Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

St Mary's CofE Foundation Primary School

Inspected 2 Dec 2011 · published 4 Jan 2012 · URN 115269

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    2 Dec 2011

  • Name on report verified

    St Mary's CofE Foundation Primary School

  • URN verified

    115269

Page 1 of 15
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+14Mostly positivemore positive than 10% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingimprovingeffectivelyaccurateenjoystronglyhighly effectiveexceptionally
Criticisminadequatenot alwaysunacceptabletoo fewweaknesseslackslackconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings2098w+16
  • Leadership1375w+10
  • What needs to improve194w+27

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
15
Words of findings
3,655
about usual (typical 3042)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 45%Leadership 30%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 21%

Full report text

Age group 4–11 Inspection date(s) 1–2 December 2011 Inspection number 379051 St Mary's CofE Foundation Primary School Inspection report

p.1

Unique Reference Number 115269 Local Authority Essex Inspection number 379051 Inspection dates 1–2 December 2011 Reporting inspector Ted Wheatley

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Foundation Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 168 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Tracey Harrison Headteacher Christine Tonkins Date of previous school inspection 18 September 2008 School address St John's Road Stansted CM24 8JP Telephone number 01279 812212 Fax number 01279 815958 Email address admin@st-marys-stansted.essex.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out by three additional inspectors who saw 12 lessons taught by seven teachers. Meetings were held with staff, members of the governing body and pupils, and inspectors spoke to some parents and carers. They observed the school’s work and looked at documentation about pupils’ progress and policies, particularly those for safeguarding, as well as school development planning and evidence of self-evaluation. They considered 60 questionnaires returned by parents and carers.

p.3

Introduction

The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the school’s work. It looked in detail at a number of key areas.

p.3

Introduction

 How effectively is teaching narrowing the gap in progress between different groups of pupils?  How effective are the school’s efforts to improve attainment in pupils’ writing?  How well is the Early Years Foundation Stage working to improve children’s progress, especially to give children a good foundation in writing.

p.3

Information about the school

St Mary’s Church of England Primary is smaller than the average primary school, but is growing rapidly in size and is due to move into new buildings in summer 2012. The great majority of pupils come from White British heritage. The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is broadly average, and a small number is at the early stages of learning English. The other languages spoken are Portuguese, Bangladeshi and Urdu. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is broadly average. The proportion of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities is broadly average. A slightly higher than average proportion of pupils joins the school during the year. The school has been awarded the Active Mark. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Main findings

St Mary’s Church of England Primary School provides a satisfactory standard of education. It is an improving school and has strengths in how well it engages parents and carers in supporting pupils’ learning. Relationships with families are good and the school provides them with good personal support. Most parents and carers are pleased with the school. One wrote, ‘the school is warm and welcoming, and this has given my child great confidence’. Parents and carers also recognise that the school has experienced changes recently and this has contributed to improvements.

p.4

Main findings

Pupils’ attainment is average overall, and improving after a period in which it fell, especially at Key Stage 1. At Key Stage 2, attainment is above average in mathematics. Attainment is broadly average in English, but pulled down by weaknesses in writing. The school is at the early stages of dealing with these issues, and there is some improvement in pupils’ writing skills. Handwriting is frequently untidy and spelling inaccurate. Pupils do not produce enough prolonged writing to enable them to write with enough fluency and independence. Numeracy skills are good, and pupils understand the mathematical processes they use in calculations and solving numerical problems. Pupils’ progress is satisfactory overall, and is starting to improve. While there is occasional slow progress, there are no significant differences between different groups of pupils. Generally, pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and those who speak English as an additional language make

p.4

Main findings

satisfactory progress. In Reception, children’s progress is unsatisfactory, and action has been taken to reverse this.

p.4

Main findings

Satisfactory and improving teaching is leading to improvements in progress and attainment. The best lessons are based on teachers’ use of accurate assessment information to match work to pupils’ learning needs. In these lessons work is challenging, with marking that tells pupils how well they are doing, what they need to do next, and how to improve their work. Occasionally, inaccurate assessments lead to work not matched to pupils’ learning needs. Sometimes teachers’ marking is infrequent and lacks direction for improvement or the next steps in learning and occasionally there are no checks on whether pupils follow guidance. In some lessons, teachers model good writing, and insist that pupils produce their best writing at all times. The curriculum provides a secure range of subjects, although there are too few opportunities in all subjects to promote improvement in pupils’ writing skills. There is a good range of well supported out-of-school activities. In the Early Years

p.4

Main findings

Foundation Stage, assessment is inaccurate and work is not always matched closely to children’s needs. Activities are not always purposeful, and planning, to ensure all Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Main findings

areas of the early years’ curriculum are covered, is insecure.

p.5

Main findings

The great majority of pupils enjoy school and attendance levels are above average. Pupils mostly behave well. As a rule pupils feel safe and although they report that there is some bullying, they also say it is dealt with well. Pupils have a good understanding of the importance of healthy eating and understand that a balanced diet is essential, along with regular physical exercise. They are considerate towards each other, and carry out their school and church responsibilities well.

p.5

Main findings

The effectiveness of leaders and managers is satisfactory. The school has accurately identified the areas it needs to improve and the headteacher provides sound direction for development. After several staff changes and the new appointment of a deputy head from January 2012 to assume some senior leadership responsibilities, the school has suitable strategies in place to promote more rapid progress in Key Stage 1 and in writing, assessment and teaching. Leadership of the Early Years Foundation Stage is currently inadequate, but newly-appointed staff, with support from senior leaders, now provides a secure base for improvement. The governing body challenges the school, and has been particularly active in pushing forward plans to improve writing skills and early years’ provision. Given these are early stages of progress in most areas of the school’s work, the capacity for further improvement is satisfactory.

p.5

Main findings

Up to 40% of the schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Raise levels of attainment in writing by ensuring pupils:  frequently produce extended pieces of written work in all subjects  spell accurately  take pride in always producing neat handwriting.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve teaching by ensuring:  assessment is accurate, and collated into a record that enables all staff to see how well pupils make progress  work is always matched to pupils’ learning needs  marking is frequent, with details of how well pupils perform, what they need to do next, and there is follow-up to ensure pupils take advice given  teachers model good quality writing.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve outcomes in the Early Years Foundation Stage by ensuring:  children’s progress is accurately recorded and evaluated so that work is tailored to their individual needs  work is purposeful and covers all of the foundation stage areas of learning Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 fully record and celebrate children’s acquisition of skills  provide an action plan for developing the leadership of the early years foundation stage.

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

Children begin school with skills that are broadly in line with expectations. They make unsatisfactory progress in Reception and enter Year 1 with skills below those expected for their age. By Year 6, pupils speak and read well. They have a wide vocabulary and speak confidently. They have a wide range of numeracy skills which they apply well to mathematical problems. They explain their mathematical thinking well, and in some detail. For example, in a lesson on multiplying decimal numbers, pupils independently chose strategies to help them estimate final answers. They carried out final calculations carefully, fully explaining how they completed the calculation, and reached their answers. Most pupils write competently, and the quality of punctuation is improving fast. For example, in a lesson, starting with writing and punctuation exercises and discussion about accuracy of punctuation, pupils rapidly learned how to punctuate accurately and to evaluate their own work

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

for presentation. However, throughout the school there are instances of careless spelling and untidy handwriting, which are exacerbated by much writing done in a rough format where the expectation for accuracy is low. As a result, many pupils do not produce enough independent, lengthy writing. Pupils’ progress in mathematics and reading is good. In writing their progress is satisfactory and is improving slowly.

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

Most pupils enjoy school, like learning and behave well; the occasional unacceptable behaviour by a small number of pupils is managed effectively and does not interrupt learning. Pupils carry out any responsibilities they are given well. For example, they help give out and collect equipment in lessons, older pupils help younger pupils, others raise money for charities and many are active in supporting the local church in the main festivals it celebrates. Most pupils take part in out-of-school physical activities, and the school has gained the Active Mark award for this. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is satisfactory, with pupils gradually gaining understanding, knowledge and respect for cultures beyond Britain and the rest of Europe.

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

These are the grades for pupils’ outcomes Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning Taking into account: Pupils’ attainment 1 The quality of pupils’ learning and their progress The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4 is low Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

The extent to which pupils feel safe 3 Pupils’ behaviour 3 The extent to which pupils adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which pupils contribute to the school and wider community 3 The extent to which pupils develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being Taking into account: Pupils’ attendance 1 The extent of pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 3

p.7

How effective is the provision?

Lessons often match pupils’ interests and engage them well in learning. In the best lessons, teaching is challenging and work is matched closely to pupils’ learning needs. For example, in a Key Stage 1 lesson on writing instructions, pupils wrote and tested out instructions to make Chinese lanterns. They were encouraged to write grammatically correct sentences and this led to good progress in developing their writing skills. Despite teachers’ focus on improving pupils’ writing skills, high expectations of neat writing and accurate spelling are not always shared strongly enough with pupils, and good writing practice is not modelled effectively. Teachers carry out accurate assessments in most classes, but in a few lessons work does not fully meet pupils’ needs, and their attention wanders a little. For the most part teachers’ questioning is good and encourages pupils to explore and consolidate their own understanding. Teachers’ marking usually informs pupils of the levels they are

p.7

How effective is the provision?

working at, and how to make further progress, but this is not consistent, and sometimes the intervals, between pieces of marked work, are too long. In addition, teachers do not always check that pupils have carried out corrections or improved their work.

p.7

How effective is the provision?

The organisation of the curriculum is satisfactory and there is a good range of links between subjects. Computers are used increasingly to support learning in other subjects and to develop pupils’ information and communication technology skills. However, there are too few opportunities for pupils to reinforce their writing skills in all subjects. The curriculum is supported by a sound range of visits, links with local business and schools, and with the local church. Links to encourage cultural awareness are improving. For example, the school has a link with a school in France, and an Indian dance group has visited the school.

p.7

How effective is the provision?

Links with external agencies are good, and are successful in supporting those pupils whose challenging circumstances may make them vulnerable. Support for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities is satisfactory and improving as assessment becomes increasingly more accurate and is used to plan suitable work for pupils. Transfer arrangements between home, nurseries and secondary schools are good. Procedures to encourage regular attendance are effective, and the school Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

How effective is the provision?

is now working to improve the punctuality of a small number of pupils. Pupils joining the school during the year are well supported. Pupils attending the breakfast club are well cared for.

p.8

How effective is the provision?

These are the grades for the quality of provision The quality of teaching Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils’ needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships The effectiveness of care, guidance and support 3

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

The headteacher has a clear view of how the school should improve, and with the support of the governing body, has pushed through many initiatives. Changes in other leadership roles are intended to bring improvements to writing and early years, but are still in the early stages of their development and have not yet shown any significant improvements. Leaders have established a whole school approach to accurate assessment and recording pupils’ performance; this has been an important factor in pushing through improvements in teaching. Governance is satisfactory; the governing body is well-informed about the school and seeks parents’ and carers, and staff views of the school. The school engages parents and carers effectively in supporting pupils’ learning. Attendance at consultation evenings is very high, parents and carers are encouraged to visit the school and teachers are accessible to parents and carers at the start and end of the day. The school provides opportunities for

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

parents and carers to find out about how their children learn in literacy and numeracy. Partnerships with other schools, the church, and external services are satisfactory in promoting pupils’ learning and well-being.

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

Safeguarding requirements are met, although some recording issues and day-to-day practices were resolved at the time of the inspection. Promotion of equal opportunities is satisfactory and the gap between different groups of pupils and between subjects is narrowing. Procedures to eliminate all forms of discrimination are good and are well established in the ethos of the school. The school’s promotion of community cohesion is satisfactory overall. It is good within school and the local community, and the school is improving in its efforts to ensure pupils have a good understanding of the traditions and cultures of people around the world.

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

These are the grades for leadership and management The effectiveness of leadership and management in embedding ambition and driving improvement Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness of the governing body in challenging and supporting the school so that weaknesses are tackled decisively and statutory responsibilities met The effectiveness of the school’s engagement with parents and carers 2 The effectiveness of partnerships in promoting learning and well-being 3 The effectiveness with which the school promotes equality of opportunity and tackles discrimination The effectiveness of safeguarding procedures 3 The effectiveness with which the school promotes community cohesion 3 The effectiveness with which the school deploys resources to achieve value for money

p.9

Early Years Foundation Stage

Children do not make the progress they should, especially in their literacy and numeracy skills. When adults work with small groups of children, children’s learning is satisfactory. For example, children developed basic number work in one group, while an individual child close to the group, learned how to form the letters of his name. However, children are sometimes very noisy and run from one activity to another; they do not sustain concentration for very long unless adults work with them. Children are friendly and get on well together and welcome discussion with adults. Activities often lack purpose, mainly because assessment is not accurate, although it is improving. Learning journeys records are at an early stage of development and do not give a full picture of how well children acquire skills in all areas of learning. There are too few opportunities for early writing activities to ensure that children make good progress. However, when given the opportunity,

p.9

Early Years Foundation Stage

children cooperate in trying to make lists. For example, ‘Father Christmas’s helpers’ took orders for Christmas presents, and when asked to, made writing marks on paper. Relationships between adults and children are good, and children’s welfare is sound. The inside and outside learning areas are not always fully used to widen children’s learning experiences. The outdoor learning area is inadequate but it is safe when supervised. Improvements have not been planned because of the anticipated school’s relocation. The school has a satisfactory view of what action needs to be taken and has started to make inroads into improving provision. A new member of staff has been appointed and new leadership arrangements provide suitable direction and support for improvements.

p.9

Early Years Foundation Stage

These are the grades for the Early Years Foundation Stage Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage Taking into account: Outcomes for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage The quality of provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage The effectiveness of leadership and management of the Early Years Foundation Stage Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.9

Views of parents and carers

Just over half of parents and carers returned the questionnaire and most were positive and support the school. A small proportion of parents and carers felt the school does not deal with unacceptable behaviour well enough. However, inspectors saw mainly good behaviour, and where there was occasional unacceptable behaviour, it was dealt with well and did not interrupt learning. A very small number were concerned about bullying incidents. Inspectors found that the school responded well to these, dealing with them in confidence where necessary. A very small proportion of parents and carers commented that their children were not supported or challenged enough. Inspectors found occasions when this was the case, but also judged that the situation is improving.

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at St Mary's CofE Foundation Primary School to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school. The inspection team received 60 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 168 pupils registered at the school.

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

Statements Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree Total % Total % Total % Total % My child enjoys school 37 62 19 32 2 3 1 2 The school keeps my child safe 41 68 16 27 1 2 0 0

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

The school informs me about my child’s progress 27 45 33 55 0 0 0 0

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

My child is making enough progress at this school 29 48 28 47 3 5 0 0

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

The teaching is good at this school 31 52 28 47 1 2 0 0

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

The school helps me to support my child’s learning 26 43 31 52 3 5 0 0 The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 26 43 29 48 5 8 0 0

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 25 42 27 45 1 2 0 0

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

The school meets my child’s particular needs 26 43 28 47 6 10 0 0 The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 20 33 30 50 3 5 4 7

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 22 37 30 50 3 5 3 5

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

The school is led and managed effectively 31 52 23 38 4 7 2 3

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

Overall, I am happy with my child’s experience at this school 33 55 24 40 3 5 0 0

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.12

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 43 47 10 0 Primary schools 6 46 42 6 Secondary schools 14 36 41 9

p.12

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Sixth forms 15 42 41 3 Special schools 30 48 19 3 Pupil referral units 14 50 31 5

p.12

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 08 April 2011 and are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Sixth form figures reflect the judgements made for the overall effectiveness of the sixth form in secondary schools, special schools and pupil referral units.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.  The school’s capacity for sustained improvement.  Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils.  The quality of teaching.  The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils’ needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships.  The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.13

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.14

8JP

Thank you for welcoming us so warmly when we came to your school. We judged your school to be satisfactory. You make satisfactory progress, which continues to improve. The following things are particular strengths of the school.

p.14

8JP

 Some teaching is good. Most lessons are interesting and there are trips and activities to make learning enjoyable.  The headteacher, staff and governors work hard to make sure improvement continues.  You say you feel safe, and you know who to go to if you are worried.  Most of you behave well, and your attendance is good.  You know that following a healthy diet and doing lots of exercise makes sure you stay healthy.  Those of you who have responsibilities carry them out well.  The school takes good care of you and ensures you are safe.

p.14

8JP

In order for the school to be even better, we have asked your teachers to make sure that:

p.14

8JP

 you produce lengthy pieces of writing regularly in all subjects, spell accurately and write neatly  your progress is assessed accurately so that work is always planned to be challenging; marking tells you how well you are doing and how to improve; teachers make sure you follow any guidance given, and they show you how to write well so that you produce good work yourself  the progress of children in Reception is accurately recorded so that work is always carefully matched to their needs, staff keep individual learning journeys to show how well children make progress, and, make sure leaders are well supported in pushing through improvements.

p.14

8JP

You can all help by making sure you produce lengthy pieces of writing when you can, spell accurately and write neatly, and follow advice given in marking. Yours sincerely

p.14

8JP

Ted Wheatley Lead inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.14

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion