Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Red Row Primary School

Inspected 22 Nov 2011 · published 13 Dec 2011 · URN 122197

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Good

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    22 Nov 2011

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Red Row First School

  • URN verified

    122197

Page 1 of 13
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+53Positivemore positive than 7% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingvery wellmake good progresseffectivesuccessfullystrengthseffectivelyhappy
Criticisminadequatelimitedlacknot alwaysunacceptableweaknessespoorat risk

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1587w+51
  • Leadership1693w+53
  • What needs to improve87w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
13
Words of findings
3,357
about usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 45%Leadership 48%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 5%

Full report text

Age group 3–9 Inspection date(s) 21–22 November 2011 Inspection number 380421 Unique Reference Number 122197 Local authority Northumberland Inspection number 380421 Inspection dates 21–22 November 2011 Reporting inspector Derek Neil

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 3–9 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 105 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Anne Elliott Headteacher Linda Brett Date of previous school inspection 25 June 2009 School address Red Row Morpeth NE61 5AS Telephone number 01670 760282 Fax number 01670 761617 Email address Admin@redrow.northumberland.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It rates council children's services, and inspects services for looked after

p.1

children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way.

p.2

To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out by two additional inspectors. They observed seven lessons and part-lessons taught by six staff. They held meetings with the headteacher, groups of pupils, members of the governing body and members of staff, as well as speaking with some parents and carers and the School Improvement Partner. They observed various activities throughout the school day and looked at a range of documents including the school development plan and policies related to safeguarding the pupils. Inspectors considered 35 parental questionnaires together with questionnaires completed by pupils and staff.

p.3

Introduction

The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the school's work. It looked in detail at a number of key areas.

p.3

Introduction

 How sustainable are recent improvements in progress and attainment?  How successfully is the school improving attendance?  How much progress has the school made with the recommendations in the previous inspection report?

p.3

Information about the school

In this smaller than average primary school almost all pupils are White British and very few speak English as an additional language. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is well above average. The percentage of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities is about average. The school has Healthy School status and the Activemark.

p.3

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Main findings

This is a good school. Parents and carers are happy to send their children there. As one parent rightly commented, ‘Staff ensure that each child is an integral part of the school, enabling them to become independent and confident young people who can continue to thrive once their time at Red Row comes to an end.’

p.4

Main findings

When pupils start school their skills are often lower than those expected for their age. They make good progress in the Early Years Foundation Stage to reach standards that are slightly below average. Attainment in Key Stage 1 has been below average recently because of disruption caused by staffing problems. However, these issues have been resolved and now pupils make good progress in both key stages to reach broadly average standards at the end of the Year 4. The school’s data and inspection evidence indicate that attainment is set to rise further. Pupils’ work is neat and well presented but their creative writing is limited in quality and quantity. Some pupils lack confidence and fluency when speaking.

p.4

Main findings

Pupils’ personal development is good. They behave well in class and in the playground. They know how to keep healthy and make a good contribution to the school and local communities. Pupils in Year 4, for example, provide valuable support for children in Reception by helping them with their lunch and playing with them at break. They learn a lot about their own culture and enjoy finding out about local history and geography. They have a limited awareness of different communities elsewhere in Britain and in other countries.

p.4

Main findings

These good outcomes are due to the school’s many strengths. Most significantly, the pupils are cared for and supported effectively so that they feel safe in school. Staff know the pupils very well and do their utmost to meet their different needs so that they are able to learn. A well-planned curriculum provides a wealth of stimulating experiences that they might not otherwise enjoy at home. Teaching is good and occasionally outstanding. The staff successfully boost pupils’ self-esteem with lots of praise and engage their interest in learning with well-designed practical activities.

p.4

Main findings

Attendance is low. However, the school has made considerable progress over the past two years using a variety of approaches to bring about rapid and significant improvements. In particular, school leaders have worked successfully with the small number of families whose children’s persistent absences have a disproportionate effect on the school’s overall attendance. The headteacher and the governing body evaluate the school’s performance comprehensively and know its strengths and weaknesses very well. They have implemented effective plans that have raised standards, accelerated pupils’ progress and increased attendance. They have made good progress with the recommendation in the previous inspection report to develop the leadership of English and mathematics. The school has good capacity to improve further.

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Raise attendance by: - raising its profile throughout the school - developing the use of incentives and rewards - developing further ways of working with parents and carers whose children do not attend frequently enough.  Improve pupils’ creative writing by: - providing more planned opportunities for extended writing - developing pupils’ oral skills - enabling the subject leader for English to be more influential in this aspect of the subject.  Make pupils more aware of the different communities in Britain and in other countries.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

Pupils enjoy school. They say that they ‘like learning new things’. They work hard and make good progress in lessons. They listen to the teacher’s explanations and instructions and are often eager to answer questions. They take pride in their written work, which is neat and tidy. Their learning is good because they are given appropriate practical activities to carry out. In one lesson, for example, they enthusiastically folded paper into halves and quarters when learning about fractions. The small size of each year group means there are inevitable fluctuations in attainment and pupils’ rate of progress. One year, for example, the boys made more progress than the girls in Reception, but the following year the reverse was true. On the whole, all groups of pupils achieve well during their time in the school, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities. This latter group benefits

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

greatly from expert support in the classroom and some effective teaching in small groups outside the classroom. Pupils’ attainment in writing is slightly below average because they get limited opportunities to write creatively, and some find it difficult to express themselves.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

Pupils feel safe in school, and confidently turn to staff if they have a concern. They behave well in class. At playtime they play energetically, and use the space and the equipment provided for them very sensibly. They know what constitutes a healthy diet and understand the importance of physical exercise. They make a positive contribution to the school and wider communities. They have raised funds for a local asthma clinic, for example, and successfully urged the parish council to provide dog bins on a footpath near the school. Most come to school regularly but a small number do not. The school has improved overall attendance significantly by reducing the number of pupils who are persistently absent. Some pupils with very poor attendance in the past have almost full attendance so far this term.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

These are the grades for pupils' outcomes

p.6

2

Pupils' attainment 1 3 The quality of pupils' learning and their progress 2 The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress

p.6

How effective is the provision?

Lessons are characterised by good relationships; an emphasis on praise and encouragement to boost pupils’ confidence; clear explanations, often supported by simple but effective visual aids; and the use of practical tasks that ensure pupils are actively participating at all times. Teaching assistants are well briefed on their role in class and make a valuable contribution to the learning. Some teaching is outstanding. In these lessons, the pace is brisk and the teaching lively and enthusiastic. The work is very well organised so that pupils move from one activity to another without loss of momentum. In one session, for example, pupils were riveted by the teacher’s rapid questions and explanations about the numbers on a set of giant dominoes, before moving to individual work at their desks. Comprehensive assessment arrangements enable staff to track pupils’ progress and to provide suitable support for those at risk of underachieving. Teachers mark pupils’ work

p.6

How effective is the provision?

thoroughly and provide a well-struck balance of praise, encouragement, and guidance on how the work could be improved. Pupils do not always respond to this advice; for example, comments about punctuation or how to set out mathematical calculations sometimes go unheeded. In the best lessons the teacher sensitively corrects errors in pupils’ use of Standard English.

p.6

How effective is the provision?

The well-planned curriculum gives pupils a wealth of experiences which have a powerful effect on their personal and academic development. For example, visits to the coast and to local museums add to their understanding of their heritage and provide a stimulus for written work. Violin and yoga lessons introduce them to experiences that might not normally be available at home. In planning the curriculum, staff have concentrated on pupils’ basic writing skills; they now recognise the need to introduce a more structured approach to extended and creative writing.

p.6

How effective is the provision?

1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4 is low Staff know pupils extremely well and meet their wide range of complex needs effectively. The school has well-considered plans to create a calm and private space that it can use to support those parents and carers who are reluctant to enter the school.

p.6

How effective is the provision?

These are the grades for the quality of provision

p.7

2

The use of assessment to support learning 2

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

The headteacher leads a cohesive staff team that is fully committed to caring for the pupils and to raising standards. They have been inspired by some effective professional development, which has raised their expectations of pupils and improved their teaching. Their determination has led to clear improvements since the previous inspection. Subject leadership is much stronger than at that time, though the school recognises that currently the subject leader for English does not have enough influence on the development of English throughout the school.

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

The effective governing body is knowledgeable and supportive. It takes a keen interest in ensuring the school has good and comprehensive arrangements for safeguarding the pupils. It is very well informed on this matter. Individual governors make regular visits to the school, are very aware of its strengths, and make an important contribution to identifying priorities for the future. Equality of opportunity is good and the school does not tolerate discrimination of any kind. It carefully analyses the performance of different groups of pupils and makes sure that all are achieving well. Its analysis of participation in extra-curricular clubs indicates that pupils known to be entitled to free school meals play a full part in these activities. The school promotes community cohesion satisfactorily. Its focus so far has been on working with the local community; it has made limited progress with its ambitious

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

plans to make pupils more aware of different religious and ethnic groups in other parts of the world.

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

These are the grades for the leadership and management

p.7

2

The leadership and management of teaching and learning 2

p.7

Early Years Foundation Stage

Children make good progress and reach broadly average levels in all areas of learning, although some are less secure in their social development and in expressing themselves orally. Induction arrangements, which include sessions at the school in the term before the children are due to start, are very effective; children settle quickly into school life. Each morning, well-established routines ensure that children are happy and developing independence. Parents and carers contribute to their children’s learning and have opportunities to speak with staff. A good variety of activities stimulates the children’s interest and enables them to make progress in all areas of learning. Planning is largely led by the children’s needs and ideas. They get ample opportunity to work and play outdoors, for example when using the wheeled toys or carrying out tasks in the yard designed to develop their understanding of

p.8

Early Years Foundation Stage

mathematics. Teachers are quick to praise and build up children’s self-esteem. When a parent told staff that her daughter could count to 30, the teacher gave her the opportunity to do so in front of her classmates, who were pleased to applaud her achievement. The success of the Early Years Foundation Stage is due to the energy, experience and enthusiasm of the staff and their determination to provide a high level of care for the children. The team has a good understanding of this area’s strengths but improvement plans lack detail.

p.8

Early Years Foundation Stage

These are the grades for the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.8

2

Outcomes for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage 2 The quality of provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage 2 The effectiveness of leadership and management in the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.8

Views of parents and carers

The answers of parents and carers responding to the questionnaire were overwhelmingly positive. A small number wrote comments in praise of the staff’s work. There was no pattern to the very few minor concerns raised. These matters were brought to the attention of the headteacher.

p.8

questionnaire

Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at Red Row First School to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school. The inspector received 35 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 105 pupils registered at the school.

p.9

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My child enjoys school 22 63 13 37 0 0 0 0 The school keeps my child safe 27 77 8 23 0 0 0 0 The school informs me about my child's progress 22 63 13 37 0 0 0 0 My child is making enough progress at this school 26 74 8 23 1 3 0 0 The teaching is good at this school 27 77 8 23 0 0 0 0 The school helps me to support my child's learning 25 71 10 29 0 0 0 0 The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 23 66 12 34 0 0 0 0 The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 26 74 9 26 0 0 0 0

p.9

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school meets my child's particular needs 24 69 11 31 0 0 0 0 The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 25 71 9 26 0 0 0 0

p.9

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 23 66 12 34 0 0 0 0

p.9

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school is led and managed effectively 24 69 11 31 0 0 0 0 Overall, I am happy with my child's experience at this school 26 74 8 23 0 0 0 0

p.9

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statemen t. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%.

p.9

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.10

Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 43 47 10 0 Primary schools 6 46 42 6 Secondary schools 14 36 41 9 Sixth forms 15 42 41 3 Special schools 30 48 19 3 Pupil referral units 14 50 31 5 All schools 10 44 39 6

p.10

Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously.

p.10

Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

The data in the table above is for the period 1 September 2010 to 08 April 2011 and are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ).

p.10

Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools.

p.10

Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Sixth form figures reflect the judgements made for the overall effectiveness of the sixth form in secondary schools, special schools and pupil referral units.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

 The school's capacity for sustained improvement.  Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils.  The quality of teaching.  The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils’ needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships.  The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.11

Inspection of Red Row First School, Morpeth, NE61 5AS

Thank you for welcoming my colleague and me so warmly into your school when we visited recently. We enjoyed watching you in lessons and at play, talking about your school with you and your teachers, and looking at your work. Now I want to share with you what we thought.

p.12

Inspection of Red Row First School, Morpeth, NE61 5AS

You go to a good school. It has many strong points. Staff take good care of you; I understand why you say you feel safe there. The teachers give you interesting activities in lessons. You behave well and take good care of each other. You know how to stay healthy. You make a valuable contribution to the community; for instance, many of the older pupils look after the younger ones at lunch and playtime.

p.12

Inspection of Red Row First School, Morpeth, NE61 5AS

There are a few things that would make the school better. I have asked the staff to help you make more progress with your writing. I have asked the headteacher to give you opportunities to find out about people who live in other parts of the world. Most importantly, I want the school to improve the attendance of those pupils who do not come to school regularly. Most of you know it is important to come to school as often as possible. Those of you who are absent too much are missing out on some exciting experiences and are not learning as well as you could.

p.12

Inspection of Red Row First School, Morpeth, NE61 5AS

Thank you again for helping me so much. It was a pleasure to meet you. I wish all of you the very best for the future.

p.12

from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy

of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.13

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion