Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Castle Newnham School

Inspected 29 Nov 2011 · published 5 Jan 2012 · URN 109661

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    29 Nov 2011

  • Name on report verified

    Newnham Middle School

  • URN verified

    109661

Page 1 of 14
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+10Mostly positivemore positive than 9% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyenjoyoutstandinghighly effectiveexceptionallyhappyvery wellrapid progress
Criticismconcernsinadequateunacceptableinconsistentnot sufficientlyweakweaknessespoor

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1919w−5
  • Leadership313w+57
  • What needs to improve735w+21

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
14
Words of findings
2,959
about usual (typical 3042)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
8
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 52%Leadership 8%What needs to improve 20%About the inspection 20%

Full report text

Age group 9–13 Inspection date(s) 28–29 November 2011 Inspection number 377961 Newnham Middle School Inspection report

p.1

Unique Reference Number 109661 Local Authority Bedford Inspection number 377961 Inspection dates 28–29 November 2011 Reporting inspector Liz Talmadge

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Middle deemed secondary School category Foundation Age range of pupils 9–13 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 591 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Rob Baxter Headteacher Maxine Burrows Date of previous school inspection 3 June 2009 School address Polhill Avenue Bedford MK41 9DT Telephone number 01234 303403 Fax number 01234 303404 Email address newnhammiddle@schools.bedfordshire.gov.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out by four additional inspectors. Inspectors visited 28 lessons involving 28 teachers and held meetings with governors, staff, groups of pupils and a local authority adviser. They observed the school’s work and the school’s self-evaluation documentation, the school development plan, attainment data, school records and minutes of governors’ meetings. They analysed 206 questionnaires from parents and carers, 103 from pupils and 24 from staff.

p.3

Introduction

The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the school’s work. It looked in detail at a number of key areas.

p.3

Introduction

 The attainment and progress of all groups of pupils, particularly those targeted by the school in their development plan.  Whether the evaluation and monitoring of teaching by the school is accurate  Whether better assessment and marking is contributing to pupils understanding of what they need to do to improve their work.  What the school does to ensure that the quality of care, guidance and support enables all pupils to achieve as well as they can.  Whether the actions taken by the school since the last inspection are helping pupils to make progress in their learning.

p.3

Information about the school

Newnham Middle School is a larger than average five-form entry, co-educational middle school. It is a culturally diverse school with just over a third of pupils coming from a variety of minority ethnic groups of whom about half speak English as an additional language. The number of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities is higher than average. The school has Healthy School status and is part of the North East Bedford Learning Trust.

p.3

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Main findings

Newnham Middle School provides a satisfactory education for its pupils. It is a school to which parents are happy to send their children, and that most pupils enjoy and attend very well. Attainment and achievement at the school have showed no clear trend over the past three years but a significant dip in attainment in 2011 resulted in attainment in both mathematics and English at Key Stage 2 being below the national averages. This is because pupils’ skills in writing, problem-solving and conducting their own investigations are weak in Years 5 and 6. Consequently, the school has introduced a satisfactory range of changes. A renewed focus on achievement has led to the introduction of new monitoring and tracking systems and to some better teaching. As a result, more assessment data are available to teachers and they are starting to make use of this information in their planning. Strategies to help Year 6

p.4

Main findings

pupils reach expected standards by the end of Key Stage 2 are now being used early enough to impact on outcomes. Attainment at the end of Year 8 is in line with national expectations and progress through the upper part of the school is satisfactory. Progress in mathematics is more rapid than in English. Support for the most vulnerable pupils is good and pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities make satisfactory progress; the school is closing the gap in attainment between these pupils and other groups. The school’s decisive action to address the drop in standards and to introduce strategies for improvement demonstrates satisfactory capacity for sustained improvement.

p.4

Main findings

Leaders and governors are committed to improving the levels of achievement of pupils at all stages. They have a clear understanding of the school’s strengths and they know what they need to do to secure future improvement. Monitoring, tracking and target setting are not fully embedded in the work of the school. This means that the quality of teaching and the achievement of pupils are inconsistent. There is very little evidence of independent learning.

p.4

Main findings

There is a well-organised pastoral support system that benefits pupils, particularly those who are vulnerable. The curriculum is adequately matched to the needs of pupils although literacy, numeracy and information and communication technology (ICT) are not sufficiently evident in all subject areas. Pupils have a good understanding of how to stay healthy and they are appreciative of the range of opportunities that the school offers them. The school has good links with a small range of external agencies and is developing partnerships with others.

p.4

Main findings

About 40% of the schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may

p.4

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Accelerate progress and improve attainment in English and mathematics at Key Stage 2 by:  ensuring that pupils’ writing in Years 5 and 6 is well structured and that grammar, punctuation and spelling are accurate  improving pupils’ skills and confidence in tackling mathematical problems and investigations  developing pupils’ independent skills and their ability to conduct their own research.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of teaching so that most lessons are good or better by December 2012 by:  raising teachers’ expectations of all groups of pupils so that they are consistently high, for especially the most able pupils  making sure that teachers match work to the learning needs of all groups of pupils  making better use of marking so that all pupils know what to do to improve their learning.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Strengthen the use of assessment so that target setting, tracking and monitoring is embedded by leaders at all levels in order to improve outcomes for pupils at Key Stage 2 and Year 8.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

By the time pupils reach the end of Year 8, they have made satisfactory progress and attainment matches the levels expected of their age nationally. In lessons, pupils behave appropriately and contribute willingly when the opportunity is offered to them. However, although almost half of all pupils arrive at the school with below average attainment, they do not make enough progress in Years 5 and 6. This is because pupils’ writing is not sufficiently developed and they are not fully engaged in lessons. In addition, pupils are not confident in solving mathematical problems and conducting their own research. Intervention strategies have been used to remedy these weaknesses but in 2010 were introduced too late to have an impact on the 2011 test results for Key Stage 2. Through Years 7 and 8 pupils make more rapid progress overall. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities are given appropriate support for their learning and are set to make sufficient progress.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

However, the potentially higher attaining pupils do not have enough challenging activities to enable them to achieve as well as they can. When activities are engaging, pupils demonstrate the ability to work well together, sharing ideas, supporting each other and enjoying their learning. In a Year 8 English lesson, for

p.5

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

example, pupils were able to make good progress with writing because they explored and reflected on the topic of their writing. Where learning and progress are slower, pupils depend too much on their teachers and show very little independence in their learning.

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Pupils say that they are aware of how to stay safe in a range of circumstances. Some pupils are trained as ‘playground buddies’ and others as ‘young leaders’ enabling them to learn about responsibility and leadership. Pupils know that if they raise concerns they will be listened to and their concerns dealt with, and their parents and carers agree with them. Pupils understand what is expected of them and respond positively to the rewards and sanctions system. This leads to most behaviour seen around the school being orderly and calm. There is a good take-up of healthy meals and high numbers of pupils take part in clubs that promote exercise, and many pupils walk or cycle to school. Pupils have a clear understanding of what ‘being healthy’ means and most parents and carers think that the school promotes a healthy lifestyle. Pupils make a satisfactory contribution to the school through the school council and enjoy a range of enterprise activities that help them prepare for

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Pupils enjoy learning. Attendance at school is high and punctuality is generally good. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is satisfactory. Pupils develop their moral and social skills effectively through music and sport, but spiritual and cultural awareness are limited in subjects across the curriculum.

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for pupils’ outcomes

p.6

Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning

Taking into account: Pupils’ attainment 1 The quality of pupils’ learning and their progress The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress

p.6

contribute to their future economic well-being

Taking into account: Pupils’ attendance 1

p.6

The extent of pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 3

1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4 is low

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

How effective is the provision?

The majority of teaching seen during the inspection was judged to be satisfactory. The quality of teaching at Key Stage 2 in English and mathematics is weaker than at Key Stage 3, but recent changes have been made to address this. Where teaching is good, teachers’ planning and subject knowledge are effective and assessment is used well so that pupils know what to do to improve their learning. The best lessons have a good range of activities in which pupils can actively engage and where they can work together, express opinions and develop their thinking. Support staff are effective in complementing the work of teachers by ensuring that pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities are engaged in their learning and making progress. However, where teaching is not as effective, poor planning and the inconsistent use of marking and assessment lead to tasks and activities that are not well matched to the needs of different groups of learners. In addition, teachers’

p.7

How effective is the provision?

expectations are sometimes too low, especially in Years 5 and 6, and pupils are not encouraged to develop their independence or given sufficient opportunities to find out things for themselves.

p.7

How effective is the provision?

The curriculum is adequately matched to pupils’ needs and includes all subjects of the National Curriculum and French and German. There is an appropriate range of enrichment opportunities such as mathematics competitions for gifted and talented pupils and a good range of extra- curricular opportunities in areas such as music, drama and sport. The teaching of cross-curricular skills is less well developed and the school is aware that literacy, numeracy and ICT do not feature well enough in all areas of the curriculum.

p.7

How effective is the provision?

The care, guidance and support for pupils are satisfactory. The pastoral system is used effectively to support pupils and has a particularly important impact on the most vulnerable groups of children. Transition arrangements are good: Year 5 pupils settle quickly into school and Year 8 pupils are adequately prepared for their move to high school. The inclusive nature of the school is evident by the way in which pupils arriving mid-year from other schools are integrated into the school effectively. Whilst the quality of care is satisfactory overall, it is not yet having sufficient impact on the progress of all pupils. This is because the guidance and support for potentially higher achieving pupils is not robust enough and the improved support for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities has not had time to become securely embedded.

p.7

How effective is the provision?

These are the grades for the quality of provision

p.7

The quality of teaching

Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

The headteacher, the senior leadership team and the governing body have a clear vision for the further improvement of the school. They have identified appropriate and challenging priorities for improvement and are taking steps to make the necessary changes. The school’s self-evaluation is mainly accurate and has led to higher expectations of leaders and managers at all levels so that they are accountable for outcomes and provision. The school has started to take steps to improve the quality of teaching through better monitoring and evaluation of lessons so that all groups benefit from better teaching. Leaders are providing teachers with greater access to data to help them set targets and track pupils’ progress. The school is also using intervention strategies more effectively to raise achievement at Key Stage 2. However, the use of assessment data is not well established in all subject areas to help staff monitor pupils’ progress.

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

The governing body is committed to the school and fully supportive of the headteacher. It has taken important steps recently to become actively involved in the strategies necessary to secure improvement and is offering appropriate levels of support and challenge to the school. The governing body is listening to the views of parents and is working on ways to improve the school’s satisfactory communication with parents. Partnerships with external agencies and local schools are satisfactory.

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

The school promotes equal opportunities satisfactorily and incidents of racism or discrimination are very rare. Systems to safeguard pupils are satisfactory. There are a number of trained staff who have a thorough understanding of child protection, safeguarding and risk assessment. Promotion of community cohesion is satisfactory because the school has audited its provision appropriately and is looking at ways of extending it so that it can be embedded in the everyday experience of pupils. The school provides satisfactory value for money.

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

These are the grades for leadership and management

p.8

driving improvement

Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.9

Views of parents and carers

Parents and carers who responded to the questionnaire were very positive about how well the school keeps their child safe and how much their children enjoy school. Most parents and carers felt that the school was well led and managed and were satisfied, overall, with their children’s experience of the school. The way in which the school deals with unacceptable behaviour was, however, a cause for concern for a small minority of parents. The inspectors investigated the parental concerns and found that the behaviour of pupils is managed satisfactorily.

p.9

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at Newnham Middle School to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school. The inspection team received 206 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 591 pupils registered at the school.

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My child enjoys school 74 36 117 57 9 4 4 2 The school keeps my child safe 72 35 120 58 5 2 6 3 The school informs me about my child’s progress 52 25 127 62 19 9 3 1 My child is making enough progress at this school 53 26 125 61 19 9 2 1 The teaching is good at this school 50 24 132 64 11 5 1 0 The school helps me to support my child’s learning 48 23 123 60 21 10 3 1 The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 49 24 133 65 18 9 1 0 The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 51 25 121 59 9 4 3 1

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school meets my child’s particular needs 49 24 124 60 18 9 4 2 The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 44 21 111 54 31 15 9 4 The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 46 22 126 61 17 8 1 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school is led and managed effectively 61 30 125 61 9 4 2 1 Overall, I am happy with my child’s experience at this school 72 35 112 54 14 7 3 1

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%.

p.10

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.11

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 43 47 10 0 Primary schools 6 46 42 6 Secondary schools 14 36 41 9

p.11

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Sixth forms 15 42 41 3 Special schools 30 48 19 3 Pupil referral units 14 50 31 5

p.11

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 08 April 2011 and are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Sixth form figures reflect the judgements made for the overall effectiveness of the sixth form in secondary schools, special schools and pupil referral units.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.  The school’s capacity for sustained improvement.  Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils.  The quality of teaching.  The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils’ needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships.  The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.12

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.13

Inspection of Newnham Middle School, Bedford, MK41 9DT

Thank you for the warm welcome that you gave the inspection team when we visited your school recently. We enjoyed being in your lessons and talking to you about your school and were impressed with the sensible way in which you answered our questions.

p.13

Inspection of Newnham Middle School, Bedford, MK41 9DT

Here is what we found out on the inspection.  Your attendance is high.  By the end of Year 8 you attain levels that are in line with the national average.  Your behaviour in lessons and in the playground is good.  The teaching is satisfactory and you respond well when given the opportunity to be involved in interesting activities.  Staff look after you appropriately while you are at school.

p.13

Inspection of Newnham Middle School, Bedford, MK41 9DT

We have asked the school to make some improvements.  Help those of you in Years 5 and 6 to improve your skills in writing and mathematics.  Improve the quality of teaching so that most lessons are good or better.  Strengthen the use of assessment so that target setting, tracking and monitoring is embedded by leaders at all levels.

p.13

Inspection of Newnham Middle School, Bedford, MK41 9DT

You can all help too by trying hard in your lessons and always doing your best.

p.13

from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy

of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.14

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion