an in-depth understanding of the school's strengths and weaknesses. Formal monitoring of the work of the school is developing. The governing body ensures that safeguarding procedures are good and are implemented well. Staff are thoroughly trained in safeguarding and good steps are taken to minimise any risk to pupils on- or off-site. A basic audit of provision for community cohesion, including an action plan and evaluation, ensures that community understanding is very strong within

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

school and in the locality. There are good plans to extend this more prominently in the national and global communities.

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for leadership and management

p.8

driving improvement

Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning

p.8

Early Years Foundation Stage

Children settle happily into school and make good progress in their learning from widely varying starting points, which are mostly below the expected level overall, and sometimes low. As a result, attainment is usually broadly average overall, by the end of Reception, although in some years it has been below average. Children's behaviour is good and positive relationships help them to feel confident and safe. They make sensible choices about what to eat and drink, know how to keep themselves safe on visits and when using the toys and equipment provided, such as scissors. Good teaching and well-planned activities, many of which children choose for themselves, ensure they are interested and able to use their imagination well. The indoor and outside environments are stimulating and well-resourced, which successfully promotes learning and personal development.

p.8

Early Years Foundation Stage

Careful planning is paying dividends. Reception children benefit socially and academically from working alongside older pupils. Assessment procedures are efficient, with children’s progress carefully recorded and quickly used to guide the planning of next steps. Questioning ensures that the most able are challenged. For instance, in an excellent start to the day, during the inspection, probing questioning enabled the more-able Nursery children to extend their reading of written numbers up to ten, and encouraged less-able children to develop confidence in recognising numbers. Links with partners, such as the local authority, are strong, providing a source of additional expertise, reflecting the leaders’ strong drive for improvement.

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.9

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.9

Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage

Taking into account: Outcomes for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage The quality of provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage The effectiveness of leadership and management of the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.9

Views of parents and carers

An above-average number of responses were received to the questionnaire. Most parents and carers who responded are happy with the school. Typical comments were, ‘The school provides a nurturing and supportive environment, where my children continue to thrive,’ and ‘Staff are in tune with my children’s needs and I feel involved in the life of the school and in my children’s education.’

p.9

Views of parents and carers

Parents and carers are particularly pleased with how safe their children are at school, the teaching, and the way the school is led and managed. Inspectors confirmed that these aspects are good. A few parents and carers indicated they were unhappy with how unacceptable behaviour was tackled. Inspectors investigated this by looking at school records, observing lessons, observing behaviour out of lessons, and talking to pupils and staff, and judged behaviour and its management to be good.

p.9

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at Kimberley Primary School to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school. The inspection team received 70 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 149 pupils registered at the school.

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My child enjoys school 47 67 22 31 1 1 0 0 The school keeps my child safe 52 74 18 26 0 0 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school informs me about my child’s progress 34 49 29 41 5 7 2 3

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My child is making enough progress at this school 39 56 27 39 1 1 2 3

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The teaching is good at this school 33 47 34 49 0 0 2 3

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school helps me to support my child’s learning 41 59 23 33 3 4 2 3 The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 40 57 28 40 2 3 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 36 51 29 41 3 4 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school meets my child’s particular needs 38 54 28 40 4 6 0 0 The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 35 50 24 34 6 9 3 4

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 24 34 41 59 1 1 3 4

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school is led and managed effectively 38 54 30 43 0 0 2 3

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

Overall, I am happy with my child’s experience at this school 43 61 21 30 1 1 2 3

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%.

p.10

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.11

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 43 47 10 0 Primary schools 6 46 42 6 Secondary schools 14 36 41 9

p.11

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Sixth forms 15 42 41 3 Special schools 30 48 19 3 Pupil referral units 14 50 31 5

p.11

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 08 April 2011 and are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Sixth form figures reflect the judgements made for the overall effectiveness of the sixth form in secondary schools, special schools and pupil referral units.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.  The school’s capacity for sustained improvement.  Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils.  The quality of teaching.  The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils’ needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships.  The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.12

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.13

Inspection of Kimberley Primary School, Nottingham NG16 2PG

Thank you for welcoming us to your school. Special thanks are due to those pupils who chatted with inspectors and to all those who responded to the questionnaire.

p.13

Inspection of Kimberley Primary School, Nottingham NG16 2PG

Your school is a good school that has improved since it was last inspected.

p.13

Inspection of Kimberley Primary School, Nottingham NG16 2PG

You told me how safe you feel in school, how well you are taught, and how much fun you have in lessons when subjects are linked together. As a result, you make good progress in your learning. Standards are average and improving. Last year, Year 6 reached higher standards than most eleven-year-olds. Well done for that!

p.13

Inspection of Kimberley Primary School, Nottingham NG16 2PG

You develop well as individuals and give of your best. Your behaviour is good. You know about how to keep safe and are knowledgeable about what makes a healthy lifestyle. Importantly, you like being part of a small school in which everyone gets on well and cares for each other. Your attendance is average and has recently improved. Do keep this up because, if you are not in school, you miss learning, and of course, you also miss all the fun!

p.13

Inspection of Kimberley Primary School, Nottingham NG16 2PG

I noticed that the targets you have for writing in some classes help you to know what to do to reach the next level in your learning. I have asked your headteacher and the governing body to make sure targets are given more prominence through the school, for reading and mathematics, too. In lessons, I have asked that you are given more time to work by yourselves or in small groups.

p.13

Inspection of Kimberley Primary School, Nottingham NG16 2PG

There are many things for you to be pleased about in your school. You can all help now by really thinking about your targets and how they can help you do your best.

p.13

from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy

of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.14

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion