Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Overton St Helen's Church of England Primary School

Inspected 17 Nov 2011 · published 9 Dec 2011 · URN 119539

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    17 Nov 2011

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Satisfactory

  • Name on report verified

    Overton St Helen's Church of England Primary School

  • URN verified

    119539

Page 1 of 13
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.

  • OverallSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+41Positivemore positive than 24% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingeffectivelyenjoyhappyeffectivehighly effectiveexceptionallysecure
Criticisminadequateinconsistentweakernot alwaysnot sufficientlyconcernsunacceptablenot strong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1510w+34
  • Leadership1806w+43
  • What needs to improve117w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
13
Words of findings
3,428
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
1
typical 8
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 41%Leadership 49%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 6%

Full report text

Overton St Helen's Church of England Primary School Inspection report

p.1

Age group 5–11 Inspection date(s) 16–17 November 2011 Inspection number 379831 Unique Reference Number 119539 Local authority Lancashire Inspection number 379831 Inspection dates 16–17 November 2011 Reporting inspector Peter Cox

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 5–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 171 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Paul Gallagher Headteacher Jill Milligan Date of previous school inspection 18 June 2009 School address Lancaster Road Overton Morecambe LA3 3EZ Telephone number 01524 858615 Fax number 01524 858615 Email address head@overton-st-helens.lancs.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It rates council children's services, and inspects services for looked after

p.1

children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way.

p.2

To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out by three additional inspectors. Thirteen lessons were seen taught by six teachers. Meetings were held with groups of pupils from each year group, school councillors, the Chair of the Governing Body, a local authority representative and teaching and non-teaching staff. Inspectors observed the school's work and looked at a range of documentation including governing body meeting minutes, the school’s self-evaluation documents, progress data and the school development plan. An analysis of 79 parent and carer questionnaire responses was made, together with staff and pupil questionnaire responses. Informal discussions were held with parents and carers at the start and end of the school day.

p.3

Introduction

The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the school's work. It looked in detail at a number of key areas.

p.3

Introduction

 What evidence there is to show that pupils achieve as well as they should across all years.  Inspectors investigated whether teaching is challenging enough to help pupils reach their potential.  The team examined whether the curriculum is sufficiently well matched to meet the needs of all pupils.  Inspectors looked to see whether the school’s systems for monitoring and evaluating its performance are accurate.

p.3

Information about the school

This is a smaller than average primary school with an equal number of boys and girls. The very large majority of pupils are of White British heritage. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is less than that seen nationally. The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds is below average. Very few pupils speak English as an additional language. The percentage of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities is below average as is the proportion with a statement of special educational needs. The current headteacher was not in post at the time of the previous inspection. The school has a number of awards, including Healthy Schools status.

p.3

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Main findings

Overton St Helen’s is a satisfactory school, but one which has many areas of strength including the Early Years Foundation Stage, teaching and a curriculum which helps support pupils’ personal development. Pupils enjoy coming to school, shown by their high levels of attendance. They feel safe and secure and speak well of the school council’s involvement in helping bring about improvements in school meals, which now include healthy alternatives and are enjoyed by many. Pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school is good and reflects the strong ethos and character promoted through daily acts of prayer and worship. Pupils take on responsibilities with enthusiasm and pride and most have a genuine caring attitude to one another. Pupils’ academic progress during their time at school is satisfactory overall. Children begin the Early Years Foundation Stage with skills and attributes that are generally in

p.4

Main findings

line with those expected for their age and pupils make satisfactory progress overall across the school. However, progress is inconsistent across year groups and early gains made in learning are not sufficiently well built upon throughout Key Stage 2, resulting in broadly average attainment by the time pupils leave.

p.4

Main findings

A high proportion of the teaching seen during the inspection was of a good quality, incorporating realistic levels of challenge for all. The school monitors the quality of teaching and sets a high priority for its further improvement. Senior leaders set a good example in their teaching for others to follow. Leaders and managers, including members of the governing body, are working effectively to ensure staffing issues in Year 4 are not affecting pupils’ progress unduly.

p.4

Main findings

The school has developed an accurate system for tracking pupils’ progress that has enabled the school to intervene in most areas, so that pupils’ performance is at least in line with expectations. However, not all teachers use this data well enough to plan their teaching to meet the full range of abilities in their classes. Pupils’ progress in English is well monitored but progress in mathematics is slower because assessment procedures are not fully embedded. Marking of pupils’ work is inconsistent across the school. The curriculum provides well for all pupils and ensures the range of needs and abilities are met. Care, guidance and support are good, with many of the teaching assistants, in the stronger lessons, well deployed and providing well for groups of pupils and individuals.

p.4

Main findings

The school has secured improvements since the previous inspection in terms of the Early Years Foundation Stage provision and attainment in English at the higher levels across both key stages. It knows itself well and has good systems for monitoring and evaluating its performance. It has developed targeted improvement plans that focus on raising pupils’ achievement further. Consequently, it demonstrates satisfactory capacity to sustain its improvement.

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Raise achievement of all pupils and particularly those in Key Stage 2 and in mathematics by: - increasing the proportion of good and better teaching seen in the school and sharing the stronger practice more widely - embedding further the assessment procedures in mathematics - ensuring that all pupils’ work is marked regularly so that pupils understand more clearly their next steps in learning and that corrections are completed and re-marked - using assessment data to better inform lesson planning so that it targets specific ability groups more effectively.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

Up to 40% of the schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

Pupils are happy to come to school and most engage well in their learning when teaching is active and at a pace to maintain interest. Classrooms are bright, well maintained and resources generally used well to assist learning. Overall, pupils achieve satisfactorily during their time at school given their starting points. Good progress is made in the Early Years Foundation Stage and helped secure above- average attainment at the end of Key Stage 1 in 2011, a recovery from weaker performance in 2010. Pupils’ attainment in mathematics, while improving, is not as strong as in reading or writing. Pupils’ progress is satisfactory but is accelerating due to good teaching. This is evident from pupils’ books and in lessons. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities make the same satisfactory progress, because of the targeted support that includes one-to-one and small group sessions to improve speaking and writing. Pupils get along well together in the mixed-aged

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

classes and behaviour is good overall. They know who to turn to on the rare occasions when they are made to feel uncomfortable by others. Pupils take on responsibilities well such as monitors, buddies and salad bar assistants at lunchtime. Their good spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is underpinned by the school’s ethos and is evident in pupils’ considerate approach to and understanding of one another. These are the grades for pupils' outcomes

p.5

3

Pupils' attainment 1 3 The quality of pupils' learning and their progress 3 The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress

p.6

How effective is the provision?

Teaching is of a good quality overall. During the inspection none was seen to be inadequate and the majority of teaching observed was good. In these lessons, pupils were often engaged in a variety of activities that stimulated discussion and challenged them to think hard about solving problems. For example, in a Year 6 mathematics lesson, pupils came up with several ways of calculating the area of an irregular shape and could confidently explain the different methods. Learning and progress in the stronger lessons are good overall. Marking of pupils’ work is inconsistent across classes. Some marking informs pupils how to make the necessary next steps in their learning while other marking is only an acknowledgement of the work being seen and does not help improvement. Corrections are often asked of pupils but there is no revisiting of this by the pupils or the teachers.

p.6

How effective is the provision?

The curriculum is well suited to pupils’ needs and is reviewed periodically. It places appropriate emphasis on the development of pupils’ literacy, numeracy and information and communication technology skills. Pupils say they enjoy the opportunities to be active, energetic and to participate in a range of sports. Additional activities are well attended and enjoyed by the pupils, as are the educational visits undertaken and the range of visitors to the school.

p.6

How effective is the provision?

Care, guidance and support are a strength. Movement from one key stage to another is successful and pupils and parents feel well supported, as shown in their responses to school questionnaires. Good links with a range of external agencies ensure that pupils, particularly those whose circumstances make them vulnerable, receive timely specialist support when this is needed. Older pupils feel ready to move to secondary school, although admit to being a little apprehensive. Support in lessons for individuals and groups is most effective when the teacher targets other adults to help pupils who require support and accurate assessments are made of their impact on pupils’ learning.

p.6

How effective is the provision?

1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4 is low These are the grades for the quality of provision

p.6

2

The use of assessment to support learning 3

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

Since taking up her post, the headteacher, ably assisted by her leadership team, has set appropriate improvement priorities. These are well targeted and include improving the quality of teaching to help raise achievement. Assessment strategies employed in English are applied to mathematics but these are not fully embedded and it is too early to see whether they are securing more rapid rates of progress. However, improvements are having a positive impact, although better achievement as a result of higher quality teaching has yet to be evidenced in the school’s published results. The management of teaching and learning is of a good quality. Lesson observations are undertaken regularly and specific child-centred targets set. Leaders and managers understand what good and outstanding teaching and learning look like, although judgements on the quality of teaching are sometimes over- inflated. Middle leaders have an increasing role in ensuring best practice is shared.

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

Governors are fully supportive of the school and hold it to account satisfactorily. Safeguarding arrangements meet requirements. Gaps between the performance of boys and girls are closing and good strategies are in place to allow all pupils an equal opportunity to succeed. The promotion of community cohesion is satisfactory. Pupils have a clear understanding of their own religious, ethnic and social context but that of the wider world is less well-developed.

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

These are the grades for the leadership and management

p.7

3

The leadership and management of teaching and learning 2

p.7

Early Years Foundation Stage

Outcomes for children given their starting points are good. They make good progress towards the early learning goals, although some aspects of writing are the weakest areas of development. Good care, guidance and support are provided for children’s welfare and match that for the rest of the school. Those with special educational needs and/or disabilities are identified quickly, although assessment by all staff requires more accuracy. All areas of learning are covered and welfare requirements are successfully met. Children in Reception have opportunities to share worship and prayers with Key Stage 1 pupils as well as playing together at break and lunchtime. There is an appropriate mix of adult-led and child-initiated activities, although adults do not always facilitate children’s own explorations. Planning is good and ensures activities are linked to the main topics where possible. Assessments are undertaken

p.8

Early Years Foundation Stage

regularly but require some further development to evaluate children’s performance more precisely to determine their next steps in learning. Resources are of a good quality and the external equipment kept in a safe condition. Links with parents and carers are good with an open door policy and home visits when necessary. Children take their work home and parents are offered workshops that provide effective support to help their children to continue learning outside the setting. Leadership and management of the setting are good. The leader is knowledgeable and well informed about current practice and curriculum development.

p.8

Early Years Foundation Stage

These are the grades for the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.8

2

Outcomes for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage 2 The quality of provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage 2 The effectiveness of leadership and management in the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.8

Views of parents and carers

An above-average proportion of parents and carers submitted a response to the questionnaires. Of those, the overwhelming majority are happy with the education the school provides. A very small minority of parents and carers believe the school does not deal effectively with unacceptable behaviour. Inspectors consider pupils’ behaviour to be good and judge that, on the rare occasions behaviour falls below that expected, appropriate and effective measures are taken to address the issue.

p.8

questionnaire

Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at Overton St Helen's Church of England Primary School to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school. The inspection team received 79 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 167 pupils registered at the school.

p.9

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My child enjoys school 51 65 26 33 1 1 0 0 The school keeps my child safe 59 75 17 22 1 1 0 0 The school informs me about my child's progress 42 53 34 43 3 4 0 0 My child is making enough progress at this school 41 52 36 46 1 1 0 0 The teaching is good at this school 45 57 32 41 2 3 0 0 The school helps me to support my child's learning 43 54 32 41 4 5 0 0 The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 55 70 24 30 0 0 0 0 The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 35 44 34 43 2 3 0 0

p.9

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school meets my child's particular needs 41 52 35 44 1 1 0 0 The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 29 37 36 46 7 9 1 1

p.9

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 31 39 38 48 5 6 0 0

p.9

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school is led and managed effectively 46 58 31 39 0 0 0 0 Overall, I am happy with my child's experience at this school 55 70 22 28 1 1 0 0

p.9

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%. Inspection report: Overton St Helen's Church of England Primary School, 16–17 November 2011 10 of 13

p.9

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.10

Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 43 47 10 0 Primary schools 6 46 42 6 Secondary schools 14 36 41 9 Sixth forms 15 42 41 3 Special schools 30 48 19 3 Pupil referral units 14 50 31 5 All schools 10 44 39 6

p.10

Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously.

p.10

Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 08 April 2011 and are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ).

p.10

Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools.

p.10

Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Sixth form figures reflect the judgements made for the overall effectiveness of the sixth form in secondary schools, special schools and pupil referral units. Inspection report: Overton St Helen's Church of England Primary School, 16–17 November 2011 11 of 13

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

 The school's capacity for sustained improvement.  Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils.  The quality of teaching.  The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils’ needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships.  The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started. Inspection report: Overton St Helen's Church of England Primary School, 16–17 November 2011 12 of 13

p.11

Morecambe, LA3 3EZ

Thank you for the warm welcome you gave us when we inspected your school recently. A big ‘thank you’ to those of you who spoke with us in meetings, during lessons and at lunchtime. Your school provides you with a satisfactory standard of education. We were pleased to see how well you behave. You told us you feel safe, secure and well cared for by the teachers and the other adults who look after you. You obviously enjoy coming to school as shown by your high attendance. We think those of you that attend Reception make a good start to your education.  We want your school to be even better and we have asked your headteacher, the governors and other teachers to do more to help you get the best out of your time at school. We have asked them to make sure there is even more good teaching. This will help you achieve better by the time you leave. Also, when teachers mark your work, we ask that you are given more information on how to improve and that when

p.12

Morecambe, LA3 3EZ

you are asked to correct something, you go back to the work and teachers re-mark it. And finally, we would like the methods teachers use to understand how well you are doing in English to be applied in the same way in mathematics, and that in every lesson you are provided with work that challenges you all to do your best.

p.12

Morecambe, LA3 3EZ

You can help your teachers achieve these improvements by letting them know when you find work too easy or too difficult and continuing to work as hard as you can in lessons.

p.12

Morecambe, LA3 3EZ

Thank you again for making us so welcome and I wish you all the best for the future

p.12

Morecambe, LA3 3EZ

Peter Cox Lead inspector Inspection report: Overton St Helen's Church of England Primary School, 16–17 November 2011 13 of 13

p.12

from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy

of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.13

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion